| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0792.
GENE THERAPY
From the Divisions of Hematology and Oncology,
Department of Medicine, and the Department of Laboratory Medicine,
University of Washington, Seattle; the Clinical Research Division, Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; the Department of
Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois, Urbana; PhenoPath
Laboratories, Seattle, WA; ARIAD Gene Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA; and
Department I of Internal Medicine and Institute for Molecular Medicine
and Cell Research, University of Freiburg, Germany.
The inefficiency of gene transfer has greatly hindered gene
therapy. In vivo selection may increase the frequency of genetically modified cells, thereby circumventing this critical limitation. Here we
demonstrate regulated in vivo selection in a large animal. CD34+ cells from 2 dogs were engineered to express a
conditional derivative of the thrombopoietin receptor (F36Vmpl).
Activation of the receptor through administration of a dimerizing drug,
AP20187, produced reversible, drug-dependent rises in genetically
modified red cells, white cells, and platelets in both animals, with
minimal side effects. Cell growth switches could greatly enhance the
efficacy and applicability of gene and cell therapy.
(Blood. 2002;100:2026-2031) Stem cell gene therapy has demonstrated unequivocal
efficacy in only a single published trial, for the treatment of
X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency,1,2 where
replacement of a missing receptor subunit allows pro-T cells to
complete development in the thymus. This success is attributable to the
tremendous selective advantage conferred upon corrected lymphocytes
relative to their unmodified counterparts. However, for most diseases, little or no selective advantage in favor of the genetically corrected cell population can be anticipated.
Several strategies have been devised for generating a selective
pressure that favors genetically modified cells and can be applied in
vivo. Initial reports in rodent models used genes that confer
resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Selectable markers that have been
evaluated include dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), which confers
resistance to folate analogues, including trimetrexate3; multidrug-resistance gene 1 (MDR1), which confers resistance to a
number of drugs, including taxol4; and
06-methylguanine methyl transferase (MGMT), which confers
resistance to alkylating agents, such as BCNU
(1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea).5 Attempts
to use drug resistance genes for in vivo selection in large animal
models6-8 and in phase 1 clinical trials9-13
have been complicated by the resistance of hemopoietic progenitor and stem cells to many cytotoxic agents14,15 and by the
considerable side effects associated with cytotoxic drug
administration.6,8
We have developed an alternative method for positive
selection16,17 that employs a derivative of the
thrombopoietin receptor (mpl) to deliver a conditional growth signal to
genetically modified cells in response to a nontoxic drug called a
chemical inducer of dimerization (CID). The mpl signaling domain is
incorporated into a fusion protein (F36Vmpl) that remains functionally
inert unless directed to dimerize through administration of the CID. The F36Vmpl fusion therefore acts as a "cell growth switch" that is
turned on in the presence of CID and off following withdrawal of CID.
In previous studies we have shown that CID-regulated activation of mpl
allows transduced murine progenitor cells to be dramatically expanded
both in vitro18-20 and in vivo.21
Dogs provide a well-established preclinical model for testing cell and
gene therapies,22-25 and results obtained in the dog model
can be considered predictive of results in humans. We therefore tested
whether CIDs could regulate the growth of F36Vmpl-engineered hemopoietic cells in the dog.
Animals
CD34 enrichment of bone marrow cells
Bone marrow buffy-coat cells were labeled with biotinylated monoclonal antibody 1H6 (immunoglobulin G1 anti-canine CD34). The cells were washed twice, incubated with streptavidin-conjugated microbeads, washed, and then separated by an immunomagnetic column technique used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Collection of virally conditioned media (VCM) and determination of viral titer Retroviral supernatant was collected in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% Pen/Strep from subconfluent monolayers of F36VmplGFP/PG13 producer cells after incubation for 48 hours at 33°C.To determine the titer, 5 × 104 HeLa cells were plated in 6-well plates (Corning) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Pen/Strep. After incubation for 24 hours, the medium was replaced by 1 mL VCM diluted 1:10 in DMEM containing Polybrene at a final concentration of 4 µg/mL. After 6 hours, 1 mL of fresh DMEM was added. After an additional 18 hours, the mixture of VCM and DMEM was exchanged. Cells were cultured for an additional 48 hours, trypsinized, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Titer was determined according to the following formula: 5 × 104 cells plated × 2 (after initial 24 hours of culture before transduction) × 10 (to correct for 1:10 dilution of VCM) × fraction GFP-positive (for the VCM used here, between 0.09 and 0.14). Titer of VCM was determined to be 0.9 × 105 for the first animal and 1.3 × 105 for the second animal. Transduction of enriched bone marrow cells CD34+ cells were transduced by established methods26 with the following modifications. Transductions were carried out on a Retronectin-coated surface (Retronectin was generously provided by Takara Shuzo, Kyoto, Japan) twice preloaded with VCM. After 48 hours of prestimulation using canine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, canine stem cell factor, and human Flt3-ligand (50 ng/mL), the cells were pelleted, resuspended in VCM, and cultured for 4 hours in a 5% CO2 37°C incubator. The cells were then centrifuged and resuspended in human Dexter medium. The procedure was repeated the following day. Immediately following the second exposure to VCM (after a total culture period of approximately 72 hours), cells were reinfused into the irradiated autologous recipient. The absence of replication-competent helper virus was confirmed by PCR for GALV-envelope sequences, using DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes isolated at various time points after transplantation.AP20187 administration AP20187 (www.ariad.com/regulationkits) was formulated in 5% solutol at a concentration of 10 mg/mL and stored at 4°C. On the day of injection, an appropriate volume of AP20187 stock solution (1 mL for the first dog and 1.3 mL for the second dog) was diluted to a total volume of 30 mL in 0.9% sodium chloride and injected intravenoulsy over 15 minutes. Each course of AP20187 was administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg twice daily for 30 days.Flow cytometric analysis Flow cytometric quantification of at least 20 000 events (gated by forward and right-angle light scatter and excluded for propidium iodide [1 mg/mL] was performed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Analysis of flow cytometric data was performed with CELLQuest v3.1f software with gating to exclude fewer than 0.1% control cells in the relevant region. Monoclonal antibodies conjugated to phycoerythrin, which had been shown to bind canine CD markers CD3, CD21, and CD14, were used to study canine T cells, B cells, and monocytes, respectively. Antibody DM5 was used to examine dog granulocytes. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Intrastain reagents (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA). Antibodies to CD79 (Clone HM57, DAKO) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Supertechs, Bethesda, MD) were used.
To test whether the F36Vmpl fusion can generate a proliferative signal in canine hemopoietic cells, we transduced CD34-selected marrow cells with a PG-13 packaged murine stem cell virus (MSCV)-based bicistronic retroviral vector encoding a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter and the F36Vmpl fusion (F36VmplGFP).21 Following transduction, cells cultured in the presence of a CID (AP20187, 100 nM) expanded up to 34-fold relative to transduced cells cultured in the absence of CID, and prominent selection of GFP-expressing cells was observed (data not shown). These data confirmed that the F36VmplGFP vector could generate a proliferative signal in canine hemopoietic cells, and we proceeded to studies of CID-mediated in vivo selection. CID-mediated in vivo selection of genetically modified red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets The first dog was a 9-month-old female beagle. Marrow cells were harvested, CD34-selected and transduced using the F36VmplGFP vector, then reinfused into the lethally irradiated autologous recipient. Engraftment was uneventful, and by week 13 after transplantation, stable frequencies of GFP-marked red cells, white cells, and platelets had been achieved in the peripheral blood (all in the range of 1.3%). We then began administration of AP20187 at a dose of 1 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for 30 consecutive days. AP20187 treatment stimulated a striking transient elevation in peripheral hemopoietic cells of multiple lineages, including red cells, white cells, and platelets (Figure 1). The most significant responses to AP20187 occurred in GFP+ red cells (Figure 1A), which steadily rose from 1.3% at baseline to 9.5% by the end of drug treatment before peaking at 13.2% more than 2 weeks later. Thereafter, GFP+ red cells gradually declined to 5.2% 76 days after completion of the 30-day course. The earliest indicator of a response to AP20187 occurred among GFP-positive white cells (Figure 1B), which rose to 4.3% by day 2 and 10.5% by day 3 before falling rapidly to 2% to 3% despite continuation of the drug. Standard forward/side scatter parameters indicated that this early spike arose from a wave of GFP-positive granulocytes (data not shown). A similar, albeit less pronounced, spike (to 7.2%) occurred on day 16 of drug treatment, and then GFP-labeled white cells remained in the range of 2% to 4% until the drug treatment was discontinued. Unexpectedly, discontinuation of AP20187 prompted a further rise in GFP-positive white cells, to 6.9% by day 33 (3 days after completion of AP20187 treatment) and 9.2% by day 47, before they gradually fell to the range of 3% to 4% by week 6 after treatment. GFP-labeled platelets also steadily rose in response to AP20187, reaching 7.3%, then promptly fell following discontinuation of AP20187, stabilizing in the range of approximately 2% (Figure 1C). CID administration achieved not only a relative but also an absolute increase in transduced circulating blood cells (Figure 1D-E).
CID-mediated effects in the marrow Responses to AP20187 were even more evident in the marrow (Figure 2). At baseline, 1.8% of nucleated cells in the marrow were GFP positive, whereas by the end of drug treatment 29.4% of all nucleated cells were GFP labeled. Effects among CD34+ cells were even more prominent. The frequency of CD34+ cells expressing GFP rose from a baseline of 1.4% to 65% after 7 days of drug treatment, reaching a peak of 96.8% by the end of CID treatment. The absolute number of GFP+/CD34+ cells also rose dramatically, such that by the end of the 30-day course of CID they constituted more than 21% of all nucleated cells in the marrow. Five weeks after the drug was stopped, 3.3% of nucleated cells and 4.8% of CD34+ cells were GFP positive, and CD34+/GFP+ double-positive cells constituted fewer than 0.2% of all nucleated cells in the marrow. We confirmed selection of marked cells in the marrow independently, using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Figure 2E) and Southern blot (data not shown). A more detailed analysis of the CD34+/GFP+ double-positive population indicated that it was constituted of pro-B cells, as described further below. A preliminary analysis of integration sites using a highly sensitive linear amplification-mediated (LAM)-PCR method27 suggested that multiple clones contributed to the CID response (data not shown).
Persistent responsiveness to retreatment with CID To evaluate the persistence of CID responsiveness, we administered a second identical course of AP20187 treatment to the same animal, beginning 78 days after completion of the first cycle (Figure 1). Repeated treatment reproduced virtually all of the features seen with the first drug cycle, including the initial wave of GFP-positive white cells (mainly neutrophils) peaking on day 4 of drug retreatment and the step-up in GFP-positive white cells following drug discontinuation, reaching a maximal frequency of 10.9%. Similarly, GFP-positive platelets rose to a maximal value of 5.8%, while GFP-positive red cells reached a peak frequency of 18%. The effect of AP20187 retreatment on GFP-positive cells in the marrow also closely mirrored the response to the initial course of treatment (Figure 2). At the end of the second 30-day course of AP20187, 26.6% of nucleated cells in the marrow were GFP positive, while 96.2% of CD34+ cells in the marrow were GFP positive.To evaluate the reproducibility of these findings, we treated a
24-month-old male beagle, using an identical protocol. By 10 weeks
after transplantation, a stable frequency of GFP-positive cells in the
blood and marrow was established and the 30-day course of AP20187 was
begun. Results in the second animal closely mirrored those in the first
animal, both in the peripheral blood and in the bone marrow (Figure
3).
CID treatment produces a substantial rise in transduced B cells A more detailed analysis of the AP20187-expanded CD34+/GFP+ bone marrow cells was carried out (Figure 4). Cytospin preparations of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-sorted CD34+/GFP+ bone marrow cells from the first animal revealed a lymphoblastic morphology (Figure 4A). Sorted CD34+/GFP+ cells lacked clonogenicity, with colonies arising from only 0.06% of cells plated in semisolid media. In contrast, sorted CD34+/GFP from the same
dog and CD34+ cells from a normal dog formed colonies at
expected frequencies of 10% and 4.8%, respectively. Finally,
CD34+/GFP+ bone marrow cells expressed terminal
deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase (Tdt; Figure 4B) and CD79 (data not
shown), consistent with their identity as pro-B cells. The
disappearance of these cells from the marrow at the end of CID
treatment was associated with a sustained rise in
CD21+/GFP+ leukocytes (ie, B cells) in the
peripheral blood (Figure 4C). Subset analysis of peripheral blood
leukocytes from the first dog showed peak GFP marking levels of 4.3%
among monocytes, 6.4% among granulocytes, and 7.3% among T cells.
Peak marking reached 39% after the first drug cycle in the first
animal. In the second dog, peak marking in B cells reached even higher
levels, of up to more than 50% (Figure 4C).
To determine whether GFP-positive B cells emerging in response to AP20187 were capable of trafficking to lymphoid tissue, a lymph node biopsy was performed one month after completion of the first drug cycle, when marking in B cells was declining. Flow cytometry showed that among CD21+ B cells, 20% expressed GFP, whereas only 5% of CD3+ T cells were GFP positive. A lymph node biopsy from the second dog also yielded very similar results (data not shown). Immunohistochemistry revealed a substantial number of GFP-positive cells, particularly in the deep pole of germinal centers (Figure 4D). In aggregate, these results indicate that AP20187 induced the expansion of transduced pro-B cells that subsequently expressed CD21, circulated in peripheral blood and finally homed to lymph nodes. This expansion of B cells was unanticipated on the basis of our previous studies in mice.21 Treatment with AP20187 was associated with minimal side effects. Serial
complete blood counts (Figure 5) revealed
reversible, mild to moderate thrombocytopenia beginning during the
second week of AP20187 treatment, with platelet counts falling to
minimal levels of 50 000/µL. No bleeding or other adverse effects
were observed. Clinical chemistries and tests of liver and kidney
function were performed weekly throughout drug treatment and the
results remained normal.
These findings provide the first demonstration of CID-regulated in vivo selection of genetically modified cells in a large animal. Selection was most prominent in red blood cells and in B lymphoid cells. The pronounced proliferative effect of mpl signaling on immature B lymphoid cells was unexpected. Experiments in nonhuman primates are ongoing and will be helpful in determining whether this phenomenon, not observed in the mouse, is specific to the canine system. While no serious toxicities were encountered in the present study, long-term observation will be required to evaluate the potential development of malignancy. In this regard, the observed expansion of immature B cells is unnecessary for most applications, with the possible exception of inherited immunodeficiencies. It will be of interest to evaluate the effect of sequences derived from receptors other than mpl on various lineages in the canine system. In vitro data in experiments using primary murine cells suggest that dimerizer-mediated activation of different receptors produces profoundly different outcomes.20 Alternatively, the clinical application of this system may depend on developing vectors that direct expression of the growth switch in a lineage-specific manner. We chose to demonstrate the feasibility of CID-mediated selection in the setting of myeloablative conditioning. Ultimately, for the treatment of nonmalignant diseases by stem cell gene therapy, it would be desirable to reduce or eliminate cytotoxic conditioning. Conferring a selective proliferative advantage on the transduced cell population may help to achieve this goal. Experiments testing the feasibility of combining reduced conditioning with in vivo selection are warranted. Recently, substantial progress has been made toward the
development of gene therapy vectors for the treatment of
hemoglobinopathies such as In the present study, mild thrombocytopenia was the only side effect of AP20187 administration, and this was promptly reversed on withdrawal from CID treatment (Figure 5). Preliminary investigations suggest that the thrombocytopenia may be a direct side effect of the drug or its solutol-based carrier. It is also possible that the thrombocytopenia arose as an indirect consequence of mpl signaling, either by inducing platelet aggregation (causing artifactual thrombocytopenia) or by inducing the elaboration of cytokines that inhibit platelet production. Of note, preliminary studies using the same AP20187 dose and formulation in nonhuman primates have not produced thrombocytopenia, suggesting that this side effect may be specific to the canine model (data not shown). The present data demonstrate that the combination of a nontoxic small-molecule drug and a cell growth switch allows for pharmacologically regulated in vivo selection in a clinically relevant large animal model. The use of cell growth switches opens up the possibility for stem cell gene therapy to become feasible for the wide array of diseases for which corrected cells enjoy no selective advantage. Derivatives of this approach have the potential to make gene therapy effective for disorders beyond the hemopoietic system. For example, a recent study has demonstrated the feasibility of using CIDs to regulate the growth of genetically modified myoblasts.32 Finally, cell growth switches might play a fundamental role in unleashing the enormous therapeutic potential of stem cells. A number of recent reports suggest that stem cells from a variety of different tissues retain a surprising degree of plasticity,33 while human embryonic stem cells are capable of generating any tissue.34 In theory, it should be possible to equip stem cells with growth switches that are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. Expression of the growth switch upon elaboration of the desired cell type might allow specific stem cell-derived tissues to be expanded either in vitro or in vivo. The data presented here provide a platform for improving the safety and efficacy of gene therapy. Growth switches may help to fulfill the promise of gene and cell therapy.35
The authors would like to thank David Dalgarno and John Iuliucci for advice; Marilyn Skelly, M. Jane Chladny, David Dalgarno, Katy Dougherty, Melissa C. Richman, Bobbie M. Thomasson, and Kathrin Bernt for technical assistance; Leonard W. Rozamus and Terence Keenan for AP20187; and Eric Bell, Michelle Spector, Alix Joslyn, and the staff of the canine facility of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
Submitted March 14, 2002; accepted May 1, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0792.
Supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants DK 52997, DK 57525, DK 61844, HL 53750, DK 55820, HL 36444, DK 56465, and DK 47754), a fellowship grant from the German Krebshilfe to P.A.H., and a fellowship grant from Cooley's Anemia Foundation to T.N.
Two of the authors (T.C., S.W.) are employed by a company whose technology is featured in the present work.
H.-P.K. and C.A.B. contributed equally to this paper.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: C. Anthony Blau, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Box 357710, Seattle, WA 98195; e-mail: tblau{at}u.washington.edu.
1.
Cavazzana-Calvo M, Hacein-Bey S, de Saint Basile G, et al.
Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease.
Science.
2000;288:669-672
2.
Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Le Deist F, Carlier F, et al.
Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy.
N Engl J Med.
2002;346:1185-1193 3. Allay JA, Persons DA, Galipeau J, et al. In vivo selection of retrovirally transduced hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 1998;4:1136-1143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Sorrentino BP, Brandt SJ, Bodine D, et al.
Selection of drug-resistant bone marrow cells in vivo after retroviral transfer of human MDR1.
Science.
1992;257:99-103
5.
Davis BM, Koc ON, Gerson SL.
Limiting numbers of G156A O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-transduced marrow progenitors repopulate nonmyeloablated mice after drug selection.
Blood.
2000;95:3078-3084
6.
Stead RB, Kwok WW, Storb R, Miller AD.
Canine model for gene therapy: inefficient gene expression in dogs reconstituted with autologous marrow infected with retroviral vectors.
Blood.
1988;71:742-747
7.
Hibino H, Tani K, Ikebuchi K, et al.
The common marmoset as a target preclinical primate model for cytokine and gene therapy studies.
Blood.
1999;93:2839-2848
8.
Licht T, Haskins M, Henthorn P, et al.
Drug selection with paclitaxel restores expression of linked IL-2 receptor gamma-chain and multidrug resistance (MDR1) transgenes in canine bone marrow.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2002;99:3123-3128
9.
Hesdorffer C, Ayello J, Ward M, et al.
Phase I trial of retroviral-mediated transfer of the human MDR1 gene as marrow chemoprotection in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation.
J Clin Oncol.
1998;16:165-172
10.
Cowan KH, Moscow JA, Huang H, et al.
Paclitaxel chemotherapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation and engraftment of hematopoietic cells transduced with a retrovirus containing the multidrug resistance complementary DNA (MDR1) in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Clin Cancer Res.
1999;5:1619-1628
11.
Hanania EG, Giles RE, Kavanagh J, et al.
Results of MDR-1 vector modification trial indicate that granulocyte/macrophage colony-forming unit cells do not contribute to posttransplant hematopoietic recovery following intensive systemic therapy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1996;93:15346-15351
12.
Moscow JA, Huang H, Carter C, et al.
Engraftment of MDR1 and NeoR gene-transduced hematopoietic cells after breast cancer chemotherapy.
Blood.
1999;94:52-61 13. Abonour R, Williams DA, Einhorn L, et al. Efficient retrovirus-mediated transfer of the multidrug resistance 1 gene into autologous human long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2000;6:652-658[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Blau CA, Neff T, Papayannopoulou T. The hematological effects of folate analogs: implications for using the dihydrofolate reductase gene for in vivo selection. Hum Gene Ther. 1996;7:2069-2078[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
15.
Blau CA, Neff T, Papayannopoulou T.
Cytokine prestimulation as a gene therapy strategy: implications for using the MDR1 gene as a dominant selectable marker.
Blood.
1997;89:146-154
16.
Blau CA, Peterson KR, Drachman JG, Spencer DM.
A proliferation switch for genetically modified cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:3076-3081
17.
Neff T, Blau CA.
Pharmacologically regulated cell therapy.
Blood.
2001;97:2535-2540
18.
Jin L, Siritanaratkul N, Emery DW, et al.
Targeted expansion of genetically modified bone marrow cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1998;95:8093-8097
19.
Richard RE, Wood B, Zeng H, Jin L, Papayannopoulou T, Blau CA.
Expansion of genetically modified primary human hemopoietic cells using chemical inducers of dimerization.
Blood.
2000;95:430-436
20.
Zeng H, Masuko M, Jin L, Neff T, Otto KG, Blau CA.
Receptor specificity in the self-renewal and differentiation of primary multipotential hemopoietic cells.
Blood.
2001;98:328-334 21. Jin L, Zeng H, Chien S, et al. In vivo selection using a cell-growth switch. Nat Genet. 2000;26:64-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Thomas E, Storb R, Clift RA, et al. Bone-marrow transplantation (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975;292:832-843[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 23. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, et al. Bone-marrow transplantation (second of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975;292:895-902[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. Kiem HP, von Kalle C, Schuening F, Storb R. Gene therapy and bone marrow transplantation. Curr Opin Oncol. 1995;7:107-114[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Goerner M, Horn PA, Peterson L, et al.
Sustained multilineage gene persistence and expression in dogs transplanted with CD34(+) marrow cells transduced by RD114-pseudotype oncoretrovirus vectors.
Blood.
2001;98:2065-2070
26.
Goerner M, Bruno B, McSweeney PA, Buron G, Storb R, Kiem HP.
The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during retroviral transduction on fibronectin fragment CH-296 enhances gene transfer into hematopoietic repopulating cells in dogs.
Blood.
1999;94:2287-2292 27. Schmidt M, Hoffmann G, Wissler M, et al. Detection and direct genomic sequencing of multiple rare unknown flanking DNA in highly complex samples. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12:743-749[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 28. May C, Rivella S, Callegari J, et al. Therapeutic haemoglobin synthesis in beta-thalassaemic mice expressing lentivirus-encoded human beta-globin. Nature. 2000;406:82-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
29.
Pawliuk R, Westerman KA, Fabry ME, et al.
Correction of sickle cell disease in transgenic mouse models by gene therapy.
Science.
2001;294:2368-2371
30.
Persons DA, Allay ER, Sabatino DE, Kelly P, Bodine DM, Nienhuis AW.
Functional requirements for phenotypic correction of murine beta-thalassemia: implications for human gene therapy.
Blood.
2001;97:3275-3282 31. Iuliucci JD, Oliver SD, Morley S, et al. Intravenous safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel dimerizer drug, AP1903, in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41:870-879[Abstract].
32.
Whitney ML, Otto KG, Blau CA, Reinecke H, Murry CE.
Control of myoblast proliferation with a synthetic ligand.
J Biol Chem.
2001;276:41191-41196 33. Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, et al. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med. 2000;6:1229-1234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
34.
Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al.
Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.
Science.
1998;282:1145-1147 35. Lagasse E, Shizuru JA, Uchida N, Tsukamoto A, Weissman IL. Toward regenerative medicine. Immunity. 2001;14:425-436[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
H. Zhao, T. I. Pestina, M. Nasimuzzaman, P. Mehta, P. W. Hargrove, and D. A. Persons Amelioration of murine {beta}-thalassemia through drug selection of hematopoietic stem cells transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding both {gamma}-globin and the MGMT drug-resistance gene Blood, June 4, 2009; 113(23): 5747 - 5756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Abdel-Azim, Y. Zhu, R. Hollis, X. Wang, S. Ge, Q.-L. Hao, G. Smbatyan, D. B. Kohn, M. Rosol, and G. M. Crooks Expansion of multipotent and lymphoid-committed human progenitors through intracellular dimerization of Mpl Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 4064 - 4074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Allocca, U. Di Vicino, M. Petrillo, F. Carlomagno, L. Domenici, and A. Auricchio Constitutive and AP20187-Induced Ret Activation in Photoreceptors Does Not Protect from Light-Induced Damage Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 5199 - 5206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Ball, I. H. Pilz, M. Schmidt, S. Fessler, D. A. Williams, C. von Kalle, and H. Glimm Stable differentiation and clonality of murine long-term hematopoiesis after extended reduced-intensity selection for MGMT P140K transgene expression Blood, September 15, 2007; 110(6): 1779 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-P. Kiem, J. Allen, G. Trobridge, E. Olson, K. Keyser, L. Peterson, and D. W. Russell Foamy virus-mediated gene transfer to canine repopulating cells Blood, January 1, 2007; 109(1): 65 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Clackson Translational Research in Academia and Industry Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2006; 231(11): 1685 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nagasawa, B. L. Wood, L. Wang, I. Lintmaer, W. Guo, T. Papayannopoulou, M. A. Harkey, C. Nourigat, and C. A. Blau Anatomical Compartments Modify the Response of Human Hematopoietic Cells to a Mitogenic Signal Stem Cells, April 1, 2006; 24(4): 908 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Neff, B. C. Beard, and H.-P. Kiem Survival of the fittest: in vivo selection and stem cell gene therapy Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 1751 - 1760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Lucas, N. E. Seidel, C. D. Porada, J. G. Quigley, S. M. Anderson, H. L. Malech, J. L. Abkowitz, E. D. Zanjani, and D. M. Bodine Improved transduction of human sheep repopulating cells by retrovirus vectors pseudotyped with feline leukemia virus type C or RD114 envelopes Blood, July 1, 2005; 106(1): 51 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Richard, M. Weinreich, K.-H. Chang, J. Ieremia, M. M. Stevenson, and C. A. Blau Modulating erythrocyte chimerism in a mouse model of pyruvate kinase deficiency Blood, June 15, 2004; 103(12): 4432 - 4439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Horn, K. A. Keyser, L. J. Peterson, T. Neff, B. M. Thomasson, J. Thompson, and H.-P. Kiem Efficient lentiviral gene transfer to canine repopulating cells using an overnight transduction protocol Blood, May 15, 2004; 103(10): 3710 - 3716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Persons, J. A. Allay, A. Bonifacino, T. Lu, B. Agricola, M. E. Metzger, R. E. Donahue, C. E. Dunbar, and B. P. Sorrentino Transient in vivo selection of transduced peripheral blood cells using antifolate drug selection in rhesus macaques that received transplants with hematopoietic stem cells expressing dihydrofolate reductase vectors Blood, February 1, 2004; 103(3): 796 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Baum, J. Dullmann, Z. Li, B. Fehse, J. Meyer, D. A. Williams, and C. von Kalle Side effects of retroviral gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells Blood, March 15, 2003; 101(6): 2099 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||