|
|
Blood, 15 April 2008, Vol. 111, No. 8, pp. 4233-4244.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on February 13, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2007-07-099226.
Previous Article | Table of Contents | Next Article 
IMMUNOBIOLOGY
Identification of discrete tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cell subpopulations with distinct T cell–suppressive activity
Kiavash Movahedi1,2,
Martin Guilliams1,2,
Jan Van den Bossche1,2,
Rafael Van den Bergh1,2,
Conny Gysemans3,
Alain Beschin1,2,
Patrick De Baetselier1,2, and
Jo A. Van Ginderachter1,2
1 Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Department of Molecular and Cellular Interactions, VIB, Brussels;
2 Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels; and
3 Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
The induction of CD11b+Gr-1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) is an important immune-evading mechanism used by tumors. However, the exact nature and function of MDSCs remain elusive, especially because they constitute a heterogeneous population that has not yet been clearly defined. Here, we identified 2 distinct MDSC subfractions with clear morphologic, molecular, and functional differences. These fractions consisted of either mononuclear cells (MO-MDSCs), resembling inflammatory monocytes, or low-density polymorphonuclear cells (PMN-MDSCs), akin to immature neutrophils. Interestingly, both MO-MDSCs and PMN-MDSCs suppressed antigen-specific T-cell responses, albeit using distinct effector molecules and signaling pathways. Blocking IFN- or disrupting STAT1 partially impaired suppression by MO-MDSCs, for which nitric oxide (NO) was one of the mediators. In contrast, while IFN- was strictly required for the suppressor function of PMN-MDSCs, this did not rely on STAT1 signaling or NO production. Finally, MO-MDSCs were shown to be potential precursors of highly antiproliferative NO-producing mature macrophages. However, distinct tumors differentially regulated this inherent MO-MDSC differentiation program, indicating that this phenomenon was tumor driven. Overall, our data refine tumor-induced MDSC functions by uncovering mechanistically distinct MDSC subpopulations, potentially relevant for MDSC-targeted therapies.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Stewart, D. J. Liewehr, S. M. Steinberg, K. M. Greeneltch, and S. I. Abrams
Modulating the Expression of IFN Regulatory Factor 8 Alters the Protumorigenic Behavior of CD11b+Gr-1+ Myeloid Cells
J. Immunol.,
July 1, 2009;
183(1):
117 - 128.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Corzo, M. J. Cotter, P. Cheng, F. Cheng, S. Kusmartsev, E. Sotomayor, T. Padhya, T. V. McCaffrey, J. C. McCaffrey, and D. I. Gabrilovich
Mechanism Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumor-Induced Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
J. Immunol.,
May 1, 2009;
182(9):
5693 - 5701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ostrand-Rosenberg and P. Sinha
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Linking Inflammation and Cancer
J. Immunol.,
April 15, 2009;
182(8):
4499 - 4506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Ko, A. H. Zea, B. I. Rini, J. L. Ireland, P. Elson, P. Cohen, A. Golshayan, P. A. Rayman, L. Wood, J. Garcia, et al.
Sunitinib Mediates Reversal of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Accumulation in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2009;
15(6):
2148 - 2157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-J. Ko, J.-M. Lee, Y.-J. Kim, Y.-S. Kim, K.-A Lee, and C.-Y. Kang
Immunosuppressive Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Can Be Converted into Immunogenic APCs with the Help of Activated NKT Cells: An Alternative Cell-Based Antitumor Vaccine
J. Immunol.,
February 15, 2009;
182(4):
1818 - 1828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Li, Y. Han, Q. Guo, M. Zhang, and X. Cao
Cancer-Expanded Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Induce Anergy of NK Cells through Membrane-Bound TGF-{beta}1
J. Immunol.,
January 1, 2009;
182(1):
240 - 249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|