| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 15 March 2007, Vol. 109, No. 6, pp. 2657-2662. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on November 16, 2006; DOI 10.1182/blood-2006-08-013995.
TRANSPLANTATION A phase 2/3 multicenter randomized clinical trial of ABX-CBL versus ATG as secondary therapy for steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease1 Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 2 M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3 Abgenix, Fremont, CA; 4 University of Washington, Seattle; 5 Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel; 6 Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh; 7 Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; 8 University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Medical Center; 9 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha; 10 University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Stanford Healthcare; 11 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; 12 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA Treatment for steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has had limited success. ABX-CBL is a hybridoma-generated murine IgM monoclonal antibody against the CD147 antigen, weakly expressed on human leukocytes and up-regulated on activated lymphocytes. A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial comparing ABX-CBL to antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for treatment of steroid-resistant acute GVHD was conducted in 95 patients at 21 centers. Forty-eight patients received ABX-CBL daily for 14 consecutive days followed by up to 6 weeks of ABX-CBL twice weekly. Forty-seven patients received equine ATG, 30 mg/kg every other day for a total of 6 doses with additional courses as needed. By day 180, overall improvement was similar in the patients receiving ABX-CBL and in those receiving ATG (56% versus 57%, P = .91). Patient survival at 18 months was less favorable on ABX-CBL than on ATG (35% versus 45%), with the 95% confidence interval ruling out that ABX-CBL provides at least a 10.4% improvement. Data from this trial suggest that ABX-CBL does not offer an improvement over ATG in the treatment of acute steroid-resistant GVHD. This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial for steroid-resistant acute GVHD serves as a model for future evaluation of new agents.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||