| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
BRIEF REPORT
From the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute and
Department of Surgery and the Department of Molecular Genetics and
Biochemistry, University of Pittsburgh, PA, and the Institute of
Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Justus-Liebig University,
Giessen, Germany.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells
(APCs) that use 2 major pathways for antigen uptake: constitutive macropinocytosis and mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis. Efficient endocytosis is critical for DCs to fulfill their sentinel function in
immunity. We investigated the influence of the immunosuppressive macrolide rapamycin on macropinocytosis of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-albumin and mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis of
FITC-dextran by murine bone marrow-derived DCs by flow cytometry. The
data show that (1) at a low, physiologically relevant concentration (1 ng/mL), rapamycin impairs macropinocytosis and mannose
receptor-mediated endocytosis; (2) the effects are independent of DC
maturation and can be demonstrated specifically in immature
CD11c+ major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class
IIlo DCs by 3-color flow cytometry; (3)
inhibition of endocytosis is not related to apoptotic cell death; and
(4) molar excess of the structurally related molecule FK506 inhibits
the actions of rapamycin. The inhibitory effects of rapamycin on DC
endocytosis were confirmed in vivo. To our knowledge, this is the first
report that a clinically relevant immunosuppressant inhibits DC endocytosis.
(Blood. 2002;100:1084-1087) Dendritic cells (DCs) arise from CD34+
bone marrow (BM) stem cells and represent a heterogenous population of
ubiquitously distributed antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that play
critical roles as initiators and modulators of immune
responses.1,2 Among the most striking features underlying
the efficiency of DCs as APCs is their unsurpassed capacity to take up
antigens via constitutive macropinocytosis and mannose
receptor-mediated endocytosis3 and to subsequently process
and present major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-antigen complexes
on their surface.1 The capacity of DCs to endocytose and
to present antigens is under tight developmental control: immature DCs
are excellent at internalizing antigens but express low surface levels
of MHC class II molecules, whereas mature DCs down-regulate
endocytotic activity and up-regulate MHC class II and costimulatory
molecules (CD40, CD80, CD86) that promote T-cell
activation.1 Anti-inflammatory drugs such as corticosteroids4 or salicylates5 suppress DC
maturation and as a consequence enhance their endocytotic activity.
Recent reports point toward Rho family proteins Cdc426 and
Rac,7 as well as aquaporins,8 as important
factors that regulate DC endocytosis. Rapamycin is a potent
immunosuppressive macrolide, isolated from Streptomyces
hygroscopicus, that inhibits downstream signaling from the targets
of rapamycin proteins (TORs) by forming a complex with its
intracellular receptor FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12) and
TORs.9 It is used clinically to prevent and treat
allograft rejection.10-12 Interaction of the
rapamycin-FKBP12 complex with TORs results in inhibition of multiple
biochemical pathways (eg, p70 S6 kinase, cyclin-dependent kinases,
translational effector proteins) that are critical for cytokine/growth
factor-induced cellular proliferation, ribosome biosynthesis,
translation initiation, and cell cycle progression into S
phase.9,13 In view of the paucity of information
concerning the influence of rapamycin on APC function and its
well-documented inhibitory effects on protein synthesis, we analyzed
the impact of rapamycin on DC endocytosis. Our results indicate that
rapamycin is an inhibitor of DC endocytosis in vitro and in vivo and
that molar excess of the structurally related immunophilin ligand FK506
partially reverses its inhibitory effects.
Generation of BM-derived DCs
In vivo administration of rapamycin
Endocytosis Quantitative analysis of endocytosis was performed as described,5 with minor modifications. Cells (5 × 105) were incubated with 5 µg/mL FITC-albumin (Sigma) or 0.1 mg/mL FITC-dextran (MW 42000, Sigma) at either 37°C or 4°C for 60 minutes (for in vivo-expanded DCs, 500 µg/mL FITC-albumin and 1 mg/mL FITC-dextran for 40 minutes). Endocytosis was stopped by 2 washes in ice-cold 0.1% sodium azide/1% FCS/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were stained for CD11c (HL3) and, in some experiments, for MHC class II expression (IAb -chain, 25-9-17) as described
(monoclonal antibodies from BD PharMingen, San Diego,
CA).5
Apoptotic cell death Apoptosis was analyzed by staining of phosphatidylserine translocation with FITC-annexin-V in combination with the vital dye 7-AAD (BD PharMingen) and detection of DNA fragmentation by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated fluorescein-2'-deoxyuridine 5'-triphosphate (dUTP) labeling (TUNEL assay; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Positive controls included deoxyribonuclease (DNase) treatment and ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiation (60 J/m2) in the TUNEL and annexin-V assay, respectively. Cells were costained for CD11c expression and analyzed by means of an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Hialeah, FL).Statistics Statistical analysis was performed with a 2-tailed Student t test. Normal distribution of values was proved by the Kolomogorov-Smirnov test.
Analysis of GM-CSF+IL-4-expanded, BM-derived DCs harvested at day
7 of culture revealed a reduced capacity of cells exposed to rapamycin
to exhibit macropinocytosis of FITC-albumin and mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis of FITC-dextran. This was evident with
respect to both the incidence (Figure 1A,
B) and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI; Figure 1D) of
CD11c+ cells. CD11c is a very reliable marker for murine
DCs15 and is not expressed in significant amounts by murine
macrophages.5,16 Because DC maturation is associated with
marked down-regulation of endocytotic capacity,3 we
questioned whether these effects might be related to a stimulatory
effect of rapamycin on DC maturation. However, rapamycin-exposed
CD11c+ DCs displayed significantly decreased surface MHC
class II (Figure 1C) and costimulatory molecules (data not shown),
indicating that they were more immature than untreated, control cells.
It could be argued that the analysis of a fixed number of DCs by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) might mask an
inhibitory effect of rapamycin on the differentiation of precursor
cells into DCs. As shown in Figure 1E, however, rapamycin inhibited
total cell expansion in a dose-dependent manner
(antagonizable by a molar excess of FK506) but did not significantly
block the differentiation of precursor cells into
CD11c+ DCs, as evidenced by the comparable yield of
CD11c+ DCs. Achievement of similar DC yields was due to
consistently increased percentages of CD11c+ DCs with
characteristic DC morphology in the rapamycin-treated cultures.
Because additional experiments indicated that the inhibitory effect of
rapamycin on DC maturation was IL-4 dependent (H.H., T.T., unpublished
observations, October 2001), we expanded DCs with GM-CSF only.
Generation of murine DCs in GM-CSF is a well-established culture
method.17 Additionally, to determine more precisely the
endocytotic activity of homogenous DCs at the same stage of maturation,
we specifically analyzed immature MHC IIlo DCs. These
experiments confirmed the inhibitory effects of rapamycin on DC
endocytosis and indicated that they were not IL-4 related (Figure
2A-C). Again, low concentrations of 1 ng/mL rapamycin (1.1 nmol) were sufficient to significantly and
markedly suppress endocytotic activity. When 1 ng/mL rapamycin was
used, the relative MFI of immature MHC class IIlo
CD11c+ DCs compared with controls was < 42% and < 32%
with respect to FITC-albumin and FITC-dextran, respectively (Figure
2C). Given that mean trough whole blood levels of rapamycin
in patients are 17.3 ng/mL (5 mg rapamycin/d)18 and that
the free plasma fraction is 8%, these concentrations are clinically
highly relevant. When rapamycin was added at day 6 of culture, it still
inhibited DC endocytosis, but the overall effect was weaker (relative
MFI 69% and 53% for FITC-albumin and FITC-dextran, respectively, at 5 ng/mL rapamycin).
Binding of rapamycin to FKBP12 and TOR inhibition can be antagonized in vitro by the structurally related immunophilin ligand FK506.19,20 Whereas FK506 alone (20 ng/mL) did not interfere with DC endocytosis (data not shown), addition of 20 ng/mL FK506 to 1 ng/mL rapamycin (22.3-fold molar excess) antagonized the inhibitory effects of rapamycin, indicating that these were related to FKBP12-mediated TOR inhibition (Figures 1A, B; 2A-C). However, the antagonistic effect of FK506 was incomplete, especially with respect to mannose receptor-mediated endocytosis. Similar results were obtained over a wide range of drug concentrations (1-20 ng/mL rapamycin, 10-250 ng/mL FK506) and at different FK506/rapamycin ratios (10-55 molar). This suggested that other FKBPs might also be involved in endocytosis inhibition. One candidate is FKBP25, which has > 100 times greater binding affinity for rapamycin than FK506.21 Having established that rapamycin inhibited DC endocytosis, we analyzed
whether this effect was due to increased apoptotic cell death. In
contrast to a recent report,22 the incidence of apoptosis
at day 7 of culture was consistently low (< 10%) and was not affected
significantly by rapamycin, even at a suprapharmacological dose of 100 ng/mL, as determined independently by annexin-V/7-AAD and TUNEL
staining (Figure 2D, E). Similar results were obtained with
GM-CSF+IL-4-expanded DCs and at day 4 of culture (data not shown). To
investigate the in vivo relevance of DC endocytosis inhibition, we
analyzed endocytotic activity in splenic DCs of animals that were
injected with rapamycin (0.5 mg/kg/d for 10 days, ip) or vehicle and in
which DCs were expanded with Flt3 ligand as we have
described.14 After 10 days, the animals were killed and
FITC-albumin and FITC-dextran uptake by freshly isolated splenic
CD11c+ DCs was analyzed. The phenotype of these DCs was
immature in both treatment groups. As shown in Figure
3, CD11c+ DC of
rapamycin-treated animals displayed significantly reduced macropinocytotic activity, with respect to both the number of positive
cells and the relative MFI (P = .001 and
P = .002, respectively). Similar findings were obtained
with respect to FITC-dextran uptake (41.5% positive cells vs 24.8% in
rapamycin-injected animals, P < .05; relative MFI
74.7%, P < .05).
The results of this study suggest that rapamycin can interfere with immune responses at a very early stage by inhibiting DC endocytosis. Thus, rapamycin targets a unique function of DCs that influences the induction of immunity against microbial pathogens (eg, Salmonella23) and allergens.24 This effect may also suppress indirect alloantigen processing following transplantation. The precise mechanisms by which rapamycin inhibits DC endocytosis remain to be determined. In this context, it is important to note that the Rho GTPases CDC42 and Rac that interfere with the endocytotic activity of DCs7,8 complex with and activate the p70 S6 kinase25 that belongs to the central signaling pathway disrupted by rapamycin.9 In addition, rapamycin's inhibition of TOR signaling down-regulates protein translation and has been demonstrated to suppress actin synthesis.26 Because, to our knowledge, no clinical immunosuppressant has been reported to inhibit DC endocytosis, these findings may provide further incentive for trials of rapamycin in clinical settings other than transplantation, for example, in autoimmune disease.
We thank Jan Urso for excellent technical assistance, Wyeth-Ayerst for providing rapamycin and advice, Immunex for providing Flt3 ligand, and Dr Venkataramanan for helpful discussion.
Submitted October 29, 2001; accepted April 2, 2002.
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 DK49745 and R01 AI41011 to A.W.T.). H.H. is supported by a scholarship from the Stiftung Hämotherapie-Forschung, Bonn, Germany.
H.H. and T.T. contributed equally to this work.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Angus W. Thomson, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, W1544 BST, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; e-mail: thomsonaw{at}msx.upmc.edu.
1. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:767-811[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Hackstein H, Morelli AE, Thomson AW. Designer dendritic cells for tolerance induction: guided not misguided missiles. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:437-442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Sallusto F, Cella M, Danieli C, Lanzavecchia A.
Dendritic cells use macropinocytosis and the mannose receptor to concentrate macromolecules in the major histocompatibility complex class II compartment: downregulation by cytokines and bacterial products.
J Exp Med.
1995;182:389-400
4.
Piemonti L, Monti P, Allavena P, et al.
Glucocorticoids affect human dendritic cell differentiation and maturation.
J Immunol.
1999;162:6473-6481
5.
Hackstein H, Morelli AE, Larregina AT, et al.
Aspirin inhibits in vitro maturation and in vivo immunostimulatory function of murine myeloid dendritic cells.
J Immunol.
2001;166:7053-7062 6. Garrett WS, Chen LM, Kroschewski R, et al. Developmental control of endocytosis in dendritic cells by Cdc42. Cell. 2000;102:325-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. West MA, Prescott AR, Eskelinen EL, Ridley AJ, Watts C. Rac is required for constitutive macropinocytosis by dendritic cells but does not control its downregulation. Curr Biol. 2000;10:839-848[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
de Baey A, Lanzavecchia A.
The role of aquaporins in dendritic cell macropinocytosis.
J Exp Med.
2000;191:743-748 9. Sehgal SN. Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression. Clin Biochem. 1998;31:335-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Saunders RN, Metcalfe MS, Nicholson ML. Rapamycin in transplantation: a review of the evidence. Kidney Int. 2001;59:3-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Hong JC, Kahan BD. Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:1579-1584[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
12.
Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Ryan EA, et al.
Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen.
N Engl J Med.
2000;343:230-238
13.
Raught B, Gingras AC, Sonenberg N.
The target of rapamycin (TOR) proteins.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2001;98:7037-7044
14.
Morelli AE, Antonysamy MA, Takayama T, et al.
Microchimerism, donor dendritic cells, and alloimmune reactivity in recipients of Flt3 ligand-mobilized hemopoietic cells: modulation by tacrolimus.
J Immunol.
2000;165:226-237 15. Grabbe S, Kampgen E, Schuler G. Dendritic cells: multi-lineal and multi-functional. Immunol Today. 2000;21:431-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Metlay JP, Witmer-Pack MD, Agger R, Crowley MT, Lawless D, Steinman RM.
The distinct leukocyte integrins of mouse spleen dendritic cells as identified with new hamster monoclonal antibodies.
J Exp Med.
1990;171:1753-1771
17.
Inaba K, Inaba M, Romani N, et al.
Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor.
J Exp Med.
1992;176:1693-1702 18. MacDonald A, Scarola J, Burke JT, Zimmerman JJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus. Clin Ther. 2000;22(suppl B):B101-B121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Kuo CJ, Chung J, Fiorentino DF, Flanagan WM, Blenis J, Crabtree GR. Rapamycin selectively inhibits interleukin-2 activation of p70 S6 kinase. Nature. 1992;358:70-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Dumont FJ, Melino MR, Staruch MJ, Koprak SL, Fischer PA, Sigal NH. The immunosuppressive macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin act as reciprocal antagonists in murine T cells. J Immunol. 1990;144:1418-1424[Abstract].
21.
Jin YJ, Burakoff SJ, Bierer BE.
Molecular cloning of a 25-kDa high affinity rapamycin binding protein, FKBP25.
J Biol Chem.
1992;267:10942-10945
22.
Woltman AM, de Fijter JW, Kamerling SW, et al.
Rapamycin induces apoptosis in monocyte- and CD34-derived dendritic cells but not in monocytes and macrophages.
Blood.
2001;98:174-180
23.
Niedergang F, Sirard JC, Blanc CT, Kraehenbuhl JP.
Entry and survival of Salmonella typhimurium in dendritic cells and presentation of recombinant antigens do not require macrophage-specific virulence factors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2000;97:14650-14655 24. Noirey N, Rougier N, Andre C, Schmitt D, Vincent C. Langerhans-like dendritic cells generated from cord blood progenitors internalize pollen allergens by macropinocytosis, and part of the molecules are processed and can activate autologous naive T lymphocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:1194-1201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 25. Chou M, Blenis J. The 70 kDa S6 kinase complexes with and is activated by the Rho Family G proteins Cdc42 and Rac1. Cell. 1996;85:573-583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 26. Miyamoto S, Safer B. Immunosuppressants FK506 and rapamycin have different effects on the biosynthesis of cytoplasmic actin during the early period of T cell activation. Biochem J. 1999;344:803-812[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, M. Parker, C. Xia, R. Peng, C. Wasserfall, T. Clarke, L. Wu, T. Chowdhry, M. Campbell-Thompson, J. Williams, et al. Rabbit Polyclonal Mouse Antithymocyte Globulin Administration Alters Dendritic Cell Profile and Function in NOD Mice to Suppress Diabetogenic Responses J. Immunol., April 15, 2009; 182(8): 4608 - 4615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Huang, P. Johnston, B. Zhang, A. Zakari, T. Chowdhry, R. R. Smith, E. Marban, H. Rabb, and K. L. Womer Kidney-Derived Stromal Cells Modulate Dendritic and T Cell Responses J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 831 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Reichardt, C. Durr, D. von Elverfeldt, E. Juttner, U. V. Gerlach, M. Yamada, B. Smith, R. S. Negrin, and R. Zeiser Impact of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibition on Lymphoid Homing and Tolerogenic Function of Nanoparticle-Labeled Dendritic Cells following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4770 - 4779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yadav and N. Sarvetnick B7-2 Regulates Survival, Phenotype, and Function of APCs J. Immunol., May 15, 2007; 178(10): 6236 - 6241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cutler, S. Li, V. T. Ho, J. Koreth, E. Alyea, R. J. Soiffer, and J. H. Antin Extended follow-up of methotrexate-free immunosuppression using sirolimus and tacrolimus in related and unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 3108 - 3114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zeiser, V. H. Nguyen, A. Beilhack, M. Buess, S. Schulz, J. Baker, C. H. Contag, and R. S. Negrin Inhibition of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell function by calcineurin-dependent interleukin-2 production Blood, July 1, 2006; 108(1): 390 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yilmaz, C. Reiss, A. Weng, I. Cicha, C. Stumpf, A. Steinkasserer, W. G. Daniel, and C. D. Garlichs Differential effects of statins on relevant functions of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2006; 79(3): 529 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Battaglia, A. Stabilini, E. Draghici, S. Gregori, C. Mocchetti, E. Bonifacio, and M.-G. Roncarolo Rapamycin and Interleukin-10 Treatment Induces T Regulatory Type 1 Cells That Mediate Antigen-Specific Transplantation Tolerance Diabetes, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 40 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nalbandian, V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, A. Mao, S. Nale, and S. Kovats The Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, Tamoxifen and Raloxifene, Impair Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Activation J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2666 - 2675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Battaglia, A. Stabilini, and M.-G. Roncarolo Rapamycin selectively expands CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells Blood, June 15, 2005; 105(12): 4743 - 4748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-R. Lee, I.-H. Yang, Y.-H. Lee, S.-A Im, S. Song, H. Li, K. Han, K. Kim, S. K. Eo, and C.-K. Lee Cyclosporin A and tacrolimus, but not rapamycin, inhibit MHC-restricted antigen presentation pathways in dendritic cells Blood, May 15, 2005; 105(10): 3951 - 3955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-H. Chiang, L. Wang, C. A. Bonham, X. Liang, J. J. Fung, L. Lu, and S. Qian Mechanistic Insights into Impaired Dendritic Cell Function by Rapamycin: Inhibition of Jak2/Stat4 Signaling Pathway J. Immunol., February 1, 2004; 172(3): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Steinschulte, T. Taner, A. W. Thomson, G. Bein, and H. Hackstein Cutting Edge: Sanglifehrin A, a Novel Cyclophilin-Binding Immunosuppressant Blocks Bioactive IL-12 Production by Human Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., July 15, 2003; 171(2): 542 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hackstein, T. Taner, A. F. Zahorchak, A. E. Morelli, A. J. Logar, A. Gessner, and A. W. Thomson Rapamycin inhibits IL-4--induced dendritic cell maturation in vitro and dendritic cell mobilization and function in vivo Blood, June 1, 2003; 101(11): 4457 - 4463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Woltman and C. van Kooten Functional modulation of dendritic cells to suppress adaptive immune responses J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2003; 73(4): 428 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||