| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0149.
BRIEF REPORT
From the Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of
Haematology and Blood Coagulation, the Department of Laboratory
Medicine, and the Department of Medical Computer Sciences, Vienna
University Hospital, Austria.
There is strong evidence that the incidence of venous
thromboembolism (VTE) is increased during pregnancy. However, it is unknown whether and to which extent pregnancy influences the risk for
recurrent VTE in women with previous thrombosis. To investigate whether
pregnancy temporarily increases the risk for recurrent thrombosis, we
retrospectively evaluated the recurrence rate in 109 women who had at
least one pregnancy after an episode of VTE by comparing the time
period during pregnancy with the nonpregnant period. Forty-three women
had a first recurrence during a total observation time of 1014 years.
Eight events (73 observation years) occurred during pregnancy, and 35 events (941 observation years) occurred outside pregnancy.
Recurrence rates per 100 patient-years were 10.9% during and 3.7%
outside pregnancy. Relative risk during pregnancy was 3.5 (95%
confidence interval, 1.6-7.8; P = .002). Our data suggest
that pregnancy leads to a temporary increase in the risk for recurrent
thrombotic events.
(Blood. 2002;100:1060-1062) Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs infrequently
but is a leading cause of maternal death.1 Debate
is ongoing about whether pregnant women with previous venous thrombosis
should routinely receive prophylactic anticoagulation therapy.
Estimates of the rate of recurrent VTE during pregnancy vary; in
retrospective studies, rates as high as 12% have been
found.2 In a recent prospective study, Brill-Edwards et
al3 found a low risk for recurrent antepartum VTE despite
withholding prophylactic anticoagulation, and they concluded that
antepartum prophylaxis should be considered only in patients with
idiopathic thrombosis and those with thrombophilia.
In the general population, pregnancy increases the risk for VTE
approximately 5-fold.4 No data in the literature show how pregnancy influences the risk for recurrent VTE in women with previous
thrombosis. To investigate whether pregnancy temporarily increases the
risk for recurrent thrombosis, we studied women with a history of VTE
and evaluated their risk for recurrence during pregnancy in comparison
with durations when they were not pregnant.
Patients
Statistical analysis
Forty-three of the 109 women had a first recurrent event during a
total observation period of 1014 years
The main question is whether women with previous thrombosis
should receive prophylaxis not only after delivery but also during pregnancy. The low risk for pregnancy-associated recurrent VTE in the
recently published prospective study3 prompted the authors of the Sixth ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic
Therapy1 to recommend 2 general approaches Our data suggest that pregnancy leads to a temporary and a more than 3-fold increase in the risk for symptomatic recurrent thrombosis. Temporary risk factors at first event or the investigation for thrombosis risk factors seem not to differentiate clearly between women at high risk or low risk for pregnancy-associated recurrence. Probably prophylactic heparin can reduce the incidence of thrombosis during pregnancy. Possible disadvantages of prophylactic heparin during pregnancy are inconvenience for the woman, costs, and, though infrequent, bleeding, osteoporosis, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, based on a systematic review of 486 pregnancies,8 low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be regarded as safe. In the 486 pregnancies, there were no cases of clinically important bleeding or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 1 case of symptomatic osteoporosis, and 3 cases of VTE. Because the study is retrospective, it has certain limitations. Thromboembolic events were objectively confirmed in each pregnancy-associated episode, but some of the events outside pregnancy were not confirmed. By not including these events, the relative risk during pregnancy would be even higher. Furthermore, our overall recurrence rate was not high in comparison with the results from most published studies on recurrence rates9-11 and was close to that observed in the prospective AUREC study in patients without elevated factor VIII levels, in whom a 5% likelihood of recurrence at 2 years was observed.12 During pregnancy the recurrence rate was significantly higher (10.9 per 100 patient years). Recurrent VTE is a serious complication of pregnancy because it is potentially life threatening, and a recurrent thrombotic event increases the probability for a postthrombotic syndrome.9 The time of pregnancy and the postpartum period delineate a well-defined period of increased risk. Prophylactic administration of LMWH during pregnancy might reduce the risk for this pregnancy-associated thrombosis and thus the overall recurrence rate in this young patient population and probably does not have the disadvantage of high bleeding risk observed during oral anticoagulant treatment.13 However, it remains to be shown in well-designed randomized trials that prophylactic anticoagulation is definitely able to decrease the rate for pregnancy-associated recurrent VTE and to establish its safety.
Submitted January 17, 2002; accepted March 7, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0149.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Ingrid Pabinger, Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Haematology and Blood Coagulation, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: ingrid.pabinger{at}akh-wien.ac.at.
1.
Ginsberg JS, Greer I, Hirsh J.
Use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy.
Chest.
2001;119:122S-131S 2. Tengborn L, Bergqvist D, Mätzsch T, Bergqvist A, Hedner U. Recurrent thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:90-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Brill-Edwards P, Ginsberg JS, Gent M, et al.
Safety of withholding heparin in pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med.
2000;343:1439-1444 4. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Prevention of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 1986;256:744[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Pabinger I, Grafenhofer H, Kaider A, et al.
Preeclampsia and fetal loss in women with a history of venous thromboembolism.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
2001;21:874-879 6. Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analyzing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1995. 7. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187-220. 8. Sanson BJ, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, et al. Safety of low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnancy: a systemic review. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81:668-672[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
9.
Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, et al.
The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis.
Ann Intern Med.
1996;125:1-7
10.
Schulman S, Riiedin AS, Lindmarker P, et al.
A comparison of six weeks with six months of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med.
1995;332:1661-1665
11.
Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J, et al.
A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med.
1999;340:901-907
12.
Kyrle PA, Minar E, Hirschl M, et al.
High plasma levels of factor VIII and the risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med.
2000;343:457-462 13. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT): Italian study on complications of oral anticoagulant therapy. Lancet. 1996;348:423-428[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
S. M. Bates, I. A. Greer, I. Pabinger, S. Sofaer, and J. Hirsh Venous Thromboembolism, Thrombophilia, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 844S - 886S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Bates Management of Pregnant Women with Thrombophilia or a History of Venous Thromboembolism Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||