Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 5 November 2009, Vol. 114, No. 19, pp. 4027-4033.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 26, 2009; DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229351.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2009-06-229351v1
114/19/4027    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giles, F.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giles, F.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Free Research Articles
Right arrow Myeloid Neoplasia
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS

Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of high-dose continuous infusion cytarabine alone or with laromustine (VNP40101M) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse

Francis Giles1, Norbert Vey2, Daniel DeAngelo3, Karen Seiter4, Wendy Stock5, Robert Stuart6, Darinka Boskovic7, Arnaud Pigneux8, Martin Tallman9, Joseph Brandwein10, Jonathan Kell11, Tadeusz Robak12, Peter Staib13, Xavier Thomas14, Ann Cahill15, Maher Albitar16, and Susan O'Brien17

1 Cancer Therapy & Research Center (CTRC) at The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio; 2 Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; 3 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 4 New York Medical College, Valhalla; 5 University of Chicago, IL; 6 Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston; 7 Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; 8 Hôpital Haut Lévèque, Bordeaux, France; 9 Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL; 10 Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON; 11 University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; 12 Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland; 13 Klinikum der Universität Köln, Köln, Germany; 14 Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; 15 Vion Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT; 16 Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, CA; and 17 University of Texas (UT) M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

Laromustine is a sulfonylhdrazine alkylator with significant antileukemia activity. An international, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to compare complete remission (CR) rates and overall survival (OS) in patients with first relapse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with laromustine and high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) versus HDAC/placebo. Patients received 1.5 g/m2 per day cytarabine continuous infusion for 3 days and laromustine 600 mg/m2 (n = 177) or placebo (n = 86) on day 2. Patients in CR received consolidation with laromustine/HDAC or HDAC/placebo as per initial randomization. After interim analysis at 50% enrollment, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) expressed concern that any advantage in CR would be compromised by the observed on-study mortality, and enrollment was held. The CR rate was significantly higher for the laromustine/HDAC group (35% vs 19%, P = .005). However, the 30-day mortality rate and median progression-free survival were significantly worse in this group compared with HDAC/placebo (11% vs 2%; P = .016; 54 days vs 34; P = .002). OS and median response durations were similar in both groups. Laromustine/HDAC induced significantly more CR than HDAC/placebo, but OS was not improved due to mortality associated with myelosuppression and its sequelae. The DSMB subsequently approved a revised protocol with laromustine dose reduction and recombinant growth factor support. The study was registered as NCT00112554 [ClinicalTrials.gov] at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020