Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hjelle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hjelle, B.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Human T-cell leukemia virus type II infection frequently goes undetected in contemporary US blood donors

B Hjelle, C Wilson, S Cyrus, P Bradshaw, J Lo, C Schammel, T Wiltbank and S Alexander

Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87131.

Serologic screening for human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) infection was begun in US blood banks with the licensure of enzyme- linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in December 1988. We examined the donation histories of the first 60 Western blot (WB)-confirmed HTLV- I/II positive donors to one blood center and found 8 had made 16 previous donations that scored negative on the screening ELISA. All 16 donations had ELISA absorbance below the cutoff for a positive assay, but still well above that of the average donation (17.6% +/- 5.7% of the cutoff). In a more extensive study, 17 donations from a total of 61,752 at six blood centers were both ELISA-positive and WB-positive for HTLV-I (4) or HTLV-II (13), and 218 samples had ELISA absorbance greater than 50% of the ELISA cutoff. One hundred seventy-eight of the 218 were tested further by WB and 11 were found positive. All 11 positives were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction; 10 had HTLV-II and 1 had HTLV-I. Thus, the HTLV-I-based screening ELISA missed at least 10 of 23, or 43% (95% confidence interval, 23% to 66%), of HTLV- II infections, compared with 1 of 5, or 20%, of HTLV-I infections.

Volume 81, Issue 6, pp. 1641-1644, 03/15/1993
Copyright © 1993 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. T. Goodnough, M. E. Brecher, M. H. Kanter, and J. P. AuBuchon
Transfusion Medicine -- Blood Transfusion- First of Two Parts
N. Engl. J. Med., February 11, 1999; 340(6): 438 - 447.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. B. Schreiber, M. P. Busch, S. H. Kleinman, J. J. Korelitz, and The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study
The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infections
N. Engl. J. Med., June 27, 1996; 334(26): 1685 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020