| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 1, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0457.
RED CELLS
From the Department of Medicine, Overton Brooks VA
Medical Center and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State
University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport.
The inverse relationship between expression and methylation of
The developmental regulation of globin gene
expression is an intensely studied problem because of its central
importance in the understanding of many common inherited diseases
caused by defects in globin gene expression such as thalassemia. The
chicken globin families are a well-characterized set of developmentally regulated genes. The avian Direct binding of specific transcriptional repressors to methylated DNA
appears to be a major mechanism of transcriptional repression.10,11 Of the 5 proteins that have the
methyl-CpG-binding domain, 4 (MBD1,
MBD2, MBD3, and MeCP2) are implicated in transcriptional repression.10 MBD2 is a component of the
methyl cytosine-binding protein 1 (MeCP1) complex, together with histone deacetylases HDAC1 and
HDAC2.12 MBD3 is a component of the Mi2/NuRD deacetylase complex.13,14 MBD1 binds selectively to methylated DNA and represses transcription from a naked methylated promoter in
vitro.10 MBD4 is a thymidine glycosylase repair enzyme and
is not associated with transcriptional inactivation.15 We
have shown that chicken MeCPC, which contains MBD2 and HDAC1, binds to
the methylated but not the unmethylated In this study, we show that methylation represses the expression of the
Blood collection
RNA/DNA purification
RT-PCR Primers for![]() -globin were designed
so as to flank the intron-exon boundaries (accession no. V00408).
PiRTF1 (5'-TCACTGGAGAGGCTTTTTGCC-3') corresponded to positions 466 to
477 and 1055 to 1063. PiRTR1 (5'GTGGGAAAGCAGCTTGAAGTT-3') corresponded
to positions 1565 to 1554 and 1259 to 1251. Reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was
performed using the Reverse Transcription Systems from Promega
(Madison, WI) following the manufacturer's protocol except that 5 µg
RNA was used to make cDNA. ![]() -Globin cDNA was made
using the specific primer PiRTR1; for -actin, cDNA was made with the
random primers included in the kit. The ![]() -globin cDNA
was then amplified using PiRTF1 and PiRTR1; -actin was
amplified using the primers BactinRT1
(5'-CGCTCGTTGTTGACAATGGCTC-3') and BactinRT2
(5'CCAGTTGGTGACAATACCGTGTTC-3').
Bisulfite conversion and methylation analysis RBCs were collected from 4-, 5-, 6-, 8-, 11-, and 14-day embryos and bisulfite treated as previously described.6,18 Primers for the amplification of the![]() -globin
promoter region were designed with the help of a Microsoft Word macro
program.19 Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified using the
primers PiBisulfF (5'-TTTAGTTTGTTTAAAATTTATTGAAAGG-3', corresponding to
positions 322 to 304 relative to the transcription start site) and
PiBisulfR (5'-AATAAACACCCAAAACAAATTATAC-3', corresponding to positions
+22 to 3 relative to the transcription start site). Sequencing of the
PCR-amplified product was performed using the forward and reverse
primers. The -33P-labeled dideoxynucleotide
triphosphate (ddNTP) terminator kit (USB, Cleveland, OH) was
used for sequencing. The sequencing gel was dried and exposed to a
phosphorimager screen (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT).
Plasmids A PCR product corresponding to a 327-bp fragment of the![]() -globin promoter was amplified with the
primers PiClonF1 (5'GTGAGCTCAAAATCCATTGAAAGGC-3'), which contains a
SacI restriction site, and PiClonR1
(5'-GAGAAGCTTGTACTGAGTGCCCTC-3'), which contains a HindIII
site. The amplified fragment was digested with restriction enzymes to
create sticky ends and cloned into pGL3-Basic and pGL3-Enhancer vectors
(Promega) to yield ![]() pGL3 and ![]() pGL3E,
respectively. Methylation was accomplished with SssI
methylase from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA); the unmethylated
control plasmid was treated similarly but without the addition of
S-adenosylmethionine. Completion of the reaction was determined by
digestion with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. For the
probes used in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) the entire
plasmid was methylated, and then the fragment was excised and labeled.
For transient transfections, in certain experiments, the fragment was
excised, methylated, and religated into the reporter plasmid.
Transient transfections RBCs were resuspended to a final volume of 100 µL per transfection and then spun down. The pellets were resuspended in 1 mL filter-sterilized NH4Cl (pH 7.2-7.3), freshly made, and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours with periodic mixing, spun down, and resuspended in 0.5 mL transfection medium (66.6% [vol/vol] L-15 [Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO]; 50 mM Tris (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane)-HCl, pH 7.45; 300 µg/mL diethylaminoethyl [DEAE]-Dextran) containing the 2 µg of the DNA construct to be transfected and 200 ng of the plasmid pRL-TK as a control for transfection efficiency. All transfections were done in triplicate. The transfections were incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes, then at 37°C for 10 minutes, and then spun down. Pellets were washed with 800 µL chicken culture medium (74% L-15, 22% chicken serum [Gibco, Grand Island, NY], 3.5% fetal bovine serum [FBS] [Gibco], 0.5% penicillin-streptomycin solution [Sigma]) and then resuspended in 500 µL culture medium and added to culture flasks containing 5 mL medium. Cells were grown for 48 hours and then harvested.Luciferase assays Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay system from Promega following the manufacturer's protocol for single sample luminometers. The cell suspensions were spun down, and the RBC pellets were washed twice with PBS and then resuspended in 500 µL 1 × passive lysis buffer (Promega). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation for 2 minutes at 4°C and then transferred to fresh 1.5 mL tubes and stored at 80°C. Luciferase
and Renilla activity were measured on a TD-20/20 Luminometer from Turner Designs (Sunnyvale, CA). Results were reported
in terms of the ratio of luciferase to Renilla activity and
expressed as the percentage of the value of unmethylated
![]() -globin promoter-driven activity.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays RBC nuclear extracts from 14-day embryos were prepared according to a modified Dignam procedure as described previously.6,7 The probes used were in vitro-methylated and mock-methylated![]() -globin promoter excised from
![]() pGL3 and labeled with
[ -32P]deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) (New
England Nuclear, Boston, MA) using the Klenow fragment of DNA
polymerase I. Assay conditions were as previously
described.6,7 Two micrograms of sonicated Micrococcus lysodeikticus DNA was used as a nonspecific
competitor in all assays. Assays were performed on 2% agarose gels,
run approximately 3 hours at 150 V in 0.5 × TBE
(Tris-borate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]), and
then dried and analyzed using a Cyclone phosphorimager (Packard Instrument).
For antibody/supershift ablation experiments, EMSA was performed with or without the addition of one of the following antisera (1.5 µL) or antibodies (800 ng): anti-MBD2 antisera, anti-MBD2 IgG (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-MBD1, anti-MBD3, and anti-MBD4 IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were carried out with a kit from Upstate Biotechnology using the manufacturer's protocol and reagents except that the reactions were scaled down 10-fold. Briefly, 2 × 107 cells were incubated in 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes to cross-link bound proteins, washed, lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis buffer, and sonicated to 100- to 500-bp lengths; 10 µL chromatin was mixed with 90 µL dilution buffer and precleared with protein A-agarose, and then the chromatin was incubated with antibody overnight at 4°C. Thirty µL protein A-agarose beads was added, and the chromatin was immunoprecipitated 2 hours at 4°C. The supernatant (unbound chromatin) and beads (bound chromatin) were separated. The beads were washed 5 times with the buffers provided, and then the chromatin was eluted twice in 1% SDS in 0.1 M NaHCO3. Both bound and unbound chromatin fractions were de-cross-linked by the addition of 5 M NaCl and incubation at 65°C for at least 4 hours. Proteins were digested by proteinase K, and then chromatin was extracted with phenol/chloroform. DNA was ethanol precipitated and dissolved in 100 µL water. The experiment was repeated on 3 separate occasions.Quantitative real-time PCR Primers for the analysis of the![]() -globin
promoter were designed with the Primer Express software package that
accompanies the Applied Biosystems model 7700 sequence detector
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and are as follows (positions
indicated are relative to the transcription start site): PiChipF
(5'-CCAATACGTGTTCAGAAGCAAGAA-3'), corresponding to positions
210 to 187; PiChipR (5'-AGCTTGGGTCAGTGCCATT-3'), corresponding to positions +72 to +54.
The real-time PCR was performed in triplicate using 10 µL bound DNA and 5 µL unbound DNA template obtained after chromatin immunoprecipitation, the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and 400 nM of each primer. The cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute each. A dissociation curve was created using software from Applied Biosystems to confirm the presence of a single PCR product. Relative quantitation of template DNA was performed as described in the User Bulletin no. 2, ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems).
Expression of the chicken -type embryonic
![]() -globin during development in primary
erythroid cells using RT-PCR. ![]() -Globin mRNA
is easily detected in 4- to 5-day primitive embryonic erythroid cells
but is barely detectable by day 11 of embryonic development (Figure
1). These results are consistent with the earlier studies that examined the expression of avian -type globin genes during development in erythroid cells.20
Methylation analysis of the chicken -type embryonic
globin gene ( -globin) promoter is completely unmethylated
in primitive erythroid cells and completely methylated in erythroid
cells from adult chickens.6 To elucidate the methylation
pattern of the chicken -type embryonic globin gene
(![]() -globin) during development, we employed
the bisulfite genomic sequencing method.11,21 This
technique is based on bisulfite-induced oxidative deamination of
genomic DNA under conditions in which cytosine is converted to uracil
and 5-methylcytosine remains unchanged. The target sequence is
amplified by PCR using strand-specific primers. Upon sequencing of the
amplified DNA, all uracil and thymine residues become detectable as
thymine and only 5-methylcytosine residues amplify as cytosines. Our
laboratory has developed a Microsoft Word macro to facilitate primer
design for bisulfite genomic sequencing.19 We determined
the methylation pattern of ![]() -globin gene
promoter during development in primary erythroid cells. The CpG
dinucleotides in the ![]() -globin gene promoter
are completely unmethylated in day 5 erythroid cells (Figure
2). Methylation progresses during
development and is complete in DNA from adult erythroid cells. The
genomic DNA from the brain tissue of 5-day-old chicken embryos and
oviduct from adult chicken also demonstrated complete methylation (data not shown).
Methylation of a luciferase reporter construct driven by
![]() -globin represses transcription in primary
erythroid cells, a 315-bp ![]() -globin promoter
region was cloned in an expression construct (![]() pGL3E)
containing a luciferase reporter gene and SV40 enhancer. The
![]() pGL3E construct was transfected into primary
erythroid cells derived from 5-day-old chicken embryos. Methylation of
![]() pGL3E resulted in a 20-fold inhibition of expression
(Figure 3A). Because methylation of the
transcribed region and/or enhancer can inhibit transcription, it is
possible that the inhibition of repression could be due entirely to the
methylation of the luciferase gene and SV40 enhancer. To test whether
methylation of the ![]() -globin promoter alone
can inhibit transcription, ![]() -globin
promoter was excised, either methylated or mock-methylated with
SssI methylase, religated back into the reporter plasmid, and transfected into primary erythroid cells. As shown in Figure 3B,
methylation of the ![]() -globin promoter
sequences resulted in a 7-fold inhibition of expression.
Methylated -gene promoter sequences can bind to an MeCP1-like complex, MeCPC.6 We have also shown that a methylated 248-bp
proximal transcribed region of the -globin gene forms a
cell type-specific MeCPC that contained MBD2 and HDAC1 proteins but
differs from MeCP1.7 We examined whether the
transcriptional repression conferred by methylated
![]() -globin promoter sequences correlates with
their affinity for MeCPC, which would imply a role for MeCPC in
mediating transcriptional repression. End-labeled methylated and
mock-methylated ![]() -globin probes were
incubated with 14-day erythroid cell nuclear extract and then subjected
to EMSA to detect an MeCP1-like complex as described.6,7
On autoradiography, a complex was observed with methylated
![]() -globin probe, as shown in Figure
4A, and this complex was effectively competed by a 25-fold molar excess of cold methylated
![]() -globin but not by a 200-fold excess of
cold unmethylated ![]() -globin fragment (Figure
4B). However, unlike the complex observed with -globin
gene proximal transcribed sequence, this complex could not be depleted
with MBD2 antibodies or MBD2 antiserum (data not shown). We also
performed EMSA using antibodies against other known methylcytosine
binding proteins (MBD1, MBD3, MBD4, and MeCP2). No depletion or
supershift of the complex was observed. This could be due to either
failure of the antibodies (raised against human proteins) to recognize
chicken homologs or due to the presence of yet unknown proteins present
in the complex. Further efforts to determine the composition of this
complex are underway. Interestingly, this complex was also seen with
5-day chicken red cell nuclear extract (data not shown), suggesting
that the proteins that bind to methylated
![]() -globin promoter are present throughout
development.
Histone H3 and H4 acetylation pattern of the
![]() -globin
promoter in day 5 and 14 erythroid cells using a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Formaldehyde cross-linked chromatin was
immunoprecipitated with antibodies against acetylated histones H3 and
H4. The antibody-bound DNA was analyzed for the
![]() -globin gene using a quantitative
real-time PCR approach.25 There are many advantages to
quantifying gene sequences using this technology, the foremost being
sensitivity and precision. ChIP assays have previously been based on
qualitative or semiquantitative analysis usually involving the
examination of PCR products at a fixed cycle number, followed by
densitometry of the radioactive band or ethidium bromide-stained
DNA.26-28
Slight hyperacetylation of histone H3 but a marked
hyperacetylation of histone H4 was seen in 5-day when compared with
14-day erythroid cells (Figure 5B). These
results are consistent with the recruitment of histone
deacetylase-containing complexes by methylated DNA, resulting in a
localized deacetylation.
The distribution of methylated and unmethylated CpG
dinucleotides in vertebrates conforms to a generalized pattern. About 70% to 80% of CpG sites contain methylated cytosines.29
Promoter region CpG islands are usually unmethylated in all normal
tissues regardless of the transcriptional activity of the
gene.11,30 The inverse relationship between expression and
methylation of Direct binding of specific transcriptional repressor complexes to
methylated DNA appears to be a major mechanism of transcriptional repression.10 MeCP1 binds to DNA containing multiple
symmetrically methylated CpGs and migrates as a large complex on
EMSA.32 MeCP1 has been shown to repress transcription from
densely methylated genes, and cells deficient in MeCP1 show much
reduced repression of methylated genes.33 We have recently
shown that a novel tissue- and/or sequence-specific methyl CpG binding
protein complex MeCPC exists in chicken erythrocytes.7
This complex contains MBD2 and binds to sequences in the methylated but
not the unmethylated Recent evidence suggests that acetylation of the amino-terminal
tails of H3 and H4 may be a principal regulator of transcription factor
access to nucleosomal DNA.35 The underlying patterns of
methylated cytosines are important in guiding histone deacetylases to
specific DNA sequences.23,24 This suggests that
methylation represses transcription by recruiting HDAC activity,
resulting in hypoacetylation of histones in methylated DNA. Consistent
with this hypothesis, we found the
Submitted February 12, 2002; accepted July 15, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 1, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0457.
Supported by a grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs and by funding from the Feist-Weiller Cancer Center (R.S.). R.S. is a recipient of the "Advanced Research Career Development Award" from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Rakesh Singal, Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Overton Brooks VA Medical Center & LSU Health Sciences Center, 510 East Stoner Ave, 111-H, Shreveport, LA 71101-4295; e-mail: rakeshsingal{at}hotmail.com.
1.
Dodgson JB, Engel JD.
The nucleotide sequence of the adult chicken
2.
Brown JL, Ingram VM.
Structural studies on chick embryonic hemoglobins.
J Biol Chem.
1974;249:3960-3972 3. Orkin SH. Regulation of globin gene expression in erythroid cells. Eur J Biochem. 1995;231:271-281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
McGhee JD, Ginder GD.
Specific DNA methylation sites in the vicinity of the chicken
5.
Shen CK, Maniatis T.
Tissue-specific DNA methylation in a cluster of rabbit
6.
Singal R, Ferris R, Little JA, Wang SZ, Ginder GD.
Methylation of the minimal promoter of an embryonic globin gene silences transcription in primary erythroid cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:13724-13729
7.
Singal R, Wang SZ, Sargent T, Zhu SZ, Ginder GD.
Methylation of promoter proximal-transcribed sequences of an embryonic globin gene inhibits transcription in primary erythroid cells and promotes formation of a cell type-specific methyl cytosine binding complex.
J Biol Chem.
2002;277:1897-1905
8.
Haigh LS, Owens BB, Hellewell OS, Ingram VM.
DNA methylation in chicken
9.
Razin SV, Ioudinkova ES, Scherrer K.
Extensive methylation of a part of the CpG island located 3.0-4.5 kbp upstream to the chicken
10.
Bird AP, Wolffe AP.
Methylation-induced repression
11.
Singal R, Ginder GD.
DNA methylation.
Blood.
1999;93:4059-4070 12. Ng HH, Zhang Y, Hendrich B, et al. MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor belonging to the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex [see comments]. Nat Genet. 1999;23:58-61[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
13.
Zhang Y, Ng HH, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Bird A, Reinberg D.
Analysis of the NuRD subunits reveals a histone deacetylase core complex and a connection with DNA methylation.
Genes Dev.
1999;13:1924-1935 14. Wade PA, Gegonne A, Jones PL, Ballestar E, Aubry F, Wolffe AP. Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation [see comments]. Nat Genet. 1999;23:62-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
15.
Hendrich B, Bird A.
Identification and characterization of a family of mammalian methyl-CpG binding proteins.
Mol Cell Biol.
1998;18:6538-6547
16.
Hebbes TR, Thorne AW, Clayton AL, Crane-Robinson C.
Histone acetylation and globin gene switching.
Nucleic Acids Res.
1992;20:1017-1022
17.
Anguita E, Johnson CA, Wood WG, Turner BM, Higgs DR.
Identification of a conserved erythroid specific domain of histone acetylation across the
18.
Singal R, vanWert JM.
De novo methylation of an embryonic globin gene during normal development is strand specific and spreads from the proximal transcribed region.
Blood.
2001;98:3441-3446 19. Singal R, Grimes SR. Microsoft Word macro for analysis of cytosine methylation by the bisulfite deamination reaction. Biotechniques. 2001;30:116-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Weintraub H, Larsen A, Groudine M.
21.
Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, et al.
A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1992;89:1827-1831 22. Grunstein M. Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature. 1997;389:349-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 23. Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wade PA, et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet. 1998;19:187-191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. Nan XS, Ng HH, Johnson CA, et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature. 1998;393:386-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Christenson LK, Stouffer RL, Strauss JF III.
Quantitative analysis of the hormone-induced hyperacetylation of histone H3 associated with the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein gene promoter.
J Biol Chem.
2001;276:27392-27399
26.
Schubeler D, Lorincz MC, Cimbora DM, et al.
Genomic targeting of methylated DNA: influence of methylation on transcription, replication, chromatin structure, and histone acetylation.
Mol Cell Biol.
2000;20:9103-9112
27.
Gui CY, Dean A.
Acetylation of a specific promoter nucleosome accompanies activation of the
28.
Forsberg EC, Downs KM, Christensen HM, Im H, Nuzzi PA, Bresnick EH.
Developmentally dynamic histone acetylation pattern of a tissue-specific chromatin domain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2000;97:14494-14499 29. Bird AP. Gene number, noise reduction and biological complexity [see comments]. Trends Genet. 1995;11:94-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 30. Cross SH, Bird AP. CpG islands and genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995;5:309-314[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
Hohn T, Corsten S, Rieke S, Muller M, Rothnie H.
Methylation of coding region alone inhibits gene expression in plant protoplasts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1996;93:8334-8339 32. Meehan RR, Lewis JD, McKay S, Kleiner EL, Bird AP. Identification of a mammalian protein that binds specifically to DNA containing methylated CpGs. Cell. 1989;58:499-507[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 33. Boyes J, Bird A. DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein. Cell. 1991;64:1123-1134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
34.
Magdinier F, Wolffe AP.
Selective association of the methyl-CpG binding protein MBD2 with the silent p14/p16 locus in human neoplasia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2001;98:4990-4995
35.
Vitolo JM, Thiriet C, Hayes JJ.
The H3-H4 N-terminal tail domains are the primary mediators of transcription factor IIIA access to 5S DNA within a nucleosome.
Mol Cell Biol.
2000;20:2167-2175
36.
Deckert J, Struhl K.
Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by specific activators and repressors.
Mol Cell Biol.
2001;21:2726-2735
37.
Gregory RI, Randall TE, Johnson CA, et al.
DNA methylation is linked to deacetylation of histone H3, but not H4, on the imprinted genes Snrpn and U2af1-rs1.
Mol Cell Biol.
2001;21:5426-5436
38.
Wan M, Zhao K, Lee SS, Francke U.
MECP2 truncating mutations cause histone H4 hyperacetylation in Rett syndrome.
Hum Mol Genet.
2001;10:1085-1092
39.
Singal R, van Wert J, Bashambu M.
Cytosine methylation represses glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene expression in human prostate cancer cells.
Cancer Res.
2001;61:4820-4826 40. Cameron EE, Bachman KE, Myohanen S, Herman JG, Baylin SB. Synergy of demethylation and histone deacetylase inhibition in the re-expression of genes silenced in cancer. Nat Genet. 1999;21:103-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
A. A. Gavrilov and S. V. Razin Spatial configuration of the chicken {alpha}-globin gene domain: immature and active chromatin hubs Nucleic Acids Res., July 11, 2008; (2008) gkn429v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, H. Liu, C. M. Lin, M. I. Aladjem, and E. M. Epner Targeted Deletion of the Chicken {beta}-Globin Regulatory Elements Reveals a Cooperative Gene Silencing Activity J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 23340 - 23348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||