Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 March 2007, Vol. 109, No. 5, pp. 1810-1816.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on November 9, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-08-041152.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2006-08-041152v1
109/5/1810    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tallman, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appelbaum, F. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tallman, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Perspectives
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

PERSPECTIVE

End points to establish the efficacy of new agents in the treatment of acute leukemia

Frederick R. Appelbaum1, Daniel Rosenblum2, Robert J. Arceci3, William L. Carroll4, Philip P. Breitfeld5, Stephen J. Forman6, Richard A. Larson7, Stephanie J. Lee8, Sharon B. Murphy9, Susan O'Brien10, Jerald Radich1, Nancy S. Scher11, Franklin O. Smith12, Richard M. Stone8, and Martin S. Tallman13

1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; 2 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; 3 Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at John Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; 4 Mount Sinai and New York University Schools of Medicine, New York, NY; 5 Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; 6 City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; 7 University of Chicago Medical Center, IL; 8 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 9 Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio; 10 M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 11 US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD; 12 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH; 13 Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL

Federal regulations provide 2 pathways for approval of new agents for the treatment of acute leukemia, regular and accelerated approval. Regular approval requires evidence of clinical benefit, which is generally defined as either prolongation of life or improved quality of life, or an effect on an end point established as a surrogate for clinical benefit. Accelerated approval can be obtained based on demonstration of an effect on a surrogate measure "reasonably likely" to predict clinical benefit, but requires demonstration of clinical benefit after approval as well. The acute leukemias are a heterogeneous and relatively uncommon group of diseases. The design and execution of prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrating prolongation of life or improved quality of life for patients with these disorders can be difficult and costly and require lengthy follow-up. Thus, the development of novel trial design and inclusion of validated surrogate markers for clinical benefit are needed. To explore some of the issues pertinent to the choice of end points for drug approval in acute leukemia, the Food and Drug Administration invited the American Society of Hematology to participate in the organization and conduct of a joint workshop. In this report, we present the results of that effort.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Metzelder, Y. Wang, E. Wollmer, M. Wanzel, S. Teichler, A. Chaturvedi, M. Eilers, E. Enghofer, A. Neubauer, and A. Burchert
Compassionate use of sorafenib in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia: sustained regression before and after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Blood, June 25, 2009; 113(26): 6567 - 6571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
H. P. Erba
Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients with AML and the Implications for Treatment
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 420 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020