|
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on February 13, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2613.
 Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
Blood, 15 June 2003, Vol. 101, No. 12, pp. 4695-4700
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
Minimal residual disease in adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias: early immunophenotypic evaluation has high clinical value
María-Belén Vidriales,
José J. Pérez,
Maria Consuelo López-Berges,
Norma Gutiérrez,
Juana Ciudad,
Paulo Lucio,
Lourdes Vazquez,
Ramón García-Sanz,
Maria Consuelo del Cañizo,
Javier Fernández-Calvo,
Fernando Ramos,
M. Jesús Rodríguez,
M. José Calmuntia,
Ana Porwith,
Alberto Orfao, and
Jesús F. San-Miguel
From the Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain; the Department of Cytometry, University of Salamanca, Spain; the Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal; the Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain; the Department of Hematology, Complejo Hospitalario, León, Spain; the Department of Hematology, General Hospital, Avila, Spain; the Department of Hematology, General Hospital, Segovia, Spain; the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; and the Centro de Investigación del Cancer, Salamanca, Spain.
Investigation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute leukemias by immunophenotyping and/or molecular techniques is proving to be increasingly valuable for disease monitoring. In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), most MRD studies have focused on children, whereas in contrast, information on the value of MRD on adult ALL is scanty, and almost exclusively restricted to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies. Early response to therapy is one of the most important prognostic factors in acute leukemia, which prompted us to investigate whether or not early immunophenotypic assessment of MRD could also be a valuable tool for predicting relapse in adult patients with ALL. For that purpose we have analyzed the level of MRD during the initial phase of treatment (induction phase) by multiparameter flow cytometry in a series of 102 adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult patients with ALL. Immunophenotypic evaluation of the bone marrow (BM) at day +35 showed that patients with low MRD levels (< 0.05% leukemia-associated phenotype [LAP+] cells) had a significantly longer relapse-free survival (RFS) than patients with high MRD levels, and this prognostic influence was retained when only those patients in morphologic complete remission (mCR) at day +35 were considered (median RFS: 42 months vs 16 months; P = .001). Moreover, immunophenotyping helped to identify a small subset of patients (n = 12) with negative or low MRD levels (< 0.03% LAP+ cells) by day +14, with an excellent prognosis (projected RFS of 90% at 5 years). The contrary is true of patients who achieved late mCR (after day +35), since immunophenotypic investigation of MRD showed that, in spite of the mCR, none of the cases with more than 0.1% LAP+ cells would be relapse-free after 2 years. Multivariate analysis showed that the immunologic evaluation of MRD at day +35 was the most relevant independent prognostic parameter for adult patients with ALL, and together with age, white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis, and presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, represented the most informative combination of variables for predicting relapse-free survival.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
R. Bassan, O. Spinelli, E. Oldani, T. Intermesoli, M. Tosi, B. Peruta, G. Rossi, E. Borlenghi, E. M. Pogliani, E. Terruzzi, et al.
Improved risk classification for risk-specific therapy based on the molecular study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)
Blood,
April 30, 2009;
113(18):
4153 - 4162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Huguet, N. Boissel, and H. Dombret
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adolescents and Young Adults: Is the Treatment Paradigm Changing?
ASCO Educational Book,
January 1, 2009;
2009(1):
360 - 364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Paiva, M.-B. Vidriales, J. Cervero, G. Mateo, J. J. Perez, M. A. Montalban, A. Sureda, L. Montejano, N. C. Gutierrez, A. G. de Coca, et al.
Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation
Blood,
November 15, 2008;
112(10):
4017 - 4023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Mateo, M. A. Montalban, M.-B. Vidriales, J. J. Lahuerta, M. V. Mateos, N. Gutierrez, L. Rosinol, L. Montejano, J. Blade, R. Martinez, et al.
Prognostic Value of Immunophenotyping in Multiple Myeloma: A Study by the PETHEMA/GEM Cooperative Study Groups on Patients Uniformly Treated With High-Dose Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2008;
26(16):
2737 - 2744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. E. Craig and K. A. Foon
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms
Blood,
April 15, 2008;
111(8):
3941 - 3967.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bottcher, M. Ritgen, S. Buske, S. Gesk, W. Klapper, E. Hoster, W. Hiddemann, M. Unterhalt, M. Dreyling, R. Siebert, et al.
Minimal residual disease detection in mantle cell lymphoma: methods and significance of four-color flow cytometry compared to consensus IGH-polymerase chain reaction at initial staging and for follow-up examinations
Haematologica,
April 1, 2008;
93(4):
551 - 559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Raff, N. Gokbuget, S. Luschen, R. Reutzel, M. Ritgen, S. Irmer, S. Bottcher, H.-A. Horst, M. Kneba, D. Hoelzer, et al.
Molecular relapse in adult standard-risk ALL patients detected by prospective MRD monitoring during and after maintenance treatment: data from the GMALL 06/99 and 07/03 trials
Blood,
February 1, 2007;
109(3):
910 - 915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Stock and N. L. Seibel
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma
ASH Self-Assessment Program,
January 1, 2007;
2007(1):
253 - 264.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bruggemann, T. Raff, T. Flohr, N. Gokbuget, M. Nakao, J. Droese, S. Luschen, C. Pott, M. Ritgen, U. Scheuring, et al.
Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood,
February 1, 2006;
107(3):
1116 - 1123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Jabbour, S. Faderl, and H. M. Kantarjian
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
November 1, 2005;
80(11):
1517 - 1527.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
