Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 October 2008, Vol. 112, No. 8, pp. 3107-3114.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on May 27, 2008; DOI 10.1182/blood-2008-04-149427.


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
blood-2008-04-149427v1
112/8/3107    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palumbo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boccadoro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palumbo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Boccadoro, M.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Next Article next article arrow

Submitted April 1, 2008
Accepted May 2, 2008

Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: updated results of a randomized, controlled trial

Antonio Palumbo*, Sara Bringhen, Anna M Liberati, Tommaso Caravita, Antonietta Falcone, Vincenzo Callea, Marco Montanaro, Roberto Ria, Antonio Capaldi, Renato Zambello, Giulia Benevolo, Daniele Derudas, Fausto Dore, Federica Cavallo, Francesca Gay, Patrizia Falco, Giovannino Ciccone, Pellegrino Musto, Michele Cavo, and Mario Boccadoro

Divisione di Ematologia dell’Universita di Torino, Azienda Ospedaliera S Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
Clinica Medica I, Policlinico Monteluce, Perugia, Italy
Cattedra e Divisione di Ematologia, Universita Tor Vergata, Ospedale S Eugenio, Roma, Italy
Unita Operativa di Ematologia Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedali Riuniti, Calabria, Italy
Unita Operativa Complessa di Ematologia, Ospedale Sant'Anna di Ronciglione, Ronciglione (VT), Italy
Sezione Medicina Interna e Oncologia Clinica, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
Divisione di Oncologia ed Ematologia, IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
Divisione di Ematologia e Immunologia Clinica Universitaria, Dipartimento Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Padova, Italy
Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
Unita Operativa di Ematologia, Ospedale "A. Businco", Cagliari, Italy
Istituto di Ematologia, Universita di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
Servizio di Epidemiologia dei Tumori dell’Universita di Torino, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista e CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy
Ematologia e Trapianto Cellule Staminali IRCCS, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
Istituto di Ematologia e Oncologia Medica, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy

* Corresponding author; email: appalumbo{at}yahoo.com.

Rationale: The initial analysis of the oral combination melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT) in newly diagnosed patients with myeloma showed significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS) than did the standard melphalan and prednisone (MP) combination and suggested a survival advantage. In this updated analysis, efficacy and safety endpoints were updated. Objectives: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral MPT or MP alone. Updated analysis was by intention-to-treat and included PFS, overall survival (OS), and survival after progression. Findings: After a median follow-up of 38.1 months, the median PFS was 21.8 months for MPT and 14.5 months for MP (P = .0004). The median OS was 45.0 months for MPT and 47.6 months for MP (P = .79). In different patient subgroups, MPT improved PFS irrespective of age, serum concentrations of b2-microglobulin, or high International Staging System. Thalidomide or bortezomib administration as salvage regimens significantly improved survival after progression in the MP group (P = .0002) but not in the MPT group (P = .34). Conclusion: These data confirm activity of MPT for PFS but failed to show any survival advantage. New agents in the management of relapsed disease could explain this finding. The study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT00232934.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Crossover confusion: MPT still best
Brian G. M. Durie
Blood 2008 112: 2998-2999. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J.-L. Harousseau, M. Dreyling, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv97 - iv99.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
D. Reece, J.-L. Harousseau, and M. A. Gertz
Nontransplant Therapy of Myeloma, High-dose Therapy for Myeloma, and a Personalized Care Plan for Treatment of Myeloma
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 502 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020