|
|
Blood, 1 February 2006, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 1166-1173.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on October 18, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2325.
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
NEOPLASIA
AML engraftment in the NOD/SCID assay reflects the outcome of AML: implications for our understanding of the heterogeneity of AML
Daniel J. Pearce,
David Taussig,
Kazem Zibara,
Lan-Lan Smith,
Christopher M. Ridler,
Claude Preudhomme,
Bryan D. Young,
Ama Z. Rohatiner,
T. Andrew Lister, and
Dominique Bonnet
From the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, London, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK Medical Oncology Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Medical Oncology Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Queen Mary and St Bartholomew's Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
The nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) assay is the current model for assessment of human normal and leukemic stem cells. We explored why 51% of 59 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients were unable to initiate leukemia in NOD/SCID mice. Increasing the cell dose, using more permissive recipients, and alternative tissue sources did not cause AML engraftment in most previously nonengrafting AML samples. Homing of AML cells to the marrow was the same between engrafters and nonengrafters. FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) and nucleophosmin mutations occurred at a similar frequency in engrafters and nonengrafters. The only variable that was related to engraftment ability was the karyotypically defined risk stratification of individual AML cases. Of interest, follow-up of younger patients with intermediate-risk AML revealed a significant difference in overall survival between NOD/SCID engrafting and nonengrafting AMLs. Hence, the ability of AML to engraft in the NOD/SCID assay seems to be an inherent property of AML cells, independent of homing, conditioning, or cell frequency/source, which is directly related to prognosis. Our results suggest an important difference between leukemic initiating cells between engrafting and nonengrafting AML cases that correlates with treatment response.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Adams and A. Strasser
Is Tumor Growth Sustained by Rare Cancer Stem Cells or Dominant Clones?
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2008;
68(11):
4018 - 4021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.M Adams, P.N. Kelly, A. Dakic, S. Carotta, S.L. Nutt, and A. Strasser
Role of "Cancer Stem Cells" and Cell Survival in Tumor Development and Maintenance
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2008;
73(0):
451 - 459.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Adams, P. N. Kelly, A. Dakic, S. L. Nutt, and A. Strasser
Response to Comment on "Tumor Growth Need Not Be Driven by Rare Cancer Stem Cells"
Science,
December 14, 2007;
318(5857):
1722d - 1722d.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Schepers, D. van Gosliga, A. T. J. Wierenga, B. J. L. Eggen, J. J. Schuringa, and E. Vellenga
STAT5 is required for long-term maintenance of normal and leukemic human stem/progenitor cells
Blood,
October 15, 2007;
110(8):
2880 - 2888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. van Rhenen, G. A. M. S. van Dongen, A. Kelder, E. J. Rombouts, N. Feller, B. Moshaver, M. S.-v. Walsum, S. Zweegman, G. J. Ossenkoppele, and G. Jan Schuurhuis
The novel AML stem cell associated antigen CLL-1 aids in discrimination between normal and leukemic stem cells
Blood,
October 1, 2007;
110(7):
2659 - 2666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Spoo, M. Lubbert, W. G. Wierda, and J. A. Burger
CXCR4 is a prognostic marker in acute myelogenous leukemia
Blood,
January 15, 2007;
109(2):
786 - 791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Testa and R. Riccioni
Deregulation of apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia
Haematologica,
January 1, 2007;
92(1):
81 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Grimwade
NPM1 mutation in AML: WHO and why?
Blood,
December 15, 2006;
108(13):
3965 - 3965.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kalinkovich, S. Tavor, A. Avigdor, J. Kahn, A. Brill, I. Petit, P. Goichberg, M. Tesio, N. Netzer, E. Naparstek, et al.
Functional CXCR4-Expressing Microparticles and SDF-1 Correlate with Circulating Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Cells.
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2006;
66(22):
11013 - 11020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|