SEARCH:   Advanced

Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 15, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1164. This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2002-04-1164v1 101/1/143    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Delneste, Y. Articles by Jeannin, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Delneste, Y. Articles by Jeannin, P. Related Collections Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells Immunobiology Social Bookmarking                   What's this?  Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article  Blood, 1 January 2003, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 143-150 HEMATOPOIESIS Interferon- switches monocyte differentiation from dendritic cells to macrophages Yves Delneste, Peggy Charbonnier, Nathalie Herbault, Giovanni Magistrelli, Gersende Caron, Jean-Yves Bonnefoy, and Pascale Jeannin From the Department of Biology, Centre d'Immunologie Pierre Fabre, Saint Julien en Genevois, France.     Abstract Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References Human monocytes differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs) or macrophages according to the nature of environmental signals. Monocytes stimulated with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) plus interleukin 4 (IL-4) yield DCs. We tested here whether interferon- (IFN-), a potent activator of macrophages, may modulate monocyte differentiation. Addition of IFN- to IL-4 plus GM-CSF-stimulated monocytes switches their differentiation from DCs to CD14CD64+ macrophages. IFN- increases macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and IL-6 production by IL-4 plus GM-CSF-stimulated monocytes by acting at the transcriptional level and acts together with IL-4 to up-regulate M-CSF but not IL-6 production. IFN- also increases M-CSF receptor internalization. Results from neutralizing experiments show that both M-CSF and IL-6 are involved in the ability of IFN- to skew monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages. Finally, this effect of IFN- is limited to early stages of differentiation. When added to immature DCs, IFN- up-regulates IL-6 but not M-CSF production and does not convert them to macrophages, even in the presence of exogenous M-CSF. In conclusion, IFN- shifts monocyte differentiation to macrophages rather than DCs through autocrine M-CSF and IL-6 production. These data show that IFN- controls the differentiation of antigen-presenting cells and thereby reveals a new mechanism by which IFN- orchestrates the outcome of specific immune responses. (Blood. 2003;101:143-150) © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.     Introduction Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References Peripheral blood monocytes can differentiate into dendritic cells (DCs) or macrophages depending on environmental factors encountered during their migration from blood to peripheral tissues.1-4 Transendothelial trafficking5 and culture in the presence of serum from systemic lupus erythematosus (through the presence of interferon  [IFN-]) induce monocyte differentiation into immature DCs.6 On contact with interleukin 4 (IL-4) plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; cytokines that could be produced by tissue mast cells), monocytes also differentiate into immature DCs.2-4 Addition of transforming growth factor  (TGF-) or exposition of monocytes to GM-CSF plus IL-15 led to DCs with features of Langerhans cells.7,8 In contrast, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a potent macrophage differentiation factor.1 IL-69,10 and IL-1011 also shift monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages. Tumor cells produce IL-6 and M-CSF that shift the differentiation of CD34+ progenitors from DCs to macrophages.9 Fibroblasts, via IL-6 production, up-regulate functional M-CSF receptor (CD115) expression and autocrine M-CSF consummation by monocytes, thereby switching their differentiation from DCs to macrophages.10 DCs are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs).12 In the periphery, immature DCs capture antigens and, on contact with stress factors (such as microbial components), migrate to the lymphoid organs and undergo a maturation process. They express high levels of costimulatory and accessory molecules, up-regulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules, and neoexpress CD83. In the lymph nodes, mature DCs prime naive antigen-specific T cells.12 In contrast to DCs, macrophages are effector cells that produce various mediators and have evolved to ingest as many pathogens as possible. Although they present antigens, macrophages are less efficient than DCs and unable to prime naive T cells.13 IFN-, released during early and late stages of the immune response by natural killer (NK) cells and activated T cells, respectively, regulates several aspects of the immune response.14 In addition to direct antiviral activity, IFN- orchestrates leukocyte-endothelium interaction14 and plays a crucial role in vivo in "cancer immunosurveillance."15 IFN- is a potent activator of macrophages. On contact with IFN-, monocyte-macrophages undergo biochemical and morphologic modifications that allow them to perform their functional activities.16 INF- stimulates macrophage antimicrobial and tumoricidal activities and accessory cell functions and modulates proteasome gene expression.16 IFN- also acts on uncommitted myeloid immature DCs to polarize them into TH1 cell-promoting effector cells that produce high levels of IL-12 on stimulation.17 We tested here whether IFN- could be involved in monocyte differentiation and report that IFN- switches monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages, at least partly via an autocrine production of M-CSF and IL-6.     Materials and methods Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References Cytokines All human and murine recombinant cytokines were from R & D Systems (Abingdon, United Kingdom). Human monocyte differentiation Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll-Paque (Life Technologies, Cergy Pontoise, France) density gradient centrifugation. Monocytes were purified from PBMCs by positive selection using a magnetic cell separator (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Purity, assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-CD13 monoclonal antibody (mAb), was more than 98%. Monocytes were differentiated into DCs by 5 days of culture in complete medium (CM) consisting of RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid) and 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (all from Life Technologies) at 5 × 106 cells/5 mL/well in 6-well tissue culture plates (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA) with 20 ng/mL IL-4 and 20 ng/mL GM-CSF. Macrophages were obtained by culturing monocytes for 5 days in CM with 2 ng/mL GM-CSF and 20 ng/mL M-CSF.18 In some experiments, monocytes were cultured for 5 days in CM with 20 ng/mL GM-CSF. All these cultures were also performed in the presence of different concentrations of IFN- (2-50 ng/mL) added at different time points, from day 0 to day 5. In neutralization experiments, monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 containing or not 25 ng/mL IFN- were treated at day 0 and day 2 with 30 µg/mL neutralizing antihuman M-CSF mAb (R & D Systems) plus 30 µg/mL neutralizing antihuman IL-6 mAb (Diaclone, Besancon, France) or with 30 µg/mL mouse isotype control mAbs (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). In other experiments, day 5 immature DCs were recultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 without or with 25 ng/mL IFN- alone, 25 ng/mL IFN- plus 100 ng/mL M-CSF, or 100 ng/mL M-CSF plus 100 ng/mL IL-6 or were recultured in CM without cytokine. Finally, in some experiments cells were stimulated with 20 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma, St Louis, MO). MLRs with human cells DCs and macrophages, obtained as described above, were washed, irradiated (3000 rad), and cultured in quintuplicate at 4 × 102, 2 × 103, or 2 × 104 cells/200 µL/well in 96-well flat-bottomed plates with 105 allogenic T cells purified from PBMCs by rosetting with sheep red blood cells (the purity, assessed by FACS analysis using a FITC-labeled anti-CD3 mAb, was > 95%). In some experiments, day-5 immature DCs were treated or not with 25 ng/mL IFN-. After 48 hours, cells were or were not stimulated with 2 ng/mL LPS for 24 hours and used in mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays at 2 × 104 cells/mL with 106 allogenic purified T cells. After 5 days, cells were pulsed during the last 16 hours with 0.25 µCi/well (0.00925 MBq) 3H-thymidine (Amersham, Uppsala, Sweden). Thymidine incorporation was measured by standard liquid scintillation counting. Results are expressed in counts per minute (mean of quintuplicate values). Murine cells C57BL/6 (IAb) and Balb/c (IAd) mice were from Harlan (Gannat, France). Murine DCs were generated as described19 by culturing bone marrow cells from C57BL/6 mice in CM supplemented with 50 µM -mercaptoethanol (-ME) and containing 3 ng/mL GM-CSF. In some experiments, 25 ng/mL murine IFN- was added at the beginning of the culture. After 5 days, the phenotype of the cells was analyzed by FACS and MLRs were performed as follows. Briefly, allogenic CD4+ T cells from Balb/c mice were purified by incubation with a FITC-labeled antimurine CD4 mAb (BD Pharmingen) followed by positive selection using anti-FITC mAb-coated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). After 5 days of culture in GM-CSF, myeloid APCs were depleted in Gr1+ cells by incubation with an anti-Gr1 mAb (Caltag, Burlingame, CA) followed by antimouse Ig mAb-coated beads (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). In 96-well flat-bottomed culture plates (Corning Costar), 4 × 105 CD4+ T cells plus 5 × 104 APCs were cultured in triplicate for 72 hours. During the last 16 hours, 3H-thymidine was added. Results are expressed in counts per minute × 103 as mean ± SD (n = 3). FACS analysis The phenotype of cells was analyzed by cytofluorometry using a FACSvantage cytofluorometer (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium). For human cells, the following mAbs were used: FITC-labeled anti-CD1a (Immunoquality Products, Groningen, The Netherlands), anti-CD14 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-CD64 (Caltag), anti-CD86, and anti-HLA-DR (both from BD Pharmingen) mAbs; unlabeled anti-mannose receptor (MR; Research Diagnostic, Flanders, NJ), -MHC I, -CD83 (both from Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) revealed by FITC-labeled antimouse IgG antibody (Silenus, Melbourne, Australia) and goat anti-CD115 antibody (R & D Systems) revealed by FITC-labeled antigoat IgG antibody (Silenus). To analyze intracellular expression of CD115 and RFD7, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Intrastain kit (Dako) before staining with anti-CD115 or anti-RFD7 mAbs (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom) revealed by FITC-labeled antigoat IgG antibody or antimouse IgG antibody, respectively. Murine cells were phenotyped using FITC-labeled anti-CD11b, anti-CD11c, anti-CD86, anti-IAb (all from BD Pharmingen), biotin-labeled anti-F4/80 mAb (Caltag) revealed by FITC-labeled streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-CD11c (BD Pharmingen) and anti-Gr1 mAbs. Isotype control mAbs were from BD Pharmingen. Results are expressed as a percentage of positive cells or in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values after subtraction of the MFI obtained with the control mAb. Analysis of mRNA expression by RT-PCR In freshly purified human monocytes and in monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 in the absence or presence of 25 ng/mL IFN- for 2, 4, 8, or 16 hours, the expression of the mRNA encoding IL-6, IL-10, M-CSF, and CD115 was determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Briefly, RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies) and the single-strand cDNA was synthesized using 2 µg total RNA by reverse transcription using an oligo-dT primer (Amersham). PCRs were performed with cDNA corresponding to 50 ng total RNA and primers designed to amplify the coding sequence of the cytokines and cytokine receptor. PCR was as follows: 94°C for 5 minutes, 30 cycles 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. RNA integrity and cDNA synthesis were verified by amplifying glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA. The amplified fragments were size-separated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide. Quantification of human cytokines and soluble IL-6 receptor IL-6, M-CSF, and glycoprotein 80 (gp80; soluble IL-6 receptor) were quantified in the cell-free culture supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; R & D Systems; sensitivity of 0.7, 9, and 6.5 pg/mL, respectively). Results are expressed in nanograms per milliliter or micrograms per milliliter (as mean ± SD, n = 4). Phagocytosis and cytochemistry To analyze endocytic properties, cells were incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C with FITC-labeled dextran (40 000 molecular weight), Staphylococcus aureus, or latex beads (2 µm diameter; all from Molecular Probes). After extensive washings, cells were analyzed by FACS. Results are expressed in MFI or as a percentage of fluorescent cells. Nonspecific esterase activity was analyzed using the  naphthyl acetate esterase kit (Sigma) following the manufacturer's instructions. Cell staining was analyzed by light microscopy.     Results Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References IFN- shifts monocyte differentiation from DCs to activated macrophages CD1aCD14+ monocytes cultured with GM-CSF plus IL-4 differentiate after 5 days into CD1a+CD14 immature DCs2,3 (Table 1). When cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 containing IFN-, monocytes differentiate into CD1alowCD14 cells (Table 1). Compared to monocyte-derived immature DCs, cells treated with IFN- express CD64 and CD86, express higher levels of MHC class I and class II molecules, express lower levels of MR (Table 1), and present reduced T-cell costimulatory properties (Figure 1A, left panel). Microscopic observation shows that, whereas immature DCs are mostly nonadherent round cells, IFN--treated cells form a network of adherent elongated cells (Table 1 and Figure 1B). In contrast to macrophages, LPS-stimulated immature DCs undergo a maturation process. They present morphologic changes associated with veils (Table 1 and Figure 1B); neoexpress CD83 (Table 1); up-regulate MHC class II, CD40, CD80, and CD86 expression (data not shown); and acquire potent costimulatory properties (Figure 1A, right panel). On LPS stimulation, IFN--treated cells are adherent, do not present veils (Table 1 and Figure 1B), and do not acquire CD83 expression (Table 1); in addition, the expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, and CD86) is not modulated (data not shown). Moreover, these cells have limited costimulatory properties compared to mature DCs (Figure 1A, right panel). Lastly, in response to 2 ng/mL LPS, IFN--treated cells produce undetectable levels of bioactive IL-12, in contrast to immature DCs (835 ± 160 pg/mL; data not shown). IFN--treated cells do not express Langerhans cell-associated markers (langerhin and E-cadherin; data not shown). Together, these data suggest that GM-CSF plus IL-4 plus IFN--treated monocytes present a macrophage phenotype.                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 1. Characteristics of monocytes cultured for 5 days with GM-CSF plus IL-4, GM-CSF, or M-CSF in the absence or presence of IFN- View larger version (92K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. IFN- shifts monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages. (A) Monocytes were cultured in medium containing M-CSF (circles) or GM-CSF plus IL-4 (triangles) in the absence (filled symbols) or presence (open symbols) of 25 ng/mL IFN-. After 5 days, cells were (right panel) or were not (left panel) stimulated for 24 hours with 20 ng/mL LPS. Cells were then irradiated and used to stimulate allogenic T cells. Results are expressed in counts per minute × 103 as means ± SDs of quintuplicate values. Results shown are of 1 experiment representative of 3. Results show mean SD of quintuplicate values of 1 experiment representative of 3. (B) Monocytes were cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 in the absence (left) or presence of 25 ng/mL IFN- (right). After 5 days, cells were (top) or were not (bottom) stimulated for 24 hours with 20 ng/mL LPS and observed by microscopy (original magnification, × 100). Some macrophage subsets, such as monocytes differentiated into macrophages in the presence of M-CSF, are characterized by CD14, CD64, RFD7, and MR expression and by potent phagocytic and nonspecific esterase activities (Table 1). IFN- modulates macrophage phenotype and functions; it up-regulates MHC class I, HLA-DR, and CD64 expression20 and down-regulates CD14,21 RFD7,22 and MR23 expression as well as phagocytic properties14,24 and nonspecific esterase activity (Table 1). In agreement with these data, monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 plus IFN- express CD86 and CD64 but not RFD7 and CD14, and present reduced endocytic and nonspecific esterase activities (Table 1). In parallel, IFN- poorly modulates macrophage accessory cell function25 (Figure 1A, right panel). Together, these data show that IFN- skews monocyte differentiation from immature DCs to IFN--stimulated macrophages. By comparing the respective properties of IL-4 and IFN- on GM-CSF-treated monocytes (Table 1, left and middle panels), it appears that IL-4 and IFN- have an additive effect on the up-regulation of MHC class I and MHC class II molecule expression.26 This additive effect was observed at any time point analyzed during the differentiation process (from day 1 to day 5; data not shown). Moreover, IL-4 and IFN- have also an additive effect in up-regulating CD64 and CD86 expression on day 5-differentiated macrophages. Together, these observations suggest a more complex dialogue between IL-4 and IFN- than just a decrease in monocyte-differentiating cell sensitivity to IL-4 mediated by IFN-.27 IFN- prevents murine bone marrow progenitor differentiation into DCs We therefore tested whether the ability of IFN- to skew myeloid cell differentiation from DCs to macrophages could be extended to an IL-4-independent model of DC generation. In the presence of GM-CSF, murine bone marrow-derived progenitors differentiate into DCs.19 Bone marrow progenitors were incubated for 5 days with GM-CSF in the absence or presence of IFN-. Under the aegis of GM-CSF, MHC class II progenitors give rise to a major population of DCs (75%-90% of the cells according to the experiments, n = 5) characterized by MHC class II, CD11c, CD86, and F4/80 expression and potent T-cell stimulatory properties (Table 2). In addition to DCs, macrophages (adherent, CD11c, Gr1, CD11b+, and low or no MHC class II) and granulocytes (nonadherent, Gr1+ and MHC class II) are also present19 (data not shown).                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2. IFN- prevents murine progenitor differentiation into DCs When progenitors are cultured in the presence of GM-CSF plus IFN- for 5 days, no CD11c+ cells are generated (Table 2). In addition to a minor proportion of Gr1+ granulocytes (15%-32%), the Gr1 and CD11c cells express low or undetectable levels of MHC class II, but express CD86, F4/80, and CD11b (Table 2). They do not express B, T, or NK cell markers (data not shown). Finally, in contrast to DCs, these CD11cCD11b+ cells present poor MLR-stimulating activity (Table 2). These data show that IFN- skews murine bone marrow progenitor differentiation from DCs to macrophagelike cells. They also support a direct effect of IFN- on DC precursors. IFN- up-regulates M-CSF production by monocytes M-CSF is the most potent macrophage differentiation factor described.1 We then tested whether IFN- may affect M-CSF production by monocytes. Human monocytes were cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 containing or not IFN-, and M-CSF was quantified in the supernatants at different time points during the differentiation process. Monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 produce M-CSF28 (Figure 2A). M-CSF production is maximal at day 1 and declines during the 5-day period of culture (Figure 2A). Surprisingly, the presence of IFN- together with GM-CSF plus IL-4 results in a sustained (Figure 2A) and dose-dependent up-regulation of M-CSF production (maximal increase of 300% ± 42% using 25 ng/mL IFN-; mean ± SD, n = 4; Figure 2B). M-CSF mRNA expression is induced by culturing monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-428 and is up-regulated by IFN- as early as 2 hours after stimulation (Figure 3). View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. IFN- up-regulates M-CSF and IL-6 production by IL-4 plus GM-CSF-stimulated monocytes. (A,C) Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 were () or were not () stimulated with 25 ng/mL IFN- at day 0 and M-CSF (A) and IL-6 (C) were quantified in the cell-free supernatants from day 1 to day 5. (B,D) Monocytes were cultured in GM-CSF () or GM-CSF plus IL-4 () in the absence or presence of 1 to 50 ng/mL IFN- added at day 0 and M-CSF (B) and IL-6 (D) were quantified in the 24-hour supernatants (day 1). As control, monocytes were cultured in medium without cytokine (dotted bars). (A-D) Results are expressed in micrograms per milliliter as means ± SDs of 4 experiments. (E) Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 were () or were not () stimulated with 25 ng/mL IFN-. At days 1, 3, and 5, membrane CD115 expression was analyzed by FACS. At day 1, intracellular CD115 expression was analyzed after cell permeabilization. Results are expressed in MFI (after subtraction of the MFI obtained with the control mAb) as means ± SDs of 4 separate experiments. (F) Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 were not () or were () stimulated with 25 ng/mL IFN- in the absence or presence of neutralizing anti-M-CSF plus anti-IL-6 mAbs or of isotype control mAbs. After 5 days, cells were stimulated with 20 ng/mL LPS and CD83 expression was analyzed by FACS. Results are expressed in MFI values as means ± SDs, n = 3. View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. IFN- enhances M-CSF and IL-6 mRNA expression by monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4. Freshly isolated monocytes were not (none) or were cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 in the absence or presence of 25 ng/mL IFN-. After 2, 4, 8, and 16 hours, the expression of the mRNA encoding M-CSF, IL-6, IL-10, CD115, and GAPDH was analyzed by RT-PCR. We next evaluated the respective roles of IL-4 and IFN- on M-CSF production (Figure 2B). Monocytes were exposed to GM-CSF in the absence or presence of IL-4 and different concentrations of IFN-. M-CSF was quantified in the 24-hour supernatants. GM-CSF induces M-CSF production28 (Figure 2B) in a dose-dependent manner (data not shown). IL-4 and IFN- have antagonistic effects on GM-CSF-induced M-CSF production as they down-regulate28 and up-regulate M-CSF production, respectively (Figure 2B). Surprisingly, when added together, IFN- and IL-4 have an additive effect on the up-regulation of M-CSF production (Figure 2B). Monocytes in GM-CSF produce higher levels of M-CSF when stimulated with IFN- plus IL-4 than with IFN- alone (increase of 300% ± 42% and 80% ± 19% using 25 ng/mL IFN-, respectively; mean ± SD, n = 4; Figure 2B). Finally, IFN- also up-regulates murine M-CSF production by bone marrow progenitors (data not shown). Thus, we report for the first time that IFN- is a potent inducer of M-CSF production by human and murine myeloid cells. IFN- up-regulates IL-6 production by monocytes IL-6 shifts monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages by enhancing M-CSF consummation.9,10 We then evaluated whether IFN- may control the production of IL-6 by monocyte-differentiating DCs. Human monocytes were maintained in GM-CSF plus IL-4 containing or not IFN-, and IL-6 was quantified in the supernatants during the differentiation process. Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 produce IL-6 (Figure 2C). Maximal IL-6 levels are obtained at day 1 and then decline time dependently (Figure 2C). Addition of IFN- up-regulates IL-6 production in a time- (Figure 2C) and dose-dependent manner (with a maximum obtained using 50 ng/mL; Figure 2D). IL-6 mRNA expression is induced by culturing monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 and is up-regulated by IFN- (with an effect detectable 2 hours after stimulation; Figure 3). Analysis of the respective roles of IL-4 and IFN- on IL-6 production shows that GM-CSF induces IL-6 production by monocytes and that IL-4 and IFN- down- and up-regulate GM-CSF-induced IL-6 production, respectively (Figure 2D). In contrast to M-CSF, no additive effect of IL-4 plus IFN- on IL-6 production is observed as IL-4 partly prevents IFN--induced IL-6 production (Figure 2D). A previous study reported that soluble IL-6 receptor (gp80) cooperates with IL-6 and M-CSF in switching monocyte differentiation to macrophages.10 We observed that IFN- only slightly up-regulated gp80 production with a maximum occurring at day 3 (0.26 ± 0.05 and 0.35 ± 0.06 ng/mL, in the absence or presence of IFN-, respectively; mean ± SD, n = 4). Lastly, IL-10 has also been shown to shift monocyte differentiation into macrophages.11 We failed in detecting IL-10 production (data not shown) or an up-regulation of IL-10 mRNA expression on treatment with IFN- (Figure 3). Together, these data show that IFN- up-regulates IL-6 production by monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 by acting, at least partly, at the transcriptional level. IFN- down-regulates CD115 cell surface expression on monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 M-CSF consummation is associated with CD115 internalization.29 We then evaluated whether the addition of IFN- to monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 results in a modulation of CD115 expression. Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 express CD115 and this expression remains stable during the differentiation process10,28 (Figure 2E). The presence of IFN- in GM-CSF plus IL-4 results in a decrease in membrane CD115 expression, observed at day 1 and maximal at day 3 (Figure 2E). CD115 expression returns to basal level at day 5 (Figure 2E). Analysis of CD115 expression in permeabilized cells shows similar levels of expression on monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 with or without IFN- (Figure 2E), thereby suggesting an internalization of CD115 by IFN--treated cells. In accordance with these data, a decrease in M-CSF concentrations in the day 3 supernatants of monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 plus IFN- is observed (Figure 2A). Moreover, IFN- slightly enhances CD115 mRNA expression on monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 (Figure 3). Together, these data suggest that the up-regulation of M-CSF and IL-6 production by monocytes induced by IFN- is associated to an autocrine enhancement of M-CSF consummation. Both M-CSF and IL-6 are involved in the effect of IFN- on monocyte differentiation into DCs In neutralizing experiments, we evaluated whether autocrine IL-6 and M-CSF production induced by IFN- was involved in its ability to skew monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages. Monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 were treated or not with IFN- in the absence or presence of neutralizing anti-M-CSF or anti-IL-6 mAbs. At day 5, cells were stimulated with LPS for 24 hours before to analyze CD83 expression. Results show that IFN--treated cells partly recover the ability to acquire CD83 expression in the presence of neutralizing mAbs (61% ± 10%; mean ± SD, n = 4; Figure 2F). When anti-M-CSF mAb or anti-IL-6 mAb was used alone, CD83 expression was also slightly recovered (35% ± 8% and 29% ± 5%, respectively; Figure 2F), thereby suggesting that both cytokines participate to the effect of IFN- on monocyte differentiation. No significant effect was observed with control mAbs (Figure 2F). As control, the neutralizing mAbs do not affect IL-4 plus GM-CSF-induced monocyte differentiation into DCs (Figure 2F). Together, these data show that IFN- shifts differentiating DCs toward macrophages at least partly by up-regulating autocrine consummation of M-CSF and IL-6. Immature DCs do not produce M-CSF nor differentiate into macrophages in response to IFN- We then evaluated whether IFN- may reconvert immature DCs toward macrophages. IFN- has been reported to polarize immature DCs into DC1s that produce high levels of IL-12 and present potent costimulatory properties.17 In accordance with these data, we show that immature DCs exposed to IFN- retain a phenotype of CD1a+CD14 DC (Table 3). Moreover, on LPS stimulation, immature DCs exposed to IFN- acquire veils (data not shown), neoexpress CD83, and present potent T-cell costimulatory properties (Table 3).                                View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 3. IFN- does not shift immature DCs toward macrophages We tested whether IFN- may control M-CSF and IL-6 production by immature DCs. IFN- does not modulate M-CSF production (Figure 4A) nor mRNA expression (data not shown) by immature DCs. Kinetic experiments show that the ability of monocytes cultured in GM-CSF plus IL-4 to produce M-CSF in response to IFN- is maximal at day 1 and decreases time dependently during the differentiation process (Figure 4A). In contrast, immature DCs retain the ability to produce IL-6 in response to IFN- (Figure 4B). These data show that the regulation of M-CSF production in response to IFN- is tightly regulated during the differentiation process from monocytes to DCs. View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. IFN- does not modulate M-CSF production by immature DCs. (A-B) Day 5 immature DCs were maintained in GM-CSF plus IL-4 and 25 ng/mL IFN- was not () or was () added at day 0, 2, or 4. After 24 hours, M-CSF (A) and IL-6 (B) were quantified in the supernatants. Results are expressed in micrograms per milliliter (means ± SDs, n = 4). We evaluated whether IFN- may reconvert immature DCs to macrophages when exogenous M-CSF is added. In the presence of a high concentration of M-CSF (100 ng/mL), IFN--treated immature DCs in GM-CSF plus IL-4 retain a DC phenotype; they express CD1a but not CD14 (Table 3), present a morphology of immature DCs (data not shown), and, on LPS stimulation, acquire CD83 expression (Table 3) and veils (data not shown). In agreement with others,10 they also present a decrease in cell surface CD115 expression (Table 3), thereby suggesting a consummation of M-CSF by immature DCs. Finally, even in the presence of exogenous M-CSF and IL-6, immature DCs in GM-CSF plus IL-4 retain a DC phenotype (Table 3). As a positive control,30 on GM-CSF and IL-4 removal, immature DCs acquire CD14 expression and convert toward adherent macrophages (Table 3). Thus, these data suggest that, in the presence of GM-CSF plus IL-4, immature DCs may express functional CD115 but are resistant to IFN--, IL-6-, and M-CSF-induced macrophage differentiation.     Discussion Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References IFN- produced by NK or activated T cells participates in the control of the innate and adaptive phases of the immune response.14 IFN- exerts most of its effects on APCs; it activates macrophages and polarizes immature DCs into Th1 cell-promoting effector DCs.14,16,17 We show here for the first time that IFN- also participates to the control of APC differentiation; IFN- switches monocyte differentiation to activated macrophages at least in part via autocrine activation by IL-6 and M-CSF. M-CSF is a major macrophage differentiation factor1 that skews CD34+ progenitor and monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages.9,10,30 By enhancing functional M-CSF receptor expression and M-CSF consummation,10 IL-6 cooperates with M-CSF in this process.9,10 In agreement with these data, we report that IFN- switches monocyte differentiation into macrophages via an up-regulation of autocrine IL-6 and M-CSF production. GM-CSF induces M-CSF production by monocytes10,28 in a dose-dependent manner with a maximum at 100 ng/mL (data not shown). In our experimental conditions, the concentrations of M-CSF present in the supernatants of monocytes in GM-CSF plus IL-4 were lower than those reported by others.10,28 The use of 20 ng/mL instead of 100 ng/mL GM-CSF in our study may explain this difference. We also show that monocytes treated with IL-4 plus GM-CSF produce IL-6. Levels of IL-6 induced by IL-4 plus GM-CSF were lower than those induced by GM-CSF alone. Thus, it appears that IL-4 inhibits GM-CSF-induced M-CSF28 and IL-6 production. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the inhibitory effect of IL-4 on M-CSF and IL-6 production may contribute to explain its DC differentiation factor property. Although IFN- antagonizes many IL-4-mediated responses,27 it has been also previously observed that IL-4 and IFN- act synergistically to enhance MR-dependent phagocytosis31 and CD23 expression on macrophages.32 We report that whereas IFN- up-regulates IL-6 and M-CSF production, IL-4 down-regulates their production. However, when used together, they mutually inhibit their respective effects on IL-6 production and have an additive effect on the up-regulation of M-CSF production. Together, these observations suggest a complex dialogue between IL-4 and IFN- not limited to antagonistic effects. IFN- antagonizes many physiologic responses mediated by IL-4, by acting at posttranscriptional27 or transcriptional levels. IFN- and IL-4 activate signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)1 and Stat6, respectively.33,34 IFN- inhibits IL-4-mediated Stat6 activation by inducing the expression of suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS)1.35 The antagonist effect of IFN- on IL-4-induced inhibition of IL-6 production could be related to the SOCS1-mediated Stat6 inhibition. Moreover, expression of IL6 gene is under the control of transcription factors, including AP-1, nuclear factor-B (NF-B), and NF-IL-6.36 Whereas NF-IL-6 is strongly inhibited by IL-4,37 it is poorly affected by IFN-.38 Consequently, the ability of IL-4 to down-regulate IFN--induced IL-6 production could be related to the strong inhibition of NF-IL-6 which is mediated by IL-4 and not counteracted by IFN-. In accordance with data showing a differential regulation of M-CSF and IL-6 gene expression in monocytes,39 we report that IFN- plus IL-4 have an additive effect of M-CSF production. The role of members of the Stat family in the regulation of M-CSF expression is poorly documented. Nevertheless, we could hypothesize that the down-regulation of IL-4-induced activation of some members of the Stat family mediated by IFN- may contribute to explain this effect. In addition, the increase of M-CSF production induced by IL-4 plus IFN- could be also indirect. M-CSF increases M-CSF mRNA expression by GM-CSF-activated monocytes.40 M-CSF receptor gene expression is controlled by transcription factors including NF-B, AP-1, and PU-1. PU-1 is activated by IFN-41 and interacts with the interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) which expression is increased by IL-4.42 Thus, the additive effect of IFN- and IL-4 on M-CSF production could be consecutive to an increase of M-CSF receptor transcription. Additional experiments are required to determine the effects of IL-4 plus IFN- on the expression of the transcription factors involved in IL-6 and M-CSF production. DCs and macrophages have different roles in the immune response. Whereas DCs initiate specific immune responses, macrophages and especially IFN--activated macrophages exhibit potent bactericidal and antitumoral activities.14 When added to differentiated uncommitted immature DCs, IFN- polarizes them into Th1 cell-promoting effector DCs.17 Th1 cells produce IFN-, IL-2, and tumor necrosis factor  (TNF-) and evoke cell-mediated immunity and phagocyte-dependent inflammation. In addition to acting on mature APC functions, IFN- may also act on DC/macrophage precursors to favor their differentiation into macrophages. Interestingly, IFN- acts mainly at the initial stages of monocyte differentiation. The ability of cells to produce M-CSF in response to IFN- varies with the status of differentiation. In contrast to monocytes, immature DCs express CD115 but do not revert to macrophages on contact with IL-6, M-CSF, or IFN-. The mechanisms underlying this resistance remain to be identified. These data also suggest that the effects of IFN- are tightly controlled according to the status of cell differentiation. Lastly, in agreement with data showing that environmental cytokines tightly control monocyte differentiation into immature DCs and macrophages and the interconversion into one another,4,30 we observed that the removal of IFN- from the culture at the early stages of differentiation partly prevents its blocking effect on DC differentiation. IL-10 also shifts monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages.11 IL-10 and IFN- give rise to macrophagelike cells with divergent antigen presentation and endocytosis properties.43 These observations suggest that monocyte differentiation and the function of the cells generated are also tightly controlled by the nature of cytokines encountered. DCs are the only APCs that prime naive T cells and initiate specific immune responses.12 Consequently, they have a central role in vaccine strategies and especially in antitumor immunotherapies.44,45 Tumor-specific vaccination using antigen-loaded autologous DCs has reached the stage of human clinical trials. These studies have been made possible by the development of methods for obtaining large numbers of DCs. Most of these studies have been carried out with ex vivo generated monocyte-derived DCs.44,45 Thus, to identify factors that control monocyte differentiation is crucial in order to optimize DC generation. Our results show that IFN- skews monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages, suggesting that the presence of IFN--producing cells together with monocytes could interfere with the differentiation process into DCs. Finally, in agreement with others, we report that IFN--stimulated macrophages present undetectable or low levels of markers that are usually considered as macrophage markers (RFD7, CD14, and MR). This observation points out that the expression of CD1a or CD14 (or both) is sometimes not sufficient to clearly distinguish between monocyte-derived macrophages or DCs and that the study of additive morphologic, phenotypic, and functional parameters is required. In conclusion, our data show that, in addition to a direct effect on APC functions, IFN- skews monocyte differentiation from DCs to macrophages and thereby reveals a new mechanism by which IFN- may control the outcome of the immune response.     Acknowledgments We sincerely acknowledge Ms R. Vellaidom for manuscript handling.     Footnotes Submitted April 17, 2002; accepted August 6, 2002. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 15, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-04-1164. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734. Reprints: Pascale Jeannin, Centre d'Immunologie Pierre Fabre, 5, Avenue Napoléon III, F-74160 Saint-Julien en Genevois, France; e-mail: pascale.jeannin{at}pierre-fabre.com.     References Top Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion References 1. Becker S, Warren MK, Haskill S. Colony-stimulating factor-induced monocyte survival and differentiation into macrophages in serum-free culture. J Immunol. 1987;139:3703-3709[Abstract]. 2. Sallusto P, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor . J Exp Med. 1994;179:1109-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 3. Zhou LJ, Tedder TF. CD14+ blood monocytes can differentiate into functionally mature CD83+ dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:2588-2592[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 4. Chapuis F, Rosenzwajg M, Yagello M, Ekman M, Biberfeld P, Gluckman JC. Differentiation of human dendritic cells from monocytes in vitro. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27:431-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 5. Randolph GJ, Beaulieu S, Lebecque S, Steinman RM, Muller WA. Differentiation of monocytes into dendritic cells in a model of transendothelial trafficking. Science. 1998;282:480-483[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 6. Blanco P, Palucka AK, Gill M, Pascual V, Banchereau J. Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-alpha in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science. 2001;294:1540-1543[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 7. Geissmann F, Prost C, Monnet JP, Dy M, Brousse N, Hermine O. Transforming growth factor beta 1, in the presence of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin 4, induces differentiation of human peripheral blood monocytes into dendritic Langerhans cells. J Exp Med. 1998;187:961-966[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 8. Mohamadzadeh M, Berard F, Essert G, et al. Interleukin 15 skews monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells with features of Langerhans cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1013-1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 9. Menetrier-Caux C, Montmain G, Dieu MC, et al. Inhibition of the differentiation of dendritic cells from CD34+ progenitors by tumors cells: role of interleukin-6 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1998;92:4778-4791[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 10. Chomorat P, Banchereau J, Davoust J, Paluka AK. IL-6 switches the differentiation of monocytes from dendritic cells to macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:510-514[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Allavena P, Piemonti L, Longoni D, et al. IL-10 prevents the differentiation of monocytes to dendritic cells but promotes their maturation to macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:359-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:767-811[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Ganz T. Macrophage function. New Horiz. 1993;1:23-27[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Boehm U, Klamp T, Groot M, Howard JC. Cellular responses to interferon-gamma. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:749-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 15. Shankaran V, Ikeda H, Bruce AT, et al. IFNgamma and lymphocytes prevent primary tumor development and shape tumor immunogenicity. Nature. 2001;410:1107-1111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Schreiber RD, Celada A. Molecular characterization of interferon-gamma as a macrophage activating factor. Lymphokines. 1985;11:87-118. 17. Vieira PL, de Jong EC, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML, Kalinski P. Development of Th1-inducing capacity in myeloid dendritic cells requires environmental instruction. J Immunol. 2000;164:4507-4512[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 18. Caracciolo D, Shirsat N, Wong GG, Lange B, Clark S, Rovera G. Recombinant human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) requires subliminal concentrations of granulocyte/macrophage (GM)-CSF for optimal stimulation of human macrophage colony formation in vitro. J Exp Med. 1987;166:1851-1860[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 19. Inaba K, Inaba M, Deguchi M, et al. Granulocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells arise from a common major histocompatibility complex class II-negative progenitor in mouse bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:3038-3042[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 20. Cassatella MA, Flynn RM, Amezaga MA, Bazzoni F, Vicentini F, Trinchieri G. Interferon gamma induces in human neutrophils and macrophages expression of the mRNA for the high affinity receptor for monomeric IgG (Fc gamma R-I or CD64). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;170:582-588[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Landmann R, Ludwig C, Obrist R, Obrecht JP. Effect of cytokines and lipopolysaccharide on CD14 antigen expression in human monocytes and macrophages. J Cell Biochem. 1991;47:317-329[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Poulter LW, Rook GA, Steele J, Condez A. Influence of 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 and gamma interferon on the phenotype of human peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages. Infect Immun. 1987;55:2017-2020[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 23. Harris N, Super M, Rits M, Chang G, Ezekowitz RA. Characterization of the murine macrophage mannose receptor: demonstration that the downregulation of receptor expression mediated by interferon-gamma occurs at the level of transcription. Blood. 1992;80:2363-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 24. Montaner LJ, da Silva RP, Sun J, et al. Type 1 and type 2 cytokine regulation of macrophage endocytosis: differential activation by IL-4/IL-13 as opposed to IFN- or IL-10. J Immunol. 1999;162:4606-4613[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 25. Fischer HG, Opel B, Reske K, Reske-Kunz AB. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-cultured bone-marrow-derived macrophages reveal accessory function and synthesis of MHC class II determinants in the absence of external stimuli. Eur J Immunol. 1988;18:1151-1158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 26. Becker S, Daniel EG. Antagonistic and additive effects of IL-4 and interferon-gamma on human monocytes and macrophages: effects on Fc receptors, HLA-D antigens, and superoxide production. Cell Immunol. 1990;129:351-362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 27. So EY, Park HH, Lee CE. IFN-gamma and IFN-alpha posttranscriptionnally down regulate the IL-4 induced IL-4 receptor gene expression. J Immunol. 2000;165:5472-5479[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 28. Rieser C, Ramoner R, Bock G, et al. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells produce macrophage colony-stimulating factor: enhancement of c-fms expression by interleukin-10. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28:2283-2288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 29. Fixe P, Praloran V. Macrophage colony-stimulating-factor (M-CSF or CSF-1) and its receptor: structure-function relationships. Eur Cytokine Netw. 1997;8:125-1236[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 30. Palucka KA, Taquet N, Sanchez-Chapuis F, Gluckman JC. Dendritic cells as the terminal stage of monocyte differentiation. J Immunol. 1998;160:4587-4595[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 31. Stahl PD, Ezekowitz RA. The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998;10:50-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 32. Alderson MR, Armitage RJ, Tough TW, Ziegler SF. Synergistic effects of IL-4 and either GM-CSF or IL-3 on the induction of CD23 expression by human monocytes: regulatory effects of IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma. Cytokine. 1994;6:407-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 33. Shuai K, Schindler C, Presiozo VR, Darnell JE. Activation of transcription by IFN: tyrosine phosphorylation of a 91 kD protein. Science. 1992;258:1808-1812[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 34. Hou J, Schindler U, Henzel WJ, Ho TZ, Brasseur M, McKnight SL. An interleukin-4 induced transcription factor: IL-4 Stat. Science. 1994;265:1701-1706[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 35. Dickensheets HL, Venkataraman C, Schindler U, Donnelly RP. Interferons inhibit activation of STAT6 by interleukin 4 in human monocytes by inducing SOCS-1 gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:10800-10805[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 36. Matsusaka T, Fujikawa K, Nishio Y, et al. Transcription factors NF-IL6 and NF-B synergistically activate transcription of the inflammatory cytokines, interleukin 6 and interleukin 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:10193-10197[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 37. Dokter WH, Koopmans SB, Vellenga E. Effects of IL-10 and IL-4 on LPS-induced transcription factors (AP-1, NF-IL6 and NF-kappa B) which are involved in IL-6 regulation. Leukemia. 1996;10:1308-1316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 38. Akira S, Isshiki H, Nakajima T, et al. Regulation and expression of the interleukin 6 gene: structure and function of the transcription factor NF-IL6. Ciba Found Symp. 1992;167:47-62[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 39. De Wit H, Essenlik MT, Halie MR, Vellenga E. Differential regulation of M-CSF and IL-6 gene expression in monocytic cells. Br J Haematol. 1994;86:259-264[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 40. Gruber MF, Gerrard TL. Production of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) by human monocytes is differentially regulated by GM-CSF, TNF alpha and IFN-gamma. Cell Immunol. 1992;142:361-369[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 41. Zhang DE, Hetherington CJ, Chen HM, Tenen DG. The macrophage transcription factor PU.1 directs tissue-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:373-381[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 42. Gupta S, Jiang M, Anthony A, Pernis AB. Lineage-specific modulation of interleukin 4 signaling by interferon regulatory factor 4. J Exp Med. 1999;190:1837-1848[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 43. Olikowsky T, Wang ZQ, Dudhane A, Horowitz H, Conti B, Hoffmann MK. Two distinct pathways of human macrophage differentiation are mediated by interferon-gamma and interleukin-10. Immunology. 1997;91:104-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 44. Nestle FO. Dendritic cell vaccination for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2000;19:6673-6679[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 45. Banchereau J, Schuler-Thurner B, Palucka AK, Schuler G. Dendritic cells as vectors for therapy. Cell. 2001;106:271-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. © 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.   CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this? This article has been cited by other articles: E. Ibeas, L. Fuentes, R. Martin, M. Hernandez, and M. L. Nieto Secreted phospholipase A2 type IIA as a mediator connecting innate and adaptive immunity: new role in atherosclerosis Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2009; 81(1): 54 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] M. G. Netea, E. C. Lewis, T. Azam, L. A. B. Joosten, J. Jaekal, S.-Y. Bae, C. A. Dinarello, and S.-H. Kim Interleukin-32 induces the differentiation of monocytes into macrophage-like cells PNAS, March 4, 2008; 105(9): 3515 - 3520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] B. E. Potts, M. L. Hart, L. L. Snyder, D. Boyle, D. A. Mosier, and S. K. Chapes Differentiation of C2D Macrophage Cells after Adoptive Transfer Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 243 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] A. Rydstrom and M. J. Wick Monocyte Recruitment, Activation, and Function in the Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissue during Oral Salmonella Infection J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5789 - 5801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] L. Overbergh, K. Stoffels, M. Waer, A. Verstuyf, R. Bouillon, and C. Mathieu Immune Regulation of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-1{alpha}-Hydroxylase in Human Monocytic THP1 Cells: Mechanisms of Interferon-{gamma}-Mediated Induction J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3566 - 3574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] N. Sanarico, A. Ciaramella, A. Sacchi, D. Bernasconi, P. Bossu, F. Mariani, V. Colizzi, and S. Vendetti Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells differentiated in the presence of IL-2 produce proinflammatory cytokines and prime Th1 immune response J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 80(3): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] J. Vakkila, R. Jaffe, M. Michelow, and M. T. Lotze Pediatric cancers are infiltrated predominantly by macrophages and contain a paucity of dendritic cells: a major nosologic difference with adult tumors. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2049 - 2054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] M. Delgado, E. Gonzalez-Rey, and D. Ganea The Neuropeptide Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Generates Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7311 - 7324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] M. Ostrowski, M. Vermeulen, O. Zabal, J. R. Geffner, A. M. Sadir, and O. J. Lopez Impairment of Thymus-Dependent Responses by Murine Dendritic Cells Infected with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3971 - 3979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] X.-X. Jiang, Y. Zhang, B. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, Y. Wu, X.-D. Yu, and N. Mao Human mesenchymal stem cells inhibit differentiation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells Blood, May 15, 2005; 105(10): 4120 - 4126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Y. Bakri, S. Sarrazin, U. P. Mayer, S. Tillmanns, C. Nerlov, A. Boned, and M. H. Sieweke Balance of MafB and PU.1 specifies alternative macrophage or dendritic cell fate Blood, April 1, 2005; 105(7): 2707 - 2716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] N. H. Bergman, K. D. Passalacqua, R. Gaspard, L. M. Shetron-Rama, J. Quackenbush, and P. C. Hanna Murine Macrophage Transcriptional Responses to Bacillus anthracis Infection and Intoxication Infect. Immun., February 1, 2005; 73(2): 1069 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] A. Martino, A. Sacchi, N. Sanarico, F. Spadaro, C. Ramoni, A. Ciaramella, L. P. Pucillo, V. Colizzi, and S. Vendetti Dendritic cells derived from BCG-infected precursors induce Th2-like immune response J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2004; 76(4): 827 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] T. H. Wu, C. N. Pabin, Z. Qin, T. Blankenstein, M. Philip, J. Dignam, K. Schreiber, and H. Schreiber Long-Term Suppression of Tumor Growth by TNF Requires a Stat1- and IFN Regulatory Factor 1-Dependent IFN-{gamma} Pathway but Not IL-12 or IL-18 J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 3243 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] S. H. Jackson, C.-R. Yu, R. M. Mahdi, S. Ebong, and C. E. Egwuagu Dendritic Cell Maturation Requires STAT1 and Is under Feedback Regulation by Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 2307 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2002-04-1164v1 101/1/143    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Delneste, Y. Articles by Jeannin, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Delneste, Y. Articles by Jeannin, P. Related Collections Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells Immunobiology Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

	Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020