|
|
Blood, 15 August 2005, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 1376-1381.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 28, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0272.
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
NEOPLASIA
[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome
Corinne Haioun,
Emmanuel Itti,
Alain Rahmouni,
Pauline Brice,
Jean-Didier Rain,
Karim Belhadj,
Philippe Gaulard,
Laurent Garderet,
Eric Lepage,
Felix Reyes, and
Michel Meignan
From the Departments of Clinical Hematology, Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Pathology, and Biostatistics, H. Mondor Hospital, Paris XII University, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France; the Departments of Clinical Hematology and Nuclear Medicine, St-Louis Hospital, Paris VII University, AP-HP, Paris, France; and the Department of Clinical Hematology, St-Antoine Hospital, Paris VI University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Assessment of early therapeutic response using metabolic imaging is potentially useful to determine prognosis in aggressive lymphoma. Between January 2000 and January 2004, 90 patients with newly diagnosed aggressive lymphoma (median age 53 years, 94% diffuse large B-cell) were prospectively explored with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) prior to induction chemotherapy, after 2 cycles ("early PET"), and after induction completion. Therapeutic response was evaluated using conventional diagnostic methods at 4 cycles. Induction treatment with an anthracycline-containing regimen was administered to all patients, associated with rituximab in 41%. According to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), 37 patients and 53 patients belonged to the lower- and higher-risk groups, respectively. At midinduction, "early PET" was considered negative in 54 patients and positive in 36. After completion of induction, 83% of PET-negative patients achieved complete remission compared with only 58% of PET-positive patients. Outcome differed significantly between PET-negative and PET-positive groups; the 2-year estimates of event-free survival reached 82% and 43%, respectively (P < .001), and the 2-year estimates of overall survival reached 90% and 61%, respectively (P = .006). Predictive value of "early PET" was observed in both the lower-risk and higher-risk groups, indicating prognostic independence from the IPI. Therefore, FDG-PET should be an early guide to first-line strategies in aggressive lymphoma. (Blood. 2005;106:1376-1381)

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Haioun, N. Mounier, J. F. Emile, D. Ranta, B. Coiffier, H. Tilly, C. Recher, C. Ferme, J. Gabarre, R. Herbrecht, et al.
Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Ann. Onc.,
June 30, 2009;
(2009)
mdp237v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Meignan, E. Itti, S. Bardet, J. Lumbroso, V. Edeline, P. Olivier, T. V. Borght, O. Reman, G. Karcher, O. Mundler, et al.
Development and Application of a Real-Time On-Line Blinded Independent Central Review of Interim Pet Scans to Determine Treatment Allocation in Lymphoma Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 1, 2009;
27(16):
2739 - 2741.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hutchings and S. F. Barrington
PET/CT for Therapy Response Assessment in Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2009;
50(Suppl_1):
21S - 30S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Terasawa, J. Lau, S. Bardet, O. Couturier, T. Hotta, M. Hutchings, T. Nihashi, and H. Nagai
Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for Interim Response Assessment of Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2009;
27(11):
1906 - 1914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Cheson
The Case Against Heavy PETing
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 10, 2009;
27(11):
1742 - 1743.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Itti, C. Lin, J. Dupuis, G. Paone, D. Capacchione, A. Rahmouni, C. Haioun, and M. Meignan
Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of Chemotherapy
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2009;
50(4):
527 - 533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dupuis, E. Itti, A. Rahmouni, F. Hemery, C. Gisselbrecht, C. Lin, C. Copie-Bergman, K. Belhadj, T. El Gnaoui, I. Gaillard, et al.
Response assessment after an inductive CHOP or CHOP-like regimen with or without rituximab in 103 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrating 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to the International Workshop Criteria
Ann. Onc.,
March 1, 2009;
20(3):
503 - 507.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. Han, M. P. Escalon, B. Hsiao, A. Serafini, and I. S. Lossos
High incidence of false-positive PET scans in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with rituximab-containing regimens
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2009;
20(2):
309 - 318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Plathow and W. A. Weber
Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging
J. Nucl. Med.,
June 1, 2008;
49(Suppl_2):
43S - 63S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bodet-Milin, F. Kraeber-Bodere, B. Dupas, F. Morschhauser, T. Gastinne, S. Le Gouill, L. Campion, J.-L. Harousseau, W. A. Wegener, D. M. Goldenberg, et al.
Evaluation of response to fractionated radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-epratuzumab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Haematologica,
March 1, 2008;
93(3):
390 - 397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sasaki, N. Shikama, K. Koiwai, and M. Kadoya
Relationship Between the Response to Treatment and the Prognosis of Patients with Aggressive Lymphomas Treated with Chemotherapy Followed by Involved-field Radiotherapy: Radiographic Assessment
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2008;
38(1):
43 - 48.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Seam, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson
The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma
Blood,
November 15, 2007;
110(10):
3507 - 3516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Bakker and G. W. van Imhoff
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: from treatment to early detection and prevention?
Haematologica,
November 1, 2007;
92(11):
1447 - 1450.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Weber
18F-FDG PET in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Qualitative or Quantitative?
J. Nucl. Med.,
October 1, 2007;
48(10):
1580 - 1582.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kako, K. Izutsu, Y. Ota, Y. Minatani, M. Sugaya, T. Momose, K. Ohtomo, Y. Kanda, S. Chiba, T. Motokura, et al.
FDG-PET in T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms
Ann. Onc.,
October 1, 2007;
18(10):
1685 - 1690.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lin, E. Itti, C. Haioun, Y. Petegnief, A. Luciani, J. Dupuis, G. Paone, J.-N. Talbot, A. Rahmouni, and M. Meignan
Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis
J. Nucl. Med.,
October 1, 2007;
48(10):
1626 - 1632.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Advani, L. Maeda, P. Lavori, A. Quon, R. Hoppe, S. Breslin, S. A. Rosenberg, and S. J. Horning
Impact of Positive Positron Emission Tomography on Prediction of Freedom From Progression After Stanford V Chemotherapy in Hodgkin's Disease
J. Clin. Oncol.,
September 1, 2007;
25(25):
3902 - 3907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Zinzani, M. Tani, R. Trisolini, S. Fanti, V. Stefoni, M. Alifano, P. Castellucci, G. Musuraca, G. Dalpiaz, L. Alinari, et al.
Histological verification of positive positron emission tomography findings in the follow-up of patients with mediastinal lymphoma
Haematologica,
June 1, 2007;
92(6):
771 - 777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dupuis, P. Gaulard, F. Hemery, E. Itti, C. Gisselbrecht, A. Rahmouni, C. Copie-Bergman, J. Briere, T. E. Gnaoui, I. Gaillard, et al.
Respective prognostic values of germinal center phenotype and early 18fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scanning in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Haematologica,
June 1, 2007;
92(6):
778 - 783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Strobel, N. Schaefer, C Renner, P Veit-Haibach, D Husarik, A. Koma, and T. Hany
Cost-effective therapy remission assessment in lymphoma patients using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography: is an end of treatment exam necessary in all patients?
Ann. Onc.,
April 1, 2007;
18(4):
658 - 664.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. H. Sehn, B. Berry, M. Chhanabhai, C. Fitzgerald, K. Gill, P. Hoskins, R. Klasa, K. J. Savage, T. Shenkier, J. Sutherland, et al.
The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP
Blood,
March 1, 2007;
109(5):
1857 - 1861.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Cheson, B. Pfistner, M. E. Juweid, R. D. Gascoyne, L. Specht, S. J. Horning, B. Coiffier, R. I. Fisher, A. Hagenbeek, E. Zucca, et al.
Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2007;
25(5):
579 - 586.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W. Schot, J. M. Zijlstra, W. J. Sluiter, G. W. van Imhoff, J. Pruim, W. Vaalburg, and E. Vellenga
Early FDG-PET assessment in combination with clinical risk scores determines prognosis in recurring lymphoma
Blood,
January 15, 2007;
109(2):
486 - 491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Reiter
Diagnosis and Treatment of Childhood Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hematology,
January 1, 2007;
2007(1):
285 - 296.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. L. Kasamon, R. J. Jones, and R. L. Wahl
Integrating PET and PET/CT into the Risk-Adapted Therapy of Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med.,
January 1, 2007;
48(1_suppl):
19S - 27S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. S. Jhanwar and D. J. Straus
The Role of PET in Lymphoma
J. Nucl. Med.,
August 1, 2006;
47(8):
1326 - 1334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. H. Sehn
Optimal Use of Prognostic Factors in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hematology,
January 1, 2006;
2006(1):
295 - 302.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hutchings, A. Loft, M. Hansen, L. M. Pedersen, T. Buhl, J. Jurlander, S. Buus, S. Keiding, F. D'Amore, A.-M. Boesen, et al.
FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphoma
Blood,
January 1, 2006;
107(1):
52 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dupuis, P. Gaulard, E. Itti, A. Rahmouni, F. Hemery, J. Briere, B. Fabiani, C. Copie-Bergman, C. Gisselbrecht, M. Meignan, et al.
Early Response Evaluation with 18FDG-PET Scanning, but Not Phenotypic Profile, Are Predictive of Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts),
November 16, 2005;
106(11):
1914 - 1914.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Saleem
Potential of PET in oncology and radiotherapy
Br. J. Radiol.,
November 1, 2005;
Supplement_28(1):
6 - 16.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W A Weber
PET for response assessment in oncology: radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Br. J. Radiol.,
November 1, 2005;
Supplement_28(1):
42 - 49.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|