| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 5 November 2009, Vol. 114, No. 19, pp. 4027-4033. Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 26, 2009; DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229351.
CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of high-dose continuous infusion cytarabine alone or with laromustine (VNP40101M) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse1 Cancer Therapy & Research Center (CTRC) at The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio; 2 Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 4 New York Medical College, Valhalla; 5 University of Chicago, IL; 6 Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston; 7 Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8 Hôpital Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France; 9 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; 10 Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON; 11 University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; 12 Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; 13 Klinikum der Universität Köln, Köln, Germany; 14 Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; 15 Vion Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT; 16 Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA; and 17 University of Texas (UT) M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Laromustine is a sulfonylhdrazine alkylator with significant antileukemia activity. An international, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to compare complete remission (CR) rates and overall survival (OS) in patients with first relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with laromustine and high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) versus HDAC/placebo. Patients received 1.5 g/m2 per day cytarabine continuous infusion for 3 days and laromustine 600 mg/m2 (n = 177) or placebo (n = 86) on day 2. Patients in CR received consolidation with laromustine/HDAC or HDAC/placebo as per initial randomization. After interim analysis at 50% enrollment, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) expressed concern that any advantage in CR would be compromised by the observed on-study mortality, and enrollment was held. The CR rate was significantly higher for the laromustine/HDAC group (35% vs 19%, P = .005). However, the 30-day mortality rate and median progression-free survival were significantly worse in this group compared with HDAC/placebo (11% vs 2%; P = .016; 54 days vs 34; P = .002). OS and median response durations were similar in both groups. Laromustine/HDAC induced significantly more CR than HDAC/placebo, but OS was not improved due to mortality associated with myelosuppression and its sequelae. The DSMB subsequently approved a revised protocol with laromustine dose reduction and recombinant growth factor support. The study was registered as NCT00112554 [ClinicalTrials.gov] at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||