SEARCH:   Advanced

Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 30, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0236. This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2001-12-0236v1 100/3/1078    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aittomäki, S. Articles by Silvennoinen, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aittomäki, S. Articles by Silvennoinen, O. Related Collections Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells Signal Transduction Gene Expression Brief Reports Social Bookmarking                   What's this?  Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article  Blood, 1 August 2002, Vol. 100, No. 3, pp. 1078-1080 BRIEF REPORT Distinct functions for signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of Fc  receptor I promoter Saara Aittomäki, Jie Yang, Edward W. Scott, M. Celeste Simon, and Olli Silvennoinen From the Institute of Medical Technology, University of Tampere, Finland; the Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville; the Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia; and the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.     Abstract Top Abstract Introduction Study design Results and discussion References The myeloid cell-specific expression and interferon- (IFN-) induction of Fc  receptor I (FcRI) requires cooperation between PU.1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1) by means of mechanisms that are unknown. We found that PU.1 and Stat1 mediated distinct functions in the activation of FcRI promoter. The basal activity of the natural FcRI promoter was strictly dependent on PU.1, and IFN- induction required both PU.1 and Stat1. Recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) to the FcRI promoter did not replace PU.1 in promoter activation, suggesting that TBP is not sufficient for FcRI activation and that PU.1 mediates additional contacts with basal transcription machinery. In contrast, Stat1 did not interact with basal transcription machinery, but the Stat1-mediated activation of FcRI promoter critically required CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300. These results define functional cooperativity between PU.1 and Stat1 in FcRI promoter activation, in which PU.1 appears to serve as a bridging factor with the basal transcription machinery and IFN--mediated induction of transcription occurs through recruitment of CBP/p300 by Stat1. (Blood. 2002;100:1078-1080) © 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.     Introduction Top Abstract Introduction Study design Results and discussion References Interferon- (IFN-)-induced gene responses are largely dependent on signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (Stat1). Stat1 is phosphorylated on tyrosine 701 by Jak kinases in the receptor complex, and the phosphorylated Stat1 dimers translocate to the nucleus and bind to specific regions (-activated sequence [GAS]) on IFN--responsive promoters.1,2 Regulation of gene expression is conferred by combinatorial use of various enhancer element-binding transcription factors and their cooperation in recruitment of general transcription factors (GTFs). The activation domains of transcription factors may function by interacting directly with GTFs, or they may employ coactivator proteins to facilitate transcription. Stat1 has been shown to cooperate with Sp1, AP1, and nuclear factor-B transcription factors,3 and Stat1-mediated transcription has been shown to involve histone acetyltransferase CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 as well as p300/CBP-interacting protein coactivators.3-5 However, most of the studies related to Stat-mediated transcriptional activation have used artificial promoters in the context of heterologous promoters and have therefore not identified the mechanisms by which Stats are connected to basal transcription machinery. An important cell-type-specific target for IFN- is the high-affinity receptor for IgG (Fc  receptor I [FcRI]),6 which mediates phagocytosis, respiratory burst, and antibody-mediated cytotoxic reactions. FcRI is constitutively expressed on myeloid cells, but its expression is rapidly induced by IFN-. FcRI promoter contains 2 cis elements within the 190 nucleotides upstream of the translation initiation site that confer the IFN- inducibility and myeloid cell-specific expression of the gene. The IFN- response region (GRR) binds Stat1, and myeloid expression requires a PU.1 (Spi-1)-binding element.7-9 PU.1, which belongs to the Ets family of transcription factors, regulates several genes participating in the development and function of myeloid and B cells.10,11 The function of PU.1 in cell differentiation has been shown to involve cooperation with transcription factors such as acute myelogenous leukemia 1, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein  (C/EBP), C/EBP, and Myb, but the role of PU.1 in cytokine-induced transcriptional activation and its cooperation with Stat factors is unknown. The requirement for both PU.1 and Stat1 in transcriptional activation of FcRI provided an experimental system for investigating the specific roles of Stat1 and PU.1 in cytokine-induced transcriptional activation.     Study design Top Abstract Introduction Study design Results and discussion References Plasmids Stat1, PU.1, and IFN regulatory factor-GAS-luc reporter were characterized previously.12,13 The other reporters were constructed by inserting fragments from the FcRI promoter, made by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from human genomic DNA, into promoterless pLuc vector14 or vector containing TATA box from IFN- promoter.15 The 189/66-GAS-TATAluc was constructed by mutating CAG (from 142 to 140) to ACT to disrupt the Stat1-binding site. The TCC sequence from the PU.1-binding site (from 94 to 92) was mutated to GAA to yield 89/66-PU.1-TATAluc. The 189/66-GASPU.1-luc harbors both mutations. Wild-type E1A,  conserved region 1 (CR1), and CR2,16 were subcloned into pCI-neo vector and tagged with C-terminal HA epitope. E1AR2G mutant17 and E1A N (amino acids 45-243) were generated by PCR. Cell culture and transfections Mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal-calf serum (FCS). Human fibrosarcoma U3A cells18 were cultured in DMEM with 10% Cosmic calf serum. U3A cells were transfected by using the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method. RAW264.7 cells were transfected by electroporation with a GenePulser apparatus (250 V and 960 µF; Bio-Rad; Hercules, CA). Reporter gene assays RAW 264.7 cells (6 × 106) were transfected with 6 µg reporter and 4 µg pCMV--galactosidase plasmid. After electroporation, cells were divided on 4 3.5-cm plates per transfection and incubated for 24 hours. Cells were starved overnight in DMEM with 1% FCS, left untreated or treated for 6 hours with 20 ng/mL murine IFN-, and lysed in reporter lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer (1254 Luminova; ThermoLabsystems, Beverly, MA) and normalized against the -galactosidase activity of the lysates. Reporter gene assays with U3A cells were done as described previously.12     Results and discussion Top Abstract Introduction Study design Results and discussion References A heterologous TATA-containing promoter cannot substitute for the function of PU.1 in FcRI activation We investigated the mechanisms that underlie transcriptional regulation in IFN- signaling in the context of natural FcRI promoter. A typical feature for most myeloid-specific genes, including FcRI, is the lack of TATA element. Instead, these promoters contain an initiator sequence, and PU.1 or Stat1 might function by recruiting TBP and allowing assembly of the preinitiation complex. PU.1 was found to interact with TBP, as was shown previously,19 whereas no interaction between Stat1 and TBP was detected (S.A., unpublished data, March 2001). To analyze the functional importance of TBP recruitment in activation of the FcRI promoter, we inserted the Stat1-binding element GRR of the FcRI promoter (156 to 126) into a luciferase construct with or without a TATA-box element from the IFN- promoter (GRR-TATAluc and GRR-luc, respectively). In RAW264.7 cells, the GRR-luc construct was inactive (Figure 1B). The presence of TATA box in the context of GRR element resulted in low basal and IFN--induced activation of the reporter. However, activation of GRR-TATAluc was significantly lower than that of FcRI-luc. Similar results were obtained in Stat1- and PU.1-transfected U3A cells lacking endogenous Stat1 and PU.1 (Figure 1C). These results indicate that the presence of TATA box in the promoter is not sufficient for efficient Stat1-mediated transcription. View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Stat1-binding site alone is not sufficient to drive IFN--inducible transcription of FcRI gene. (A) Schematic diagram of the reporter constructs. (B) RAW264.7 cells were transfected with different reporter constructs, and luciferase activity was measured after 6 hours of treatment with IFN-. (C) The same reporter constructs as in panel B were analyzed in U3A cells. U3A cells were transfected with 1 µg reporter, 0.5 µg -galactosidase plasmid, 250 ng Stat1, and 50 ng PU.1 and either not stimulated or stimulated with IFN- for 6 hours before measurement of luciferase activity. (D) RAW264.7 cells were transfected with 189/66-TATAluc or 189/66-PU.1-TATAluc and analyzed as in shown in panel B. Values shown (± SD) are from 3 different experiments. To test the functional relation between PU.1-TBP recruitment and TATA box directly, we made a FcRI promoter construct containing GRR and PU.1 elements in the presence of TATA box (189/66-TATAluc). The 189/66-TATAluc was active in RAW264.7 cells, but mutation of the PU.1 site completely abrogated its activity (Figure 1D). These results indicate that TATA box cannot substitute the function of PU.1 and that recruitment of TBP is not sufficient for FcRI promoter activation. It is possible that TBP is not required for FcRI activation. An example of such regulation is the activation of major histocompatibility complex class I by class II transcriptional activator, which occurs independently of TBP-associated factor II 250 and TATA box.20 Alternatively, PU.1 may be mediating other critical interactions in FcRI promoter activation. This hypothesis was supported by the finding that RNA polymerase II interacted with PU.1 but not with Stat1 (J.Y., unpublished data, August 2001). E1A inhibits IFN--induced transcription of FcRI Both Stat1 and PU.1 have been shown to interact with CBP/p300,4,21 and recruitment of CBP/p300 to the promoter could be an underlying mechanism for their cooperation. To analyze the role of CBP/p300 in FcRI activation, U3A cells were cotransfected with different E1A constructs, along with PU.1, Stat1, and FcRI-luc reporter. Although E1A binds to and inhibits CBP/p300,16 it only partly decreased basal PU.1-mediated transcription of FcRI. In contrast, E1A completely abrogated IFN--dependent transcription (Figure 2B). The specificity of E1A function was further demonstrated by using the mutant E1AR2G, which inhibits and interacts with Stat1 but not with CBP/p300.17 E1AR2G inhibited the IFN--induced activity without affecting basal transcription. Additional E1A mutants lacking the ability to interact with CBP also failed to inhibit FcRI promoter activity. E1A CR1, which cannot bind CBP or retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, and E1A N, which does not bind CBP/p300, did not inhibit transcription. E1A CR2 (C124G, E135K), which restrained binding only to Rb, inhibited transcription in a manner similar to that of wild-type E1A. These results suggest that the function of Stat1 in transcriptional activation depends strictly on its ability to recruit CBP/p300. View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. The effect of E1A on basal and IFN--induced transcription of FcRI. (A) Schematic diagram of the E1A constructs. (B) Equimolar amounts (determined by Western blotting) of E1A constructs were transfected into U3A cells together with FcRI-luc, Stat1, and PU.1. Experimental conditions and DNA amounts were the same as in Figure 1C. Mean (± SD) normalized values from 3 experiments are shown. Cytokine-induced transcription is assumed to require precise arrangement of promoter-binding transcription factors, hierarchical recruitment of coactivator proteins, and connection of these factors and proteins to the basal transcription machinery. The results reported here strongly suggest that PU.1 and Stat1 mediate distinct functions in transcriptional activation of the FcRI promoter. PU.1 is responsible for basal activation and bridges with GTFs, whereas the function of Stat1 depends on CBP/p300 recruitment. It is likely that analogous functional coordination between different transcription factors to assemble GTFs and coactivator proteins to the promoter also occurs in other cytokine-responsive genes.     Acknowledgments We thank Paula Kosonen for excellent technical assistance and Drs J. E. Darnell, T. Kouzarides, and I. Kerr for providing reagents.     Footnotes Submitted December 13, 2001; accepted March 26, 2002. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 30, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0236. Supported by the Medical Research Council (Academy of Finland), the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, the Finnish Foundation for Cancer Research, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the Tuberculosis Foundation of Tampere. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734. Reprints: Olli Silvennoinen, Institute of Medical Technology, University of Tampere, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland; e-mail: olli.silvennoinen{at}uta.fi.     References Top Abstract Introduction Study design Results and discussion References 1. Darnell JE Jr, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science. 1994;264:1415-1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 2. Silvennoinen O, Saharinen P, Paukku K, Takaluoma K, Kovanen P. Cytokine receptor signal transduction through Jak tyrosine kinases and Stat transcription factors. APMIS. 1997;105:497-509[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Shuai K. Modulation of STAT signaling by STAT-interacting proteins. Oncogene. 2000;19:2638-2644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Zhang JJ, Vinkemeier U, Gu W, Chakravarti D, Horvath CM, Darnell JE Jr. Two contact regions between Stat1 and CBP/p300 in interferon  signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:15092-15096[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 5. Torchia J, Rose DW, Inostroza J, et al. The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature. 1997;387:677-684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 6. Guyre PM, Morganelli PM, Miller R. Recombinant immune interferon increases immunoglobulin G Fc receptors on cultured human mononuclear phagocytes. J Clin Invest. 1983;72:393-397[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. Perez C, Coeffier E, Moreau-Gachelin F, Wietzerbin J, Benech PD. Involvement of the transcription factor PU.1/Spi-1 in myeloid cell-restricted expression of an interferon-inducible gene encoding the human high-affinity Fc  receptor. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:5023-5031[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 8. Pearse RN, Feinman R, Shuai K, Darnell JE Jr, Ravetch JV. Interferon -induced transcription of the high-affinity Fc receptor for IgG requires assembly of a complex that includes the 91-kDa subunit of transcription factor ISGF3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:4314-4318[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 9. Eichbaum QG, Iyer R, Raveh DP, Mathieu C, Ezekowitz RA. Restriction of interferon  responsiveness and basal expression of the myeloid human Fc gamma R1b gene is mediated by a functional PU.1 site and a transcription initiator consensus. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1985-1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 10. Lloberas J, Soler C, Celada A. The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages. Immunol Today. 1999;20:184-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Simon MC. PU.1 and hematopoiesis: lessons learned from gene targeting experiments. Semin Immunol. 1998;10:111-118[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Aittomaki S, Pesu M, Groner B, Janne OA, Palvimo JJ, Silvennoinen O. Cooperation among Stat1, glucocorticoid receptor, and PU.1 in transcriptional activation of the high-affinity Fc  receptor I in monocytes. J Immunol. 2000;164:5689-5697[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 13. Saharinen P, Ekman N, Sarvas K, Parker P, Alitalo K, Silvennoinen O. The Bmx tyrosine kinase induces activation of the Stat signaling pathway, which is specifically inhibited by protein kinase C. Blood. 1997;90:4341-4353[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 14. Saksela K, Baltimore D. Negative regulation of immunoglobulin  light-chain gene transcription by a short sequence homologous to the murine B1 repetitive element. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:3698-3705[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 15. Fujita T, Nolan GP, Ghosh S, Baltimore D. Independent modes of transcriptional activation by the p50 and p65 subunits of NF- B. Genes Dev. 1992;6:775-787[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 16. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. CBP-induced stimulation of c-Fos activity is abrogated by E1A. EMBO J. 1995;14:4758-4762[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 17. Look DC, Roswit WT, Frick AG, et al. Direct suppression of Stat1 function during adenoviral infection. Immunity. 1998;9:871-880[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Muller M, Laxton C, Briscoe J, et al. Complementation of a mutant cell line: central role of the 91 kDa polypeptide of ISGF3 in the interferon- and - signal transduction pathways. EMBO J. 1993;12:4221-4228[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Hagemeier C, Bannister AJ, Cook A, Kouzarides T. The activation domain of transcription factor PU.1 binds the retinoblastoma (RB) protein and the transcription factor TFIID in vitro: RB shows sequence similarity to TFIID and TFIIB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:1580-1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 20. Raval A, Howcroft TK, Weissman JD, et al. Transcriptional coactivator, CIITA, is an acetyltransferase that bypasses a promoter requirement for TAF(II)250. Mol Cell. 2001;7:105-115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Yamamoto H, Kihara-Negishi F, Yamada T, Hashimoto Y, Oikawa T. Physical and functional interactions between the transcription factor PU.1 and the coactivator CBP. Oncogene. 1999;18:1495-1501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. © 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.   CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this? This article has been cited by other articles: R. Dahl, S. R. Iyer, K. S. Owens, D. D. Cuylear, and M. C. Simon The Transcriptional Repressor GFI-1 Antagonizes PU.1 Activity through Protein-Protein Interaction J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6473 - 6483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] D. M. Barrett, K. S. Gustafson, J. Wang, S. Z. Wang, and G. D. Ginder A GATA Factor Mediates Cell Type-Restricted Induction of HLA-E Gene Transcription by Gamma Interferon Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2004; 24(14): 6194 - 6204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] S. Aittomaki, J. Yang, E. W. Scott, M. C. Simon, and O. Silvennoinen Molecular basis of Stat1 and PU.1 cooperation in cytokine-induced Fc{gamma} receptor I promoter activation Int. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 265 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2001-12-0236v1 100/3/1078    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aittomäki, S. Articles by Silvennoinen, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aittomäki, S. Articles by Silvennoinen, O. Related Collections Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells Signal Transduction Gene Expression Brief Reports Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

	Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020