Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicola, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicola, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Separation of functionally distinct human granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factors

NA Nicola, D Metcalf, GR Johnson and AW Burgess

Human placental conditioned medium (HPCM) contans colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) required for the growth in vitro of neutrophilic granulocyte-macrophage (GM) and eosinophilic (EO) progenitor cells from human bone marrow. Fractionation of CSFs in HPCM was achieved by manipulation of the elution conditions on a column of phenyl-Sepharose. After equilibration of the phenyl-Sepharose column at high ionic strength (1 M ammonium sulfate), all of the CSF bound; one species of GM-CSF (alpha) and all of the elutable EO-CSF were eluted from the column simply by reducing the salt concentration, whereas the second species of GM-CSF (beta) was free of EO-CSF and was eluted only by increasing the concentration of tehylene glycol in the elution buffer. The two GM-CSFs were functionally distinct. GM-CSF alpha preferentially stimulated colony formation by day 14 of culture, and there was a decreased proportion of neutrophil colonies and increased proportion of macrophage colonies as the strength of the stimulus was decreased; GM- CSF beta, on the other hand, preferentially stimulated colony formation by day 7 of culture, and the proportion of neutrophil colonies was high (average 80%) and independent of the concentration of GM-CSF beta. GM- CSF alpha and GM-CSF beta were indistinguishable on the basis of apparent molecular size on tel filtration columns (molecular weight 30,000), charge properties on isoelectric focusing beds (isoelectric point, 4.9), and were not related to each other as a sialoglycoprotein is related to its asialo form. Adherent cell removal of the target bone marrow cells (to remove colony-stimulating cells) suggested that both GM-CSFs acted directly rather than by stimulating the production of GM- CSF. Mixing and titration experiments indicated that the differences in functional specificities of the two GM-CSFs (and the lack of EO-CSF associated with GM-CSF beta) were not due to the presence of specific inhibitory molecules or lower absolute levels of CSF in one fraction relative to the other. These two species of GM-CSF should be useful in separately enumerating subpopulations of different GM-progenitor cells inhuman hemopoietic disorders.

Volume 54, Issue 3, pp. 614-627, 09/01/1979
Copyright © 1979 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. L. Asquith, H. S. Ramshaw, P. M. Hansbro, K. W. Beagley, A. F. Lopez, and P. S. Foster
The IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF Common Receptor Plays a Pivotal Role in the Regulation of Th2 Immunity and Allergic Airway Inflammation
J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 1199 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. D. Panopoulos, L. Zhang, J. W. Snow, D. M. Jones, A. M. Smith, K. C. El Kasmi, F. Liu, M. A. Goldsmith, D. C. Link, P. J. Murray, et al.
STAT3 governs distinct pathways in emergency granulopoiesis and mature neutrophils
Blood, December 1, 2006; 108(12): 3682 - 3690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. J. Smith, D. J. Cousins, Y.-K. Jee, D. Z. Staynov, T. H. Lee, and P. Lavender
Suppression of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Expression by Glucocorticoids Involves Inhibition of Enhancer Function by the Glucocorticoid Receptor Binding to Composite NF-AT/Activator Protein-1 Elements
J. Immunol., September 1, 2001; 167(5): 2502 - 2510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Sieff, S. Emerson, R. Donahue, D. Nathan, E. Wang, G. Wong, and S. Clark
Human recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: a multilineage hematopoietin
Science, December 6, 1985; 230(4730): 1171 - 1173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
E. Kawasaki, M. Ladner, A. Wang, J Van Arsdell, M. Warren, M. Coyne, V. Schweickart, M. Lee, K. Wilson, A Boosman, et al.
Molecular cloning of a complementary DNA encoding human macrophage-specific colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1)
Science, October 18, 1985; 230(4723): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D Metcalf
The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors
Science, July 5, 1985; 229(4708): 16 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1979 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020