Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nathwani, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Whitcomb, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nathwani, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Whitcomb, C. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

What should be the morphologic criteria for the subdivision of follicular lymphomas?

BN Nathwani, GE Metter, TP Miller, JS Burke, RB Mann, M Barcos, CR Kjeldsberg, DO Dixon, CD Winberg and CC Whitcomb

The members of the Pathology Panel for Lymphoma Clinical Studies undertook a collaborative study with the hope of resolving some of the controversies regarding the criteria and methods for the subclassification of follicular lymphomas (FLs). A group of 105 patients with FL were subclassified by seven hematopathologists according to two methods. In the first method, cases were subclassified according to the Rappaport, Lukes and Collins, and Working Formulation systems. In each of these systems, FLs are subclassified by estimation of the different cell populations, without actual counting of cells. In the second method, precise counts of different cells were made according to the standard and modified Berard methods. With this counting method, diagnoses were independently derived, based on counts provided by the seven pathologists, for large cleaved (LC), small noncleaved (SNC), and large noncleaved (LNC) cells. To ascertain what method and which criteria are most useful in predicting survival, we made clinicopathologic correlations. When the subjective (first method) diagnoses were rendered, and when the consensus diagnoses of the seven pathologists were used, there were no significant differences in survival among patients with the different subtypes. On the other hand, when we used the counting method of Berard (second method) and the cut- off points for the cell counts suggested by him for the subclassification, we were able to divide the patient population into prognostic subgroups. Because the cut-off points proposed by Berard are not derived objectively, we made statistical comparisons of survival curves to determine cut-off points (and thus to establish objective criteria). We found that the patient population could be separated into at least two prognostic groups, for SNC and/or LNC and for SNC + LNC + LC cells. The cut-off points which we derived differed with cell type, however. Until the usefulness of these new cut-off points is established, we recommend that the cut-off points and the counting method of Berard be used for the subclassification of FL. Because the choice of treatment for the different subtypes of FL is totally dependent on the histologic diagnosis, and because of the variability among the diagnoses of pathologists, treatment planning is difficult.

Volume 68, Issue 4, pp. 837-845, 10/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
C. P. Hans, D. D. Weisenburger, J. M. Vose, L. M. Hock, J. C. Lynch, P. Aoun, T. C. Greiner, W. C. Chan, R. G. Bociek, P. J. Bierman, et al.
A significant diffuse component predicts for inferior survival in grade 3 follicular lymphoma, but cytologic subtypes do not predict survival
Blood, March 15, 2003; 101(6): 2363 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. A. Peterson, G. R. Petroni, G. Frizzera, M. Barcos, C. D. Bloomfield, N. I. Nissen, D. D. Hurd, E. S. Henderson, G. P. Sartiano, J. L. Johnson, et al.
Prolonged Single-Agent Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Indolent Follicular Lymphomas: A Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 21(1): 5 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. J. Biagi and J. F. Seymour
Insights into the molecular pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma arising from analysis of geographic variation
Blood, May 29, 2002; 99(12): 4265 - 4275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Rodriguez, P. McLaughlin, F.B. Hagemeister, L. Fayad, M.A. Rodriguez, M. Santiago, M. Hess, J. Romaguera, and F. Cabanillas
Follicular Large Cell Lymphoma: An Aggressive Lymphoma That Often Presents With Favorable Prognostic Features
Blood, April 1, 1999; 93(7): 2202 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Krajewski, R. D. Gascoyne, J. M. Zapata, M. Krajewska, S. Kitada, M. Chhanabhai, D. Horsman, K. Berean, L. D. Piro, I. Fugier-Vivier, et al.
Immunolocalization of the ICE/Ced-3-Family Protease, CPP32 (Caspase-3), in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemias, and Reactive Lymph Nodes
Blood, May 15, 1997; 89(10): 3817 - 3825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1986 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020