Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Right arrow Immunobiology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 1 June 2003, Vol. 101, No. 11, pp. 4479-4484

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Fc{gamma} receptor transmembrane domains: role in cell surface expression, {gamma} chain interaction, and phagocytosis

Moo-Kyung Kim, Zhen-Yu Huang, Pyoung-Han Hwang, Brian A. Jones, Norihito Sato, Sharon Hunter, Tai-Hee Kim-Han, Randall G. Worth, Zena K. Indik, and Alan D. Schreiber

From the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and the Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University, Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Korea.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We constructed chimeric receptors to dissect the role of the transmembrane (TM) domain in cell surface expression of and phagocytosis by the {gamma} chain–dependent Fc{gamma} receptors Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI. Fc{gamma}R chimeras containing the TM and cytoplasmic (CY) domains of the {gamma} chain were expressed on the cell surface and mediated an efficient phagocytic signal. In contrast, chimeras containing the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM were poorly expressed. Receptors containing the Fc{gamma}RI TM and the {gamma} chain CY but lacking the {gamma} chain TM also were expressed efficiently and mediated phagocytosis, suggesting that a {gamma} chain dimer induced by the {gamma} chain TM is not required for efficient phagocytosis. Cotransfection of Fc{gamma}RI or Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the chimera CD8-{gamma}-{gamma} (EC-TM-CY) resulted in Fc{gamma}R cell surface expression and phagocytosis, whereas CD8-CD8-{gamma}, whose TM does not associate with Fc{gamma}R, allowed cell surface expression of (but not phagocytosis by) Fc{gamma}RI. CD8-CD8-{gamma} also did not allow surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA. Exchanging Fc{gamma}RI and CD8 TMs indicated that the C-terminal 11 amino acids of the Fc{gamma}RI TM are essential for association of Fc{gamma}RI with the {gamma} chain and phagocytosis. The data indicate that specific sequences in the Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI TMs govern their different interactions with the {gamma} chain in cell surface expression and phagocytosis and that {gamma} chain TM sequences are not required for {gamma} chain–mediated phagocytosis. The data identify a specific region of the Fc{gamma}RI TM and its asparagine as important for Fc{gamma}RI cell surface expression in the absence of the {gamma} chain and for distinguishing the Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA phenotypes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Receptors for the constant region of immunoglobin G (IgG) are expressed on many cells of hematopoietic lineage. These Fc{gamma} receptors are important in several cell functions, including endocytosis, phagocytosis, and the release of inflammatory mediators. There are 3 classes of human Fc{gamma} receptors: Fc{gamma}RI, Fc{gamma}RII, and Fc{gamma}RIII (for reviews, see references 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The cytoplasmic domains (CY) of Fc{gamma}RIIIA ({alpha} chain) and Fc{gamma}RI ({alpha} chain) contain no known signaling motifs. However, Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI are associated with a {gamma} chain7,8, 9, 10, 11 that contains an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM sequence) through which signal transduction can proceed.

The Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI {alpha} chains interact with the {gamma} chain through sequences within their homologous transmembrane (TM) regions.12, 13, 14 The {gamma} chain plays a dual role in Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI signaling. In addition to providing ITAM tyrosines for initiation of the Fc{gamma} receptor signaling cascades, association with the {gamma} chain protects the {alpha} chain of these Fc{gamma} receptors from degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum, thus facilitating their cell surface expression in monocytes/macrophages.15, 16, 17 Coexpression of the {gamma} chain also is required for cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA in transfected epithelial cells.9, 10 Although signaling by Fc{gamma}RI has been observed to be dependent upon the ITAM of an associated {gamma} chain, cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI in transfected COS-1 cells occurs in the absence of the {gamma} chain.11 The difference in the requirement of the {gamma} chain for cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI provides an approach to further investigate the interaction between the {gamma} chain and these Fc{gamma} receptors. To this end, we have constructed chimeric receptors and receptor TM domain mutants in order to (1) examine the interaction of the {gamma} chain with Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI, and (2) identify TM sequences that contribute to the differences in the Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI phenotypes.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Construction of recombinant plasmids

The exchange and substitution mutants of Fc{gamma}RIIIA, Fc{gamma}RI, CD8, and the human {gamma} subunit of Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI were constructed by 2-step overlap extension polymerase chain reaction. The mutants and chimeric receptors as well as wild-type (WT) receptors were cloned into the HindIII and XbaI cloning sites of the eucaryotic expression vector pCDNA 3.1/Myc-His B (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA).

Cell culture and transfection of COS-1 cells

COS-1 cells were maintained in high-glucose Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) containing glutamine (2 mM), streptomycin (100 U/mL), penicillin (100 µg/mL), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum at 37°C with 5% CO2/95% air. Transient transfections with cDNA were carried out by a modified diethylamino ethyl (DEAE)–Dextran method. Briefly, 5 x 105 COS-1 cells were seeded onto 35-mm well plates 24 hours prior to transfection. Plates were washed twice and incubated for 30 minutes with DMEM (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY) without serum before transfection. Following addition of transfection buffer (1 mL) containing 4 µg plasmid DNA (0.5 µg/mL) and incubation for 4 hours at 37°C, cells were treated with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 1/2 minutes and washed twice with DMEM. Cells were studied 48 hours after transfection.

Flow cytometry

Cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}R protein 48 hours after transfection was determined by flow cytometry using anti-Fc{gamma}RIIIA (3G8) or anti-Fc{gamma}RI (32.2) mAbs as the primary antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–labeled F(ab)'2 goat anti–mouse IgG antibody (TAGO, Burlingame, CA) as the cross-linking secondary antibody.10, 11 Anti-CD8 mAb was obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, CA).

Phagocytosis of IgG-sensitized RBCs

IgG-coated sheep erythrocytes (EA) were prepared as previously described.10, 11 COS-1 cell transfectants were incubated with washed EA at 37°C for 30 minutes. Unbound EA were removed by extensive washing and stained with Wright-Giemsa to determine the number of cells with bound EA. For assessment of phagocytosis, hypotonic PBS was applied briefly (30 seconds) to remove surface-bound EA. Phagocytosed cells were stained with Wright-Giemsa, and ingested erythrocytes were counted by light microscopy (x 1000). Results were presented as phagocytic index (PI), the number of ingested erythrocytes per 100 COS-1 cells. In indicated experiments, the phagocytic index was corrected for variations in cell surface receptor expression (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) as determined by flow cytometry.

Western blotting

COS-1 cell transfectants were lysed on plates with NP-40 buffer (1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 158 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris [tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane], pH 7.2, 5 mM NaEDTA (sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 1 mM Na3VO4) at 4°C for 30 minutes. Myc-tagged Fc{gamma} receptors and coimmunoprecipitating proteins were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with anti-Myc antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and proteins were resolved on 15% SDS polyacrylamide. Following electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose, proteins were immuno-blotted with anti-His antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) to identify the His-tagged {gamma} chain. Blots were developed with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat antimouse (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) and specific bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Only trace amounts of Fc{gamma}RIIIA are detected on the surface of transiently transfected COS-1 cells in the absence of {gamma} chain expression.9,10 In contrast, cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI is evident both in the absence and presence of the {gamma} chain (references 1, 11, 18, and 19; Table 1). Fc{gamma}RI- and Fc{gamma}RIIIA-mediated phagocytosis also depend on coexpression of the {gamma} chain.9,11 The association of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the {gamma} chain occurs through interaction of the individual receptor transmembrane (TM) domains.12, 13, 14 To determine which sequences in the TM regions of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIA are required for cell surface expression and phagocytosis, we first used single chain chimeras in which the extracellular domains (EC) and TM regions of these receptors were exchanged (Figure 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Effect of {gamma} chain coexpression on Fc{gamma} receptor cell surface expression

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. Schematic diagram of Fc{gamma}RI, Fc{gamma}RIIIA, the {gamma} chain, and chimeric Fc{gamma}receptors. EC indicates extracellular domain; TM, transmembrane domain; and CY, cytoplasmic domain.

 

The feasibility of using Fc{gamma} receptor/{gamma} chain chimeric receptors for functional studies was based on our observation that appending the {gamma} chain CY and TM to the EC of Fc{gamma}RIIIA or Fc{gamma}RI produced chimeric receptors RIIIA-{gamma}-{gamma} and RI-{gamma}-{gamma}, EC-TM-CY, which are well expressed in COS-1 cell transfectants.1,19 These chimeric receptors are also functional, as evidenced by their ability to phagocytose EAs with efficiencies comparable to cotransfectants of Fc{gamma}RI or Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the {gamma} chain (Indik et al1,19; and Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. Phagocytosis mediated by Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA cotransfected with the {gamma} chain or chimeric Fc{gamma}R/{gamma} chain receptors

 

Fc{gamma} receptor chimeras containing the TM of Fc{gamma}RI (RIIIA-RI-{gamma} and RI-RI-{gamma}, Figure 1) were also expressed efficiently in transfected COS-1 cells (Table 3). In contrast, the Fc{gamma} receptor chimera RIIIA-RIIIA-{gamma} was essentially undetectable on the surface of transfected COS-1 cells (Table 3). Cell surface expression of RI-RIIIA-{gamma}, which also contains the TM of Fc{gamma}RIIIA, was dramatically reduced compared to that of RI-RI-{gamma} (Table 3). As expected, phagocytosis mediated by the chimeric Fc{gamma}Rs reflect their cell surface expression; that is, chimeras containing the Fc{gamma}RI TM allow surface expression and induce the phagocytosis of EA, whereas those containing the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM are not expressed (Table 4). We are aware that construction of chimeras may bring the risk of artificial processing of the protein in cellular systems. We therefore also examined expression of other Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI TM chimeras to determine whether profound depression of Fc{gamma}R expression is specific for the TM of Fc{gamma}RIIIA or a function of chimera construction (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.. The effect of TM sequences on cell surface expression of Fc{gamma} receptor chimeras

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.. Phagocytosis by chimeric Fc{gamma} receptors

 

Expression of the Fc{gamma}RI EC was consistently most depressed by the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM (Table 3). The expression of RI-{gamma}-{gamma} was 72% ± 25% compared with RI-RI-{gamma}; the expression of RI-RIIA-RIIA was 87% of RI-RI-{gamma} (not shown), but the expression of RI-RIIIA-{gamma} was 14% of RI-RI-{gamma}. Further, the cell surface expression of the chimera RI-CD8-{gamma} was similar to that of WT Fc{gamma}RI (Table 3). In contrast, the cell surface expression of RI-RIIIA-{gamma} was only 11% of WT Fc{gamma}RI. We also observed that the cell surface expression of RIIIA-{gamma}-{gamma} was 91% ± 8% of RIIIA-RI-{gamma}, while expression of RIIIA-RIIIA-{gamma} was only 7% of RIIIA-RI-{gamma}. Our observation that the cell surface expression of the CD8-RI-RI chimera is 3- to 5-fold greater than that of the CD8-RIIIA-RIIIA chimera (Table 3) is also consistent with the thesis that the TM of Fc{gamma}RIIIA decreases the potential for receptor cell surface expression. These experiments demonstrate that the differences in cell surface expression between Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA reside largely in the sequences of their TM domains.

The data also suggest that the cytoplasmic domain may contribute to Fc{gamma} receptor surface expression. For example, the cell surface expression of RIIIA-RI-{gamma} is consistently greater than the cell surface expression of RIIIA-RI-RIIIA (P = .01), and the cell surface expression of RI-RIIIA-RI is consistently greater than the cell surface expression of RI-RIIIA-{gamma} (P = .005) or RI-RIIIA-RIIIA. These data further indicate that the {gamma} chain TM is not required for Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA phagocytic signaling. Thus, dimerization of the {gamma} chain, which occurs through formation of disulfide bridges between the TM Cys7 cysteines of the {gamma} chains,7 is not a requirement for Fc{gamma} receptor–mediated phagocytosis.

We used another series of Fc{gamma} receptor chimeras to further study the role of the TM domain in Fc{gamma} receptor expression and function and to identify the sequences of the Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI TMs necessary for interaction with the {gamma} chain. We constructed chimeric Fc{gamma} receptors containing the EC and/or TM of CD8, (RI-CD8-{gamma} [EC-TM-CY], RI-CD8-RI, CD8-CD8-{gamma}, and CD8-{gamma}-{gamma}, Figure 2). The inability of chimeras bearing the TM of CD8 to associate with the {gamma} chain is illustrated in Figure 3. In stable transfectants of Fc{gamma}RI or of RI-CD8-RI in the mouse macrophage cell line P388 (which endogenously expresses the {gamma} chain), the murine {gamma} chain coimmunoprecipitated with transfected WT human (h) Fc{gamma}RI but not with transfected hRI-CD8-hRI.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.. Schematic diagram of the Fc{gamma} receptor/CD8 chimeras. EC indicates extracellular domain; TM, transmembrane domain; and CY, cytoplasmic domain.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.. Association of the {gamma} chain with transfected WT hFc{gamma}RI but not with the hFc{gamma}RI chimera hFc{gamma}RI-CD8-hFc{gamma}RI (EC-TM-CY). COS-1 cells were cotransfected with His-tagged human {gamma} chain and either Fc{gamma}RI-CD8-Fc{gamma}RI/Myc (lane 1) or Fc{gamma}RI/Myc (lane 2). Sham-transfected cells are shown in lane 3. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody and blotted with anti-His antibody. Both flow cytometry and Western blot demonstrated that WT hFc{gamma}RI and hFc{gamma}RI-CD8-hFc{gamma}RI were similarly expressed, and Western blot showed that WT hFc{gamma}RI and hFc{gamma}RI-CD8-hFc{gamma}RI were similarly immunoprecipitated by anti-Myc antibody.

 

Both RI-CD8-RI and RI-CD8-{gamma} were expressed efficiently on the surface of COS-1 cell transfectants. RI-CD8-RI, however, did not mediate phagocytosis either in the absence or presence of cotransfected {gamma} (Figure 4), due to the inability of the CD8 TM to associate with the {gamma} chain (Figure 3) and the inability of the Fc{gamma}RI CY to mediate phagocytosis in the absence of the {gamma} chain.9 Thus, although independent of the {gamma} chain for surface expression, Fc{gamma}RI does not function as a phagocytic receptor under conditions that do not allow {gamma} chain/Fc{gamma}RI interaction. In contrast, the chimeric receptor RI-CD8-{gamma} mediated phagocytosis in the absence of cotransfected {gamma} (Figure 4), demonstrating again that {gamma} chain transmembrane sequences and dimerization of the {gamma} chain are not required for phagocytosis mediated by the {gamma} chain cytoplasmic domain.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.. Phagocytosis mediated by Fc{gamma}RI/CD8 chimeras. The chimeric receptors RI-CD8-RI (EC-TM-CY) and RI-CD8-{gamma} contain the TM of CD8. The RI-CD8/10N-RI chimera contains the first 10 aminoterminal amino acids of the CD8 TM and the 11 carboxyterminal amino acids of the Fc{gamma}RI TM. The RI-CD8/14C-RI chimera contains the first 10 aminoterminal amino acids of the Fc{gamma}RI TM and the 14 carboxyterminal amino acids of the CD8 TM (Figure 2). The phagocytic index (PI) values are expressed as % PI of Fc{gamma}RI(RI) + {gamma}. Receptor expression was monitored by flow cytometry. For RI + {gamma} and each chimeric receptor, 3-5 experiments were performed. Of note, the cell surface expression of the extracellular domain of Fc{gamma}RI in the chimera RI-CD8/14C-RI, which does not mediate phagocytosis with coexpression of {gamma}, was equal to or greater than the surface expression of WT Fc{gamma}RI + {gamma}, RI-CD8-{gamma}, or RI-CD8/10N-RI + {gamma}, all of which mediate phagocytosis efficiently.

 

To further study the requirements of Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI interaction with the {gamma} chain TM domain, we cotransfected Fc{gamma}RI or Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the CD8(EC)/{gamma} chimeras CD8-CD8-{gamma} or CD8-{gamma}-{gamma} (Table 5 and Table 6). In addition to their usefulness for examining TM function, an advantage of CD8(EC)/{gamma} chimeras is that CD8 expression, as monitored by flow cytometry using antibody directed to the EC of CD8, serves as an indicator of {gamma} chain expression. As anticipated, Fc{gamma}RI, but not Fc{gamma}RIIIA, is expressed on the surface of COS-1 cells cotransfected with CD8-CD8-{gamma} (Tables 5 and 6). Since the Fc{gamma}RI TM does not associate with the CD8 TM, cotransfection of Fc{gamma}RI with CD8-CD8-{gamma} does not support phagocytic signaling (Table 6). In contrast, cotransfection of either Fc{gamma}RI or Fc{gamma}RIIIA with CD8-{gamma}-{gamma}, which supplies the {gamma} chain TM necessary for interaction with these Fc{gamma} receptors, resulted in cell surface expression of and phagocytosis by both Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA (Tables 5 and 6). Similar results were observed in the presence of Syk kinase (not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5.. Fc{gamma} receptor expression and phagocytosis in COS-1 cells transiently cotransfected with CD8/{gamma} chain chimeras and Fc{gamma}RIIIA

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6.. Fc{gamma} receptor expression and phagocytosis in COS-1 cells transiently cotransfected with CD8/{gamma} chain chimeras and Fc{gamma}RI

 

To determine which region(s) of the Fc{gamma}RI TM domain is important for Fc{gamma}RI cell surface expression and its interaction with the {gamma} chain, we constructed Fc{gamma}RI (EC and CY) chimeras whose first 10 (amino-terminal) TM amino acids were replaced by the first 10 amino acids of the CD8 TM (Figure 2). Transfectants of this chimera were expressed efficiently (not shown), and phagocytosis mediated by cotransfectants with the {gamma} chain, both in the absence and presence of Syk kinase, testifies to a productive interaction of this chimera with the {gamma} chain (Figure 4). In contrast, replacement of the 11 carboxyterminal amino acids of the Fc{gamma}RI TM by the 14 carboxyterminal amino acids of the CD8 TM produced a chimera that did not mediate phagocytosis in spite of efficient cell surface expression.

The TM domains of Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI share extensive but incomplete sequence homology (Figure 5). For purposes of this study, we next divided the TM domain into 3 regions, P9, P8, and P4 (Table 7). Mutants were constructed in which the TM P8 region of Fc{gamma}RI was substituted for the TM P8 region of Fc{gamma}RIIIA, Fc{gamma}RIIIA(RI/P8), and vice versa, Fc{gamma}RI(RIII/P8) (Table 7). Transfection with Fc{gamma}RIIIA(RI/P8) demonstrated that the TM P8 region of Fc{gamma}RI increases cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA in the absence of the {gamma} chain 4- to 6-fold (Table 7, lines 1 and 3). In the reciprocal experiment, in which Fc{gamma}RI(RIII/P8) was transfected, surface expression decreased to 60%-80% of WT Fc{gamma}RI (Table 7, lines 2 and 5). There was little or no effect on surface expression when the P9 or P4 regions of the TM domains were exchanged (not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.. The transmembrane domains of the {gamma} chain and the {alpha} chains of Fc{gamma}RI, Fc{gamma}RIIIA, Fc{epsilon}RI, and Fc{alpha}RI. Indicated in bold are the following TM amino acids: cysteine Cys7 and aspartic acid Asp11 of the {gamma} chain, aspartic acid Asp203 of Fc{gamma}RIIIA, aspartic acid Asp195 of Fc{epsilon}RI, asparagine Asn306 of Fc{gamma}RI, and arginine Arg209 of Fc{alpha}RI. The TMs of Fc{gamma}RI, Fc{gamma}RIIIA, and Fc{epsilon}RI are aligned to display amino acid homologies.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7.. Cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM mutants in the absence of {gamma} chain coexpression

 

The most striking difference between the TM P8 regions of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA is the presence of asparagine in Fc{gamma}RI and aspartic acid in Fc{gamma}RIIIA (Table 7; Figure 5). Replacing aspartic acid with asparagine in Fc{gamma}RIIIA (Asp->Asn) dramatically increased surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA (5- to 8-fold, Table 7, lines 1 and 4). In the reciprocal experiment, replacement of the Fc{gamma}RI TM asparagine with aspartic acid (Asn->Asp) decreased surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI by about 50% (Table 7, lines 2 and 6). Interestingly, replacement of asparagine in the Fc{gamma}RI TM with glycine increased expression of Fc{gamma}RI (Table 7, line 7).

We also examined whether there were differences in {gamma} chain sequences required for the productive interaction of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the {gamma} chain. Previous studies indicated that the association of the {gamma} chain with some {gamma} chain–dependent Fc receptors requires cysteine Cys7 and aspartic acid Asp11 of the {gamma} chain TM.13 Fc{gamma}RIIIA cotransfected with the mutant {gamma} chain chimera CD8-{gamma}(Cys7/Asp11)-{gamma}, in which Cys7 and Asp11 of the {gamma} chain TM are replaced by glycines (Figure 5), was not expressed on the cell surface (Table 5), consistent with the observation that elimination of {gamma} chain/Fc{gamma}RIIIA interaction eliminates surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA. In contrast, Fc{gamma}RI cotransfected with CD8-{gamma}(Cys7/Asp11)-{gamma} not only was expressed on the cell surface but also was able to mediate phagocytosis, albeit at a reduced level (Table 6). These data are a further indication that Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA differ in their requirements for cell surface expression and for functional interaction with the {gamma} chain.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The interaction of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the {gamma} chain allows these Fc{gamma} receptors, which lack cytoplasmic domain tyrosines crucial for the initiation of signaling cascades, to transmit signals from external stimuli to intracellular molecules. Interaction with the {gamma} chain also plays a role in facilitating cell surface expression of some Fc receptors.9,13,16,17 Cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA is not observed in cells obtained from {gamma} chain knockout mice,16 but expression of Fc{gamma}RI, while greatly diminished, is detectable in a subset of monocytes/macrophages from {gamma} chain knockout mice (van Vugt et al17 and P. M. Hogarth, oral communication, August 2002).

Differences in Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA cell surface expression in the absence of the {gamma} chain are more evident in transfectants of COS-1 cells. Only trace amounts of Fc{gamma}RIIIA reach the cell surface of Fc{gamma}RIIIA-transfected COS-1 cells in the absence of {gamma} chain expression,9,10 while Fc{gamma}RI is efficiently expressed in COS-1 cell transfectants in the absence or presence of the {gamma} chain (Table 1). We and others have demonstrated that association of the {gamma} chain with Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA occurs through interactions between the individual transmembrane domains.11,12,14 The TM of Fc{gamma}RI consists of 21 amino acids, 7 identical to those of the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM (Figure 5). One goal of our studies was to identify Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM sequences that contribute to the differences in cell surface expression of these receptors.

Substitution of the Fc{gamma}RI TM P8 region for that of Fc{gamma}RIIIA dramatically increases cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA in the absence of the {gamma} chain. More particularly, substitution of the Fc{gamma}RI P8 asparagine for the Fc{gamma}RIIIA P8 aspartic acid allows a high level of cell surface expression by Fc{gamma}RIIIA in the absence of the {gamma} chain (Table 7). In the reciprocal experiment, in which aspartic acid is substituted for asparagine in the Fc{gamma}RI TM, Fc{gamma}RI cell surface expression in the absence of the {gamma} chain was reduced. Our data are consistent with the thesis that negatively charged residues in the TM are determinants for retention and rapid breakdown of some proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum20 and identify the Fc{gamma}RI TM asparagine as important for {gamma} chain–independent cell surface expression by these Fc{gamma} receptors.

Expression of Fc{gamma}RI was determined with mAb 32.2 and expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA with mAb 3G8. Therefore, direct comparison of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA expression by flow cytometry is not appropriate. We noted, however, that mutating asparagine to aspartic acid does not produce as profound a change in Fc{gamma}RI expression as that induced in Fc{gamma}RIIIA expression by mutating aspartic acid to asparagine in the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM. In mutating asparagine to aspartic acid, we observed a 2-fold decrease in {gamma} chain–independent Fc{gamma}RI expression; in mutating aspartic acid to asparagine, we observed a 6- to 8-fold increase in {gamma} chain–independent Fc{gamma}RIIIA expression (Table 7). One possibility is that the protein degradation apparatus in the endoplasmic reticulum does not interact efficiently with the Fc{gamma}RI TM, even in the presence of a charged amino acid residue in the P8 region. Alternatively, the P4 and/or P9 regions of Fc{gamma}RI may also contribute somewhat in resisting Fc{gamma} receptor degradation.

We also noted that there is increased {gamma}-chain independent Fc{gamma}RI expression when the P8 asparagine is changed to glycine (Table 7, line 7). Fc{gamma}RI expression thus appears to increase as the critical P8 residue changes from aspartic acid (negative charge) to asparagine (polar) to glycine. The increase in surface expression of the Fc{gamma}RI glycine mutant may be due to the lack of charge of the substituted amino acid or to its size, each capable of resisting interaction with the protein degradation machinery.

Another goal was to further identify the Fc{gamma}R TM amino acids important for productive interaction of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA with the {gamma} chain. Previous studies suggested that charged residues in TM domains are important for protein-protein interaction in the cell membrane.12,13,20, 21, 22 Fc{epsilon}RI, like Fc{gamma}RIIIA, requires the {gamma} chain for both surface expression and function in transfected cells.13 The TM of Fc{epsilon}RI, which is highly homologous to the TM of Fc{gamma}RIIIA, includes an aspartic acid at the TM position homologous to the aspartic acid in the Fc{gamma}RIIIA TM (Figure 5). Mutation of aspartic acid to alanine in the TM of rat Fc{epsilon}RI interfered with {gamma} chain/Fc{epsilon}RI interaction and reduced expression of Fc{epsilon}RI,13 and cotransfection with the WT {gamma} chain, which contains a TM aspartic acid, provided optimal expression levels of Fc{gamma}RIIIA.13 Further, the TM of the {zeta} chain of the T-cell antigen receptor, which is highly homologous to the {gamma} chain, requires the aspartic acid of the transmembrane domain for optimal association with Fc{gamma}RIIIA.12,21 Our studies of Fc{gamma} receptor expression and function in the presence of the {gamma} chain demonstrate that the Fc{gamma}RI TM region containing asparagine is required for productive interaction of Fc{gamma}RI with the {gamma} chain (Figure 4) and are consistent with a role for polar residues in protein-protein associations in cell membranes.

The {gamma} chain also interacts with the receptor for IgA.23, 24, 25, 26 Cell surface expression of Fc{alpha}RI is independent of {gamma} chain association in stable transfectants of a B-cell line, although signaling functions depend upon association with the {gamma} chain.24 Association between Fc{alpha}RI and {gamma} is also dependent upon charged residues located within the TM of both Fc{alpha}RI and the {gamma} chain.24 The 19 amino acid TM region of Fc{alpha}RI displays no obvious homology to Fc{gamma}RI but does contain a positively charged TM residue (arginine 209, Figure 5), which is required for its interaction with the {gamma} chain.24 Also of note, in Fc{alpha}RI/{gamma} chain cotransfectants, {gamma} chain protein survives in transfectants coexpressing wild-type Fc{alpha}RI (which possesses TM arginine) but does not survive in cells cotransfected with Fc{alpha}RI mutants, which possess a negatively charged TM residue.

Taken together, these studies further identify parameters for Fc{gamma} receptor cell surface expression and Fc{gamma}RI/Fc{gamma}RIIIA {gamma} chain association. Our studies confirm the requirement for specific charged or polar TM residues for association of the {gamma} chain with Fc receptors using the ITAM sequence of the {gamma} chain for signal transduction. The aspartic acid residue in the TMs of Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{epsilon}RI fulfills this function as does the Fc{gamma}RI TM polar residue asparagine. These amino acids also determine the phenotype of {gamma} chain dependence for Fc receptor cell surface expression. We have now demonstrated that asparagine at this specific TM site allows {gamma} chain–independent cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA, while the negatively charged TM residue aspartic acid plays a negative role in survival of unchaperoned Fc receptor molecules traversing the endoplasmic reticulum in transfected cell lines. Having also observed that replacement of asparagine with glycine in the Fc{gamma}RI TM further increases the efficiency of Fc{gamma}RI cell surface expression (Table 7), we suggest that the ability of Fc receptors to survive the action of proteolytic enzymes in the endoplasmic reticulum is related to the charge or polarity of specific TM residues.

In addition, our data indicating that cysteine Cys7 and aspartic acid Asp11 of the {gamma} chain are essential for the cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RIIIA but not essential for the cell surface expression of Fc{gamma}RI (Figure 5; Tables 5 and 6) are a further indication that Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA differ in their requirements for cell surface expression and for functional interaction with the {gamma} chain. Furthermore, since both Fc{gamma}RIIIA and Fc{gamma}RI are associated with {gamma} chain dimers in vivo7,8 and signaling by these Fc receptors via the {gamma} chain has been viewed to be contingent upon both {gamma} chain dimerization and this specific association, our studies also indicate that neither dimerization of an associated {gamma} chain nor the {gamma} chain TM region itself is required for Fc{gamma} receptor–mediated phagocytosis.

In summary, using Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA, which display different phenotypes for surface expression in transfected cells, we have identified a specific region, the C-terminal region, of the Fc{gamma}RI TM and its asparagine as important for Fc{gamma}RI cell surface expression in the absence of the {gamma} chain. Our data also demonstrate that a {gamma} chain dimer induced by the {gamma} chain TM is not required for efficient phagocytosis. These studies further define differences in phagocytic signaling between Fc{gamma}RI and Fc{gamma}RIIIA and extend our understanding of how transmembrane domain sequences influence the function of Fc{gamma} receptors.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted August 7, 2001; accepted January 22, 2003.

Supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI-22193 and HL-69498.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Alan D. Schreiber, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, BRBII/III, Rm 705, 421 Curie Blvd, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail: schreibr{at}mail.med.upenn.edu.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Indik ZK, Park J-G, Hunter S, Schreiber AD. The molecular dissection of Fc{gamma} receptor-mediated phagocytosis. Blood. 1995;86: 4389-4399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. McKenzie SE, Schreiber AD. Biological advances and clinical applications of Fc receptors for IgG. Leukocytes. 1994;1: 45-52.

  3. Daeron M. Fc receptor biology. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15: 203-234.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Mitchell MA, Huang M-M, Indik ZK, Chien P, Pan Q-X, Schreiber AD. Substitutions and deletions in the cytoplasmic domain of the phagocytic receptor Fc{gamma}RIIA: effect on receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and phagocytosis. Blood. 1994;84: 1753-1759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  5. Huang MM, Indik ZK, Brass LF, Hoxie JA, Schreiber AD, Brugge JS. Activation of Fc{gamma}RII induces tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins including Fc{gamma}RII. J Biol Chem. 1992;267: 5467-5473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Cambier JC. Antigen and Fc receptor signaling: the awesome power of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM). J Immunol. 1995;155: 3281-3285.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  7. Letourneur O, Kennedy ICS, Brini AT, Ortaldo JR, O'Shea JJ, Kinet J-P. Characterization of the family of dimers associated with Fc receptors (Fc{epsilon}RI and Fc{gamma}RIII). J Immunol. 1991;265: 2652-2656.

  8. Ernst LK, Duchemin AM, Anderson CL. Association of the high-affinity receptor for IgG (Fc gamma RI) with the gamma subunit of the IgE receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90: 6023-6027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Park J-G, Isaacs RE, Chien P, Schreiber AD. In the absence of other Fc receptors, Fc{gamma}RIIIA transmits a phagocytic signal that requires the cytoplasmic domain of its {gamma} subunit. J Clin Invest. 1993;92: 1967-1973.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Park J-G, Murray RK, Chien P, Darby C, Schreiber AD. Conserved cytoplasmic tyrosine residues of the {gamma} subunit are required for a phagocytic signal mediated by Fc{gamma}RIIIA. J Clin Invest. 1992;92: 2073-2079.

  11. Indik ZK, Hunter S, Huang MM, et al. The high affinity Fc{gamma} receptor (CD64) induces phagocytosis in the absence of its cytoplasmic domain: the {gamma} subunit of Fc{gamma}RIIIA imparts phagocytic function to Fc{gamma}RI. Exper Hematol. 1994;22: 599-606.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  12. Lanier L, Yu G, Phillips JH. Analysis of Fc{gamma}RIII (CD16) membrane expression and association with CD3 {zeta} and Fc{epsilon}RI-{gamma} by site directed mutation. J Immunol. 1991;146: 1571-1576.[Abstract]

  13. Varin N, Metzger H. Surface expression of mutated subunits of the high affinity mast cell receptor for IgE. J Biol Chem. 1990;265: 15685-15694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  14. Harrison PT, Bjorkhaug L, Hutchinson MJ, Allen JM. The interaction between human Fc gamma RI and the gamma-chain is mediated solely via the 21 amino acid transmembrane domain of Fc gamma RI. Mol Membr Biol. 1995;12: 309-312.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  15. Lobell RB, Arm JP, Raizman MB, Austen KF, Katz HR. Intracellular degradation of Fc gamma RIII in mouse bone marrow culture-derived progenitor mast cells prevents its surface expression and associated function. J Biol Chem. 1993;268: 1207-1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Takai T, Li M, Sylvestre D, Clynes R, Ravetch JV. FcR {gamma} chain deletion results in pleiotrophic effector cell defects. Cell. 1994;76: 519-529.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  17. van Vugt MJ, Heijnen AF, Capel PJ, et al. FcR {gamma} chain is essential for both surface expression and function of human Fc{gamma}RI (CD64) in vivo. Blood. 1996;87: 3593-3599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Indik ZK, Kelly C, Chien P, Levinson AI, Schreiber AD. Human Fc{gamma}RII, in the absence of other Fc{gamma} receptors, mediates a phagocytic signal. J Clin Invest. 1991;88: 1766-1771.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  19. Indik ZK, Park J-G, Pan XQ, Hunter S, Schreiber AD. Induction of phagocytosis by a protein tyrosine kinase. Blood. 1995;85: 1175-1180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Bonifacino JS, Cosson P, Shah N, Klausner RD. Role of potentially charged transmembrane residues in targeting proteins for retention and degradation within the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 1991;10: 2783-2793.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  21. Romeo C, Amiot M, Seed B. Sequence requirements for induction of cytolysis by the T cell antigen/Fc receptor {zeta} chain. Cell. 1992;68: 889-897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Cosson P, Lankford SP, Bonifacino JS, Klausner RD. Membrane protein association by potential intramembrane charge pairs. Nature. 1991;351: 414-416.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  23. Pfefferkorn LC, Yeaman GR. Association of IgA-Fc receptors (Fc{alpha}R) with Fc{epsilon}RI {gamma}2 subunits in U937 cells. J Immunol. 1994;153: 3228-3236.[Abstract]

  24. Morton HC, van den Herik-Oudijk IE, Vossebeld P, et al. Functional interaction between the human myeloid immunoglobulin A Fc receptor (CD89) and FcR {gamma} chain. J Biol Chem. 1995;270: 29781-29787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Launay P, Patry C, Lehuen A, Pasquier B, Blank U, Monteiro RC. Alternative endocytic pathway for immunoglobulin A Fc receptors (CD89) depends on the lack of FcR{gamma} association and protects against degradation of bound ligand. J Biol Chem. 1999;274: 7216-7225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. van Egmond M, van Vuuren AJH, Morton HC, et al. Human immunoglobulin A receptor (Fc{alpha}RI, CD89) function in transgenic mice requires both FcR {gamma} chain and CR3 (CD11b/CD18). Blood. 1999;93: 4387-4394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
D. C. Dale, L. Boxer, and W. C. Liles
The phagocytes: neutrophils and monocytes
Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 935 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Beekman, C. E. van der Poel, J. A. van der Linden, D. L. C. van den Berg, P. V. E. van den Berghe, J. G. J. van de Winkel, and J. H. W. Leusen
Filamin A Stabilizes Fc{gamma}RI Surface Expression and Prevents Its Lysosomal Routing
J. Immunol., March 15, 2008; 180(6): 3938 - 3945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. W. S. I. Rodrigo, X. Jin, S. D. Blackley, R. C. Rose, and J. J. Schlesinger
Differential Enhancement of Dengue Virus Immune Complex Infectivity Mediated by Signaling-Competent and Signaling-Incompetent Human Fc{gamma}RIA (CD64) or Fc{gamma}RIIA (CD32).
J. Virol., October 1, 2006; 80(20): 10128 - 10138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
M. Fujimoto, H. Takatsu, and H. Ohno
CMRF-35-like molecule-5 constitutes novel paired receptors, with CMRF-35-like molecule-1, to transduce activation signal upon association with FcR{gamma}
Int. Immunol., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 1499 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. D. Wines, H. M. Trist, P. A. Ramsland, and P. M. Hogarth
A Common Site of the Fc Receptor {gamma} Subunit Interacts with the Unrelated Immunoreceptors Fc{alpha}RI and Fc{epsilon}RI
J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 17108 - 17113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. E. Bakema, S. de Haij, C. F. den Hartog-Jager, J. Bakker, G. Vidarsson, M. van Egmond, J. G. J. van de Winkel, and J. H. W. Leusen
Signaling through Mutants of the IgA Receptor CD89 and Consequences for Fc Receptor {gamma}-Chain Interaction
J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3603 - 3610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. S. Iyer, J. A. Barton, S. Bourgoin{section}, and D. J. Kusner
Phospholipases D1 and D2 Coordinately Regulate Macrophage Phagocytosis
J. Immunol., August 15, 2004; 173(4): 2615 - 2623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. D. Wines, H. M. Trist, R. C. Monteiro, C. van Kooten, and P. M. Hogarth
Fc Receptor {gamma} Chain Residues at the Interface of the Cytoplasmic and Transmembrane Domains Affect Association with Fc{alpha}RI, Surface Expression, and Function
J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26339 - 26345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Schreiber, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hemostasis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Right arrow Immunobiology
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020