Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 6 August 2009, Vol. 114, No. 6, pp. 1166-1173.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 11, 2009; DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198093.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2009-01-198093v1
blood-2009-01-198093v2
114/6/1166    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harousseau, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Howes, A. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harousseau, J.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Howes, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Free Research Articles
Right arrow Myeloid Neoplasia
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

CLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS

A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older

Jean-Luc Harousseau1, Giovanni Martinelli2, Wieslaw W. Jedrzejczak3, Joseph M. Brandwein4, Dominique Bordessoule5, Tamas Masszi6, Gert J. Ossenkoppele7, Julia A. Alexeeva8, Gernot Beutel9, Johan Maertens10, Maria-Belen Vidriales11, Hervé Dombret12, Xavier Thomas13, Alan K. Burnett14, Tadeusz Robak15, Nuriet K. Khuageva16, Anatoly K. Golenkov17, Elena Tothova18, Lars Mollgard19, Youn C. Park20, Annick Bessems20, Peter De Porre20, Angela J. Howes20, and for the FIGHT-AML-301 Investigators

1 University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France; 2 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 3 Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; 4 Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON; 5 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Limoges, Limoges, France, 6 National Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary; 7 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 8 St Petersburg City Clinical Hospital, St Petersburg, Russia; 9 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany; 10 UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; 11 Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 12 Hospital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; 13 Hospital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; 14 University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom; 15 Medical University of Lodz and Memorial Copernicus Hospital, Lodz, Poland; 16 S. P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia; 17 Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute, Moscow, Russia; 18 Hospital University of PJS, Kosice, Slovak Republic; 19 Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; and 20 Ortho-Biotech Oncology R&D, a unit of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC, Beerse, Belgium

This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first-line therapy in elderly patients (≥70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 457 patients were enrolled with 24% 80 years of age or older. Tipifarnib 600 mg orally twice a day was administered for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The median survival was 107 days for the tipifarnib arm and 109 days for the BSC arm. The hazard ratio (tipifarnib vs BSC) for overall survival was 1.02 (P value by stratified log-rank test, .843). The complete response rate for tipifarnib in this study (8%) was lower than that observed previously, but with a similar median duration of 8 months. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cytopenias in both arms, slightly more infections (39% vs 33%), and febrile neutropenia (16% vs 10%) seen in the tipifarnib arm. The results of this randomized study showed that tipifarnib treatment did not result in an increased survival compared with BSC, including hydroxyurea. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00093990 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020