| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on April 30, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0339.
HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
From the Coagulation Laboratory, Institute of
Hematology, Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus, Petah-Tiqva,
Israel; Exp und Klin Hämostaseologie, Klinik und
Poliklinik fuer Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin,
University of Muenster, Germany; and the Department of
Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Studies have suggested a pivotal role for free sulfhydryls in
platelet integrin function, and enzyme-mediated reduction of disulfide
bonds on platelets has been implicated. The platelet fibrinogen
receptor The affinity of integrins for their ligands is
tightly regulated, both by cellular events and subsequent to ligand
binding.1-5 Such cellular control over the interaction of
extracellular proteins implies the existence of a mechanism to
propagate information back and forth between the extracellular head and
the cytoplasmic tail of the integrin receptor. In recent years, the
posited mechanism has been the allosteric conformational changes
occurring in the integrin receptor, both in response to cellular events
that switch the receptor from low to high affinity (inside-out
signaling) and external events that relay information about occupancy
of the receptor (outside-in signaling).6-9 Although
information about the nature of the changes in conformation is slowly
emerging (for review, see Woodside et al10) and consequent
changes in intracellular interactions are widely
documented,10-13 the molecular mechanism regulating such
changes, particularly on the exofacial domain, has not been elucidated.
We previously reported that extracellular sulfhydryls participate in
conformational changes triggered by interaction of the platelet
integrin Several reports support this hypothesis. Schwartz and
Harlan16,17 showed that exposure of free sulfhydryls on
the surface of neutrophils promotes their integrin-mediated adhesion to
endothelial cells and that blocking naturally occurring free
sulfhydryls on the neutrophils with membrane-impermeant reagents
inhibits their adhesion to endothelial cells. Expression of free
sulfhydryls on the extracellular domain of the purified platelet
integrin The expression of PDI activity on the surface of cells, including
platelets,20,21 indicates the importance of disulfide exchange on the surface of cells in general and platelets in
particular. Furthermore, inhibition of PDI was found to block
agonist-induced platelet aggregation.22 O'Neill et
al23 reported that the platelet integrin
Materials
Platelet agonists used in aggregation studies were from Bio/Data
(Horsham, PA). Para-chloromercuriphenyl sulfonate (pCMPS), dithiobis-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), bacitracin, IgG2a
control ascites, FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (sheep
F(ab')2), and FITC-conjugated mouse isotype-specific
IgG1 were from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). All reagents
were dissolved directly in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
FITC-anti-P-selectin (clone CLB-thromb/6) was from Immunotech (Marseilles, France). Quantum 26p FITC-standard beads were from Flow
Cytometry Standards (Leiden, The Netherlands).
The monoclonal anti-rat PDI clone RL90, which recognizes human
PDI, was obtained from Alexis Biochemicals (Switzerland).
FITC-conjugated monoclonal anti- Preparation of platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
Platelet-aggregation studies Platelet-aggregation studies were performed in an aggregometer (Chrono-Log, Haverton, PA, or Bio/Data Corporation, Horsham, PA) using PRP adjusted to 2 × 108 platelets/mL with autologous plasma. Platelets were activated by using adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 2-4 µM), epinephrine (0.5-4 µM), thrombin (0.375-0.5 U/mL), arachidonic acid (0.125 mg/mL), type I collagen (0.5-1.25 µg/mL), or ristocetin (1.5 mg/mL) in the presence or absence of pCMPS (125-300 µM) or DTNB (2.5 mM), bacitracin (3-6 mM), or RL90 (in ascites, diluted as indicated).When the effect of RL90 was tested, the PRP was first incubated for 10 minutes with anti-Fc Flow cytometry Fibrinogen binding.
PRP diluted in autologous plasma to a concentration of
5 × 107 platelets/mL was preincubated with pCMPS or
bacitracin for 10 minutes at room temperature followed by 150 µg/mL
fibrinogen-FITC (saturating concentration) for 3 minutes at room
temperature as described previously.27 When the effect of
RL90 was studied, platelets were preincubated with the Fab fragment of
anti-Fc LIBS antibody binding. Diluted PRP (5 × 107 platelets/mL) was preincubated with different concentrations of pCMPS, bacitracin, or RL90 as described above. Pretreated platelets (100 µL) were added to 10 µL of the agonists collagen (1 µg/mL), CRP-XL (0.5 µg/mL), or thrombin (0.2 U/mL in the presence of GPRP) at room temperature. After 3 minutes, PAC-1-FITC (5 µg/mL saturating concentration) or PMI-1 was added and incubation was done for 30 minutes at room temperature. If PMI-1 was being used, samples were subsequently labeled with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG. The platelet samples were then diluted with 0.5 mL PBS and analyzed in the flow cytometer. Expression of CD62P. Measurement of CD62P expression was performed by using the method of Frenette et al30 with some modifications. Briefly, diluted PRP (5 × 107 platelets/mL) was treated with pCMPS, bacitracin, or RL90 followed by collagen, CRP-XL, or thrombin stimulation. The sample was divided into 3 parts, and FITC-coupled monoclonal anti-CD62P was added at a predetermined saturating concentration to one third of the sample, FITC-fibrinogen to another third, and PAC-1 to the remaining third. After incubation for 30 minutes at room temperature, the samples were analyzed by FACS. Fibrinogen binding to platelets treated with activating antibody.
FITC-fibrinogen was added to diluted PRP (5 × 107
platelets/mL) in the presence of pCMPS, bacitracin, or RL-90. The
platelets were incubated with the Fab fragment of anti-Fc
Effect of extracellular thiol blockers on platelet aggregation Two inhibitors of free sulfhydryls that do not penetrate the platelet membrane, pCMPS and DTNB, were used to examine the role of ecto-sulfhydryls in platelet aggregation. At concentrations of 125 to 300 µM, pCMPS blocked platelet aggregation induced by the agonists ADP, epinephrine, thrombin, arachidonic acid, or collagen (Figure 1). DTNB had the same effect at a concentration of 2 mM (data not shown). Neither pCMPS (Figure 1) nor DTNB (data not shown) inhibited agglutination induced by ristocetin. We observed that, invariably, shape change was not affected by thiol blocking and that thrombin and ADP triggered the first wave of aggregation, which was followed by a rapid disaggregation (Figure 1). These experiments were repeated with PRP obtained from different donors. Similar results were obtained in all experiments, indicating a role for extracellular thiols in fibrinogen-mediated platelet aggregation.
Effect of inhibiting enzymatic catalysis of disulfide isomerization on platelet aggregation The membrane-impermeant cyclic antibiotic bacitracin inhibits enzymatic catalysis of disulfide exchange.31-33 Platelet aggregation in the presence of 3 to 6 mM bacitracin mimicked the effect of the thiol blockers pCMPS and DTNB. In samples from 5 different donors, bacitracin inhibited agonist-induced aggregation, blocking the second but not the first wave of ADP- or thrombin-induced aggregation and not affecting shape change (Figure 2). This suggested involvement of enzymatically catalyzed disulfide exchange in the sulfhydryl-dependent integrin function.
The possible role of membrane-associated PDI in this enzymatic
catalysis was examined by directly inhibiting the enzyme using monoclonal anti-PDI clone RL90. This antibody inhibited platelet aggregation, whereas an isotype-matched control mouse IgG had no such
effect (Figure 3), thus confirming
involvement of PDI in agonist-induced aggregation.
Binding of fibrinogen In view of the indicated involvement of extracellular disulfide exchange in platelet-platelet interaction, we measured the effect of blockade of extracellular thiols, inhibition of disulfide exchange, and specific inhibition of PDI on the direct interaction of fibrinogen with its integrin receptor. We used FACS analysis to measure binding of FITC-labeled fibrinogen to agonist-stimulated platelets,25 first as a function of agonist and inhibitor concentrations. As expected, we found that the amount of bound fibrinogen was directly proportional to the agonist concentration (data not shown). The level of bound fibrinogen in the presence of membrane-impermeant pCMPS was inversely proportional to the concentration of the thiol blocker and reached complete inhibition at a concentration of 50 to 100 µM pCMPS (Figure 4A). Blocking the extracellular thiols inhibited fibrinogen binding to platelets stimulated by ADP, thrombin, collagen, or the glycoprotein VI (GPVI)-specific agonist CRP-XL (Figure 4A). Thus, blockade of extracellular thiol inhibited sustained interaction between IIb 3 and its ligand.
Bacitracin also inhibited fibrinogen binding induced by the same
agonists as pCMPS, in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 4A);
complete inhibition was reached at the same concentration that inhibits
platelet adhesion14 and aggregation (Figure 2). These
findings suggest that disulfide exchange is necessary for sustained
ligation of To evaluate the possible role of surface-associated PDI, we measured the effect of monoclonal anti-PDI clone RL90 on fibrinogen binding. We found that anti-PDI partially inhibited fibrinogen binding induced by the same agonists as above (Figure 4A). Matched IgG controls had no such effect. Binding of PAC-1 and PMI-1 Because of the observed role of thiols in the binding of fibrinogen, we studied their possible involvement in the ligand-induced conformational change of its receptor. The effect of thiol blocking and of the inhibition of disulfide exchange on the conformation of the integrin IIb 3 was examined by assessing
binding of LIBS antibodies PAC-1 and PMI-1 to agonist-stimulated
platelets. Binding of either antibody was inhibited by pCMPS,
bacitracin, or RL90 but not by a matched IgG control, in a manner very
similar to the binding of fibrinogen (Figure 4B,C), thereby indicating
that acquisition of the ligand-induced conformation could require
disulfide exchange.
Expression of P-selectin Inhibition of binding of fibrinogen as well as of LIBS antibodies could also imply inhibition of platelet activation by disulfide inhibitors and thiol blockers. To distinguish inhibition of integrin ligation from inhibition of platelet stimulation, we examined the surface expression of P-selectin, a marker of platelet stimulation and vesicular secretion, concomitantly with fibrinogen and PAC-1 binding. Expression of P-selectin on the surface of platelets after agonist-induced stimulation in the presence of pCMPS, bacitracin, and RL90 (Figure 5) was minimally inhibited by either of the inhibitors, whereas binding of fibrinogen and PAC-1, measured in parallel, was markedly inhibited. These findings corroborated our other results indicating thiol involvement in integrin ligation.
Effect of inhibitors on ligation of the high-affinity-state integrin As expected, in the presence of anti-LIBS6, binding of fibrinogen and PAC-1 was much greater than their binding to untreated platelets (data not shown). Exposure of platelets to pCMPS or bacitracin before anti-LIBS6 was added had no effect on binding of the antibody but did inhibit binding of fibrinogen and PAC-1 to the platelets (Figure 6). Exposure to RL90 partially inhibited binding of fibrinogen and PAC-1 induced by anti-LIBS6, further suggesting at least some involvement of surface-associated PDI.
We previously established a role for disulfide exchange and PDI in
platelet adhesion mediated by integrin
The first step was to verify involvement of exofacial thiols in
fibrinogen-mediated platelet-platelet interaction. We observed that
agonist-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited in the presence of
the impermeant thiol blockers pCMPS (Figure 1) and DTNB. This finding
was in agreement with the reported role of thiols in platelet
adhesion.14 We further observed that shape change and
ristocetin-induced agglutination were not affected, indicating
involvement of extracellular thiols in ligation of Inhibition of catalyzed disulfide exchange by bacitracin also inhibited
platelet aggregation, mimicking the effect of the thiol blockers by
inhibiting the second but not the first wave of ADP- or
thrombin-induced aggregation (Figure 2). This observation was in
agreement with previous findings.22 Inhibition was
observed at concentrations of bacitracin shown to inhibit other
membrane functions32,33 as well as platelet
adhesion.14 Surface-associated PDI,20 a
principal candidate for such catalysis,22,34 is inhibited
by bacitracin.32,33 However, endogenous disulfide-exchange activity of We therefore assessed such involvement in fibrinogen binding to
Bacitracin inhibited fibrinogen binding (Figure 4A), indicating that
thiol involvement depends on catalyzed disulfide exchange during the
process of It was previously shown that whereas initial ligation of
Is induction of the high-affinity state of the receptor the
thiol-dependent step? The presence of the first wave and absence of the
second wave of aggregation indicate that the passage from low- to
high-affinity state does not depend on free sulfhydryls. To verify this
on a molecular level, we used activating antibody anti-LIBS6.
Pretreatment of platelets with anti-LIBS6 converts integrin
The involvement of thiols described above, although clearly associated
with integrin ligation, does not necessarily indicate that disulfide
exchange occurs in the integrin itself. Strong circumstantial evidence,
however, supports the presence of thiol function in the
On the basis of the data presented here, we suggest that binding
of fibrinogen to
We thank Dr Mark H. Ginsberg of the Department for Vascular Biology, Scripps Institute, La Jolla, CA, for the kind gifts of anti-LIBS antibodies PMI-1 and anti-LIBS6, and Coren Lahav for diligent work on the graphical presentation.
Submitted January 7, 2002; accepted April 1, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 30, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0339.
Supported in part by grants from the Chief Scientist's office of the Ministry of Health, Israel, and The Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Muenster, Germany (projects Fo.01KS9604/0 and IZKF C21).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Judith Lahav, Coagulation Laboratory, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Zabotinski Street, Petah-Tiqva 49100, Israel; e-mail: jlahav{at}netvision.net.il.
1. Hughes PE, Pfaff M. Integrin affinity modulation. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:359-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Shattil SJ, Kashiwagi H, Pampori N.
Integrin signaling: the platelet paradigm.
Blood.
1998;91:2645-2657 3. Bazzoni G, Hemler ME. Are changes in integrin affinity and conformation overemphasized? Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23:30-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Parise LV.
Integrin 5. Coppolino MG, Dedhar S. Bi-directional signal transduction by integrin receptors. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2000;32:171-188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Oxvig C, Lu C, Springer TA.
Conformational changes in tertiary structure near the ligand-binding site of an integrin I domain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:2215-2220
7.
Calvete JJ.
Platelet integrin GPIIb/IIIa: structure-function correlations: an update and lessons from other integrins.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med.
1999;222:29-38
8.
Emsley J, Knight CG, Farndale RW, Barnes MJ, Liddington RC.
Structural basis of collagen recognition by integrin
9.
Yan B, Hu DD, Knowles SK, Smith JW.
Probing chemical and conformational differences in the resting and active conformers of platelet integrin 10. Woodside DG, Liu S, Ginsberg MH. Integrin activation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:316-323[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
11.
Phillips DR, Nannizzi-Alaimo L, Prasad KS.
12. Fox JE. Cytoskeletal proteins and platelet signaling. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:198-213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science. 1999;286:1028-1032.
14.
Gofer-Dadosh N, Klepfish A, Schmilowitz H, Shaklai M, Lahav J.
Affinity modulation in 15. Lahav J, Gofer-Dadosh N, Luboshitz J, Hess O, Shaklai M. Protein disulfide isomerase mediates integrin-dependent adhesion. FEBS Lett. 2000;475:89-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Schwartz BR, Harlan JM. Sulfhydryl reducing agents promote neutrophil adherence without increasing surface expression of CD11b/CD18. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;169:51-57[CrossRef]. 17. Schwartz BR, Harlan JM. Neutrophil membrane sulfhydryl groups are involved in stimulated neutrophil adherence to endothelium. J Leukoc Biol. 1989;45:177-182[Abstract].
18.
Yan B, Smith JW.
A redox site involved in integrin activation.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:39964-39972 19. Yan B, Smith JW. Mechanism of integrin activation by disulfide bond reduction. Biochemistry. 2001;40:8861-8867[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
20.
Essex DW, Chen K, Swiatkowska M.
Localization of protein disulfide isomerase to the external surface of the platelet plasma membrane.
Blood.
1995;86:2168-2173 21. Essex DW, Li M, Miller A, Feinman RD. Protein disulfide isomerase and sulfhydryl-dependent pathways in platelet activation. Biochemistry. 2000;40:6070-6075. 22. Essex DW, Li M. Protein disulfide isomerase mediated platelet aggregation and secretion. Br J Haematol. 1999;104:448-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
23.
O'Neill S, Robinson A, Deering A, Ryan M, Fitzgerald DF, Moran N.
The platelet integrin 24. Xia Z, Wong T, Liu Q, Kasir-Friede A, Brown E, Frojmovic MM. Optimally functional fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled fibrinogen for quantitative studies of binding to activated platelets and platelet aggregation. Br J Haematol. 1996;93:204-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
25.
Kehrel B, Wierwille S, Clemetson KJ, et al.
Glycoprotein VI is a major collagen receptor for platelet activation.
Blood.
1998;91:491-499
26.
Morton LF, Hargreaves PG, Farndale RW, Young RD, Barnes MJ.
Integrin 27. Aszodi A, Pfeifer A, Ahmad M, et al. The vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) is involved in cGMP- and cAMP-mediated inhibition of agonist-induced platelet aggregation, but is dispensable for smooth muscle function. EMBO J. 1999;18:37-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Kehrel B, Kronenberg A, Rauterberg J, et al.
Platelets deficient in glycoprotein IIIb aggregate normally to collagen type I and III but not to collagen type V.
Blood.
1993;82:3364-3370
29.
Dormann D, Clemetson KJ, Kehrel B.
The GPIb thrombin-binding site is essential for thrombin-induced platelet procoagulant activity.
Blood.
2000;96:2469-2478
30.
Frenette PS, Denis CV, Weiss L, et al.
P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) is expressed on platelets and can mediate platelet-endothelial interaction in vivo.
J Exp Med.
2000;191:1413-1422 31. Roth RE. Bacitracin: an inhibitor of the insulin degrading activity of glutathione-insulin transhydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981;98:431-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
32.
Mandel R, Ryser HJ, Ghani F, Wu M, Peak D.
Inhibition of a reductive function of the plasma membrane by bacitracin and antibodies against protein disulfide isomerase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1993;90:4112-4116 33. Ryser HJ, Levy EM, Mandel R, DiSciullo GJ. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus infection by agents that interfere with thiol-disulfide interchange upon virus-receptor interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:4559-4563< | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||