| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 1 April 2006, Vol. 107, No. 7, pp. 3002-3008. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on December 13, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3786.
TRANSPLANTATION Oral valganciclovir leads to higher exposure to ganciclovir than intravenous ganciclovir in patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantationFrom the University of Würzburg, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg, Germany; University of Tübingen, Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology, Tübingen, Germany; University of Basel, Division of Hematology, University Hospital Basel and Hospital of Jura, Department of Internal Medicine, Porrentruy, Switzerland; University of Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Dresden, Germany; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine I, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Vienna, Austria; University of Geneva, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Geneva, Switzerland; University of Hamburg, Eppendorf University Hospital, Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, Hamburg, Germany; Hannover Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Hannover, Germany; and Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Valganciclovir (V-GCV) is an oral prodrug hydrolyzed to the anti-CMV drug ganciclovir (GCV). A randomized, multicenter, crossover, open-label clinical trial compared exposure to GCV after V-GCV and intravenous GCV (IV-GCV) as preemptive therapy for CMV disease in SCT. The primary objective was to compare exposure to GCV in patients with CMV infection stratified for intestinal graft-versus-host disease (I-GVHD). Secondary objectives were the assessment of safety and efficacy. Patients without I-GVHD had a higher exposure to GCV after V-GCV when compared with IV-GCV (area under the concentration-time curve from drug administration to last observed concentration after 12 hours [AUC0-12] 53.8 ± 17.97 µg/mL · h [mean ± SD] vs 39.5 ± 13.91; P < .001; ratio of V-GCV/IV-GCV was 1.4; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.5). This was also true in patients with I-GVHD grades I-II (AUC0-12 52.9 ± 21.75 vs 33.1 ± 12.97 µg/mL · h; P = .018; ratio 1.6; 90% CI, 1.3-2.0). Absolute bioavailability of GCV after V-GCV was approximately 75% in individuals with or without I-GVHD grades I-II. No severe GCV-related toxicity was observed and efficacy and safety was comparable (84-day follow-up). This supports the use of V-GCV in SCT, even in patients with I-GVHD grades I-II. Due to higher exposure after V-GCV compared with IV-GCV, patients should be monitored carefully for safety reasons.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||