Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 30, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0350.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-02-0350v1
100/6/1935    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farag, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Caligiuri, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farag, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Caligiuri, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Right arrow Immunotherapy
Right arrow Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 15 September 2002, Vol. 100, No. 6, pp. 1935-1947

REVIEW ARTICLE

Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect

Sherif S. Farag, Todd A. Fehniger, Loredana Ruggeri, Andrea Velardi, and Michael A. Caligiuri

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus; and The Division of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, The Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

Natural killer (NK) cells have held great promise for the immunotherapy of cancer for more than 3 decades. However, to date only modest clinical success has been achieved manipulating the NK cell compartment in patients with malignant disease. Progress in the field of NK cell receptors has revolutionized our concept of how NK cells selectively recognize and lyse tumor and virally infected cells while sparing normal cells. Major families of cell surface receptors that inhibit and activate NK cells to lyse target cells have been characterized, including killer cell immunoglobulinlike receptors (KIRs), C-type lectins, and natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs). Further, identification of NK receptor ligands and their expression on normal and transformed cells completes the information needed to begin development of rational clinical approaches to manipulating receptor/ligand interactions for clinical benefit. Indeed, clinical data suggest that mismatch of NK receptors and ligands during allogeneic bone marrow transplantation may be used to prevent leukemia relapse. Here, we review how NK cell receptors control natural cytotoxicity and novel approaches to manipulating NK receptor-ligand interactions for the potential benefit of patients with cancer. (Blood. 2002;100:1935-1947)



    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

Over the past 2 decades, a number of different immune-based strategies aimed at eradication or suppression of residual malignant disease have been proposed for the clearance of leukemic cells. T-cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) has been shown to be the most efficacious following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and donor lymphocyte infusions.1,2 Although specific antileukemic responses have been documented, most T-cell-mediated alloreactions are thought to be directed against minor or major histocompatibility antigens shared by both leukemic and normal cells with potential for widespread host tissue damage. Successful T-cell-based immunotherapy will, therefore, ultimately require better definition of tumor-specific antigens that will allow the direction of the immune response to the tumor cells.3 Unfortunately, tumor-specific antigens have only been identified on a minority of cancers.4

In contrast to antigen-specific T cells, effector cells of the innate immune system lack the ability to rearrange the genes in the germ line that encode receptor components, and, hence, they cannot recognize a multitude of antigens in the context of classical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Natural killer (NK) cells are innate immune lymphocytes that held early clinical promise because of their ability to lyse tumor cells without specific antigen recognition.5,6 Clinical trials attempting to harness the antitumor effect of NK cells, either through in vivo or in vitro activation, have met with only modest success to date.7-9 However, over the past decade our knowledge of how NK cells recognize target cells using an integration of activating and inhibitory receptors now points toward potential clinical utility for the treatment of leukemia and other malignancies. In this review we summarize our current understanding of the receptors involved in NK cell recognition of tumor targets and discuss their potential clinical role in immunotherapy of leukemia with and without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.


    Human NK cells
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

NK cells are innate immune lymphocytes critical to host defense against invading infectious pathogens and malignant transformation through elaboration of cytokines and cytolytic activity.5,6,10 Human NK cells comprise approximately 10% of all blood lymphocytes and are identified by the expression of the CD56 surface antigen and the lack of CD3. Functionally, NK cells are an important source of innate immunoregulatory cytokines (eg, interferon-gamma [IFN-gamma ], tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha ], granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) that co-orchestrate the early immune response and contribute to the delayed T-cell response following infection.10 NK cells also have direct or natural cytotoxic activity against some virus-infected, leukemic, and other tumor cells, and they also mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of targets through Fcgamma RIII (CD16), a receptor that binds the Fc portion of antibody.11-14 The receptors that regulate NK cell recognition and lysis of tumor targets are discussed below.


    Human NK cell subsets
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

Two distinct subsets of human NK cells are identified according to cell surface density of CD56 expression as recently reviewed elsewhere.10 The majority (90%) of human NK cells are CD56dim and express high levels of CD16, whereas a minority (10%) is CD56bright and CD16dim/neg. These NK subsets are functionally distinct with the immunoregulatory CD56bright cells producing abundant cytokines and the cytotoxic CD56dim cells likely functioning as efficient effectors of natural and antibody-dependent target cell lysis.15 CD56bright NK cells constitutively express the high and intermediate affinity interleukin (IL)-2 receptors and expand in vitro and in vivo in response to low (picomolar) doses of IL-2.8,16 In contrast, resting CD56dim NK cells express only the intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptor and proliferate weakly in response to high doses of IL-2 (1-10 nM) in vitro, even after induction of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor.16,17 Resting CD56dim NK cells are more cytotoxic against NK-sensitive targets (K562 and COLO205 cell lines) than CD56bright NK cells.18 However, after activation with IL-2 or IL-12, CD56bright cells exhibit similar or enhanced cytotoxicity against NK targets compared with CD56dim cells.18-20 In addition, resting CD56bright and CD56dim NK cell subsets show differences in their NK receptor repertoires.21,22 Resting CD56bright NK cells are large agranular cells and express high levels of the C-type lectin CD94/NKG2 family with only very small fractions expressing killer-cell immunoglobulin receptor (KIR) family.18 Resting CD56dim NK cells, however, express both KIR and C-type lectin NK receptors at relatively high surface density along with an abundance of cytolytic granules packaged in the cytoplasm.18


    Human NK cell development
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

NK cells originate in the bone marrow from human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) and require the bone marrow microenvironment for complete maturation. Bone marrow stroma-derived cytokines, including IL-15 in cooperation with c-kit ligand (KL) and flt-3 ligand (FL), are critical physiologic factors for NK cell development, as recently reviewed.23 Human NK cell development can be divided into an early phase of development in which a NK progenitor responds to early acting stromal cell growth factors, KL and FL, and develops into an NK cell precursor intermediate with the phenotype CD34+IL-2/ IL-15Rbeta +CD56-. This precursor is then responsive to IL-15 for maturation into a functional CD56+ NK cell. The NK cells resulting from adult CD34+ HPCs in stroma-free cultures following addition of IL-15, however, resemble the CD56bright NK cell population both functionally and phenotypically (CD56brightCD16dim/neg), including their NK receptor repertoire.24 This finding suggests that other soluble or cell-contact signals are required for CD56dim NK cell characteristics and KIR acquisition, or alternatively the CD56dim population of NK cells may arise from a different precursor. Additional studies are required to understand the regulation of CD56dim NK cell differentiation, and if a developmental relationship exists between these 2 NK subsets. The events and factors that regulate NKR repertoire acquisition during NK cell differentiation is currently unclear and an active area of investigation.25,26


    Human NK cell recognition of target cells: NK receptors
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

Unlike T and B lymphocytes, NK cells do not rearrange genes encoding receptors for antigen recognition, but they have developed the ability to recognize self-MHC class I or class I-like molecules through a unique class of receptors, NK cell receptors (NKRs), that can inhibit or activate NK cell killing. Initially, Ljunggren and Karre27 proposed the "missing-self" hypothesis, wherein the function of NK cells is to recognize and destroy autologous cells that have lost or altered self-MHC class I molecules. Although tolerant to normal autologous cells, NK cells can recognize and attack virus-infected and transformed cells that have down-regulated MHC class I molecules. Human NK cells lyse class I-deficient Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, whereas transfection of class I alleles into target cells inhibits NK lysis.28,29 Accordingly, over the past decade, a number of inhibitory NK receptors specific for classical (eg, HLA-A, -B, or -C) or nonclassical (eg, HLA-E, -G) class I molecules have been recognized.

However, MHC class I is not always necessary for protection from lysis by NK cells, and inhibition by MHC class I is not always sufficient to prevent NK cytotoxicity. For example, NK cells are unable to reject MHC class I-deficient nonhematopoietic tissues, such as skin grafts, and in vitro they fail to lyse fibroblasts, even from beta 2-microglobulin null mice that lack class I expression.30 Conversely, some virus-infected cells that maintain expression of MHC class I at the cell surface can still be killed by autologous NK cells.31,32 Furthermore, IL-2-activated NK cells have increased lytic activity compared with circulating NK cells and are able to lyse otherwise NK cell-resistant targets.16 These observations point to the additional importance of activating receptors in regulating NK cell effector function. Ligation of NK-activating receptors with membrane-bound molecules of target cells results in NK cell blastogenesis, cytokine production, cytotoxicity, and migration. Each NK cell, therefore, appears to express its own repertoire of activating and inhibitory receptors, and cytotoxicity is ultimately regulated by a balance of signals from these activating and inhibitory receptors that interact with MHC class I and class I-like molecules on target cells (Figure 1). Later, we provide an overview of some of the inhibitory and activating NKRs whose ligands or target molecules have been identified. This overview will not comprehensively examine NKR biology, as several reviews have recently been published.10,33-35 We will focus on some potential clinical applications in the therapy of hematologic malignancies based on known NKR biology.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Regulation of NK cell response by activating and inhibitory receptors. Inhibitory receptors (eg, inhibitory KIR, CD94/NKG2A) recognize and engage their ligands, MHC class I molecules (HLA), on the surface of the target tumor cell, thereby initiating an inhibitory signal. Activating receptors (eg, activating KIR, CD94/NKG2C, NKG2D) bind ligands on the target cell surface and trigger NK cell activation and target cell lysis. (A) When inhibitory receptors engage HLA in the absence of an activating receptor/ligand interaction, a net negative signal is generated, resulting in no target cell lysis. (B) Conversely, when activating receptors engage their ligands on target cells in the absence of inhibitory receptor/ligand interaction, a net activation signal is generated, resulting in target cell lysis. This scenario is likely operative in NK alloreactivity in the setting of KIR epitope mismatch (see Figure 4 and text for more details). More complex physiologic scenarios are shown in C and D with both inhibitory and activating receptor/ligand signals being generated when an NK cell interacts with a target cell. (C) Here, the activating receptor/ligand interactions predominate over weaker inhibitory receptor/ligand signals with the net result of NK cell activation and target cell lysis. This net result may occur when activation receptors and ligands are up-regulated, thereby amplifying the net activation signal to exceed the inhibitory signal. For example, the activating ligands MICA/B and ULBPs are expressed highly in stressed or transformed cells, thereby activating NKG2D/PI3K pathways that are not susceptible to inhibitory signals (see text for details). Alternatively, when expression of self-MHC class I ligands is decreased in the setting of viral infection or transformation, the net signal may be positive, also resulting in target cell lysis. (D) Here, inhibitory receptor/ligand interactions result in a net negative signal that prevents NK cell lysis of the target cell. This process may occur constantly as NK cells survey normal host tissues. Not shown is the scenario of absence of both inhibitory and activating signals that results in no NK cell activation.


    Human killer cell immunoglobulin receptors
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

KIRs belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily and are characterized structurally by 2 or 3 extracellular immunoglobulinlike domains. KIRs specifically recognize MHC class I alleles, including groups of HLA-A,36,37 HLA-B,38-40 and HLA-C.38,41,42 There are 2 functionally distinct sets of KIRs: inhibitory and activating. Each set has an identical extracellular domain, and, consequently, each set binds to identical ligands. However, because of differences in their transmembrane and intracellular or cytoplasmic domains, one set of KIRs signals an inhibitory response and one set signals an activating response following their binding to identical MHC class I alleles (Figure 2).43,44


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. How inhibitory and activating KIR operate on NK cells. KIR receptors have either 2 or 3 immunoglobulin domains (2D or 3D) and a long (L) cytoplasmic tail containing ITIM motifs or a short (S) cytoplasmic tail and positively charged transmembrane domain that interacts with the ITAM-containing adaptor molecule DAP-12. When inhibitory KIRs bind their HLA ligand, src family kinases phosphorylate the ITIM, allowing binding of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 (and possibly SHP-2) through its SH2 domain. SHP-1 is able to dephosphorylate multiple targets in the ITAM-activating pathway, thereby mediating its negative signal. In contrast, when activating KIRs are ligated, src family kinases phosphorylate the ITAM-containing adaptor molecule DAP-12 that, in turn, binds to and activates the Syk family tyrosine kinases that trigger the downstream activation cascade. As inhibitory KIRs have higher affinity for the MHC class I ligands, coligation of both activating and inhibitory receptors results in a net negative signal, and no activation of the NK cell's cytotoxic or cytokine-secreting programs.

The KIR family of NKR, located on chromosome 19p13.4,45,46 includes 12 members and a number of allelic variants, of which 6 receptors are inhibitory and 6 are activating. These are monomeric (single chain) receptors with either 2 (KIR2D) or 3 immunoglobulinlike domains (KIR3D), which can be further subdivided into those with long (L) cytoplasmic tails (KIR2DL and KIR3DL) and short (S) cytoplasmic tails (KIR2DS and KIR3DS) (Figure 2). The long tail KIRs generate an inhibitory signal, whereas the short tail KIRs generate an activation signal. The inhibitory signal results from the presence of immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIMs) in the cytoplasmic domains of the long tail receptors. The short tail receptors owe their activating signals to their association with adaptor proteins bearing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activating motifs (ITAMs) (Figure 2). Whereas KIRs are specific for a number of MHC class I molecules, HLA-C is the predominant class I isotype involved in the inhibitory and activating regulation of human NK cells to provide either protection from or induction of target cell lysis and cytokine production. For the purposes of our discussion, we will focus on KIR recognition of HLA-C class I ligands. A current listing of known KIRs and their known ligands can be found in Table 1.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Human inhibitory NK cell receptors

A single KIR recognizes determinants that are shared between members of a group of HLA-C alleles. Two HLA-C allotype groups are identified according to amino acid residues present at positions 77 and 80 in the alpha 1 helix of the HLA-C molecule. Group 1 HLA-C alleles each have Ser77 and Asn80 and include HLA-Cw1, -Cw3, -Cw7, and -Cw8. The inhibitory KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3 NKR recognize the group 1 HLA-C alleles (Table 1). Of course, activating KIR2DS2 and KIR2DS3 bear the same extracellular domains as their inhibitory counterparts and, therefore, also recognize the group 1 HLA-C alleles. The group 2 HLA-C alleles each have Asn77 and Lys80 in the alpha 1 helix and include those of HLA-Cw2, -Cw4, -Cw5, and -Cw6. The inhibitory KIR2DL1 and activating KIR2DS1 NKR recognize the group 2 HLA-C alleles. In general, it appears that the inhibitory KIRs have a greater affinity or attraction for the corresponding group of HLA-C alleles than do the activating KIRs.47 Therefore, a human NK cell that expresses both inhibitory and activating KIRs recognizing a single allele will generally be inhibited from killing.

Importantly, the number and role of inhibitory KIRs in NK cell biology are still evolving.48 A few additional inhibitory KIRs are listed in Table 1 with their respective ligands, when known. It appears clear that corresponding inhibitory KIRs to many HLA-A and HLA-B alleles do not exist, indicating that the KIR repertoire is not all inclusive for human classical class I allotypes.49 One long cytoplasmic tail KIR, KIR2DL4, recognizes the nonclassical MHC class I allele HLA-G.50,51 HLA-G is a molecule that displays limited polymorphism, and its expression has a unique restricted tissue distribution on fetal extravillous trophoblasts that invade the maternal decidua during pregnancy.52 In contrast to other KIRs that are clonally distributed, KIR2DL4 is thought to be expressed by all NK cells,51,53 although one study found that only decidual NK cells (all of which are CD56bright) expressed this receptor and that peripheral blood NK cells did not express KIR2DL4.54 Although initially classified as an inhibitory receptor because of the presence of ITIM in its cytoplasmic domain, recent evidence indicates that ligation of KIR2DL4 on resting NK cells results in activation with the unique property of inducing IFN-gamma production without lytic activity.55 This process appears to depend on an intact transmembrane domain and not the ITIM.55 The precise function of this receptor is unclear, although it has been speculated that it may mediate tolerance of the hemi-allogeneic fetus, or possibly vascularization at the implanting site through IFN-gamma secretion.56

Another group of inhibitory receptors belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily and is represented by the immunoglobulinlike transcripts (ILTs), also referred to as leukocyte immunoglobulinlike receptors (LIRs).57,58 These receptors are encoded by a series of genes on chromosome 19, close to the region encoding KIR. ILT receptors are expressed primarily on myeloid cells, dendritic cells, and B cells.57 ILT-2 (LIR-1) is also expressed on NK cells and interacts directly with a broad spectrum of HLA class I molecules, including HLA-G.57-59


    C-type lectin family of human NK receptors
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

A second family of human NK receptors is structurally characterized by C-type lectin extracellular domains and is expressed as heterodimers composed of a common subunit (CD94) covalently bonded to a distinct chain encoded by a gene of the C-type lectin NKG2 family.49,60-63 CD94 is a product of a single nonpolymorphic gene and essentially lacks a cytoplasmic domain for intrinsic signal transduction capacity.64 The extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the NKG2 molecules are structurally diverse, consistent with differences in ligand recognition and signal transduction.65-67 Homodimers of CD94 exist and are of uncertain physiologic function.68 Four closely related transcripts of the NKG2 family, with corresponding genes, have been identified: NKG2A (and its splice variant NKG2B), NKG2C, NKG2E (and its splice variant NKG2H), and NKG2F.65-67,69 NKG2D is a fifth distantly related member that displays only a low sequence similarity with the other NKG2 members and does not interact with CD94 (discussed later). The CD94 and NKG2 genes are all closely linked on chromosome 12p12.3-p13.1 in the human NK gene complex.69,70

CD94/NKG2 heterodimers are selectively expressed by NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes.71 Of the C-type lectin NK receptors, only CD94/NKG2A is inhibitory, whereas other heterodimers are activating receptors (Tables 1 and 2). NK clones may selectively bear either inhibitory or activating CD94/NKG2 receptors, yet NKG2A and NKG2C can be detected by revere transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in some NK clones, and indirect functional data suggest that a subset of NK cells may coexpress both receptors.68 The inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A complex binds the nonclassical class I molecule HLA-E.72-74 Interestingly, HLA-E binds leader peptides derived from HLA-A, -B, -C, and -G, and, therefore, CD94/NKG2A functionally senses overall expression of HLA class I molecules at the cell surface. For the same peptide/HLA-E complex, binding to the inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A is stronger than binding to the activating receptor CD94/NKG2C.75

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Human activating NK cell receptors

Only when loaded with the appropriate nonamer peptides derived from the signal sequences of classic class I MHC molecules can the HLA-E molecule be transported to the cell surface.72-74 The detection of HLA-E by the CD94/NKG2 receptors may therefore be a sensitive mechanism for the immunosurveillance for normal biosynthesis of HLA class I molecules, a process that can be altered in virally infected or tumor cells. In addition, the ability of CD94/NKG2 receptors to discriminate among different peptide/HLA-E complexes might also influence reactivity against allogeneic cells. The spectrum of HLA molecules covered by KIRs and, indirectly, by CD94/NKG2 receptors, is only partially overlapping, suggesting that both systems play a complementary role for monitoring the biosynthesis/expression of most HLA class I molecules.76 The relative importance of each system and their interaction in modulating the reactivity of NK cells against autologous virus-infected and transformed cells, or allogeneic cells, remains to be elucidated.

The biologic significance for the existence of paired inhibitory and activating receptors for MHC class I remains unclear. In both cases of KIRs and CD94/NKG2 receptors, the affinity of the activating receptor is lower than that of the corresponding inhibitory receptor,47,77 ensuring a predominance of the inhibitory signal when both activating and inhibitory receptors recognizing HLA molecules are expressed on the same NK cells. However, only a minority of NK cell clones express both activating and inhibitory isoforms that recognize the same HLA allotype.48,53,78 Much more commonly, NK cell clones expressing an activating receptor coexpress at least one inhibitory receptor specific for a different HLA class I allele that, when engaged, predominates. Therefore, the MHC class I-specific activating receptors may only signal when target cells have lost the expression of an HLA allele recognized by the inhibitory receptor, thus allowing NK cells' activating receptor to engage its ligand. In this way, NK cell surveillance may be important for removal of cells that have down-regulated or lost a single MHC class I allele while normal cells would be left unaffected.79 For example, virus-infected or transformed cells may selectively down-regulate HLA-A and -B allotypes while leaving HLA-C and -E unaffected.80,81 In this and other instances, positive target cell recognition by activating receptors is also essential to triggering NK cell cytotoxicity, and the balance between opposite signals delivered by inhibitory and/or activating receptors regulates NK cell functions. Activating receptors can be broadly grouped into those that are counterparts of the inhibitory receptors that recognize MHC class I molecules (discussed earlier) and those that do not have inhibitory counterparts and recognize inducible non-MHC molecules on target cells (Table 2).


    Non-MHC class I-specific activating NK cell receptors
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

Although the activating KIRs and CD94/NKG2 receptors may be important in mediating NK cytotoxicity against MHC class I-bearing targets, other activating receptors are important in mediating cytotoxicity against MHC class I-deficient or negative targets. A number of activating receptors with no apparent specificity for MHC class I molecules have been reported, although many act as coactivators rather than direct stimulators of NK cell function. In humans, a group of receptors called natural cytotoxicity receptors (NCRs)82-86 and the NKG2D receptor have emerged as activating receptors important in recognizing tumor cells in an MHC-independent manner. Three NCRs (NKp46, NKp44, and NKp30) have been identified. NKp46 and NKp30 are constitutively expressed by all peripheral blood NK cells and are not found on other immune cells.82,86 NKp44 is not expressed by resting NK cells but is up-regulated on NK cells after IL-2 stimulation84 and may be important for the cytotoxicity of IL-2-activated NK cells. NKp44 is also found on a proportion of gamma delta T cells.87 These receptors signal through coupling with ITAM-containing CD3zeta and/or Fcepsilon RIgamma adaptor proteins and are involved in the recognition of various tumor cells. However, the ligands for the NCR have yet to be elucidated. Thus, although they are likely to have an important role in some aspect of immune surveillance and target cell recognition, their biologic significance in NK cell interactions is currently unclear.


    Human NKG2D receptor
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

The NKG2D is the best characterized activating receptor described on NK cells. It is a C-type lectin surface receptor that is misleadingly named as a member of the NKG2 family, encoded within the NK gene complex on human chromosome 12.66,69,70 Unlike the other NKG2 proteins presented earlier, NKG2D has little sequence homology and does not associate with CD94 but is expressed as a homodimer.88 The surface expression of NKG2D requires association with a newly described adaptor subunit designated DAP1088 or KAP10.89 The intracellular domain of NKG2D does not have any signaling motif, and, therefore, signaling is exclusively through its association with DAP10, which does not contain a cytoplasmic ITAM but recruits phosphatidylinositol (PI)-3 kinase after phosphorylation that, in turn, induces cytotoxicity. Importantly, because NKG2D has a signaling pathway that is distinct from the activating KIR and C-type lectin NKR described earlier, triggering via NKG2D is likely less susceptible to signals mediated by inhibitory receptors. NKG2D is constitutively expressed by all NK cells but is also expressed by almost all human gamma delta + T cells and all CD8+ T cells.90


    Ligands for human NKG2D: MIC and UL16 binding proteins
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Human NK cells
Human NK cell subsets
Human NK cell development
Human NK cell recognition...
Human killer cell...
C-type lectin family of...
Non-MHC class I-specific...
Human NKG2D receptor
Ligands for human NKG2D:...
Roles of NCR and...
Other membrane receptors...
Clinical roles of NK...
KIR-epitope mismatch in...
KIR epitope-mismatch may...
In vivo blockade of...
Modulation of activating NK...
Conclusions
References

In contrast to the NCRs, target cell ligands for NKG2D have been identified and are induced by "stress" or neoplastic transformation, suggesting that NKG2D mediates the killing of cells that have been altered by these processes. The expression of these ligands may, therefore, be signals of "altered self" or "danger" to the innate immune system to promote NK and T-cell responses. In the human, these recently defined ligands belong to 2 distinct families, the MHC class I chain-related (MIC) antigens, and the UL16 binding proteins (ULBPs).91-94

The MIC antigens are encoded by a distinct family of genes stationed along the entire MHC class I region on human chromosome 6. They have a low degree of homology to other MHC-encoded class I genes, distinct transcriptional control elements, and a peculiar pattern of polymorphism.91 There are 7 MIC loci, A to G, but only the MICA and MICB genes are transcribed; MIC-C, -D, -E, -F and -G are pseudogenes.91-93 The MIC glycoproteins contain 3 MHC-like alpha -domains but, in contrast to MHC class I molecules, do not require beta 2-microglobulin or peptide for stable surface expression.95 MICA and MICB have been shown to be specific ligands for human NKG2D.90 Currently, 54 MICA alleles, of which 47 encode distinct putative glycoproteins, and 16 MICB alleles have been identified.91 These alleles are defined by nucleotide substitutions throughout the alpha 1, alpha 2, and alpha 3 domains.

Unlike MHC class I, MIC genes are not ubiquitously expressed. Bahram91 and Shiina et al92 have demonstrated that MIC transcripts are not expressed in the spleen and cells of the lympho-hematopoietic lineage, although they are expressed in fibroblast and epithelial cell lines as well as almost all tissues harboring these cell types. The expression of MICA and MICB are under the control of promoter elements similar to those of the heat shock protein gene PSP70.96 In this respect, exposure of MIC-expressing epithelial lines to heat shock was shown to increase expression of MIC transcripts and proteins.96 Furthermore, MIC expression on fibroblasts and epithelial cells was strongly up-regulated following infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV).97 Importantly, high MICA and MICB expression was detected on many human epithelial tumors98,99 and more recently on the JA3 and Raji leukemic cell lines,98 as well as on primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts (S.S.F., T.A.F., and M.A.C., unpublished observations, February 2002). Therefore, induction or up-regulation of MIC expression may occur with cellular stress, viral infection, or neoplastic transformation and may facilitate attack of these altered cells by NK cells and some T cells.

The second family of NKG2D ligands reported are human cellular proteins, initially identified by their ability to bind the human CMV protein UL16, which is a type I transmembrane protein known to be expressed by CMV-infected cells.100 UL16 binds to MICB and 2 proteins designated ULBP-1 and ULBP-2.94 By expression-cloning a third member of this family of proteins has been reported, ULBP-3, that, however, does not bind UL16.94 The 3 ULBPs possess alpha 1 and alpha 2 domains but differ from MIC and MHC class I molecules in lacking the alpha 3 domain, and they are expressed as glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface proteins without a requirement for association with beta 2-microglobulin for surface expression. It is currently unknown if any polymorphisms exist within this gene family. It is also possible that other ULBPs exist that may function as ligands for NKG2D. Specificity for binding to human NKG2D has been demonstrated by the cross-competition of soluble ULBPs with MICs for binding to NK cells, the ability to bind to recombinantly expressed NKG2D/DAP10 complexes, and the complete blocking of ULBP binding to primary human NK cells by anti-NKG2D antibodies.94-101

The expression of ULBPs is more widespread than that of MIC proteins. With the use of RT-PCR, ULBP transcripts were detected in heart, lung, testis, brain, lymph nodes, thymus, tonsil, liver, and bone marrow.94 However, in some tissues where high ULBP mRNA expression was detected, no cell surface expression was found by monoclonal antibody,94 suggesting that surface expression of ULBPs may be regulated at a posttranscriptional level. This finding has important implications for the study of these ligands in tumor cell recognition by NK cells.


    Roles of NCR and NKG2D in NK-mediated tumor cell