Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 15, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0755.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-03-0755v1
101/1/168    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salven, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rafii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salven, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rafii, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 January 2003, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 168-172

HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY

VEGFR-3 and CD133 identify a population of CD34+ lymphatic/vascular endothelial precursor cells

Petri Salven, Satu Mustjoki, Riitta Alitalo, Kari Alitalo, and Shahin Rafii

From the Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Molecular/Cancer Biology Laboratory and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Haartman Institute and Helsinki University Hospital, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Finland.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Human CD133 (AC133)+CD34+ stem and progenitor cells derived from fetal liver and from bone marrow and blood incorporate a functional population of circulating endothelial precursor cells. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR-3) regulates cardiovascular development and physiological and pathological lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis. However, the origin of VEGFR-3+ endothelial cells (ECs) and the mechanisms by which these cells contribute to postnatal physiological processes are not known, and the possible existence of VEGFR-3+ lymphatic or vascular EC progenitors has not been studied. Using monoclonal antibodies to the extracellular domain of VEGFR-3, we show that 11% ± 1% of CD34+ cells isolated from human fetal liver, 1.9% ± 0.8% CD34+ cells from human cord blood, and 0.2% ± 0.1% of CD34+ cells from healthy adult blood donors are positive for VEGFR-3. CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells from fetal liver coexpress the stem/precursor cell marker CD133 (AC133). Because mature ECs do not express CD133, coexpression of VEGFR-3 and CD133 on CD34+ cells identifies a unique population of stem and progenitor cells. Incubation of isolated CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells in EC growth medium resulted in a strong proliferation (40-fold in 2 weeks) of nonadherent VEGFR-3+ cells. Plating of these cells resulted in the formation of adherent VEGFR-3+Ac-LDL+ (Ac-LDL = acetylated low-density lipoprotein) EC monolayers expressing various vascular and lymphatic endothelial-specific surface markers, including CD34, VE-cadherin, CD51/61, CD105, LYVE-1, and podoplanin. These data demonstrate that human CD34+CD133+ cells expressing VEGFR-3 constitute a phenotypically and functionally distinct population of endothelial stem and precursor cells that may play a role in postnatal lymphangiogenesis and/or angiogenesis. (Blood. 2003;101:168-172)

© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, including VEGF, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D, regulate various aspects of blood vascular and lymphatic growth and function. VEGF acts through the tyrosine kinase receptors VEGFR-2 (KDR, Flk-1) and VEGFR-1 (Flt-1), which convey signals that are essential for embryonic angiogenesis and hematopoiesis.1 VEGF-C and VEGF-D, in turn, bind to and mediate signals to the blood vascular and lymphatic endothelium through VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. The resulting signals regulate cardiovascular development, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis.2,3 VEGF-C, which is expressed by various human cancers,4-6 has a potent angiogenic effect in vivo7 and also induces lymphangiogenesis, which in tumors can promote the dissemination of tumor cells to regional lymph nodes.8-14

The expression of the VEGFR-3 gene starts during mouse embryonic day 8.5 in developing blood vessels, and VEGFR-3-deficient embryos die at midgestation owing to defects in the remodeling of primary vascular networks.15 In adult tissues, VEGFR-3 expression occurs mainly in the lymphatic endothelia.15-18 In healing wounds, VEGFR-3-positive lymphatic vessels appear in the wound concurrently with blood vessels but regress quickly.19 However, VEGFR-3-expressing endothelial cells (ECs) can also be found in fenestrated capillaries of several adult organs, including bone marrow, splenic and hepatic sinusoids, kidney glomeruli, and endocrine glands.18 Notably, in human cancer VEGFR-3-expressing vascular ECs are detected in angiogenic capillaries,5,20 and in nude mice inactivation of VEGFR-3 signaling by blocking antibodies suppresses tumor growth by inhibiting the angiogenesis.21

Recent evience suggests that in adult humans circulating endothelial precursor (CEP) cells may be recruited from the stem-cell reservoirs to the peripheral circulation, and that they play a role in postnatal angiogenesis associated with vascular trauma or tumor growth.22-31 Recent data also demonstrate that lymphangiogenesis, facilitated by VEGFR-3 signaling, contributes to cancer dissemination.9,10,12,13,32,33 However, the origin of lymphatic ECs (LECs) is not known. It is conceivable that a lymphangiogenic switch promotes the recruitment of LECs from neighboring pre-existing lymphatic vessels or recruits LEC precursors from the bone marrow. However, the possible existence of LEC progenitors has not been studied. Here we demonstrate that a subset of CD34+ cells coexpress VEGFR-3 and CD133. These cells are functionally a unique population of progenitor cells with the capacity to differentiate into lymphatic or vascular ECs. They could contribute to postnatal lympangiogenesis and/or angiogenesis.


    Materials and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Positive selection of human CD34+ cells by magnetic cell sorting

Human fetal liver (FL) samples from 12- to 18-week abortus and human cord blood (CB) samples were obtained in conjunction with ethical and biohazard guidelines set by the institution. CD34+ cells were purified by magnetic activated cell sorting columns (MACS; Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, CA) using microbead-conjugated antibodies. Two purification cycles on separate columns were performed. The purity of each batch of CD34-selected cells was determined by flow cytometry using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC; green fluorescence)-labeled anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; Miltenyi Biotech).

Circulating CD34+ cells were also obtained from peripheral blood samples from growth factor-treated patients and from healthy blood donors. In brief, mononuclear cell fraction was separated with Ficoll-Hypaque (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) centrifugation and CD34 purification was done with a Clinimacs CD34-separation kit (Miltenyi Biotech). The purity of CD34-selected cells was determined by flow cytometry using FITC-labeled anti-CD34 mAbs (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). Approval was provided by the institutional review boards of Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Helsinki University Central Hospital for these studies. Informed consent was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Flow cytometry

For identification of VEGFR-3+ cells, isolated CD34+ cells were incubated with high-affinity mAbs against the extracellular domain of VEGFR-3 (clone 9d95,17). The mAbs against VEGFR-3 were labeled with phycoerythrin34 (PE, red fluorescence) or cyanine 2 (Cy2, green fluorescence; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ); labeling was performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer. PE-labeled or FITC-labeled anti-CD34 mAbs and PE-labeled anti-CD133 mAbs were purchased from Miltenyi Biotech. Other PE-, FITC- or Cy2-labeled mAbs used in flow cytometry were anti-CD105 (Serotec, Raleigh, NC), anti-CD51/61 (Pharmingen), anti-CD11b (Pharmingen), anti-CD14 (Pharmingen), anti-VE-cadherin (clone BV6; ImClone Systems, New York, NY), anti-VEGFR-1 (clone FB5; ImClone Systems), and anti-VEGFR-2 (clone 6.64; ImClone Systems). In the stainings, mAbs (5 µL of each) were incubated in different combinations with CD34+ cells for 20 minutes at 4°C. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde. The number of positive cells was compared with the number of cells positive in staining with the immunoglobulin G isotype controls (BD Pharmingen) and determined with a Coulter Elite flow cytometer (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) or FACSort flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of VEGFR-3 mRNA expression in isolated CD34+ and CD34- cells

Total RNA was extracted from isolated fetal liver CD34+ and CD34- cells by guanidine isothiocyanate lysis and silica gel membrane purification (RNeasy RNA extraction kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol and was quantitated spectrophotometrically. Primers specific for exons 7 and 8 of the human VEGFR-3 gene were used (the design of the primers was based on published sequences,35,36 GenBank accession number X68203; sense, 5'-catccagctgttgcccagg-3', and antisense, 5'-gagccactcgacgctgatgaa-3'). For RT-PCR analysis, 1.0 µg of total RNA from each sample was amplified with an intron-spanning primer pair for the human GAPDH gene37 and another 1.0 µg was amplified with the VEGFR-3 primer pair. The OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) was used. After a 30-minute reverse transcription reaction at 54°C and an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes, a 40-cycle PCR reaction was carried out, using the following amplification profile: denaturation at 94°C for 45 seconds, annealing at 65°C for 45 seconds, extension at 72°C for 45 seconds. For the GAPDH primers, a 35-cycle amplification was performed with annealing at 63°C. The PCR products were then electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel, stained with 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide, visualized under ultraviolet (UV) light, and photographed.

Liquid cultures of human CD34+ cells

Freshly isolated CD34+ cells from human FL were analyzed for the presence of CD133+VEGFR-3+ cells. Subsequently, 105 CD34+ cells were cultured in EC medium containing medium 199 (M199; GIBCO-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 18% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT), 2% human serum, VEGF at 1 ng/mL (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), bFGF at 2.5 ng/mL (Sigma, St Louis, MO), heparin at 5 U/mL, and VEGF-C at 60 ng/mL. The recombinant human VEGF-C was produced and purified as described earlier.38-40 As a control, the same experiments were performed in parallel with the freshly isolated CD34- cells from human FL. The number of viable nonadherent cells in the cultures was determined at 3, 5, 7, and 14 days by means of a bright-line counting chamber. The incubation resulted in a strong proliferation of the CD34-selected nonadherent cells. To prepare the cells for flow cytometry, the nonadherent cells were collected, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and stained with PE- or FITC-labeled mAbs.

Generation of EC monolayers from human CD34+ cells in vitro

Freshly isolated CD34+ cells from FL were analyzed for the presence of CD133+VEGFR-3+ cells. Subsequently, the cells were cultured in EC medium. After 3 days, nonadherent cells were transferred to plastic dishes and grown in the same medium for 2 to 4 weeks. This incubation resulted in attachment and proliferation of the CD34-selected cells into monolayers of mature ECs. After removal of the nonadherent cells, the adherent cell population was studied by 2-color flow cytometry. In addition, the ECs were quantified by means of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) incorporation. Dil-conjugated acetylated LDL (1 µg/mL; Intracel, Rockville, MD) was added to the media for 4 hours, and EC-specific labeling was assessed by flow cytometry.

Immunostaining of ECs

To further characterize EC monolayers generated from FL CD34+ cells in vitro, cells cultured in the chamber slides were fixed for 2 minutes in acetone and subjected to double immunostaining analyses using mouse monoclonal antibodies against human VEGFR-3 (clone 9d9) and rabbit antisera against human LYVE-141 (kindly provided by David G. Jackson, Oxford, and by Pirjo Laakkonen and Erkki Ruoslahti, La Jolla, CA) or affinity-purified rabbit antihuman podoplanin.42 The double staining procedure was essentially as described earlier.43 The slides were first rehydrated and incubated for 30 minutes in 4% normal goat serum at room temperature. The slides were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with the rabbit polyclonal anti-LYVE-1 antiserum at a dilution of 1:100 or with the rabbit polyclonal antipodoplanin at a dilution of 1:300. A subsequent incubation for 30 minutes in biotinylated antirabbit serum was followed by a 30-minute incubation using reagents of the Vectastain Elite ABC Peroxidase antirabbit IgG kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Peroxidase activity was developed with NovaRED substrate (Vector Laboratories) for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the slides were rehydrated and incubated for 30 minutes in 4% in normal horse serum at room temperature. The slides were then incubated for 1 hour with mouse monoclonal anti-VEGFR-3 antibodies at a concentration of 2.0 µg/mL. A subsequent incubation for 30 minutes in biotinylated antimouse serum was followed by a 30-minute incubation using reagents of the Vectastain ABC Alkaline phosphatase antimouse IgG kit (Vector Laboratories). Alkaline phosphatase activity was developed with Vector Blue alkaline phosphate substrate (Vector Laboratories) for 20 minutes. Negative controls were performed by omitting one or both of the primary antibodies or by using irrelevant primary antibodies.

Preparation of human umbilical vein EC (HUVEC) monolayers

HUVECs were isolated from freshly obtained umbilical cords by collagenase treatment44 and grown in EC medium. Confluent monolayers from passages 2 to 4 were studied by flow cytometry.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) of at least 3 independent experiments.


    Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Identification of a population of circulating CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells

VEGFR-3 cell-surface expression was analyzed by 2-color flow cytometry on MACS-selected CD34+ and CD34- cells isolated from human FL. The purity of the CD34+ cells was routinely 85% to 95%. Using PE-labeled mAbs against the extracellular domain of VEGFR-3, we found that 11% ± 1% (n = 6) of CD34+ cells from FL were VEGFR-3+ (Figure 1). No VEGFR-3+ cells could be detected in the CD34- cell fractions (Figure 1). This indicates that VEGFR-3+ cells are a small subpopulation of CD34+ cells.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. VEGFR-3 cell-surface expression in human CD34+ cells. After immunomagnetic separation of CD34+ cells from human fetal liver, the CD34+ and CD34- cell fractions were stained with FITC-labeled anti-CD34 and PE-labeled anti-VEGFR-3 mAbs and analyzed by 2-color flow cytometry. The results indicate that VEGFR-3+ cells are a small subpopulation of CD34+ cells.

VEGFR-3 cell-surface expression was also studied on purified CB CD34+ cells (n = 3), on purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells from adult patients treated with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; n = 16), and on CD34+ cells from healthy adult blood donors (n = 6). VEGFR-3 cell-surface expression was detected in 1.9% ± 0.8% of CD34+ cells from CB. Similarly, the number of VEGFR-3+ cells was generally found to be lower in adult patients (0.8% ± 0.2% of CD34+ cells) and in healthy adult blood donors (0.2% ± 0.1% of CD34+ cells) than in the FL samples.

VEGFR-3 mRNA is expressed in CD34+ cells but not in CD34- cells from fetal liver

Amplification of cDNA from CD34+ cells isolated from FL gave rise to a band of 322 bp (Figure 2). This is the size predicted for the VEGFR-3 transcript on the basis of the published cDNA sequence.35,36 In contrast, the FL CD34- cells were negative for VEGFR-3 mRNA. These data are consistent with the detection of VEGFR-3 cell-surface expression on FL CD34+ and CD34- cells.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RT-PCR for VEGFR-3 on human CD34+ and CD34- cells. CD34+ and CD34- cells derived from human fetal liver were analyzed for the expression of VEGFR-3 and GAPDH mRNAs. One µg of total RNA from each sample was amplified by intron-spanning primer pairs. The results indicate that VEGFR-3 mRNA is expressed in CD34+ cells but not in CD34- cells.

Phenotypic characterization of CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells identifies a population of putative endothelial progenitor cells

Coexpression of VEGFR-3 and defined stem/progenitor cell and EC markers on CD34+ cells isolated from FL or CB was analyzed by 2-color flow cytometry. The CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells could represent a heterogeneous population of mature and immature ECs, since CD34 is expressed on both mature and immature ECs. Therefore, CD34+ cells were first analyzed by using PE-conjugated mAbs against the stem-cell marker CD133 (AC133) and Cy2-conjugated anti-VEGFR-3 mAbs. We found that almost all CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells were positive for CD133 (Figure 3). Because mature ECs do not express CD133, coexpression of VEGFR-3 and CD133 on CD34+ cells identifies a unique population of stem and progenitor cells. We also found that about half of the CD34+VEGFR3+ cells also express VE-cadherin or VEGFR-2, markers that have already previously been found on circulating endothelial precursors (Figure 5).27,28,31,45 Only inconsistent, low-level, or nonexistent cell-surface expression of the endothelial-specific markers integrin alpha vbeta 3 heterodimeric complex (CD51/CD61), endoglin (CD105), and VEGFR-1 could be observed on isolated CD34+ cells coexpressing VEGFR-3 (Figure 5). Similarly, no significant cell-surface expression of CD11b or CD14 could be detected on the CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells (Figure 5).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. CD133, an early stem and precursor cell marker, is expressed on VEGFR-3+ cells. CD34+ cells derived from human fetal liver were analyzed for the expression of CD133 and VEGFR-3 (panel B); isotype control is shown in panel A. The results demonstrate that almost all CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells are positive for CD133.

Expansion of VEGFR-3+ cells in liquid culture

Incubation of 105 freshly isolated CD34+ cells from human FL for 2 weeks in EC growth medium containing VEGF, VEGF-C, and bFGF resulted in a strong proliferation (more than 30-fold) of nonadherent cells (Figure 4). Flow cytometry indicated that during the 2-week culture the mean number of nonadherent VEGFR-3+ cells had expanded more than 40-fold (from 11 × 103 to 47 × 104 cells, 11% ± 2% and 14% ± 4% of the total nonadherent cells, respectively; Figure 4).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Expansion of nonadherent VEGFR-3+ cells in liquid culture. A quantity of 1 × 105 freshly isolated CD34+ cells from human fetal liver were incubated for 2 weeks in EC growth medium. (A) The total number of viable nonadherent cells (open circle ) in the cultures was determined at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days. (B) The number of nonadherent VEGFR-3+ cells (black-triangle) in the cultures was determined at 1 and 14 days by flow cytometry. The results are given as means ± SEs of 3 independent experiments. During the 2-week culture, a strong proliferation (more than 40-fold) of nonadherent VEGFR-3+ cells can be seen.

Generation of ECs from CD34+ cells is associated with expression of VEGFR-3 on the cell surface

Incubation of freshly isolated, nonadherent CD34+ cells for 3 to 5 weeks in EC medium resulted in their differentiation into adherent monolayers of ECs. Flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-VEGFR-3 mAbs indicated that 10% ± 2% of the cells in the monolayers expressed VEGFR-3. All adherent VEGFR-3+ cells incorporated Ac-LDL, confirming that they were ECs (Figure 5). Adherent VEGFR-3+ cells coexpressing CD34, VE-cadherin, CD51/61, or CD105 were also detected (Figure 5). The monolayer cells did not express CD133, thus supporting the notion that CD133+CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells may be considered nonadherent EC precursors with progenitor potential. In double immunostainings, adherent ECs were found to coexpress VEGFR-3+ and lymphatic EC markers LYVE-1 or podoplanin (Figure 6). In cultured confluent HUVECs of passages 2 to 4 we found cell-surface expression of VEGFR-3 on 49% ± 6% of the cells. The surface-marker expression pattern of VEGFR-3+ HUVEC colonies, when analyzed by flow cytometry (CD133-VEGFR-3+CD34+VE-cadherin+CD51/61+CD105+), was similar to that of VEGFR-3+ EC colonies found in the monolayers generated from FL CD34+ cells (Figure 5).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Flow cytometric analysis of surface marker expression on VEGFR-3+ cells in isolated CD34+ cells, in monolayers generated from isolated CD34+ cells, and in HUVEC monolayers. Isolated cells coexpress VEGFR-3+ and stem/progenitor cell markers CD133 and CD34 (A). All adherent VEGFR-3+ cells in monolayers derived from isolated CD34+ cells incorporate Ac-LDL, confirming that they are ECs (B). Adherent VEGFR-3+ cells expressing endothelial markers CD105 (C) or CD51/61 (D) are also detected. VEGFR-3+ cells found in HUVEC monolayers have a surface marker expression pattern similar to that of adherent VEGFR-3+ ECs derived from CD34+ cells (panel A).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Expression of lymphatic EC markers LYVE-1 and podoplanin on VEGFR-3+ cells in monolayers generated from isolated CD34+ cells. Double immunostaining of EC monolayers derived from isolated fetal liver CD34+ cells detected adherent VEGFR-3+ cells (blue; panels A and B) coexpressing lymphatic EC markers LYVE-1 (red; panel A) or podoplanin (red; panel B). Original magnification × 500.


    Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bone marrow is a rich reservoir of organ-specific pluripotent and committed stem cells. Hematopoietic, endothelial, and mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to reside in the bone marrow, with the potential to be recruited to the peripheral circulation. They have also been shown to contribute to tumor angiogenesis and wound healing. Here, we have demonstrated that CD133+CD34+ cells coexpressing VEGFR-3 are functionally nonadherent EC precursors that have the capacity to differentiate into mature adherent VEGFR-3+ ECs. Both endothelial precursor cells and mature ECs may express similar endothelial-specific markers. In contrast, the expression of CD133 is rapidly down-regulated as progenitors and stem cells differentiate into more mature postmitotic cells.27,46 Mature endothelial cells do not express CD133.27,47 Therefore, CD34+ cells coexpressing VEGFR-3 and CD133 represent a phenotypic and functional subset of stem and progenitor cells. Although the number of circulating CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells was very small in healthy adult blood donors, these cells could be mobilized to the peripheral circulation in pathological conditions, such as tumor growth and wound healing.

The adherent CD133-VEGFR3+Ac-LDL+ cells coexpressing CD34, VE-cadherin, D51/61, and CD105 that we observed after plating of nonadherent CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells could represent either lymphatic or vascular ECs or both.48-52 Therefore, circulating CD133+CD34+VEGFR-3+ cells may contain subpopulations of both vascular and lymphatic EC precursors. VEGFR-3-expressing vascular ECs can be observed in blood vessels during tumor growth and wound healing,5,19 and circulating VEGFR-3+ vascular endothelial precursors could play a role in trauma- or tumor-induced blood vessel growth.

We also observed CD34+ cell-derived ECs coexpressing VEGFR-3 and the lymphatic EC markers LYVE-141 and podoplanin42 (Figure 6). Interestingly, Makinen et al have recently shown that up to 50% of freshly isolated human ECs (HUVECs and dermal microvascular ECs) were positive for VEGFR-3, and that the number of VEGFR-3+ ECs then decreased upon repeated subculture in vascular EC growth medium.49 The authors concluded that the cultured HUVECs and microvascular ECs consisted of distinct populations of vascular ECs and lymphatic ECs, and that the majority of VEGFR-3+ ECs were of lymphatic endothelial origin. In agreement with these conclusions, when we studied HUVECs of passages 2 to 4, we found cell-surface expression of VEGFR-3 on about half of the cells. These VEGFR-3+ HUVECs had a phenotype comparable to that of VEGFR-3+ ECs in CD34+ cell-derived monolayers. In CD34+ cell-derived monolayers the VEGFR-3+ ECs were more scarce than in HUVEC monolayers, constituting about 10% of the ECs. Taken together, these observations support the concept that a subset of VEGFR-3+ cells on cultured CD34+ cell-derived monolayers are true lymphatic ECs that have differentiated from circulating CD133+CD34+VEGFR-3+ LEC precursors. Mobilization of these LEC precursors might play a role in lymphangiogenesis associated with wound healing or tumor growth.

In summary, we have described the developmental potential of human VEGFR-3+ progenitor cells, showing that when cultured in the presence of EC growth factors they give rise to EC monolayers expressing surface markers typical of both vascular and lymphatic ECs. Further identification and characterization of the VEGFR-3+ precursor cell subsets with vascular endothelial potential should define their role in physiological and pathological blood vessel growth. Further studies should also provide a unique approach to prove or disprove the existence of circulating lymphatic EC precursors in adults and their possible role in postnatal lymphatic vessel formation.


    Footnotes

Submitted March 11, 2002; accepted August 6, 2002.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 15, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0755.

Supported by grants from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation, the Academy of Finland; and Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Petri Salven, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Ave, Room C-606, New York, NY 10021; e-mail: pjs2004{at}med.cornell.edu; petri.salven@helsinki.fl.


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J. 1999;13:9-22[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2. Veikkola T, Karkkainen M, Claesson-Welsh L, Alitalo K. Regulation of angiogenesis via vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Cancer Res. 2000;60:203-212[Free Full Text].

3. Karkkainen MJ, Jussila L, Ferrell RE, Finegold DN, Alitalo K. Molecular regulation of lymphangiogenesis and targets for tissue oedema. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:18-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

4. Salven P, Lymboussaki A, Heikkila P, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors VEGF-B and VEGF-C are expressed in human tumors. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:103-108[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5. Valtola R, Salven P, Heikkila P, et al. VEGFR-3 and its ligand VEGF-C are associated with angiogenesis in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:1381-1390[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Wartiovaara U, Salven P, Mikkola H, et al. Peripheral blood platelets express VEGF-C and VEGF which are released during platelet activation. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:171-175[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

7. Cao Y, Linden P, Farnebo J, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C induces angiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14389-14394[Abstract/Free Full Text].

8. Jeltsch M, Kaipainen A, Joukov V, et al. Hyperplasia of lymphatic vessels in VEGF-C transgenic mice. Science. 1997;276:1423-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Karpanen T, Egeblad M, Karkkainen MJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C promotes tumor lymphangiogenesis and intralymphatic tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1786-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text].

10. Mandriota SJ, Jussila L, Jeltsch M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumour metastasis. EMBO J. 2001;20:672-682[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

11. Veikkola T, Jussila L, Makinen T, et al. Signalling via vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 is sufficient for lymphangiogenesis in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 2001;20:1223-1231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

12. Skobe M, Hamberg LM, Hawighorst T, et al. Concurrent induction of lymphangiogenesis, angiogenesis, and macrophage recruitment by vascular endothelial growth factor-C in melanoma. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:893-903[Abstract/Free Full Text].

13. Skobe M, Hawighorst T, Jackson DG, et al. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by VEGF-C promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nat Med. 2001;7:192-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

14. Stacker SA, Baldwin ME, Achen MG. The role of tumor lymphangiogenesis in metastatic spread. FASEB J. 2002;16:922-934[Abstract/Free Full Text].

15. Dumont DJ, Jussila L, Taipale J, et al. Cardiovascular failure in mouse embryos deficient in VEGF receptor-3. Science. 1998;282:946-949[Abstract/Free Full Text].

16. Kaipainen A, Korhonen J, Mustonen T, et al. Expression of the fms-like tyrosine kinase 4 gene becomes restricted to lymphatic endothelium during development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3566-3570[Abstract/Free Full Text].

17. Jussila L, Valtola R, Partanen TA, et al. Lymphatic endothelium and Kaposi's sarcoma spindle cells detected by antibodies against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1599-1604[Abstract/Free Full Text].

18. Partanen TA, Arola J, Saaristo A, et al. VEGF-C and VEGF-D expression in neuroendocrine cells and their receptor, VEGFR-3, in fenestrated blood vessels in human tissues. FASEB J. 2000;14:2087-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text].

19. Paavonen K, Puolakkainen P, Jussila L, Jahkola T, Alitalo K. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in lymphangiogenesis in wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1499-1504[Abstract/Free Full Text].

20. Partanen TA, Alitalo K, Miettinen M. Lack of lymphatic vascular specificity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in 185 vascular tumors. Cancer. 1999;86:2406-2412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

21. Kubo H, Fujiwara T, Jussila L, et al. Involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in maintenance of integrity of endothelial cell lining during tumor angiogenesis. Blood. 2000;96:546-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].

22. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275:964-967[Abstract/Free Full Text].

23. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, et al. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998;92:362-367[Abstract/Free Full Text].

24. Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, et al. VEGF contributes to postnatal neovascularization by mobilizing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J. 1999;18:3964-3972[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

25. Murohara T, Ikeda H, Duan J, et al. Transplanted cord blood-derived endothelial precursor cells augment postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1527-1536[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

26. Rafii S. Circulating endothelial precursors: mystery, reality, and promise. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:17-19[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

27. Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood. 2000;95:952-958[Abstract/Free Full Text].

28. Gill M, Dias S, Hattori K, et al. Vascular trauma induces rapid but transient mobilization of VEGFR2(+)AC133(+) endothelial precursor cells. Circ Res. 2001;88:167-174[Abstract/Free Full Text].

29. Gehling UM, Ergun S, Schumacher U, et al. In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from AC133-positive progenitor cells. Blood. 2000;95:3106-3112[Abstract/Free Full Text].

30. Lyden D, Hattori K, Dias S, et al. Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow-derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth. Nat Med. 2001;7:1194-1201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

31. Reyes M, Dudek A, Jahagirdar B, Koodie L, Marker PH, Verfaillie CM. Origin of endothelial progenitors in human postnatal bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:337-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

32. Beasley NJ, Prevo R, Banerji S, et al. Intratumoral lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:1315-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text].

33. He Y, Kozaki K, Karpanen T, et al. Suppression of tumor lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:819-825[Abstract/Free Full Text].

34. Batard P, Sansilvestri P, Scheinecker C, et al. The Tie receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed by human hematopoietic progenitor cells and by a subset of megakaryocytic cells. Blood. 1996;87:2212-2220[Abstract/Free Full Text].

35. Aprelikova O, Pajusola K, Partanen J, et al. FLT4, a novel class III receptor tyrosine kinase in chromosome 5q33-qter. Cancer Res. 1992;52:746-748[Abstract/Free Full Text].

36. Iljin K, Karkkainen MJ, Lawrence EC, et al. VEGFR3 gene structure, regulatory region, and sequence polymorphisms. FASEB J. 2001;15:1028-1036[Abstract/Free Full Text].

37. Halfter H, Friedrich M, Postert C, Ringelstein EB, Stogbauer F. Activation of Jak-Stat and MAPK2 pathways by oncostatin M leads to growth inhibition of human glioma cells. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun. 1999;1:109-116[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

38. Joukov V, Sorsa T, Kumar V, et al. Proteolytic processing regulates receptor specificity and activity of VEGF-C. EMBO J. 1997;16:3898-3911[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

39. Wise LM, Veikkola T, Mercer AA, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-like protein from orf virus NZ2 binds to VEGFR2 and neuropilin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3071-3076[Abstract/Free Full Text].

40. Makinen T, Jussila L, Veikkola T, et al. Inhibition of lymphangiogenesis with resulting lymphedema in transgenic mice expressing soluble VEGF receptor-3. Nat Med. 2001;7:199-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

41. Banerji S, Ni J, Wang SX, et al. LYVE-1, a new homologue of the CD44 glycoprotein, is a lymph-specific receptor for hyaluronan. J Cell Biol. 1999;144:789-801[Abstract/Free Full Text].

42. Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, et al. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:385-394[Abstract/Free Full Text].

43. Salven P, Anttonen K, Repo H, Joensuu H, Orpana A. Endotoxins induce and interferon-alpha suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. FASEB J. 2001;15:1318-1320[Abstract/Free Full Text].

44. Jaffe EA, Nachman RL, Becker CG, Minick CR. Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins: identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2745-2756[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

45. Ogawa M, Kizumoto M, Nishikawa S, Fujimoto T, Kodama H, Nishikawa SI. Expression of alpha4-integrin defines the earliest precursor of hematopoietic cell lineage diverged from endothelial cells. Blood. 1999;93:1168-1177[Abstract/Free Full Text].

46. Miraglia S, Godfrey W, Yin AH, et al. A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. Blood. 1997;90:5013-5021[Abstract/Free Full Text].

47. Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, et al. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1997;90:5002-5012[Abstract/Free Full Text].

48. Kriehuber E, Breiteneder-Geleff S, Groeger M, et al. Isolation and characterization of dermal lymphatic and blood endothelial cells reveal stable and functionally specialized cell lineages. J Exp Med. 2001;194:797-808[Abstract/Free Full Text].

49. Makinen T, Veikkola T, Mustjoki S, et al. Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF-C/D receptor VEGFR-3. EMBO J. 2001;20:4762-4773[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

50. Sleeman JP, Krishnan J, Kirkin V, Baumann P. Markers for the lymphatic endothelium: in search of the holy grail? Microsc Res Tech. 2001;55:61-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

51. Oliver G, Detmar M. The rediscovery of the lymphatic system: old and new insights into the development and biological function of the lymphatic vasculature. Genes Dev. 2002;16:773-783[Free Full Text].

52. Wilting J, Papoutsi M, Christ B, et al. The transcription factor Prox1 is a marker for lymphatic endothelial cells in normal and diseased human tissues. FASEB J. 2002;16:1271-1273[Abstract/Free Full Text].

© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
B. Gyan, B. Q. Goka, G. O. Adjei, J. K. A. Tetteh, K. A. Kusi, A. Aikins, D. Dodoo, M. L. Lesser, C. P. Sison, S. Das, et al.
Cerebral Malaria Is Associated with Low Levels of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in African Children
Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 541 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Bogos, F. Renyi-Vamos, J. Dobos, I. Kenessey, J. Tovari, J. Timar, J. Strausz, G. Ostoros, W. Klepetko, H. J. Ankersmit, et al.
High VEGFR-3-positive Circulating Lymphatic/Vascular Endothelial Progenitor Cell Level Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Human Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 15(5): 1741 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Sausville, A. A. Molinolo, X. Cheng, J. Frampton, N. Takebe, J. S. Gutkind, and R. A. Feldman
RCAS/SCL-TVA Animal Model Allows Targeted Delivery of Polyoma Middle T Oncogene to Vascular Endothelial Progenitors In vivo and Results in Hemangioma Development
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3948 - 3955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
K. Reddy, Z. Zhou, K. Schadler, S.-F. Jia, and E. S. Kleinerman
Bone Marrow Subsets Differentiate into Endothelial Cells and Pericytes Contributing to Ewing's Tumor Vessels
Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 6(6): 929 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
T.-S. Huang, J.-Y. Hsieh, Y.-H. Wu, C.-H. Jen, Y.-H. Tsuang, S.-H. Chiou, J. Partanen, H. Anderson, T. Jaatinen, Y.-H. Yu, et al.
Functional Network Reconstruction Reveals Somatic Stemness Genetic Maps and Dedifferentiation-Like Transcriptome Reprogramming Induced by GATA2
Stem Cells, May 1, 2008; 26(5): 1186 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
N. Bonaros, R. Rauf, E. Werner, B. Schlechta, E. Rohde, A. Kocher, J. Bonatti, and G. Laufer
Neoangiogenesis after combined transplantation of skeletal myoblasts and angiopoietic progenitors leads to increased cell engraftment and lower apoptosis rates in ischemic heart failure
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, April 1, 2008; 7(2): 249 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R. S. Srinivasan, M. E. Dillard, O. V. Lagutin, F.-J. Lin, S. Tsai, M.-J. Tsai, I. M. Samokhvalov, and G. Oliver
Lineage tracing demonstrates the venous origin of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature
Genes & Dev., October 1, 2007; 21(19): 2422 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. C. Furtado, T. Marinkovic, A. P. Martin, A. Garin, B. Hoch, W. Hubner, B. K. Chen, E. Genden, M. Skobe, and S. A. Lira
Lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling is required for inflammatory lymphangiogenesis in the thyroid
PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5026 - 5031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
X. L. Aranguren, A. Luttun, C. Clavel, C. Moreno, G. Abizanda, M. A. Barajas, B. Pelacho, M. Uriz, M. Arana, A. Echavarri, et al.
In vitro and in vivo arterial differentiation of human multipotent adult progenitor cells
Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2634 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
J. B. Gilner, W. G. Walton, K. Gush, and S. L. Kirby
Antibodies to Stem Cell Marker Antigens Reduce Engraftment of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Stem Cells, February 1, 2007; 25(2): 279 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
N. Bonaros, R. Rauf, D. Wolf, E. Margreiter, A. Tzankov, B. Schlechta, A. Kocher, H. Ott, T. Schachner, S. Hering, et al.
Combined transplantation of skeletal myoblasts and angiopoietic progenitor cells reduces infarct size and apoptosis and improves cardiac function in chronic ischemic heart failure
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1321 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. P. Fadini, S. V. de Kreutzenberg, A. Coracina, I. Baesso, C. Agostini, A. Tiengo, and A. Avogaro
Circulating CD34+ cells, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular risk
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2006; 27(18): 2247 - 2255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
K. Ikeda, R. K. Kundu, S. Ikeda, M. Kobara, H. Matsubara, and T. Quertermous
Glia Maturation Factor-{gamma} Is Preferentially Expressed in Microvascular Endothelial and Inflammatory Cells and Modulates Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization
Circ. Res., August 18, 2006; 99(4): 424 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
N. Ma, Y. Ladilov, J. M. Moebius, L. Ong, C. Piechaczek, A. David, A. Kaminski, Y.-H. Choi, W. Li, D. Egger, et al.
Intramyocardial delivery of human CD133+ cells in a SCID mouse cryoinjury model: Bone marrow vs. cord blood-derived cells
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2006; 71(1): 158 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
U. Fiedler, S. Christian, S. Koidl, D. Kerjaschki, M. S. Emmett, D. O. Bates, G. Christofori, and H. G. Augustin
The Sialomucin CD34 Is a Marker of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells in Human Tumors
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 168(3): 1045 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
A. S. Arbab, V. Frenkel, S. D. Pandit, S. A. Anderson, G. T. Yocum, M. Bur, H. M. Khuu, E. J. Read, and J. A. Frank
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Confocal Microscopy Studies of Magnetically Labeled Endothelial Progenitor Cells Trafficking to Sites of Tumor Angiogenesis
Stem Cells, March 1, 2006; 24(3): 671 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
E. Rohde, C. Malischnik, D. Thaler, T. Maierhofer, W. Linkesch, G. Lanzer, C. Guelly, and D. Strunk
Blood Monocytes Mimic Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Stem Cells, February 1, 2006; 24(2): 357 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Glod, D. Kobiler, M. Noel, R. Koneru, S. Lehrer, D. Medina, D. Maric, and H. A. Fine
Monocytes form a vascular barrier and participate in vessel repair after brain injury
Blood, February 1, 2006; 107(3): 940 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. Cherqui, S. M. Kurian, O. Schussler, J. A. Hewel, J. R. Yates III, and D. R. Salomon
Isolation and Angiogenesis by Endothelial Progenitors in the Fetal Liver
Stem Cells, January 1, 2006; 24(1): 44 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Religa, R. Cao, M. Bjorndahl, Z. Zhou, Z. Zhu, and Y. Cao
Presence of bone marrow-derived circulating progenitor endothelial cells in the newly formed lymphatic vessels
Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4184 - 4190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H.-G. Kopp, S. T. Avecilla, A. T. Hooper, S. V. Shmelkov, C. A. Ramos, F. Zhang, and S. Rafii
Tie2 activation contributes to hemangiogenic regeneration after myelosuppression
Blood, July 15, 2005; 106(2): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. P. Fadini, M. Miorin, M. Facco, S. Bonamico, I. Baesso, F. Grego, M. Menegolo, S. V. de Kreutzenberg, A. Tiengo, C. Agostini, et al.
Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Reduced in Peripheral Vascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 3, 2005; 45(9): 1449 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Suzuki, T. Watabe, M. Kato, K. Miyazawa, and K. Miyazono
Roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 signaling in differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived vascular progenitor cells into endothelial cells
Blood, March 15, 2005; 105(6): 2372 - 2379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
Y. Aoki and G. Tosato
Lymphatic Regeneration: New Insights From VEGFR-3 Blockade
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 5, 2005; 97(1): 2 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
R. A. Panepucci, J. L.C. Siufi, W. A. Silva Jr., R. Proto-Siquiera, L. Neder, M. Orellana, V. Rocha, D. T. Covas, and M. A. Zago
Comparison of Gene Expression of Umbilical Cord Vein and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Stem Cells, December 1, 2004; 22(7): 1263 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
M. Aoki, M. Yasutake, and T. Murohara
Derivation of Functional Endothelial Progenitor Cells from Human Umbilical Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells Isolated by a Novel Cell Filtration Device
Stem Cells, November 1, 2004; 22(6): 994 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Hildbrand, V. Cirulli, R. C. Prinsen, K. A. Smith, B. E. Torbett, D. R. Salomon, and L. Crisa
The role of angiopoietins in the development of endothelial cells from cord blood CD34+ progenitors
Blood, October 1, 2004; 104(7): 2010 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. He, I. Rajantie, M. Ilmonen, T. Makinen, M. J. Karkkainen, P. Haiko, P. Salven, and K. Alitalo
Preexisting Lymphatic Endothelium but not Endothelial Progenitor Cells Are Essential for Tumor Lymphangiogenesis and Lymphatic Metastasis
Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 64(11): 3737 - 3740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. J Makin, A. D Blann, N. A.Y Chung, S. H Silverman, and G. Y.H Lip
Assessment of endothelial damage in atherosclerotic vascular disease by quantification of circulating endothelial cells: Relationship with von Willebrand factor and tissue factor
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2004; 25(5): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. B. Colvin
Emphatically Lymphatic
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 827 - 829.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. Herder, T. Tonn, R. Oostendorp, S. Becker, U. Keller, C. Peschel, M. Grez, and E. Seifried
Sustained Expansion and Transgene Expression of Coagulation Factor VIII-Transduced Cord Blood-Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2266 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. E. Szmitko, P. W.M. Fedak, R. D. Weisel, D. J. Stewart, M. J.B. Kutryk, and S. Verma
Endothelial Progenitor Cells: New Hope for a Broken Heart
Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3093 - 3100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
H. Kubo and K. Alitalo
The bloody fate of endothelial stem cells
Genes & Dev., February 1, 2003; 17(3): 322 - 329.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-03-0755v1
101/1/168    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salven, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rafii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salven, P.
Right arrow Articles by Rafii, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020