Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 24 September 2009, Vol. 114, No. 13, pp. 2764-2773.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 22, 2009; DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Tables and Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2009-02-203547v1
114/13/2764    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fandy, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, H. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fandy, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Myeloid Neoplasia
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

MYELOID NEOPLASIA

Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies

Tamer E. Fandy1, James G. Herman1, Patrick Kerns1, Anchalee Jiemjit1, Elizabeth A. Sugar2, Si-Ho Choi3, Allen S. Yang3, Timothy Aucott1, Tianna Dauses1, Rosalie Odchimar-Reissig4, Jonathan Licht5, Melanie J. McConnell6, Chris Nasrallah7, Marianne K. H. Kim5, Weijia Zhang8, Yezou Sun9, Anthony Murgo10, Igor Espinoza-Delgado10, Katharine Oteiza1, Ibitayo Owoeye1, Lewis R. Silverman4, Steven D. Gore1, and Hetty E. Carraway1

1 The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; 2 Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; 3 Division of Hematology, University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles; 4 Division of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; 5 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; 6 Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 7 Center for Theoretical Evolutionary Genetics, University of California, Berkeley; 8 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; 9 Personalized Medicine Research Program, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; and 10 Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD

Sequential administration of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the mechanism behind their clinical efficacy remains controversial. In this study, the methylation dynamics of 4 TSGs (p15INK4B, CDH-1, DAPK-1, and SOCS-1) were studied in sequential bone marrow samples from 30 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who completed a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy with 5-azacytidine and entinostat. Reversal of promoter methylation after therapy was observed in both clinical responders and nonresponders across all genes. There was no association between clinical response and either baseline methylation or methylation reversal in the bone marrow or purified CD34+ population, nor was there an association with change in gene expression. Transient global hypomethylation was observed in samples after treatment but was not associated with clinical response. Induction of histone H3/H4 acetylation and the DNA damage–associated variant histone {gamma}-H2AX was observed in peripheral blood samples across all dose cohorts. In conclusion, methylation reversal of candidate TSGs during cycle 1 of therapy was not predictive of clinical response to combination "epigenetic" therapy. This trial is registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00101179 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Missteps in "tango" for epigenome targeting
Keith D. Robertson and Kapil N. Bhalla
Blood 2009 114: 2569-2570. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
M. E. Figueroa, L. Skrabanek, Y. Li, A. Jiemjit, T. E. Fandy, E. Paietta, H. Fernandez, M. S. Tallman, J. M. Greally, H. Carraway, et al.
MDS and secondary AML display unique patterns and abundance of aberrant DNA methylation
Blood, October 15, 2009; 114(16): 3448 - 3458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. D. Robertson and K. N. Bhalla
Missteps in "tango" for epigenome targeting
Blood, September 24, 2009; 114(13): 2569 - 2570.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020