Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 October 2009, Vol. 114, No. 16, pp. 3382-3391.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on July 15, 2009; DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-02-206185.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Appendix and Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2009-02-206185v1
114/16/3382    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eichhorst, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hallek, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eichhorst, B. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hallek, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Free Research Articles
Right arrow Lymphoid Neoplasia
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS

First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Barbara F. Eichhorst1, Raymonde Busch2, Stephan Stilgenbauer3, Martina Stauch4, Manuela A. Bergmann5, Matthias Ritgen6, Nicole Kranzhöfer7, Robert Rohrberg8, Ulrike Söling9, Oswald Burkhard10, Anne Westermann1, Valentin Goede1, Carmen D. Schweighofer1, Kirsten Fischer1, Anna-Maria Fink1, Clemens M. Wendtner1, Günter Brittinger11, Hartmut Döhner3, Bertold Emmerich12, Michael Hallek1, and the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

1 Department I of Internal Medicine, Centre of Integrated Oncology Köln Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne; 2 Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University, Munich; 3 Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Ulm; 4 Private practice, Kronach; 5 Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Munich; 6 Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel; 7 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Saarland, Homburg; 8 Private practice, Halle; 9 Private practice, Kassel; 10 Private practice, Worms; 11 Department of Hematology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; and 12 Department of Internal Medicine Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of elderly patients, subjects older than 65 years are heavily underrepresented in clinical trials. The German CLL study group (GCLLSG) initiated a multicenter phase III trial for CLL patients older than 65 years comparing first-line therapy with fludarabine with chlorambucil. A total of 193 patients with a median age of 70 years were randomized to receive fludarabine (25 mg/m2 for 5 days intravenously, every 28 days, for 6 courses) or chlorambucil (0.4 mg/kg body weight [BW] with an increase to 0.8 mg/kg, every 15 days, for 12 months). Fludarabine resulted in a significantly higher overall and complete remission rate (72% vs 51%, P = .003; 7% vs 0%, P = .011). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the chlorambucil arm (11 vs 18 months; P = .004), but no difference in progression-free survival time was observed (19 months with fludarabine, 18 months with chlorambucil; P = .7). Moreover, fludarabine did not increase the overall survival time (46 months in the fludarabine vs 64 months in the chlorambucil arm; P = .15). Taken together, the results suggest that in elderly CLL patients the first-line therapy with fludarabine alone does not result in a major clinical benefit compared with chlorambucil. This trial is registered with www.isrctn.org under identifier ISRCTN 36294212.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

One step back but 2 steps forward
John G. Gribben
Blood 2009 114: 3359-3360. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
J. G. Gribben
One step back but 2 steps forward
Blood, October 15, 2009; 114(16): 3359 - 3360.
[Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020