Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kriegler, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kriegler, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, G. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

The effect of prostaglandins E1 and E2 on macrophage progenitor cells with high proliferative potential in mouse bone marrow in vitro

AB Kriegler, TR Bradley and GS Hodgson

High proliferative potential macrophage progenitor cells (HPP-CFC) in 5- fluorouracil (FU) treated and normal mouse bone marrow (BM) have been shown to be less sensitive to inhibition of proliferation by prostaglandins of the E series (PGE) than low proliferative potential macrophage progenitor cells (LPP-CFC) in normal BM in agar cultures. The growth of large colonies (diameter greater than 0.5 mm) derived from HPP-CFC in FU BM, which require a combination of macrophage colony- stimulating factor (CSF-1) plus a new growth factor called synergistic activity (SA), are inhibited by 50% in the presence of 5.5 X 10(-6) M PGE1. On the other hand, LPP-CFC in normal BM, which form smaller colonies (diameter less than or equal to 0.5 mm) in the presence of CSF- 1 alone, require only 5 X 10(-8) M PGE1 for the same level of inhibition. Addition of appropriate concentrations of PGE1 to the agar culture assay should improve detection of HPP-CFC by inhibiting the proliferation of LPP-CFC. These observations suggest that the apparent negative feedback control of macrophage production by PGE operates largely on the LPP-CFC, which respond to CSF-1 alone, and is probably not involved in the regulation of the more primitive HPP-CFC.

Volume 63, Issue 6, pp. 1348-1352, 06/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1984 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020