SEARCH:   Advanced

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Albert, D. Articles by Ringler, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Albert, D. Articles by Ringler, D. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?  Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article  Peripheral blood eosinophilia in owl monkeys is associated with increased eosinophilopoiesis yet depressed recruitment kinetics to the Chemokine RANTES DL Albert, SJ Brodie, VG Sasseville and DJ Ringler Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, New England Regional Primate Research Center, Southborough, MA, US. New world nonhuman primates of the genus Aotus (owl monkeys) can be categorized by 11 distinct karyotypes (K). It has been demonstrated that monkeys of K-VI persistently have one order of magnitude more eosinophils (EOS) in the peripheral blood than K-I monkeys. The purpose of this study was to investigate the basis for this difference and examine EOS recruitment using two cutaneous models of inflammation. Peripheral blood EOS were isolated on metrizamide gradients to > or = 95% purity and then used for phenotypic studies. There were no significant differences when comparing karyotypes in the ratio of normodense (K-I, 6.4% +/- 3.8%; K-VI, 21.1% +/- 8.8%) EOS or their survival in culture (K-I, 5.3% +/- 2.9% at 72 hours; K-VI, 2.8% +/- 0.7% at 72 hours) (P > .05). Examination of bone marrow revealed that K- VI monkeys had greater than fivefold more EOS and EOS precursors than K- I animals. To examine EOS function in recruitment, monkeys of each karyotype were given a single intradermal injection of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or human recombinant (PMN) and mononuclear cells occurred in response to LPS as early as 4 hours after injection; the severity of infiltration was similar in both karyotypes and at all time points up to 24 hours. In contrast, by 8 hours after intradermal injection of RANTES, leukocyte infiltration in K-I monkeys consisted mostly of PMN (94.8% +/- 0.7%) that were predominantly EOS. In comparison, there was essentially no infiltrate in K-VI animals at all time points. There was no difference in VCAM-1 expression in response to intradermal LPS or RANTES between the two karyotypes. These results suggest that the genetic basis of peripheralblood eosinophilia in K-VI owl monkeys is likely a function of heightened eosinophilopoiesis and depressed recruitment kinetics from the peripheral circulatory pool in response to RANTES. Volume 88, Issue 5, pp. 1718-1724, 09/01/1996 Copyright © 1996 by The American Society of Hematology CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this? This article has been cited by other articles: L. J. Lowenstine A Primer of Primate Pathology: Lesions and Nonlesions Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2003; 31(1_suppl): 92 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]

	Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020