Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morena, A.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morena, A.
Right arrow Articles by Falcioni, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cell Adhesion and Motility
Right arrow Hematopoiesis
Right arrow Neoplasia
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 July 2002, Vol. 100, No. 1, pp. 96-106

HEMATOPOIESIS

Expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit induces monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells

Annarita Morena, Sabrina Riccioni, Alessandra Marchetti, Alessandro Tartaglia Polcini, Arthur M. Mercurio, Giovanni Blandino, Ada Sacchi, and Rita Falcioni

From the Molecular Oncogenesis Laboratory, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'Oro, Rome, Italy; and the Department of Pathology Research North, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

The alpha 6beta 4 integrin is the receptor for various laminin isoforms and is a component of the hemidesmosome. Increased expression levels of this integrin correlate with the aggressive phenotype of many epithelial tumors compared with surrounding normal tissue. Furthermore, the long cytoplasmic tail of the beta 4 integrin subunit has been implicated in several signal transduction pathways that are involved not only in invasion, but also in proliferation and apoptosis. Here we report that the exogenous expression of beta 4 integrin in 32D/v-abl-transformed cells reduces tumor aggressiveness in vivo and strongly inhibits cell proliferation in vitro by inducing monocytic differentiation. These effects are accompanied by growth arrest and p73 protein accumulation. The hypothesis that the inhibition of v-Abl oncogenic capacity could allow the activation of the endogenous c-Abl was tested in RKO cells. The results clearly demonstrated a strong increase of c-Abl phosphorylation that is accompanied by its association with p73 protein. Overall, the reported findings indicate that alpha 6beta 4 integrin promotes growth arrest and differentiation by modulating Abl kinases and p73 protein pathway(s). (Blood. 2002;100:96-106)

© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

The integrin alpha 6beta 4 is expressed by epithelial and neuroepithelial cells. In epithelia, the distribution of this molecule is restricted to the basal layer of cells in contact with the basement membrane1 where it plays an essential role in the formation and stabilization of hemidesmosomes.2,3 The ligands for alpha 6beta 4 integrin are various laminins isoforms.4,5 The alpha 6beta 4 integrin was originally identified as a tumor-associated antigen (TSP-180).6 We and others have shown that the expression of the beta 4 subunit correlates with the metastatic phenotype of mouse tumors and increases in human invasive carcinomas relative to benign adenomas and normal tissues.7-10 This suggests a role for this integrin during tumor progression. It was recently observed that androgen receptor expression in prostate carcinoma cells suppresses alpha 6beta 4 expression and the invasive phenotype,11 suggesting that the loss of androgen receptor expression, a common feature of aggressive prostate tumors, stimulates alpha 6beta 4 expression and alpha 6beta 4-mediated invasion. Further strong evidence implicating alpha 6beta 4 in invasion was provided by the finding that the expression of the exogenous beta 4 subunit in beta 4-deficient colon and breast carcinoma cell lines increased their ability to invade in vitro.12,13 The beta 4 cytoplasmic domain is distinct both in size (approximately 1000 amino acids [aa]) and structure from any other integrin subunit.14,15 Although some progress has been made in identifying the specific regions and motifs within this domain that mediate alpha 6beta 4-specific functions, the characterization is far from being conclusive.

Our previous work demonstrated that the stimulation of alpha 6beta 4 integrin by a monoclonal antibody increases phosphorylation of the beta 4 subunit and promotes cell growth in vitro.16 We also found that the addition of insulin to intact carcinoma cells induces a 30-fold increase in the phosphorylation of the beta 4 subunit.17 This was the first evidence to implicate alpha 6beta 4 in a signaling pathway. At present, it is well established that alpha 6beta 4 participates in signaling events that regulate not only the invasion, but also cell proliferation, gene expression, and apoptosis.12,13,18-20 However, the molecular mechanisms underlining alpha 6beta 4 activities remain to be elucidated. Recently, we found that alpha 6beta 4 integrin associates in vitro and in vivo with the ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase receptor in human ovarian and mammary carcinoma cell lines.21 A significant increase in the proliferative and invasive capacity of ErbB-2-transformed NIH3T3 cells overexpressing alpha 6beta 4 strongly suggested a role for this association during tumor progression. Using this model, we identified a specific region in the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain that is critical for the ability of alpha 6beta 4 integrin to stimulate invasion. Interestingly, the extracellular domain of beta 4 is not necessary for alpha 6beta 4 to stimulate invasion. We also observed a strong activation of PI3K only with those beta 4 deletion mutants that were able to stimulate invasion upon expression in the NIH3T3/ErbB-2 cell line.22 These data agree with the finding that alpha 6beta 4 is implicated in carcinoma invasion through its ability to activate PI3K.13,22

In the present work, we investigated the possibility that alpha 6beta 4 integrin cooperates with other oncogenes such as v-src and v-abl. For this purpose we used, as a model, 32D diploid murine hemopoietic cells and their transformed v-src or v-abl counterparts. The murine myeloid progenitor 32D cells do not express the beta 4 integrin subunit and have been extensively used to study transformation,23,24 cell spreading, and motility induced by different receptors and ligands.25 It has been previously reported that v-src and v-abl expression in 32D cells induces transformation,23,24 and that 32D/v-Abl and 32D/v-src cells originate tumors in syngenic and nude mice.26,27 In these experimental conditions it was expected that de novo expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit might give additional information about its ability in modulating tumor phenotype.22 Surprisingly, we found that the beta 4 integrin subunit does not increase the malignant potential of transformed cells, but instead counteracts the transformed phenotype inducing differentiation. Indeed, we found that stable beta 4 integrin subunit expression significantly inhibits the proliferative and tumorigenic capacity of 32D/v-Abl cells. Moreover, morphologic analysis of 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells revealed that beta 4 expression induces monocytic differentiation that is accompanied by accumulation of p73 protein. Experiments undertaken to evaluate the role of p73 protein in 32D/v-Abl differentiation indicate that p73 overexpression induces monocytic differentiation of these transformed cells. The specificity of v-Abl and beta 4 interaction is demonstrated by the observation that beta 4 expression does not have any detectable effects in the proliferative and differerentiative capacity of 32D/v-src cells. These results provide for the first time evidence of a link between beta 4 integrin signaling and the p73 protein in the differentiation process.


    Materials and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cell lines and cDNAs

The murine myeloid progenitor cell line 32D, depending on interleukin 3 (IL-3) for growth and viability, was cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin, streptomycin, and glutamine (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy), and 5% WEHI-3B-conditioned medium as a source of murine IL-3. The v-src- and v-abl-transformed counterparts are instead IL-3-independent either for survival or cell growth. The parental cell line, the 32D/v-Abl-transformed cell line,23,28 and the 32D/src-transformed cell line24 were transfected, by electroporation, either with the pRC/CMV expression vector alone or carrying the wild-type human beta 4 integrin subunit cDNA.5 The 32D/v-Abl cells were also transfected with pRC/CMV vector carrying the truncated cytoplasmic domain of the beta 4 integrin subunit (beta 4 L).29 Selection of neomycin-positive clones was carried out using 1 mg/mL G418 (Invitrogen). The human large-cell carcinoma cell line H1299 stable-transfected with an expression vector encoding p73 cDNA30 was maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS (Invitrogen) and used as positive control (H-p73alpha cells). 32D cells transfected with the expression vector encoding for a p53 Val 135, maintained in culture as described below, were also used as positive controls.28 32D/v-Abl cells were also transfected with the expression vector alone or encoding p73 cDNA which is also tagged with hemaglutinin (HA) epitope,30 and maintained as described below. After selection with G418, the population of 32D/v-Abl/neo and 32D/v-Abl/p73 cells was analyzed by morphology. Colon carcinoma cell line RKO20 was cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and transient transfected with the expression vector alone or encoding the beta 4 integrin subunit cDNA.5 After transfection, endogenous c-Abl phosphorylation level and beta 4 integrin expression were analyzed by immunoprecipitation and Western blot analyses.

Antibodies

The rat monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 439-9B and 135-13C direct to the human beta 4 and alpha 6 integrin subunits, respectively, were purified as previously described.6 The rat mAb 346-11A anti-mouse beta 4 integrin subunit was prepared and purified from ascitic fluid and used as a negative control.31 Rat anti-mouse CD11b (MAC-1 alpha M chain) (IgG2b) was from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). The rat anti-mouse F4/80 (IgG2b) was kindly provided by Dr P. Giacomini (Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Italy). The rat anti-mouse CD4 (IgG2b) used as a negative control was from Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birminghan, AL). The antiphosphotyrosine (anti-P-tyr) mouse mAb 4G10 was from UBI (Lake Placid, NY). The rabbit polyclonal antibody against human and mouse c-Abl was from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA). The antiactive mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) polyclonal antibody was from Promega (Madison, WI). The polyclonal antitotal MAPK was from Santa Cruz. The polyclonal antibody direct to p73 protein was kindly provided by Y. Shaul.32 The polyclonal antibodies direct to p73 protein were from Santa Cruz. To detect p53, a mixture of monoclonal antibodies D01 and 1801 was used.33 The anti-HA monoclonal antibody was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Monza, Italy). The secondary antibodies (F[ab']2, fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]-conjugated or horseradish peroxidase [HRP]-conjugated) were from Cappel (Durham, NC).

Flow cytometry

The expression levels of cell surface receptors were analyzed by flow cytometric analysis (FACS) of stained cells. Cells were washed twice with cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.002% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 10 mM NaN3 (washing buffer). Samples of 1 × 106 control and transfected cells were incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with primary antibody diluted in PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were then washed 3 times with washing buffer (PBS containing 0.5% BSA) and incubated for 1 hour at 4°C with 50 µL FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted 1:20 in PBS/BSA. After 3 washes, the cells were suspended in 1 mL washing buffer. Cell suspensions were analyzed by a flow cytometer (Epics XL analyzer; Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL) after addition of 5 µL propidium iodide (1 mg/mL stock solution) to exclude nonviable cells. The negative controls were treated as described below. At least 1 × 104 cells per sample were analyzed.

Total cell lysates and immunoprecipitation

In brief, as previously described,6 2 × 107 cells from each control and beta 4- transfected cells were labeled with 1 mCi (37 MBq) of 125I in the presence of 10 µL lactoperoxidase (2 mg/mL in 50% of glycerol) (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and 5 µL of a 1:1000 dilution of H2O2 (30%). After labeling, cells were washed with PBS and solubilized in lysis buffer containing 5 mg/mL BSA, 1% NP-40, 1 mM NaN3, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (Sigma, St Louis, MO), 5 µg/mL leupeptin, 10 µg/mL aprotinin (Sigma), and 10 mM EDTA. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation (30 000g) for 3 hours at 4°C and solubilized proteins (5 × 106 cpm) were immunoprecipitated. Direct immunoprecipitations were performed using primary mAb 439-9B collected with 50 µL protein G-agarose beads (Pierce, Rockford, IL) suspended in lysis buffer (50% vol/vol). The immunoprecipitates were washed at 4°C in lysis buffer, boiled, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The autoradiography was performed with X-Omat RP film (Kodak, Rochester, NY).

Cell proliferation and viability curves

Exponentially growing cells were plated (3 × 104/mL) in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS in the presence or absence of IL-3. Cell numbers were determined at daily intervals in triplicate with a Thoma hemocytometer (Marienfeld, Germany). Cells viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion.

In vivo studies

32D/v-Abl and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells (2 × 107) were injected subcutaneously into 6-week-old female nu/nu mice. The mice were examined every day for the appearance of tumor masses. Tumor volume was measured every other day until day 37 from the first tumor appearance, when the first mouse died (Table 1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Tumorigenicity of 32D/v-Abl and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cell lines injected in nude mice

ApoTag staining

Cells (1 × 106) were plated for 48 hours on dishes coated with Poly-L-lysine, fibronectin (FN), vitronectin (VN), and laminin (LM) obtained from Invitrogen or on dishes coated with 10 µg/mL 439-9B and/or 135-13C mAbs in normal culture condition. Then the cells were harvested, washed in PBS, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized in 70% ethanol, and stained with ApoTag reagent (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) and propidium iodide (PI) as described above. The stained cells were analyzed by FACS.

Cell cycle analysis

Analyses of DNA content of 32D control cells and beta 4 transfectans were done by FACS. In brief, the cells were fixed in cold methanol and acetone (1:4) for 30 minutes at 4°C and stained in PBS containing 50 µg/mL PI and 0.2 mg/mL RNAse A for 30 minutes at RT. DNA content was measured by the Epics XL analyzer.

Morphology

Approximately 2 × 104 cells were spun onto a glass slide in a cytocentrifuge. For morphologic analysis, cytospin preparations were fixed and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain (Sigma) and observed under a light microscope.

Western blot analyses

32D/v-Ab cells and/or beta 4-transduced cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitors mixture). The extracts were sonicated for 10 seconds and centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 10 minutes to remove the debris. Protein concentration was determined by a coloritrimetic analysis assay (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy). Total cell lysates (200 µg/lane) were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Protein gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). The western blot analyses were resolved by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Milan, Italy).

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analyses of mouse p73 mRNA

Expression of mouse p73 mRNA was analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification. Total RNA was prepared from 32D/v-Abl/neo, 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 wild type, and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L cells using RNAzol B (Biotech, Rome, Italy) according to the manufacturer's procedure. Total RNA (7 µg) was reverse transcribed at 37°C for 1 hour in the presence of random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Mouse p73 mRNA quantitative analysiswas carried out by PCR amplification of a fragment of 298 base pair (bp) for a total of 36, 38, and 40 cycles using the follow specific primers: 5'GAGCACCTGTGGAGTTCTCTAGAG3' and 5'GGTATTGGAAGGGATGACAGGCG-3'.

The housekeeping aldolase mRNA, used as an internal control, was amplified from the same cDNA reaction mixture for a total of 25, 30, and 35 cycles using the follow specific primers: 5'-TGGATCGGCTGTCTCAACGCTGT-3', and 5'-TCACTGTCGTCCCCCGTGACA-3' to amplify a fragment of 413 bp.

Amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) and visualized under UV light.


    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

The cytoplasmic domain of the beta 4 integrin subunit influences the cell proliferation of 32D/v-Abl-transformed cells

We stable transfected 32D cells, 32D/v-src-, and 32D/v-Abl-transformed cells with the expression vector pRC/CMV alone or carrying the beta 4 integrin subunit cDNA. The 32D/v-Abl cells were also transfected with the expression vector encoding the beta 4 integrin subunit devoid of its cytoplasmic domain (beta 4 L). Clones of transfected 32D, 32D/v-src, and 32D/v-Abl cells expressing a high level of either beta 4 wild type or beta 4 L molecules were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry (Figure 1A) or by immunoprecipitation of surface-labeled proteins (Figure 1B). The expression of wild-type and truncated beta 4 proteins on the cell surface of selected clones is evident whereas the same were absent in clones transfected with the vector alone (neo) (Figure 1A-B).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit in 32D cell lines. 32D cells and v-src- or v-abl-transformed counterparts were transduced with pRC/CMV expression vector alone and/or carrying wild-type beta 4 integrin subunit and cytoplasmic-deleted beta 4 molecule (beta 4 L) cDNAs. Neo cells and beta 4-transduced cells were analyzed by FACS for the expression of exogenous beta 4 molecules (A). Control and beta 4-transduced cells were exogenous-labeled and immunoprecipitated with the anti-beta 4 monoclonal antibody 439-9B (B).

We asked whether the proliferative capacity of different 32D transfectans might be influenced by the expression of beta 4 protein. Proliferation rates were determined by daily counting the number of living cells. The data obtained showed that the expression of the wild-type beta 4 integrin subunit, but not the beta 4 L truncated protein, strongly inhibited the proliferation of 32D/v-Abl cells (Figure 2A-B). Unlike 32D/v-Abl cells, the expression of the beta 4 subunit did not influence the proliferation capacity of nontransformed 32D and 32D/v-src-transformed cells (Figure 2C-D). Cell viability curves, obtained by trypan blue exclusion experiments, showed that all 32D beta 4-transfected cell lines survived as well as control cells (Figure 2, right panels). Similar results were also obtained when transformed v-src and v-abl control cells (neo) and beta 4-transduced cells were treated with IL-3 (data not shown). All analyses were performed with 2 clones for each beta 4 transfectant. The in vitro data were also confirmed by in vivo experiments (Table 1). The tumors were detectable at the site of injection 25 days after the injection of 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells, showing a delay of tumor appearance of 15 days compared with 32D/v-Abl cells. Furthermore, by evaluating tumor masses, we observed that 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells grow significantly less than parental 32D/v-Abl cells. The value of tumor masses indicates that 32D/v-Abl/beta 4-induced tumors grow 7-fold less than the 32D/v-Abl-induced ones. These data were interpreted hypothesizing that some 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells resistant to the selection but negative for beta 4 expression (Figure 1) grow in vivo, exhibiting a strong delay of tumor appearance.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Cell proliferation of 32D, 32D/v-src, 32D/v-Abl neo cells and/or transduced with wild-type and truncated beta 4 molecules. Cells (3 × 104) were plated in triplicate and counted at daily intervals. The number of viable cells was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Panels show cell proliferation and viability of:  32D/v-Abl/neo and  32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells (A);  32D/v-Abl/neo and  32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L (B);  32D/neo and  32D/beta 4 (C);  32D/v-src/neo and  32D/v-src/beta 4 (D).

The expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit induces growth arrest in 32D/v-abl-transformed cells

We analyzed the DNA content of control and beta 4-transfected cells. This analysis revealed that beta 4 expression in 32D/v-Abl cells causes an accumulation of the cells in G1 phase of the cell cycle (Figure 3D). This effect was not evident in 32D/v-Abl cells transfected with either the beta 4 L molecule (data not shown) or the expression vector alone (Figure 3C). Moreover, the expression of beta 4 protein does not cause growth arrest in 32D as well as in 32D/v-src cells compared with the neo transfected ones (Figure 3A-B,E-F). Subsequently, we assessed whether beta 4 expression promotes apoptosis of 32D/v-Abl cells. The results showed that the level of apoptosis in 32D/v-Abl/neo cells was very low (approximately 3%) and that the expression of beta 4 did not increase this apoptotic feature (data not shown). Experiments were performed either in suspension or when the cells were allowed to adhere to various substrates or antibodies ("Materials and methods"), thus indicating that the reduced proliferative capacity induced by beta 4 expression was not due to an apoptotic event, in good agreement with the cell viability profile reported in Figure 2.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of beta 4 integrin expression on the cell cycle of 32D, 32D/v-src, 32D/v-Abl neo cells and their counterparts transduced with wild-type beta 4 molecule. (A) 32D/neo cells; (B) 32D/beta 4 cells; (C) 32D/v-Abl/neo cells; (D) 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells; (E) 32D/v-src/neo cells; (F) 32D/src/beta 4 cells. The DNA contents were measured by fluorimetric analysis of fixed and PI-stained cells.

The expression of the wild-type beta 4 integrin subunit promotes the monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells

Since reduced proliferation capacity induced by beta 4 expression in 32D/v-Abl cells could not be attributed to a reduced cell viability, we verified whether these cells underwent differentiation. The morphologic analysis showed that 32D and 32D/v-src neo or beta 4-transduced cells did not differentiate (Figure 4A-D). In contrast, 32D/v-Abl cells expressing the beta 4 integrin subunit underwent monocytic differentiation independently whether the cells were grown in the absence or in the presence of IL-3 (Figure 4F,H). The latest result is in agreement with the fact that v-abl oncogene expression in 32D cells abrogates their requirement for IL-3 and their capacity to differentiate in the presence of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).23 Interestingly, since 32D/v-Abl cells transduced with the beta 4-truncated molecule (Figure 4G) did not differentiate, it is inferred that the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 4 subunit is directly involved in signaling events that generate monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-abl-transformed cells. To further confirm the monocytic differentiation observed in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells, we tested, by FACS analysis, the expression levels of CD11b and F4/80 antigens, whose expression levels increase during monocytic differentiation. A strong up-regulation of CD11b (Figure 5A, lower panel) and F4/80 (Figure 5B, lower panel) antigens were found in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells, confirming the differentiated status we observed in these cells by morphologic analysis. The results obtained from 2 different 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 clones used (A and B) were comparable. Conversely, the expression levels of CD11b and F4/80 antigens of the neo transfectans (Figure 5A-B, upper panels) were similar to their parental 32D/v-Abl counterparts (data not shown).


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative samples of morphologic analyses of 32D, 32D/v-src, 32D/v-Abl control neo, and derivatives of beta 4-transduced cells. (A) 32D/neo cells; (B) 32D/beta 4 cells; (C) 32D/v-src/neo cells; (D) 32D/src/beta 4 cells; (E) 32D/v-Abl/neo cells; (F) 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells; (G) 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L cells; (H) 32D/vAbl cells maintained in IL-3 and transduced with wild-type beta 4 molecule. The morphology of the cytospin-fixed cells was analyzed by May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain. Original magnification × 630.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Cytofluorimetric analysis of CD11b and F4/80 antigens in 32D/v-Abl/neo and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells. 32D/v-Abl/neo and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells (clone a) were stained with anti-CD11b and/or F4/80 monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Samples of 1 × 106 of control (neo) and beta 4-transduced cells were incubated with purified rat anti-mouse CD11b, and (B) with rat anti-mouse F4/80 primary antibodies. The cells were washed, incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody, and analyzed by a flow cytometer after addition of 5 µL PI. (A,B) Negative controls were stained with rat anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibody and processed as described in "Materials and methods."

The expression of beta 4 in 32D/v-Abl cells promotes monocytic differentiation by p73 protein accumulation

It has been previously reported that p53 family members induce cell cycle arrest, differentiation and apoptosis. Furthermore, the p73 protein, a new member of p53 family, is able to activate p53 target genes as well as to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.30,33-36 It has recently been reported that (1) p73 protein accumulates during epithelial differentiation,37 (2) p73 protein accumulates during myeloid leukemia and neuroblastoma cells upon treatment with differentiating agents,38,39 and (3) p73-null mice exhibit severe defects in development.40 In accordance with these results, we asked whether monocytic differentiation induced by beta 4 expression in 32D/v-Abl cells involves p73 and/or p53 proteins. To answer this issue, we tested by Western blot the expression level of p73 proteins in different transfectans. The H1299 cell line stable-expressing p73alpha protein was used as a positive control (Figure 6, lane 1).32 We found that the expression of beta 4 integrin in 32D/v-Abl cells promotes the accumulation of p73 protein (Figure 6A, lane 3). Conversely, p73 protein was not detectable in control cells (32D/v-Abl/neo) and in cells expressing the truncated beta 4 protein (32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L) (Figure 6A, lanes 2 and 4). The lower panel of Figure 6A shows that the amount of total protein loaded in each lane was identical. To assess whether the accumulation of p73 protein was paralleled by its induction at the transcriptional level, p73 mRNA was measured by semiquantitative RT-PCR. As an internal control, the housekeeping aldolase gene was used (Figure 6C, lower panel). The reported data showed that the expression of beta 4 does not modulate the level of p73 mRNA of 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells (Figure 6C, lanes 2, 5, and 8, upper panel) compared with 32D/v-Abl/neo (Figure 6C, lanes 1, 4, and 7) and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L cells (Figure 6C, lanes 3, 6, and 9). These results indicate that beta 4 expression induces p73 protein accumulation in 32D/v-Abl cells and, apparently, does not modulate its transcriptional activation. The level of p53 protein in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells was also evaluated. The reported data show, as expected, a high level of p53 protein in 32D/tsp53 control cells (Figure 6B, lane 1). By contrast, p53 protein was not detectable either in 32D/v-Abl/neo or in beta 4-transduced 32D/v-Abl cells (Figure 6B, lanes 2, 3, and 4), indicating that p53 might not be involved in the monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells. These data agree with the finding that the overexpression of p53 in 32D/v-Abl cells induces growth arrest but not differentiation.28


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Analyses of p73 protein and mRNA in 32D/v-Abl/neo cells and 32D/v-Abl cells expressing either wild-type or truncated beta 4 molecules. (A) Total cell lysates from 32D/v-Abl/neo (lane 2), 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 wild type (lane 3), and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L (lane 4) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-p73 antibody. H-p73alpha , stably transduced with p73alpha cDNA, was used as a positive control (lane 1). (B) Total cell lysates from 32D/v-Abl/neo (lane 2), 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 wild type (lane 3), and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L (lane 4) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-mouse p53 antibody. 32D transduced with the expression vector encoding for a p53 Val 135 was used as a positive control (lane 1). The nitrocellulose used to probe p73 and p53 proteins was stripped and probed again with the anti-tubulin antibody to normalize equal loading of proteins (lanes 2, 3, and 4). (C) Total mRNA was extracted from 32D/v-Abl/neo (lanes 1, 4, and 7), from 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 wild type (lanes 2, 5, and 8), and from 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L (lanes 3, 6, and 9). RT-PCR analysis was performed using primers specific for mouse p73 and the housekeeping aldolase gene to amplify 2 fragments of 298 bp and 413 bp, respectively. The conditions are described in "Materials and methods." Molecular sizes of the 2 fragments are indicated.

To further investigate the involvement of p73 in monocytic differentiation we transfected 32D/v-Abl cells with pcDNA3 expression vector carrying p73 cDNA. After selection, 3 different p73-positive populations (Figure 7, lanes 3, 4, and 5) were analyzed morphologically. The results showed that the 3 32D/v-Abl/p73 cell populations differentiated in monocytes at day 8 after selection. The percentage of differentiating cells was 55% (± 5% SD) compared with 32D/v-Abl/neo control cells (< 1%). After longer selection we found that almost 90% of the cells differentiated in monocytes as shown in Figure 7B (right panel). This result, indicating that p73 expression is sufficient to induce the monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells, strongly suggests that p73 accumulation mediates beta 4-induced monocytic differentiation.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Expression and morphologic analysis of 32D/v-Abl/neo and 32D/v-Abl/p73 cells. (A) 32D/v-Abl cells were transduced with an expression vector alone and/or encoding p73 cDNA. After selection, total cell lysates from 32D/v-Abl/neo (lane 2), 3 derived 32D/v-Abl/p73alpha populations (lanes 3, 4, and 5), and H-p73alpha stably transduced with p73alpha cDNA (lane 1) used as a positive control were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with anti-HA monoclonal antibody. (B) The morphology of the cytospin-fixed 32D/v-Abl/neo (left panel) and 32D/v-Abl/p73 (right panel) cells was analyzed by May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain as described in "Materials and methods." Original magnification × 630.

beta 4 expression affects Abl and MAPK phosphorylation

Based on the above reported findings that beta 4 integrin expression in 32D/v-Abl cells induces growth arrest and monocytic differentiation, we investigated whether beta 4 expression could affect v-Abl and MAPK phosphorylation. Both conditions are reported to be essential for transformation and cell proliferation.23,41 To this end, v-Abl protein was immunoprecipitated from 32D/v-Abl/neo cells, wild-type beta 4-transfected cells, and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L cells, and then, after SDS-PAGE, the phosphorylation level of the protein was evaluated by an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in Figure 8A, the expression of the wild-type beta 4 molecule caused a clear decrease of v-Abl phosphorylation (lanes 2 and 3) compared with 32D/v-Abl/neo (lane 1), or 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L (lane 4). The lower part of Figure 8A shows that the amount of v-Abl immunoprecipitated and loaded in each lane was identical. By using a specific antibody that recognizes the active isoforms of ERK1 and ERK2, we also found a complete inhibition of MAPK phosphorylation in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 clones (Figure 8B, lanes 4 and 5). No modulation of MAPK phosphorylation was evident in control 32D/v-Abl/neo cells (lane 3), in cells expressing the truncated form of beta 4 (32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L) (lane 6), and in the 32D untransformed counterparts (32D/neo, and 32D/beta 4) (lanes 1 and 2). The lower part of Figure 8B shows that the amount of total protein used in each lane was identical. We conclude that beta 4 expression in 32D/v-Abl cellular context inhibits both v-Abl and MAPK phosphorylation and modulates these events through its cytoplasmic domain. We interpreted these results, hypothesising that the inhibition of v-Abl function that we reported, upon expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit, could allow the endogenous tyrosine kinase c-Abl activation to induce growth arrest and differentiation. Indeed, it has been found that the induction of G1 arrest and apoptosis, by different stimuli, requires the kinase activity of c-Abl.36,42,43 Since we have previously demonstrated that the expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit in RKO colon carcinoma cells induces growth arrest and apoptosis and it is known that carcinoma cells express the tyrosine kinase c-Abl, we asked whether beta 4 expression in these epithelial cells could activate endogenous c-Abl.20 We analyzed the phosphorylation status of endogenous c-Abl in RKO colon carcinoma cells transfected with the vector alone (Figure 9A, lane 1) or carrying beta 4 cDNA (Figure 9A, lane 2).20 Cell lysates from RKO/neo and RKO/beta 4 were immunoprecipitated with c-Abl antibody and blotted with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in Figure 9B, the expression of the beta 4 molecule caused a clear increase of c-Abl phosphorylation (upper panel B, lane 2) compared with RKO/neo (upper panel B, lane 1) where the phosphorylation level of this kinase was undetectable. The lower part of Figure 9B shows that the amount of c-Abl immunoprecipitated and loaded in each lane was identical. Since it has been shown that in epithelial cells activated c-Abl induces growth arrest and apoptosis by its interaction with p73,42,43 we asked whether we were able to observe similar interaction in RKO cells upon beta 4 transduction. To this end, we immunoprecipitated p73 protein from RKO/neo and RKO/beta 4 cells (Figure 9C) and blotted with an anti-c-Abl antibody. We found an increase of association between p73 and c-Abl in RKO cells expressing the beta 4 integrin subunit (upper panel C, lane 2) compared with untrasfected beta 4 cells (upper panel C, lane 1). We also found that the interaction of c-Abl and p73 correlates with the accumulation of p73 protein (lower panel C, lane 2). These results are in good agreement with a previous finding showing that c-Abl/p73 interaction occurs when different stimuli activate c-Abl to induce G1 arrest and apoptosis.36,42,43


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Analyses of v-Abl and MAPK phosphorylation on 32D neo and beta 4 transfectans. (A) Total cell lysates from 32D/v-Abl/neo cells (lane 1), 2 derived 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 clones (lanes 2 and 3), and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L clone (lane 4), were immunoprecipitated with anti-Abl monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitated Abl proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (upper panel A). The nitrocellulose was stripped and probed again with the anti-Abl polyclonal antibody (lower panel A). (B) Total cell lysates from 32D/neo (lane 1), 32D/beta 4 (lane 2), 32D/v-Abl/neo (lane 3), 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 (lanes 4 and 5), and 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 L cells (lane 6) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with an antibody to the active doubly phosphorylated forms of the MAPK (ERK 1 and 2) (upper panel B). The nitrocellulose was stripped and probed again with an antibody specific to the native unmodified form of ERK/MAPK (lower panel B).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Analyses of c-Abl activation on RKO/neo and beta 4-transfected cells. (A) Total cell lysates (500 µg) from RKO/neo (lane 1) and RKO/beta 4 (lane 2) cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-beta 4 monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitated beta 4 proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with an antibody direct to the beta 4 integrin subunit. (B) Equal amounts of cell lysates from RKO/neo cells (lane 1) and RKO/beta 4 cells (lanes 2) were immunoprecipitated with anti-Abl monoclonal antibody. The immunoprecipitated Abl proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and probed with antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (upper panel B). The nitrocellulose was stripped and probed again with the anti-Abl polyclonal antibody (lower panel B). (C) Equal amounts of cell lysates from RKO/neo cells (lane 1) and RKO/beta 4 cells (lanes 2) were immunoprecipitated with anti-p73 polyclonal antibody and probed with anti-cAbl antibody (upper panel C). The nitrocellulose was stripped and probed again with the anti-p73 antibody (lower panel C).


    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

In addition to many studies indicating that integrins promote survival,44-47 we previously demonstrated that alpha 6beta 4 can also inhibit the proliferation of p53 wild-type carcinoma cell lines and induce their apoptosis by activating p5320 and increasing the expression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21.48,49 For the first time, we report that expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit promotes monocytic differentiation of 32D/v-Abl cells by a mechanism that involves beta 4-mediated growth arrest and p73 protein accumulation.

The p73 protein, which is a member of the p53 family, is a transcription factor whose functions recapitulate those of p53.35,50 Indeed, it has been shown that p73 induces cell cycle arrest at G1 phase and apoptosis when it is overexpressed either in p53+/+ and p53-/- cells.30,33-36,42,50 Recently, it was demonstrated that p73 protein plays an important role in differentiation.37-40,51 Although it has been described that p53 is a regulator of cell differentiation, at least in part by its transcriptional activity,52-54 we did not find any accumulation of p53 protein in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells. Additional support for the hypothesis that accumulation of p73 protein in 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells promotes monocytic differentiation is the finding that the overexpression of p73 protein in 32D/v-Abl cells actually induces monocytic differentiation. Moreover, our results are in agreement with previous data indicating that the induction of p73 protein occurs during differentiation of the myeloid leukemia cell line.38 Further support for the role of p73 in differentiation has also been provided by the phenotype of p73-deficient mice that exhibit neurologic and inflammatory defects.40 These studies suggest a direct involvement of p73 in the proper development of white lineage. The murine myeloid progenitor cell line 32D does not express the beta 4 integrin subunit that is instead expressed by adult, neonatal, and fetal mouse thymocytes.55 We used 32D cells and v-src- or v-abl-transformed 32D cells as a model to study a possible cooperation between beta 4 integrin and the above-mentioned oncogenes as we previously demonstrated with ErbB-2.17,22 Surprisingly, we found that beta 4 expression inhibits the transformed phenotype of 32D/v-Abl cells inducing growth arrest, differentiation, and p73 protein accumulation. To gain more insight into the mechanism by which beta 4 expression interferes with the oncogenic potential of v-abl, we observed strong reduction of v-Abl phosphorylation. Furthermore, the fact that the expression of a truncated beta 4 molecule in 32D/v-abl cells does not affect the level of either v-Abl or MAPK phosphorylation strongly indicates the involvement of the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain in these events. Recently, an immune T-cell inhibitory motif (ITIM) in the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain has been identified, which is a potential binding site for SHP-1/2 (src-homology 2 domains protein tyrosine phosphatases) protein tyrosine phosphatases.56 Accordingly, it might be that the binding of SHP-1/2 phosphatases to the beta 4 cytoplasmic domain could induce directly or indirectly a down-regulation of v-Abl phosphorylation. As a consequence, the strong reduction of v-Abl phosphorylation in 32D/v-Abl cells by beta 4 might cause the inhibition of cell cycle progression. Based on the fact that during cell proliferation MAPK proteins are highly active,41 the strong inhibition of MAPK phopshorylation we found on 32D/v-Abl/beta 4 cells is in agreement with v-Abl phosphorylation status and the growth arrest of these cells. The observation that beta 4 integrin expression does not inhibit cell proliferation either of 32D/v-src-transformed cells or parental cells indicates a specific interference of alpha 6beta 4 receptor signaling on v-abl oncogenic pathways. These results suggested the possibility that the inhibition of v-abl oncogenic capacity upon expression of the beta 4 integrin subunit could allow the endogenous c-Abl activation and its cooperation with p73 to induce growth arrest and differentiation. This hypothesis was confirmed by the fact that the expression of the