| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0808.
HEMATOPOIESIS
From the Department of Stem Cell Biology, University of
Groningen, and Department of Hematology, University Hospital
Groningen; both of The Netherlands; Division of
Hematology/Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Markey
Cancer Center, University of Kentucky; and Department of Physiology,
University of Kentucky Medical Center; both of Lexington; and
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, NJ.
Hematopoietic stem cells from different strains of mice vary widely
with respect to their cell cycle activity. In the present study we used
complementary genetic and genomic approaches to identify molecular
pathways affecting this complex trait. We identified a major
quantitative trait locus (QTL) associated with variation in cell
proliferation in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice to a 10 centimorgan (cM) region
on chromosome 11. A congenic mouse model confirmed that a genomic
interval on chromosome 11 in isolation confers the proliferation
phenotype. To detect candidate genes we performed subtractive
hybridizations and gene arrays using cDNA from highly enriched stem
cells from parental strains. Intriguingly, a disproportionate number of
differentially expressed genes mapped to chromosome 11 and, more
specifically, these transcripts occurred in 3 distinct clusters. The
largest cluster colocalized exactly with the cell cycling QTL. Such
clustering suggested the involvement of genetic variation that affects
higher-order chromosomal organization. This hypothesis was reinforced
by the fact that differentially expressed genes mapped to recombination
"coldspots," as a consequence of which clustered genes are
collectively inherited. These findings suggest the functional
interdependence of these closely linked genes. Our data are consistent
with the hypothesis that this isolated cell cycle QTL does not result
from a mutation in a single gene but rather is a consequence of
variable expression of a collection of highly linked genes.
(Blood. 2002;100:2056-2062) Lifelong replenishment of short-lived
circulating blood cells is ensured by a relatively small population of
lymphohematopoietic stem and progenitor cells residing in the bone
marrow.1 Mechanisms regulating proliferation of these
primitive cells during steady-state blood cell production are poorly
understood. It has long been assumed that most hematopoietic stem cells
are quiescent for prolonged periods and do not actively contribute to
mature blood cell production.2-5 However, this concept has
been challenged by in vivo bromodeoxyuridine labeling studies that
indicated that in fact most, if not all, stem cells in the mouse will
divide at least once during a period of 3 to 4 weeks, suggesting that
all stem cells participate in steady-state blood cell
production.6-8 In addition to a plethora of
cell-extrinsically acting cytokines, such as the ligands for c-kit,
flt3/flk2, and c-mpl, that have been demonstrated to affect kinetics of
stem and progenitor cells,9-11 superimposed on such a
growth factor network intrinsic genetic factors play an important role
in this process as well. We have shown by analyzing various inbred
strains of mice that the rate of progenitor cell cycling varies
dramatically from strain to strain. Intriguingly, we found that strains
with rapidly cycling stem and progenitor cells (eg, AKR/J, C3H, DBA)
invariably had a shorter mean life span than strains with more slowly
proliferating cells (B6, 129/J).12,13 To assess whether
these 2 traits were causally related, we have mapped quantitative trait
loci (QTL) that were associated with variation in cell cycling
in a panel of BXD recombinant inbred mice and compared these with loci
associated with mean life span.14 Indeed, 2 loci,
occurring on chromosome 7 and 11, respectively, showed suggestive
linkage with both traits.15
The heritable component of quantitative traits, such as variation in
cell cycling, is thought to result from the additive and epistatic
interactions of multiple genetic loci. The ensuing nonmendelian
segregation pattern has significantly hampered the identification of
individual genes associated with quantitative traits.16,17
Strategies such as the production of congenic or consomic strains,
carrying only the QTL or chromosome of interest, have been proposed to
circumvent this problem.18-20 In the present study we
followed this approach, and by employing a variety of complementary
genetic and genomic approaches we have searched for molecular pathways
affecting hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation.
Mice
Generation of backcross animals and the use of a marker-assisted
selection protocol to produce congenic mice
All mice were kept in sterile microisolators and were fed sterile food and water ad libitum. Progenitor and stem cell assays The percentage of hematopoietic progenitors in S phase was determined using standard semisolid granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit (CFU-GM) assays supplemented with recombinant rat stem cell factor (a gift from Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) and recombinant murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (a gift from Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany). Prior to their use in the progenitor assay, bone marrow cells were incubated with or without the S phase-specific cytotoxic drug hydroxyurea (200 µg/mL; Sigma, St Louis, MO) for 1 hour. Cells were washed twice, and CFU-GM assays were subsequently performed using standard procedures. Cultures were evaluated after 7 days. The fraction of progenitors that was killed by hydroxyurea incubation was calculated and was considered to have been in the S phase of the cell cycle. Cobblestone area-forming cell (CAFC) assays to quantify progenitor and stem cell frequencies were performed exactly as described previously.13 Both assays were chosen for consistency and to allow comparison with our previously published data.12,13,15Competitive repopulation assay and chimerism analysis Recipient C57BL/6.SJL.Ptprca (Ly5.1+/CD45.1+) were conditioned with a sublethal dose of 4 Gy total body -irradiation administered in 1 single dose 24 hours prior to transplantation. Recipient mice received
a dose of 3 × 106 unfractionated bone marrow
cells derived from wild-type B6 (n = 6) or congenic
B6.DBAScp2 (n = 6) donors (both strains are
Ly5.2+/CD45.2+). To determine the percentage
donor blood cell contribution, mice were bled from the retro-orbital
sinus. Erythrocytes were eliminated by hypotonic lysis, and the
remaining leukocytes were incubated with saturating amounts of
phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-Ly5.1/CD45.1 antibodies and fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-Ly5.2/CD45.2 antibodies
(Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). Fluorescence was determined using a dual
laser FACSCalibur System (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San
Jose, CA).
Linkage analysis In this study we used 3 independent data sets. First, we phenotyped an additional set of 7 newly derived BXD strains21 and added these data to our database, which includes information on 26 BXD strains that we have previously used to search for cell cycle QTL.15 In addition, we derived 2 novel datasets consisting of 60 N2 and 43 N6 backcross animals. For linkage analysis we used MapManager QT software22 (version b28ppc, available at ftp://mcbio.med.buffalo.edu/pub/MapMgr/QT). We determined the probability of obtaining the observed likelihood ratio statistic (LRS) values by random chance using the permutation test. This test, which is implemented in MapManager QT software, was performed with 2000 permutations at 1 centimorgan (cM) intervals (genome-wide for the BXD set and restricted to chromosome 11 for the N2 and N6 backcross).Stem cell purification Hematopoietic stem cells were purified using flow cytometry exactly as described before, from pooled marrow cells obtained from 10 B6 and 10 DBA mice.23 Sorted cells were identified by the absence of a panel of lineage-specific cell surface markers (CD3, CD5, CD8, CD11b/Mac-1, CD45R/B220, and Ly-6G/Gr-1, collectively referred to as Lin ) and the presence of the Sca-1 and c-kit antigen.
Viable (propidium iodide-negative)
Lin Sca-1+c-kit+ cells were sorted
using a dual-laser FACS Vantage instrument (Becton Dickinson
Immunocytometry Systems).
Subtractive hybridization Total RNA was isolated from 105 Lin Sca-1+c-kit+ B6 and DBA cells
using Trizol (Gibco). DNAse-treated RNA was reverse transcribed (Superscript II, Gibco), and cDNA was amplified using the
SMART PCR cDNA synthesis kit (Gibco). Bidirectional subtractive
hybridizations using B6- and DBA-amplified stem cell cDNA as
"tester" and "driver," reciprocally, were performed with the
PCR-Select cDNA subtraction kit (Gibco). All procedures were carried
out according to the manufacturer's suggestions.
Cloning of differentially expressed transcripts Subtracted cDNA samples were randomly cloned in pCR2-Topo or pCR4-Topo (Invitrogen, Hoogkerk, The Netherlands). A total number of 240 clones (about 50% originating from the B6 minus DBA subtraction and 50% derived from the reverse DBA minus B6 subtraction) were sequenced, and BLAST searches were performed to identify the transcripts.Gene array analysis Amplified but unsubtracted B6 and DBA cDNA samples were labeled with [33P]-dCTP (deoxycytidine triphosphate). Two mouse filter gene arrays (GF400a, Research Genetics), each containing 5184 cDNA fragments, were hybridized with B6- and DBA-labeled cDNA samples. Hybridization signals were identified using a Storm phospor imager system (Molecular Dynamics), and appropriately configured files were analyzed with Pathways Software (Research Genetics). After signal normalization, only spots for which the intensity of either B6 or DBA signal was 3-fold above background were considered. Both in B6 and DBA samples about 12% of the transcripts were found to be expressed in hematopoietic stem cells. We selected the 100 transcripts from both B6 and DBA that showed most pronounced differential hybridization intensities for further study.Mapping of differentially expressed genes We tried to determine the chromosomal localization of all (ie, 440) nonredundant differentially expressed transcripts in silico using a variety of publicly available databases (predominantly http://www.informatics.jax.org and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene/). We were successful in assigning the chromosomal location to 156 transcripts. Some transcripts were mapped by synteny to their map position in the human genome.RT-PCR analysis To independently confirm that transcripts were differentially expressed, we studied the expression pattern of a selected number of chromosome 11 genes by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. To this end purified stem cells or unfractionated bone marrow cells were isolated from an additional cohort of B6 and DBA mice. Also, cells from B6.DBAScp2 congenic mice were used. The primers that were used to amplify differentially expressed transcripts were designed with sequence information as present in GenBank.
Genetic mapping of cell proliferation loci To map quantitative trait loci associated with variation in cell cycle, we performed a genome-wide linkage analysis using cell cycling phenotypes (ie, fraction of CFU-GMs in S phase) of 33 BXD recombinant inbred strains (analysis of 26 of these strains was previously reported15). We found 2 markers, D7Mit178 and D11Mit131, that showed suggestive linkage (Table 1) and refer to these QTL as Stem cell proliferation-1 and -2, respectively. For both loci the presence of DBA alleles was associated with higher cell proliferation rates.
To confirm linkage, a set of 60 (B6 × BDF1) backcross animals was
generated. A distinctive effect of the presence of D alleles at
D11Mit178 (at 47 cM) was observed. The phenotype of mice carrying 2 B
alleles (n = 34; mean percentage S phase cells, 12.4%) was significantly different (P < 2.5 × 10
In contrast to homozygous BXD mice, heterozygous backcross animals
provided no evidence for the involvement of Scp1, located on
chromosome 7 (data not shown). The backcrossing strategy was continued
to derive a congenic mouse strain in which the effect of
Scp2 could be investigated in isolation. In N6 mice highly significant linkage was observed with an interval extending from 39 cM
to 49 cM on chromosome 11, documenting the strength of this isolated
locus (more than 99% of the genome of these animals is of B6 origin)
(Figure 1C). Homozygous B6.DBAScp2 congenic
animals were produced, which, as expected, showed a high fraction of
cells in S phase (Figure 1D). The difference between B6 and DBA
(P < 1.4 × 10 Stem cell pool size is not affected in B6.DBAScp2 congenic mice Previous studies by several groups, including ours, have mapped loci regulating stem cell frequency to chromosomes 1, 12, and 18.13,24,25 These chromosomal locations suggested that stem cell frequency is maintained by a different set of genes than those affecting cell cycling, mapping to chromosome 11. Our congenic mice offered the possibility of directly assessing whether stem cell frequency and proliferation are regulated by distinct genetic pathways. We quantified cobblestone area-forming cell (CAFC) frequencies in bone marrow from B6, DBA, and B6.DBAScp2 mice after 7, 21, and 35 days in culture (Figure 2). As expected, CAFC frequency was substantially higher in DBA compared with B6 bone marrow. However, stem and progenitor cell frequency in the B6.DBAScp2 congenics was identical to B6 values. This demonstrates that Scp2 is not involved in maintaining stem cell pool size.
B6.DBAScp2 stem cells are defective in long-term repopulating ability In embryo and radiation chimeras in which DBA and B6 stem cells coexist, highly cycling DBA stem cells, although initially functioning appropriately, cease to contribute to the process of blood cell formation during aging.26-28 It has been shown that DBA stem cells can be reactivated after secondary transplantation, demonstrating that DBA stem cells are present but remain fully dormant in the unmanipulated, aged chimeras.29 Conversely, more quiescent B6 stem cells have a major competitive advantage over the long term and will eventually outcompete DBA stem cells. Our previous data showing a correlation between cell cycling and mouse life span12,15 support a model in which enhanced cellular senescence is induced by high cell turnover rates and thus would be controlled by Scp2. The availability of B6.DBAScp2 congenic mice allowed us to address this question directly by testing the competitive repopulation potential of B6.DBAScp2 stem cells compared with wild-type B6 stem cells. C57BL/6.SJL.Ptprca (Ly5.1+/CD45.1+) mice were sublethally irradiated and underwent transplantation with 3 × 106 unfractionated B6 or B6.DBAScp2 (Ly5.2+/CD45.2+) bone marrow cells. B6.DBAScp2 stem cells showed a reduced repopulating potential (Figure 3).
Because B6 and B6.DBAScp2 bone marrow cells contained an equal number of stem cells (Figure 2), differences in engraftment kinetics must have resulted from qualitative stem cell differences. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that unknown minor histocompatibility antigens may (partially) have induced lower levels of chimerism, no such genes are known to map to the congenic chromosome 11 interval, and therefore we favor the concept that high rates of cell turnover are associated with impaired stem cell functioning. Clustering of candidate genes By cotransplanting DBA and B6 stem cells into BDF1 recipients, we have previously shown that Scp2 acts cell autonomously.28 Therefore, to detect candidate genes for this locus, we identified differentially expressed genes in highly enriched (and consequently highly identical) Lin Sca-1+c-kit+ stem cells
isolated by flow cytometry from 10 pooled B6 and DBA bone marrow
samples using bidirectional subtractive hybridization and gene array
analysis. After subtractive hybridization, 240 B6- and
DBA-derived cDNA fragments were cloned and identified by sequence analysis.
In parallel, unsubtracted B6 and DBA cDNAs were separately hybridized
with DNA arrays. A total of 200 most strongly differentially expressed
transcripts were analyzed. We were able to assign the chromosomal
localization to 156 transcripts. Interestingly, a disproportionate
number of these differentially expressed transcripts was located on
chromosome 11 (Figure 4).
A total of 28 genes were shown to map to the average sized chromosome
11, which represents about 18% of all differentially expressed
transcripts for which a chromosomal map position could be assigned
(Table 2). The observed excess of
chromosome 11 genes is significantly different from expected random
distribution (P < 1 × 10
Assuming a total genome size of about 1500 cM, the distance between the 156 differentially expressed transcript on average is expected to be 156/1500 equals about 10 cM. We considered transcripts to be clustered if multiple genes mapped to an interval less than 10 cM. The first cluster centered around 30 cM (6 transcripts were identified that map to this cluster). The largest cluster (containing 11 genes) extended from about 40 to about 50 cM and coincided exactly with the Scp2 interval (compare Figure 1B and C). The most telomeric cluster covered a region from about 60 to about 78 cM and contained 9 transcripts. To confirm the differential expression pattern of transcripts first identified by subtractive hybridization or array analysis, we performed RT-PCR experiments using cDNA obtained from B6, DBA, and B6.DBAScp2 bone marrow or stem cells (Figure 5). When we randomly checked expression of other genes that map closely to those identified by subtractive hybridization or array analysis, we were able to show distinct expression levels in a significant number of them as well (such as Epx and Stat5a). This indicates that the collection of variably expressed genes within the clusters can be extended. Differentially expressed genes map to recombination coldspots A more detailed analysis of the Scp2 cluster showed that differentially expressed transcripts mapped either to a region from 42 to 45 cM or around 49 cM, whereas no transcripts were found from 45 to 48 cM (Table 2, Figure 5) Also, RT-PCR analysis of randomly selected genes known to map to the silent interval failed to reveal any expression differences (data not shown). Such clustering of differentially expressed genes suggested the involvement of genetic variation affecting higher-order chromosomal organization. Because most laboratory mice have been derived from a limited number of selected founders, there is a number of shared haplotypes across the genome in B6 and DBA mice.30 When we assessed the extent of shared haplotypes in the Scp2 interval (by comparing polymorphism at a series of microsatellite repeats), we found evidence of extensive polymorphism from 38 to 45 cM and again from 47 to 52 cM, but the silent region from 45 to 47 cM in which we failed to detect differentially expressed genes turned out to be identical in both strains (Figure 6).
We made an interesting observation by assessing meiotic recombination frequencies in the Scp2 region using our own backcross panel and the existing BXD panel. In both datasets, recombinations in the Scp2 cluster occurred preferentially in the silent region, in which the DBA and B6 genomes are highly homologous. In contrast, recombinations in the bordering regions were strongly suppressed (Figure 6).
In this study we demonstrate convergence of a collection of differentially expressed stem cell genes with a locus that is strongly associated with variation in hematopoietic cell turnover between B6 and DBA mice. Differentially expressed transcripts mapped to a polymorphic genomic region that is characterized by suppressed recombination frequencies. To exclude the possibility that clustering resulted from a preponderance of hematopoietic genes in these regions, we randomly picked 150 genes from the Stem Cell Data Base (http://stemcell.princeton.edu/), which contains a large collection of B6 stem cell-specific transcripts.31 We found no evidence of clustering in this dataset (data not shown), reinforcing the notion that it is the genetic difference between the 2 strains that causes the clustering. Also, the extent of overrepresentation of chromosome 11 transcripts cannot be attributed to a potentially increased gene density on this chromosome.32 Most fundamental to our studies is the issue of how variation in progenitor cell proliferation is induced. Two alternative hypotheses can be provided. First, allelic variation of one of the genes in the Scp2 interval may confer the cell cycling trait. Possible candidates, based upon known functional activity and/or an appropriate (ie, DBA-like) expression pattern in B6.DBAScp2 congenic mice, include platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, ribosomal protein S6 kinase,33 and Tbox2.34 If this "single-gene" hypothesis is correct, the additional differentially expressed transcripts that are closely linked to the underlying gene are not contributing to the phenotype, and their map position is entirely coincidental. Although we cannot exclude this, we favor an alternative but more provocative explanation: Variation in cell cycle does not result from a single gene but rather is the consequence of variable expression of a collection of highly linked genes in stem cells from both parental strains. Genotype-independent phenotypic variability (ie, reduced penetrance) in the N2, but particularly in the more homogenous N6 generation, would be explained by such a model. The fact that the Scp2 gene cluster occurs in a genomic interval in which meiotic recombination is suppressed implies that the cluster is transmitted to the next generation in its entirety. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the strong linkage disequilibrium points to a functional interdependence of genes within the cluster.35 Interestingly, several studies have recently documented findings in other model systems that are reminiscent of the data that we show here. First, Caron et al showed that in the human genome gene expression occurs in highly localized "ridges."36 In addition, suppression of recombination over a large segment has been reported for the cytokine cluster on human chromosome 5q,37 a region that has shown strong linkage to various immunologic quantitative traits.38,39 Intriguingly, the human cytokine cluster is homologous to a segment of mouse chromosome 11 at about 30 cM, colocalizing with one of the clusters we report here. Very similarly, an extreme degree of long-range linkage disequilibrium has been reported for a locus on human chromosome 17q21, containing BRCA1.40 Again, this segment is homologous to the most telomeric cluster (about 60 cM) we report here. Collectively these data indicate that the selective forces that result in effective recombination suppression have been conserved in human and mouse. It has generally been assumed that the heritable component of quantitative traits results from additive and epistatic interactions of multiple loci, each locus containing a single mutated gene.16,20 In this respect it is interesting that in our study a number of DBA-derived genes showed a B6-like expression pattern in the B6.DBAScp2 congenic animals (eg, Zfp147, Mm.4973). This confirms the presence of specific modifying loci in the B6 genome that may prevent the penetrance of a bona fide QTL. Loss of the expected phenotype in congenic mice has repeatedly been observed.41,42 It has been notoriously difficult to identify genes underlying QTL.17,43 Our studies suggest a novel concept that may explain the difficulty of associating individual genes with quantitative traits. Variation at a specific locus may result in altered basal expression of many genes in this region, and it is only in the context of the expression pattern of neighboring genes that biologic variation is induced. We speculate that the model we put forward may also apply to certain tumorigenic chromosomal abberations (translocations, deletions, insertions, inversions) in which the altered chromosomal structure affects the expression of a large number of adjacent genes that collectively induce a (subtle) growth advantage.
The authors thank Anke van den Berg, Geert Harms, Joost Kluiver, and Peter Terpstra for technical assistance and advice.
Submitted March 15, 2002; accepted April 30, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, May 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0808.
Supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (RUG 2000-2183), a fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) to G.d.H., National Institutes of Health grant AG16653 to G.V.Z., and a fellowship of the Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina funded by the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung to H.G.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Gerald de Haan, Department of Stem Cell Biology, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; e-mail: g.de.haan{at}med.rug.nl.
1. Lajtha LG. Stem cell concepts. Differentiation. 1979;14:23-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 2. Rosendaal M, Hodgson GS, Bradley TR. Organization of haemopoietic stem cells: the generation-age hypothesis. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1979;12:17-29[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
3.
Jordan CT, Lemischka IR.
Clonal and systemic analysis of long-term hematopoiesis in the mouse.
Genes Dev.
1990;4:220-232
4.
Capel B, Hawley R, Covarrubias L, Hawley T, Mintz B.
Clonal contributions of small numbers of retrovirally marked hematopoietic stem cells engrafted in unirradiated neonatal W/Wv mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1989;86:4564-4568
5.
Abkowitz JL, Persik MT, Shelton GH, et al.
Behavior of hematopoietic stem cells in a large animal.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1995;92:2031-2035
6.
Pietrzyk ME, Priestley GV, Wolf NS.
Normal cycling patterns of hematopoietic stem cell subpopulations: an assay using long-term in vivo BrdU infusion.
Blood.
1985;66:1460-1462 7. Bradford GB, Williams B, Rossi R, Bertoncello I. Quiescence, cycling, and turnover in the primitive hematopoietic stem cell compartment. Exp Hematol. 1997;25:445-453[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Cheshier SH, Morrison SJ, Liao X, Weissman IL.
In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long-term self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:3120-3125 9. Zsebo KM, Williams DA, Geissler EN, et al. Stem cell factor is encoded at the Sl locus of the mouse and is the ligand for the c-kit tyrosine kinase receptor. Cell. 1990;63:213-224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Mackarehtschian K, Hardin JD, Moore KA, Boast S, Goff SP, Lemischka IR. Targeted disruption of the flk2/flt3 gene leads to deficiencies in primitive hematopoietic progenitors. Immunity. 1995;3:147-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Alexander WS, Roberts AW, Nicola NA, Li R, Metcalf D.
Deficiencies in progenitor cells of multiple hematopoietic lineages and defective megakaryocytopoiesis in mice lacking the thrombopoietic receptor c-Mpl.
Blood.
1996;87:2162-2170
12.
de Haan G, Nijhof W, Van Zant G.
Mouse strain-dependent changes in frequency and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells during aging: correlation between lifespan and cycling activity.
Blood.
1997;89:1543-1550
13.
de Haan G, Van Zant G.
Intrinsic and extrinsic control of hemopoietic stem cell numbers: mapping of a stem cell gene.
J Exp Med.
1997;186:529-536
14.
Gelman R, Watson A, Bronson R, Yunis E.
Murine chromosomal regions correlated with longevity.
Genetics.
1988;118:693-704
15.
De Haan G, Van Zant G.
Genetic analysis of hemopoietic cell cycling in mice suggests its involvement in organismal life span.
FASEB J.
1999;13:707-713
16.
Lander ES, Schork NJ.
Genetic dissection of complex traits.
Science.
1994;265:2037-2048 17. Nadeau JH, Frankel WN. The roads from phenotypic variation to gene discovery: mutagenesis versus QTLs. Nat Genet. 2000;25:381-384[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Wakeland E, Morel L, Achey K, Yui M, Longmate J. Speed congenics: a classic technique in the fast lane (relatively speaking). Immunol Today. 1997;18:472-477[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Matin A, Collin GB, Asada Y, Varnum D, Nadeau JH. Susceptibility to testicular germ-cell tumours in a 129.MOLF-Chr 19 chromosome substitution strain. Nat Genet. 1999;23:237-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Nadeau JH, Singer JB, Matin A, Lander ES. Analysing complex genetic traits with chromosome substitution strains. Nat Genet. 2000;24:221-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Taylor BA, Wnek C, Kotlus BS, Roemer N, MacTaggart T, Phillips SJ. Genotyping new BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains and comparison of BXD and consensus maps. Mamm Genome. 1999;10:335-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Manly KF, Olson JM. Overview of QTL mapping software and introduction to map manager QT. Mamm Genome. 1999;10:327-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
de Haan G, Szilvassy SJ, Meyerrose TE, Dontje B, Grimes B, Van Zant G.
Distinct functional properties of highly purified hematopoietic stem cells from mouse strains differing in stem cell numbers.
Blood.
2000;96:1374-1379
24.
Muller-Sieburg CE, Riblet R.
Genetic control of the frequency of hematopoietic stem cells in mice: mapping of a candidate locus to chromosome 1.
J Exp Med.
1996;183:1141-1150 25. Chen J, Astle CM, Harrison DE. Genetic regulation of primitive hematopoietic stem cell senescence. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:442-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Van Zant G, Holland BP, Eldridge PW, Chen JJ.
Genotype-restricted growth and aging patterns in hematopoietic stem cell populations of allophenic mice.
J Exp Med.
1990;171:1547-1565 27. Van Zant G, Thompson BP, Chen JJ. Differentiation of chimeric bone marrow in vivo reveals genotype-restricted contributions to hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol. 1991;19:941-949[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 28. Kamminga LM, Akkerman I, Weersing E, et al. Autonomous behavior of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:1451-1459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 29. Van Zant G, Scott-Micus K, Thompson BP, Fleischman RA, Perkins S. Stem cell quiescence/activation is reversible by serial transplantation and is independent of stromal cell genotype in mouse aggregation chimeras. Exp Hematol. 1992;20:470-475[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
30.
Grupe A, Germer S, Usuka J, et al.
In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice.
Science.
2001;292:1915-1918
31.
Phillips RL, Ernst RE, Brunk B, et al.
The genetic program of hematopoietic stem cells.
Science.
2000;288:1635-1640 32. Hudson TJ, Church DM, Greenaway S, et al. A radiation hybrid map of mouse genes. Nat Genet. 2001;29:201-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
33.
Boeuf H, Merienne K, Jacquot S, et al.
The ribosomal S6 kinases, cAMP-responsive element-binding, and STAT3 proteins are regulated by different leukemia inhibitory factor signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells.
J Biol Chem.
2001;276:46204-46211 34. Jacobs JJ, Keblusek P, Robanus-Maandag E, et al. Senescence bypass screen identifies TBX2, which represses Cdkn2a (p19(ARF)) and is amplified in a subset of human breast cancers. Nat Genet. 2000;26:291-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 35. Goldstein DB. Islands of linkage disequilibrium. Nat Genet. 2001;29:109-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
36.
Caron H, van Schaik B, van der Mee M, et al.
The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains.
Science.
2001;291:1289-1292 37. Daly MJ, Rioux JD, Schaffner SF, Hudson TJ, Lander ES. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2001;29:229-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
38.
Postma DS, Bleecker ER, Amelung PJ, et al.
Genetic susceptibility to asthma 39. Rioux JD, Daly MJ, Silverberg MS, Lindblad K, et al. Genetic variation in the 5q31 cytokine gene cluster confers susceptibility to Crohn disease. Nat Genet. 2001;29:223-228[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 40. Liu X, Barker DF. Evidence for effective suppression of recombination in the chromosome 17q21 segment spanning RNU2-BRCA1. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1427-1439[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 41. Bennett B, Johnson TE. Development of congenics for hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol by QTL-marker-assisted counter selection. Mamm Genome. 1998;9:969-974[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
42.
Morrison SJ, Qian D, Jerabek L, et al.
A genetic determinant that specifically regulates the frequency of hematopoietic stem cells.
J Immunol.
2002;168:635-642 43. Flint J, Mott R. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:437-445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2002 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
S. Avagyan, L. Glouchkova, J. Choi, and H.-W. Snoeck A Quantitative Trait Locus on Chromosome 4 Affects Cycling of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells through Regulation of TGF-{beta}2 Responsiveness J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 5904 - 5911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B.H. Williams, E. K.F. Chan, M. J. Cowley, and P. F.R. Little The influence of genetic variation on gene expression Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1707 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Kamminga, L. V. Bystrykh, A. de Boer, S. Houwer, J. Douma, E. Weersing, B. Dontje, and G. de Haan The Polycomb group gene Ezh2 prevents hematopoietic stem cell exhaustion Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 2170 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Martelli, B. Ghinassi, B. Panetta, E. Alfani, V. Gatta, A. Pancrazzi, C. Bogani, A. M. Vannucchi, F. Paoletti, G. Migliaccio, et al. Variegation of the phenotype induced by the Gata1low mutation in mice of different genetic backgrounds Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4102 - 4113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Allan, E. J. Eisen, and D. Pomp Genomic Mapping of Direct and Correlated Responses to Long-Term Selection for Rapid Growth Rate in Mice Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1863 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Kerns, A. Ravindranathan, S. Hassan, M. P. Cage, T. York, J. M. Sikela, R. W. Williams, and M. F. Miles Ethanol-Responsive Brain Region Expression Networks: Implications for Behavioral Responses to Acute Ethanol in DBA/2J versus C57BL/6J Mice J. Neurosci., March 2, 2005; 25(9): 2255 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Couldrey, H. L. Bradley, and K. D. Bunting A STAT5 modifier locus on murine chromosome 7 modulates engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells during steady-state hematopoiesis Blood, February 15, 2005; 105(4): 1476 - 1483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shanker, N. Auphan-Anezin, P. Chomez, L. Giraudo, B. V. d. Eynde, and A.-M. Schmitt-Verhulst Thymocyte-Intrinsic Genetic Factors Influence CD8 T Cell Lineage Commitment and Affect Selection of a Tumor-Reactive TCR J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 5069 - 5077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-F. Chang, K.-M. Wai, and H. G. Patterton Calculating the statistical significance of physical clusters of co-regulated genes in the genome: the role of chromatin in domain-wide gene regulation Nucleic Acids Res., March 19, 2004; 32(5): 1798 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Papayannopoulou Current mechanistic scenarios in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization Blood, March 1, 2004; 103(5): 1580 - 1585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. O'Brien and W. N. Frankel Moving forward with chemical mutagenesis in the mouse J. Physiol., January 1, 2004; 554(1): 13 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Frank, K. A. Meyers, I. C. Welsh, and T. P. O'Brien Development of an enhanced GFP-based dual-color reporter to facilitate genetic screens for the recovery of mutations in mice PNAS, November 25, 2003; 100(24): 14103 - 14108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||