Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linch, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linch, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Monoclonal antibodies differentiating between monocytic and nonmonocytic variants of AML

DC Linch, C Allen, PC Beverley, AG Bynoe, CS Scott and N Hogg

Blast cells from 70 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with a preponderance of monocytic variants (M4 and M5), were stained with a panel of 10 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) that react with normal myeloid cells. Two McAb, UCHMI and UCHALF, stained cells from nearly every case of M4 and M5 leukemia, but not cells from cases of M1/M2 leukemia. Two other antibodies, E11 and UC45, were also specific for the monocytic leukemias, but stained cells from a lesser proportion of cases. The antibodies TG1, OKM1, Smo, DA2, 28, and 5.5 stained a differing proportion of cases in both the M1/M2 and M4/M5 subtypes. Routine morphology and alpha-naphthyl acetate esterase (ANAE) staining were largely in agreement with the antibody findings, though the interpretation of the fluoride sensitivity of ANAE was apparently misleading in 10% of cases. It is concluded that these antibodies, particularly UCHMI and UCHALF, will be of considerable value in the more precise subtyping of AML and that some of this panel of antibodies will be valuable tools for the investigation of normal monocytic differentiation.

Volume 63, Issue 3, pp. 566-573, 03/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1984 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020