Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumpel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Anstee, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumpel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Anstee, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Human Rh D monoclonal antibodies (BRAD-3 and BRAD-5) cause accelerated clearance of Rh D+ red blood cells and suppression of Rh D immunization in Rh D- volunteers

BM Kumpel, MJ Goodrick, DH Pamphilon, ID Fraser, GD Poole, C Morse, GR Standen, GE Chapman, DP Thomas and DJ Anstee

International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, Bristol, UK.

The use of prophylactic anti-D to prevent Rh D immunization in Rh D- women and subsequent hemolytic disease in Rh D+ infants is widespread, but has led to shortages of the anti-D Ig. With the aim of substituting monoclonal anti-D for Rh D prophylaxis, we have compared the abilities of monoclonal and polyclonal anti-D to clear Rh D+ red blood cells (RBCs) infused into Rh D- male volunteers and to suppress Rh D immunization. Two human monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), BRAD-3 (IgG3) and BRAD-5 (IgG1), produced from stable Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, were selected because of their proven in vitro activity in promoting RBC lysis in antibody-dependent cell- mediated cytotoxicity assays. RBC clearance was assessed by intravenous injection of 3 mL of 51chromium-labeled D+ RBCs into 27 volunteers 48 hours after intramuscular injection of monoclonal or polyclonal anti-D. Further 3-mL injections of unlabeled D+ cells were administered at 6 and 9 months to induce immunization. Blood samples were taken throughout the 12-month period of study for the serologic detection of anti-D. The mean half-life (t50%) of RBCs in 7 recipients of 300 micrograms BRAD-5 (5.9 hours) was similar to that in 8 recipients of 500 IU polyclonal anti-D (5.0 hours), whereas D+ cells were cleared more slowly in some of the 8 subjects injected with 300 micrograms BRAD- 3 (mean t50% 12.7 hours) and in 1 individual administered 100 micrograms BRAD-3 (t50% 41.0 hours). The rate of RBC clearance in both groups administered 300 micrograms monoclonal anti-D correlated with the amount of antibody bound per cell, determined by flow cytometry. There was no evidence of primary immunization having occurred in any subject after 6 months of follow-up. Five of 24 subjects produced anti- D after one or two further injections of RBCs, confirming that they were responders who had been protected by the monoclonal or polyclonal anti-D administered initially. Four of these responders were recipients of monoclonal anti-D (3 BRAD-3, 1 BRAD-5). One individual who received BRAD-5 produced accelerated clearance of D+ RBCs at the third unprotected RBC challenge but did not seroconvert. This study shows that the human MoAbs BRAD-3 and BRAD-5 can prevent Rh D immunization, and indicates that they may be suitable replacements for the polyclonal anti-D presently used in prophylaxis of Rh D hemolytic disease of the newborn.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Volume 86, Issue 5, pp. 1701-1709, 09/01/1995
Copyright © 1995 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Kjaersgaard, R. Aslam, M. Kim, E. R. Speck, J. Freedman, D. I. H. Stewart, E. J. Wiersma, and J. W. Semple
Epitope specificity and isotype of monoclonal anti-D antibodies dictate their ability to inhibit phagocytosis of opsonized platelets
Blood, August 15, 2007; 110(4): 1359 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Miescher, M. O. Spycher, H. Amstutz, M. de Haas, M. Kleijer, U. J. Kalus, H. Radtke, A. Hubsch, I. Andresen, R. M. Martin, et al.
A single recombinant anti-RhD IgG prevents RhD immunization: association of RhD-positive red blood cell clearance rate with polymorphisms in the Fc{gamma}RIIA and Fc{gamma}IIIA genes
Blood, June 1, 2004; 103(11): 4028 - 4035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Bazin, E. Aubin, L. Boyer, I. St-Amour, C. Roberge, and R. Lemieux
Functional in vivo characterization of human monoclonal anti-D in NOD-scid mice
Blood, February 15, 2002; 99(4): 1267 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. C. I. Karlsson, A. Getahun, and B. Heyman
Fc{gamma}RIIB in IgG-Mediated Suppression of Antibody Responses: Different Impact In Vivo and In Vitro
J. Immunol., November 15, 2001; 167(10): 5558 - 5564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. D. Avent and M. E. Reid
The Rh blood group system: a review
Blood, January 15, 2000; 95(2): 375 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020