Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarroll, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, R.
Right arrow Articles by McCarroll, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

The effects of tumor-promoting phorbol esters on human granulopoiesis in vitro

R Sullivan, RA Brodie, NE Larsen, PJ Gans and LA McCarroll

In order to determine whether the tumor-promoting phorbol esters are capable of inducing normal human committed granulocytic-monocytic progenitor cells (CFUc) to proliferate and differentiate in the absence of granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating activity (CSA), we studied the effects of these compounds on human granulopoiesis in vitro. We found that when light-density human marrow cells or peripheral blood leukocytes were depleted of adherent cells and then incubated in semisolid tissue culture medium under conditions optimal for CFUc growth, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and its congeners produced no measurable stimulatory effect on the proliferation of CFUc in the absence of added CSA. Likewise, when light-density marrow cells that had not been depleted of adherent cells were plated in the cultures, no stimulation of CFUc colony growth resulted from the addition of PMA. However, when light-density peripheral blood leukocytes were used as a target source of CFUc without first subjecting them to adherence separation, enhanced proliferation and differentiation of CFUc were noted in cultures that contained PMA. To investigate the possibility that CSA production by monocytes in these cultures in response to activation by PMA might account for the enhanced colony formation that we observed, we incubated isolated peripheral blood monocytes in short- term liquid suspension cultures and found that in the presence of PMA, large quantities of CSA were secreted into the surrounding medium. Finally, we noted that when marrow cell suspensions were suboptimally stimulated by low concentrations of CSA added to the cultures, the effects of PMA on CFUc proliferation were unpredictable, enhancing colony formation in some cases and inhibiting it in others. Our data indicate that although the tumor-promoting phorbol esters do not appear capable of directly stimulating the proliferation or differentiation of human CFUc in the absence of CSA, they may do so indirectly by causing auxiliary cells such as monocytes to secrete CSA.

Volume 64, Issue 2, pp. 526-533, 08/01/1984
Copyright © 1984 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1984 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020