Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
 Blood, 15 January 2004, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 486-488.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 11, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1615.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2003-05-1615v1
103/2/486    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luethi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luethi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, A. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Red Cells
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
Brief report

Telehematology: critical determinants for successful implementation

Urs Luethi, Lorenz Risch, Wolfgang Korte, Margrit Bader, and Andreas R. Huber

From the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland; and the Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Despite modern technologies, such as immunophenotyping and molecular probing, cytomorphologic examination of stained peripheral blood smears by microscopy remains the mainstay of diagnosis in a large variety of diseases. This holds true especially in underdeveloped or rural areas where profound expertise and equipment are not easily available. Although communication technologies have been dramatically improved, telehematology has not become routine. To date, little information is available on which procedures are critical for successful implementation. Therefore, a study evaluating possible factors that prevented implementation of telehematology was initiated. We found that staining technique, smearing procedure, training skills, number of captured images, and prevalent disease influenced the accuracy of diagnosis by the reference laboratory. Using realtime teleconferencing allowed for overcoming these deficits. Together, when certain rules are observed, telehematology allows for rapid, accurate, standardized, and cheap expert advice. This technology should improve treatment of patients in remote areas where expertise is not available.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NEJMHome page
B. J. Bain
Diagnosis from the Blood Smear
N. Engl. J. Med., August 4, 2005; 353(5): 498 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]


click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020