SEARCH:   Advanced

Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 17, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0011. This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2002-01-0011v1 100/2/415    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Flowers, M. E. D. Articles by Martin, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Flowers, M. E. D. Articles by Martin, P. J. Related Collections Transplantation Clinical Trials and Observations Social Bookmarking                   What's this?  Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article  Blood, 15 July 2002, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 415-419 CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS Comparison of chronic graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow in allogeneic recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized trial Mary E. D. Flowers, Pablo M. Parker, Laura J. Johnston, Alice V. B. Matos, Barry Storer, William I. Bensinger, Rainer Storb, Frederick R. Appelbaum, Stephen J. Forman, Karl G. Blume, and Paul J. Martin From the Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle; City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Stanford University Hospital, CA.     Abstract Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References In a previous multicenter phase III trial comparing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from HLA-matched related donors, we found no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of clinical extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the 2 groups. We have analyzed the results in more detail to determine whether the clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD after PBSCT might be distinct from those that occur after BMT. Clinical extensive chronic GVHD developed in 39 of 63 recipients of PBSCs and in 32 of 63 BM recipients who were alive and free of malignancy at day 100 after the transplantation. No significant differences were found in the time and type of onset of clinical extensive chronic GVHD or in the frequency of complications associated with severe morbidity. Involvement of skin and female genital tract was more frequent in PBSC recipients than in BM recipients. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 3 years was similar in the 2 groups, but the number of successive treatments needed to control chronic GVHD was higher after PBSCT than after BMT (P = .03), and the duration of glucocorticoid treatment was longer after PBSCT compared to BMT (P = .03). These results suggest that chronic GVHD after PBSCT may be more protracted and less responsive to current treatment than chronic GVHD after BMT. Assessment of the overall benefits of PBSCT compared to BMT will require continued long-term follow up of morbidity associated with chronic GVHD. (Blood. 2002;100:415-419) © 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.     Introduction Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has emerged as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for treatment of malignant diseases. Nearly all studies have indicated faster engraftment and earlier hematopoietic recovery with PBSCT than with BMT.1-5 In some studies, the incidence of clinical extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic recipients was higher with PBSCT than with BMT,6-9 but others have not confirmed these findings.1,2 Although the incidence of clinical extensive chronic GVHD has been evaluated in many studies comparing PBSCT to BMT, information describing the clinical features and clinical course of chronic GVHD after PBSCT has not been reported. We have now carried out a detailed retrospective review of results from a randomized prospective study1 comparing PBSCT and BMT to determine whether the clinical characteristics of chronic GVHD after PBSCT might be distinct from those that occur after BMT.     Patients and methods Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References Selection of patients We previously reported outcomes among 172 patients randomized to receive either bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantations from an HLA-identical sibling for treatment of hematologic malignancy. All patients received their transplants at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, at the City of Hope Medical Center, or at Stanford University Hospital between March 1996 and July 1999.1 Seventy-one of the 126 patients who were alive and free of malignancy at 100 days after the transplantation were included in the current study because they have developed extensive chronic GVHD after BMT (n = 32) or after PBSCT (n = 39). Information was retrieved by reviewing long-term follow-up medical records. Patients and donors signed forms approved by the Institutional Review Board documenting informed consent to participate in the clinical trials. Analysis was carried out as of October 31, 2001. Conditioning regimens and acute GVHD prophylaxis The pretransplantation conditioning regimen varied according to the underlying disease.1 Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase received busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Patients with acute leukemia or lymphoma received regimens of cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation. Patients with multiple myeloma or myelodysplastic syndrome received regimens of busulfan and total body irradiation. All patients received methotrexate plus cyclosporine for prevention of acute GVHD.10 Procurement of hematopoietic stem cells Marrow was collected from the donor according to standard procedures. PBSC donors were treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a dose of 16 µg/kg per day by subcutaneous injection from day 5 to day 1. Mononuclear cells were collected by apheresis with a COBE Spectra machine (Gambro BCT, Lakewood, CO) on the day before the transplantation and on the day of the transplantation according to standard procedures. Diagnosis of extensive chronic GVHD Patients were evaluated for chronic GVHD between 80 and 100 days after the transplantation,11,12 at 1 year after the transplantation, whenever clinically indicated to establish the diagnosis of chronic GVHD, and at 9 to 12 months after initiation of treatment to assess response. The diagnosis and grading of chronic GVHD were established according to clinical and pathologic criteria.13,14 Treatment of chronic GVHD Patients in both transplant groups received systemic immunosuppressive treatment according to available protocols or standard treatment guidelines for extensive chronic GVHD. Medications administered for control of chronic GVHD were continued for at least 9 months unless changes in therapy were clinically indicated. Protocol guidelines for starting secondary treatment of chronic GVHD included (1) progression of disease manifestations after at least 2 weeks of therapy, (2) no improvement after at least 1 month of therapy, (3) improvement with persistent disease after 9 to 12 months of therapy, or (4) recurrence of disease manifestations after discontinuation of immunosuppressive treatment. Statistics One patient with extensive chronic GVHD had been originally assigned to receive PBSCs but received BM because consent was withdrawn after the result of randomization was disclosed. Results for this patient were analyzed according to the treatment actually given. Treatments for chronic GVHD were counted from the start of initial therapy until the date of last contact. Changes in treatment were counted at the time of initiation of a new therapy, when the dose of steroids was increased to 1 mg/kg or more every other day, or when systemic immunosuppressive treatment was reinstituted for exacerbation of chronic GVHD after discontinuation of therapy. Topical steroid therapy was counted as a separate treatment only when used to control chronic GVHD involving at least 2 sites (mouth and vagina) or when administered to control progression of pre-existing manifestations or development of new manifestations during systemic immunosuppressive treatment. The 2 or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the significance of differences in proportions, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare continuously valued outcomes and to evaluate the significance of differences in distributions among ordered categories.15 The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall and disease-free survival. Cumulative incidences and standard errors were estimated according to Andersen et al.16 Comparisons between survival curves and cumulative incidence curves are based on likelihood ratio statistics from proportional hazards regression models.     Results Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References Incidence of chronic GVHD and follow-up Clinical extensive chronic GVHD developed in 39 of 63 PBSC recipients and in 32 of 63 BM recipients who were alive and free of malignancy at day 100 after the transplantation procedure. The cumulative incidence of clinical extensive chronic GVHD was 63% (95% CI, 51%-76%) at 3 years after PBSCT and 52% (95% CI, 39%-65%) after BMT (P = .33). The median follow up is 41 months (range, 26-63 months) for BM recipients and 40 months (range, 25-62 months) for PBSC recipients. Characteristics of patients who developed extensive chronic GVHD after PBSCT (n = 39) and after BMT (n = 32) were similar (Table 1).                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Characteristics of patients, according to transplant arm Characteristics of clinical extensive chronic GVHD at time of diagnosis Characteristics of chronic GVHD after PBSCT were similar to those observed after BMT. Similarities included the proportion of patients with a prior history of acute GVHD, the time and the type of onset of the disease, the prevalence of thrombocytopenia (< 100 × 109/L), the extent of skin involvement, and the types of immunosuppressive treatment being given when chronic GVHD was diagnosed (Table 2). The proportion of patients with high-risk features of chronic GVHD was 59% for the BMT group and 38% for the PBSCT group (P = .08).                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. Characteristics of extensive chronic GVHD at the time of diagnosis, according to transplant arm Clinical features of chronic GVHD The prevalence of organ involvement at the initial diagnosis of clinical extensive chronic GVHD was similar in the 2 groups (data not shown). Skin, mouth, liver, and eyes were the sites most frequently affected by chronic GVHD during the course of the disease (Figure 1). Skin involvement was more frequent in PBSC recipients than in BM recipients (P = .02). Involvement of the vagina and vulva was observed in 7 of 15 female PBSC recipients compared to 1 of 10 female BM recipients (P = .05). The prevalence of organ involvement was otherwise similar in the 2 groups (Figure 1). The incidence rates of bronchiolitis obliterans, scleroderma, joint contractures, myofascitis, esophageal strictures, and keratitis were similar in the 2 groups (Table 3). View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Sites affected by chronic GVHD. Similar sites are affected by chronic GVHD after PBSCT compared to BMT; however, skin and vaginal involvement is more prevalent after PBSCT. Columns show the proportions of patients with organs affected by chronic GVHD at any time.                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. Complications of chronic GVHD associated with severe morbidity, according to transplant arm Treatment of chronic GVHD The most common initial treatment for chronic GVHD in both arms was prednisone plus cyclosporine or tacrolimus (Table 4). One patient in the BMT group received interferon as part of a clinical trial to prevent recurrent CML. This patient did not receive any treatment for control of chronic GVHD, and manifestations of chronic GVHD resolved after discontinuation of treatment with interferon. One PBSC recipient was treated with topical glucocorticoids for control of chronic GVHD limited to the mouth and vagina. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) alone was given as initial therapy for chronic GVHD of the skin and oral cavity in one PBSC recipient who declined glucocorticoid therapy and in whom cyclosporine blood levels could not be measured under the care of the referring physician. Seven patients were treated with cyclosporine alone (6 PBSC recipients and 1 BM recipient) after they declined combination treatment with prednisone. None of these patients had high-risk features at the onset of extensive chronic GVHD (ie, platelet count < 100 × 109/L, progressive onset, or rash involving > 50% of body surface area [BSA]). Neither of the 2 BM recipients treated initially with prednisone alone had high-risk features of chronic GVHD (Table 2). Two PBSC recipients were treated initially with MMF and prednisone because of cyclosporine toxicity.                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Initial treatment for extensive chronic GVHD at diagnosis, according to transplant arm Although the power to detect differences is limited by the small number of patients, the number of agents used for initial treatment was similar between the 2 transplant arms (P = .28, rank sum test). The proportions of patients treated initially with a single drug as opposed to 2 or more drugs were also similar between PBSCT and BMT (P = .37). The numbers of successive treatments needed to control chronic GVHD were higher in PBSC recipients than in BM recipients (P = .03; Table 5). In keeping with this finding, the duration of glucocorticoid treatment was longer in PBSC recipients than in BM recipients (P = .03; Figure 2). The duration of immunosuppressive treatment was similar in the 2 transplant arms (P = .08; Figure 3). Because higher numbers of treatments might simply reflect longer survival in PBSC recipients compared to the BM recipients, we analyzed the proportions of patients who received less than or equal to 1 versus more than 1 cycle of treatment for control of chronic GVHD. The proportion of patients receiving more than one treatment was higher in the PBSCT group than in the BMT group (P = .04). The average duration of treatment cycles was similar in the 2 groups. All patients in both groups receiving more than one cycle had progression of chronic GVHD in a previously involved site, development of chronic GVHD in a new site, or unimproved chronic GVHD as a reason for starting secondary treatment (Table 6). These findings suggest that chronic GVHD is less responsive to treatment when it occurs after PBSCT as compared to BMT.                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 5. Number of successive treatments for chronic GVHD, according to transplant arm View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Duration of glucocorticoid treatment. The duration of glucocorticoid treatment for chronic GVHD was longer with PBSCT than with BMT. Curves indicate the probability of discontinuing glucocorticoid treatment after the diagnosis of clinical extensive chronic GVHD (P =  .03). Follow-up was censored at the time of recurrent malignancy. View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Survival and overall duration of immunosuppressive treatment. Survival and overall duration of immunosuppressive treatment were similar for patients with chronic GVHD after PBSCT and after BMT. Upper curves indicate the probability of relapse-free survival after the diagnosis of chronic GVHD (P = .08). Lower curves indicate the probability of discontinuing all immunosuppressive (D/C IS) treatment after the diagnosis of chronic GVHD (P = .08). The space between the upper and lower curves indicates patients who are alive with continued immunosuppressive therapy. Follow-up was censored at the time of recurrent malignancy.                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 6. Reasons for initiating secondary therapy for chronic GVHD Survival Survival at 3 years after the diagnosis of chronic GVHD was 76% (95% CI, 53%-98%) for PBSC recipients and 70% (95% CI, 51%-88%) for BM recipients. Clinical performance of all surviving patients according to the transplant arm is shown in Table 7. The estimated relapse-free survival at 3 years after the diagnosis of chronic GVHD was 68% (95% CI, 42%-94%) for PBSC recipients and 61% (95% CI, 41%-80%) for BM recipients (P = .08; Figure 3). In the PBSCT group, deaths were caused by recurrent malignancy (n = 3), Aspergillus pneumonia (n = 1), and cytomegalovirus pneumonia (n = 1). In the BMT group, deaths were caused by recurrent malignancy (n = 3), cytomegalovirus pneumonia (n = 1), herpes simplex encephalitis (n = 1), idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (n = 1), and myocardial infarction (n = 1).                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 7. Karnofsky scores at the time of last contact*     Discussion Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References Results of this study suggest that chronic GVHD may be more difficult to control when it occurs after PBSCT as compared to BMT. This conclusion is supported by the greater numbers of treatments given to PBSC recipients and by the longer duration of glucocorticoid treatment in PBSC recipients. These findings could indicate either that the agents currently used for treatment of chronic GVHD are less effective in PBSC recipients or that the manifestations of the disease are more severe in PBSC recipients as compared to BM recipients. We found no evidence to suggest that PBSCT was associated with more severe chronic GVHD, because the incidence rates of complications caused by chronic GVHD and the proportions of patients with risk factors associated with poor outcome were not significantly different in the 2 groups, although there was a trend suggesting higher risk for BM recipients. Further assessment of this question will have to await the development and validation of scales for measuring the severity of chronic GVHD. In a prospective, nonrandomized study of 168 PBSC recipients, Przepiorka et al21 reported that a platelet count of less than 100 × 109/L had an adverse impact on overall mortality and relapse-free survival in patients with chronic GVHD. In our study, the incidence of chronic GVHD and the distribution of high-risk features, including thrombocytopenia, were similar among BM and PBSC recipients (Table 2) and thus could not explain the findings of more protracted chronic GVHD in the PBSCT group. The requirement for increased therapy in patients with chronic GVHD after PBSCT as compared to BMT is difficult to explain. In the era before G-CSF, the incidence of chronic GVHD was higher in patients treated with donor "buffy coat" after BMT compared to BMT alone.17 In that study, chronic GVHD appeared to be less severe and more responsive to treatment than progressive-onset chronic GVHD after BMT alone. The administration of G-CSF has been shown to favor the development of a type 2-cytokine profile in T-helper cells, with characteristic production of interleukin 4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-10 as opposed to IL-2 and interferon .18 Although these differences might contribute to the increased incidence of chronic GVHD after PBSCT as compared to BMT, they do not readily explain the differences in response to treatment. Experiments in mice have suggested that abnormal selection of T cells in the thymus may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD. Failure of negative selection in the thymus may allow the development of T cells that recognize recipient or donor-derived antigens, leading to clinical manifestations that frequently mimic those of autoimmune diseases.19 It is possible that PBSCT causes more thymic damage than BMT, simply as a result of differences in the number of T cells in the graft. On the other hand, the increased incidence of chronic GVHD after PBSCT has been associated with higher numbers of CD34 cells in the graft and not with the numbers of CD3 or CD14 cells.20 These analyses did not evaluate associations between the numbers of CD34, CD3, or CD14 cells and the response of chronic GVHD during treatment. We found no association between the numbers of CD34, CD3, or CD14 cells and the numbers of treatments given for control of GVHD (data not shown). Results of a recent meta-analysis showed that chronic GVHD occurs more frequently after PBSCT as compared to BMT, with a trend toward a protective effect of PBSCT in preventing relapse.9 Although the power to detect differences may be compromised by the relatively small numbers of patients in our study, we did not find any difference between the rates of extensive chronic GVHD between PBSCT and BMT, but we found that chronic GVHD may be more protracted after PBSCT than after BMT. Assessment of the overall benefits of PBSCT compared to BMT will require continued long-term evaluation of quality of life and follow-up of morbidity associated with chronic GVHD in long-term survivors.     Acknowledgments We thank Judy Campbell, RN; and Carina Moravec, ARNP, for outstanding assistance in the management of patients with chronic GVHD; and Chris Davis and the Long-Term Follow-Up staff at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the data managers at City of Hope and Stanford University for assistance in data collection.     Footnotes Submitted January 2, 2002; accepted March 11, 2002. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 17, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0011. Supported by Public Health Service grants CA18029, HL36444, CA18221, and CA15704 from the National Institutes of Health and by a Presidential Award from the Jose Carreras International Leukemia Foundation. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734. Reprints: Mary E. D. Flowers, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, D5-290, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109; e-mail: mflowers{at}fhcrc.org.     References Top Abstract Introduction Patients and methods Results Discussion References 1. Bensinger WI, Martin PJ, Storer B, et al. Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral-blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:175-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 2. Champlin RE, Schmitz N, Horowitz MM, et al. Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation. Blood. 2000;95:3702-3709[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 3. Powles R, Mehta J, Kulkarni S, et al. Allogeneic blood and bone-marrow stem-cell transplantation in hematological malignant diseases: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1231-1237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Schmitz N, Bacigalupo A, Hasenclever D, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation vs filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with early leukemia: first results of a randomised multicentre trial of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21:995-1003[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 5. Pavletic ZS, Bishop MR, Tarantolo SR, et al. Hematopoietic recovery after allogeneic blood stem-cell transplantation compared with bone marrow transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1608-1616[Abstract]. 6. Blaise D, Kuentz M, Fortanier C, et al. Randomized trial of bone marrow versus lenograstim-primed blood cell allogeneic transplantation in patients with early-stage leukemia: a report from the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:537-571[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 7. Vigorito AC, Azevedo WM, Marques JF, et al. A randomised, prospective comparison of allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:1145-1151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 8. Solano C, Martinez C, Brunet S, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell or bone marrow transplantation from matched related donors: a case-control study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:1129-1135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 9. Cutler C, Giri S, Jeyapalan S, Paniagua D, Viswanathan A, Antin JH. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell and bone marrow transplantation: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3685-3691[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 10. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Farewell V, et al. Marrow transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: methotrexate alone compared with a combination of methotrexate and cyclosporine for prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1986;68:119-125[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 11. Wagner JL, Flowers MED, Longton G, Storb R, Schubert M, Sullivan KM. The development of chronic graft-versus-host disease: an analysis of screening studies and the impact of corticosteroid use at 100 days after transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;22:139-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Loughran TP Jr, Sullivan KM. Early detection and monitoring of chronic graft-vs.-host disease. In: Burakoff SJ,Deeg HJ,Ferrara J,Atkinson K, eds. Graft-vs.-Host Disease: Immunology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1990:631-636. 13. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man: a long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:204-217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Sullivan KM. Graft-versus-host disease. In: Forman SJ,Blume KG,Thomas ED, eds. Bone Marrow Transplantation. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994:339-362. 15. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;19:695-706. 16. Anderson PK, Borgan O, Gill R, Keiding N. Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. New York, NY: Springer; 1993. 17. Storb R, Prentice RL, Sullivan KM, et al. Predictive factors in chronic graft-versus-host disease with aplastic anemia treated by marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:461-466[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Krenger W, Ferrara JL. Graft-versus-host disease and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. Immunol Res. 1996;1:50-73[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Perreault C, Decary F, Brochu S, Gyger M, et al. Minor histocompatibility antigens. Blood. 1990;76:1269-1280[Free Full Text]. 20. Zaucha JM, Gooley TA, Bensinger WI, et al. CD34 cell dose in G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell grafts affects engraftment kinetics and development of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Blood. 2001;98:3221-3227[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 21. Przepiorka D, Anderlini P, Saliba R, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogneic blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2001;98:1695-1700[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 22. Akpek G, Zahurak ML, Margolis J, et al. Development of a prognostic model for grading chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2001;97:1219-1226[Abstract/Free Full Text]. © 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.   CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this? This article has been cited by other articles: P. Stratton, M. L. Turner, R. Childs, J. Barrett, M. Bishop, A. S. Wayne, and S. Pavletic Vulvovaginal Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease With Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2007; 110(5): 1041 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] H. Schrezenmeier, J. R. Passweg, J. C. W. Marsh, A. Bacigalupo, C. N. Bredeson, E. Bullorsky, B. M. Camitta, R. E. Champlin, R. P. Gale, M. Fuhrer, et al. Worse outcome and more chronic GVHD with peripheral blood progenitor cells than bone marrow in HLA-matched sibling donor transplants for young patients with severe acquired aplastic anemia Blood, August 15, 2007; 110(4): 1397 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] V. G. Oehler, T. Gooley, D. S. Snyder, L. Johnston, A. Lin, C. C. Cummings, S. Chu, R. Bhatia, S. J. Forman, R. S. Negrin, et al. The effects of imatinib mesylate treatment before allogeneic transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1782 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] N. Schmitz, M. Eapen, M. M. Horowitz, M.-J. Zhang, J. P. Klein, J. D. Rizzo, F. R. Loberiza, A. Gratwohl, and R. E. Champlin Long-term outcome of patients given transplants of mobilized blood or bone marrow: a report from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Blood, December 15, 2006; 108(13): 4288 - 4290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] L. H. S. Tomas, F. R. Loberiza Jr, J. P. Klein, P. M. Layde, R. J. Lipchik, J. D. Rizzo, C. N. Bredeson, and M. M. Horowitz Risk Factors for Bronchiolitis Obliterans in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Leukemia Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 153 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] S. J. Lee New approaches for preventing and treating chronic graft-versus-host disease Blood, June 1, 2005; 105(11): 4200 - 4206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] B. E. Anderson, J. M. McNiff, D. Jain, B. R. Blazar, W. D. Shlomchik, and M. J. Shlomchik Distinct roles for donor- and host-derived antigen-presenting cells and costimulatory molecules in murine chronic graft-versus-host disease: requirements depend on target organ Blood, March 1, 2005; 105(5): 2227 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] M. Eapen, M. M. Horowitz, J. P. Klein, R. E. Champlin, F. R. Loberiza Jr, O. Ringden, and J. E. Wagner Higher Mortality After Allogeneic Peripheral-Blood Transplantation Compared With Bone Marrow in Children and Adolescents: The Histocompatibility and Alternate Stem Cell Source Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2004; 22(24): 4872 - 4880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] B. L. Stewart, B. Storer, J. Storek, H. J. Deeg, R. Storb, J. A. Hansen, F. R. Appelbaum, P. A. Carpenter, J. E. Sanders, H.-P. Kiem, et al. Duration of immunosuppressive treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3501 - 3506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] B. E. Anderson, J. M. McNiff, C. Matte, I. Athanasiadis, W. D. Shlomchik, and M. J. Shlomchik Recipient CD4+ T cells that survive irradiation regulate chronic graft-versus-host disease Blood, September 1, 2004; 104(5): 1565 - 1573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]