|
|
Blood, 1 June 2005, Vol. 105, No. 11, pp. 4337-4344.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on February 8, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0010.
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Identification of a transiently exposed VE-cadherin epitope that allows for specific targeting of an antibody to the tumor neovasculature
Chad May,
Jacqueline F. Doody,
Rashed Abdullah,
Paul Balderes,
Xiaohong Xu,
Chien Peter Chen,
Zhenping Zhu,
Lawrence Shapiro,
Paul Kussie,
Daniel J. Hicklin,
Fang Liao, and
Peter Bohlen
From ImClone Systems Incorporated, New York, NY; and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
VE-cadherin is an adhesion molecule localized at the adherens junctions of endothelial cells. It is crucial for the proper assembly of vascular structures during angiogenesis and maintaining vascular integrity. We have studied 3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against murine VE-cadherin that inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth. Two of these, BV13 and 10G4, also disrupted normal vessels, resulting in severe vascular leakage, whereas the third, E4G10, did not. The goal of the current report was to identify the epitope of E4G10 and distinguish it from those of the disruptive mAbs. We mapped the epitope of E4G10 to within the first 10 amino acids of mature VE-cadherin and demonstrated that conserved tryptophan residues in this sequence are required for VE-cadherinmediated trans-adhesion. The disruptive mAbs target a different epitope within amino acids 45 to 56, which structural homology modeling suggests is not involved in trans-adhesion. From our studies, we hypothesize that E4G10 can only bind the neovasculature, where VE-cadherin has not yet engaged in trans-adhesion and its epitope is fully exposed. Thus, E4G10 can inhibit junction formation and angiogenesis but is unable to target normal vasculature because its epitope is masked. In contrast, BV13 and 10G4 bind an epitope that is accessible regardless of VE-cadherin interactions, leading to the disruption of adherens junctions. Our findings establish the immediate N-terminal region of VE-cadherin as a novel target for inhibiting angiogenesis.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Related Article in Blood Online:
-
Targeting VE-cadherin (while naked, and not engaged)
- Francesco Bertolini
Blood 2005 105: 4157.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Monaghan-Benson and K. Burridge
The Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-induced Microvascular Permeability Requires Rac and Reactive Oxygen Species
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 18, 2009;
284(38):
25602 - 25611.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Shapiro and W. I. Weis
Structure and Biochemistry of Cadherins and Catenins
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol,
September 1, 2009;
1(3):
a003053 - a003053.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Salter, S. K. Meadows, G. G. Muramoto, H. Himburg, P. Doan, P. Daher, L. Russell, B. Chen, N. J. Chao, and J. P. Chute
Endothelial progenitor cell infusion induces hematopoietic stem cell reconstitution in vivo
Blood,
February 26, 2009;
113(9):
2104 - 2107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Nolan, A. Ciarrocchi, A. S. Mellick, J. S. Jaggi, K. Bambino, S. Gupta, E. Heikamp, M. R. McDevitt, D. A. Scheinberg, R. Benezra, et al.
Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells are a major determinant of nascent tumor neovascularization
Genes & Dev.,
June 15, 2007;
21(12):
1546 - 1558.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Xiao, J. Garner, K. M. Buckley, P. A. Vincent, C. M. Chiasson, E. Dejana, V. Faundez, and A. P. Kowalczyk
p120-Catenin Regulates Clathrin-dependent Endocytosis of VE-Cadherin
Mol. Biol. Cell,
November 1, 2005;
16(11):
5141 - 5151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. J. Harrison, E. M. Corps, and P. J. Kilshaw
Cadherin adhesion depends on a salt bridge at the N-terminus
J. Cell Sci.,
September 15, 2005;
118(18):
4123 - 4130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|