| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 5, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1636.
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Division of Hematology/Oncology,
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute, Department of
Neurosurgery, and Department of Pathology, UCSF; San Francisco, CA;
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Genentech, South San
Francisco, CA; and IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA.
Most lymphomas that involve the central nervous system are B-cell
neoplasms that express the cell surface molecule CD20. After intravenous administration, rituximab can be reproducibly measured in
the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with primary central nervous
system lymphoma; however, the CSF levels of rituximab are approximately
0.1% of serum levels associated with therapeutic activity in patients
with systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Because lymphomatous meningitis is
a frequent complication of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, we have conducted an
analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of direct intrathecal
administration of rituximab using cynomolgus monkeys. No significant
acute or delayed toxicity, neurologic or otherwise, was detected.
Pharmacokinetic analysis suggests that drug clearance from the
CSF is biphasic, with a terminal half-life of 4.96 hours. A phase 1 study to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal
rituximab in patients with recurrent lymphomatous meningitis will be
implemented based on these findings.
(Blood. 2003;101:466-468) Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is
associated with an adverse outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin
lymphoma (NHL).1 Most NHLs that involve the CNS are B-cell
neoplasms that express CD20.2 Dissemination within the
leptomeninges represents a common pathway of progression in systemic
NHL and primary CNS lymphoma and usually heralds neurologic
deterioration and a fatal outcome.3
Rituximab monoclonal antibody therapy is an effective treatment
for B-cell NHL.4-7 To date, preclinical and clinical
practice involving rituximab has been limited to intravenous
administration. This agent binds specifically to the antigen CD20,
which is expressed on more than 90% of B-cell NHL and primary CNS
lymphoma but is not expressed by normal neurons or glia in
the brain.
A number of preclinical models have demonstrated that therapeutic
antibodies administered into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are able to
concentrate in and eradicate tumors within the craniospinal axis with
minimal toxicity.8,9 The primate model of drug delivery
into the CSF represents a valid experimental model for the prediction
of CSF drug pharmacokinetics in humans.10-13 This is the
first preclinical analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of
rituximab administration within the craniospinal axis.
All experimental procedures have been reviewed and approved by
the Committee on Human Research and by the Committee on Animal Research, University of California, San Francisco.
Four female cynomolgus monkeys, aged 16 to 18 years, weighing 3 to 5 kg, were obtained from Biosurg (Winters, CA). A total of 7 experiments
were performed with one monkey in each experiment. Data are reported
from the 4 experiments that involved suboccipital administration of
rituximab. Three experiments used an Ommaya reservoir (Integra
NeuroCare, Plainsboro, NJ) in the right lateral ventricle. Although
intra-Ommaya administration of rituximab resulted in high CSF
concentrations, the size of the reservoir adversely affected normal CSF
flow; therefore, these experiments did not provide data suitable for
pharmacokinetic analysis. Two of the reported experiments used the same
monkey, and the other 2 experiments used separate animals.
Animals were fasted overnight before anesthesia for rituximab
intrathecal administration and CSF and serum collections. Animals were
anesthetized with intramuscular midazolam plus ketamine and then intubated and maintained under anesthesia with isoflurane. Intravenous vancomycin and atropine were administered. Continuous intravenous fluid was provided during anesthesia. No intubation was
required for cisternal puncture for CSF and serum collections on days
subsequent to rituximab intrathecal administration.
Suboccipital administration of antibody was performed as described
after an equivalent volume of CSF was removed.12 Rituximab (10 mg/mL) was administered as a single dose over 1 minute in a total
volume of 0.2 to 0.5 mL, yielding 2 to 5 mg. CSF samples (less than 0.5 mL) were obtained by repeat suboccipital puncture and analyzed for
chemistry, cell count, and rituximab concentration.
Pharmacokinetics
Evaluation of toxicity
After intravenous administration in patients with CNS lymphoma,
rituximab is reproducibly detected in the CSF at concentrations that
are at most 0.1% that of matched serum14 (Table
1). It is probable that the blood-brain
barrier limits the potential efficacy of intravenous rituximab in the
prophylaxis or treatment of CNS lymphoma or lymphomatous
meningitis.
To improve the therapeutic index of rituximab in CNS lymphoma, it is critical that higher concentrations of this antibody be delivered into the intracranial compartment. For this reason there has been significant interest in intrathecal administration of rituximab in the treatment of patients with lymphomatous meningitis. The observed CSF and serum profiles of rituximab concentrations
after intrathecal injection (Figure 1; Table
2) are consistent with the existence
of a space within the CSF-brain compartment that is separate
from the central space following intrathecal administration. This is
supported both by the fit of a 2-compartment model to the CSF
concentration data and by the nonparallel profiles of rituximab in CSF
and in serum, which indicate that there is a delayed transfer of
rituximab from the CSF to the serum. This delay may indicate a distinct
distribution space within the CSF prior to distribution to the systemic
circulation. A rapid direct transfer from a single space within the CSF
to serum would have resulted in parallel rituximab profiles in the 2 biologic fluids. It is possible that following intrathecal
administration rituximab distributes within the extracellular space of
brain parenchyma and then undergoes a transfer from the CSF through the
arachnoid granulations or the Virchow-Robin spaces into the blood. A
capacity-limited saturable transfer process from the CSF to the blood
may also explain this observation.
A 2-compartment model was fit to data from one full CSF profile (Figure 1B) and to the mean CSF profile across all 4 experiments (Figure 1C). Based upon the mean CSF profile, half-lives for the initial distribution/elimination and terminal elimination phase were 0.414 hours and 4.96 hours, respectively. Predicted maximal CSF concentration (Cmax at time zero) was 2250 µg/mL. The CSF distribution volume for rituximab was estimated to be 6.82 mL at distribution equilibrium (Vss; Table 2). It was not possible to compute pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for serum concentrations, because rituximab levels were generally still plateaued at the end of the sampling period. Intrathecal rituximab administration was well tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys. There was no clinical evidence of neurotoxicity after 7 intrathecal administrations in a total of 4 animals (3 animals received intrathecal rituximab twice) (Figure 1D). The administration of rituximab into the CSF in patients with lymphomatous meningitis may provide an opportunity to deduce its mechanism of action. Blockade of CD20 may elicit B-cell lysis by several mechanisms, including induction of apoptosis and complement-mediated or antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. Under normal conditions and in the presence of intracranial tumors, CSF levels of complement proteins C3 and C4 are approximately 100- to 200-fold lower than serum levels.15 We were unable to detect complement activation or C3 antigen in the CSF of cynomolgus monkeys before and after the addition of rituximab. The emergence of monoclonal antibody therapy in the treatment of leptomeningeal cancer may provide a potentially important addition to the limited armamentarium currently available for this devastating problem. Our pharmacokinetic data suggest that the intrathecal administration of a monoclonal antibody results in an initial high concentration before distribution into the CSF-brain compartment. There was no evidence for CNS toxicity in this study. This is the first analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal administration of an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody targeted to treat cancer. These data may constitute a basis for the evaluation of other emerging antibodies that target tumors that commonly exhibit leptomeningeal involvement. We are currently using this information to initiate the first of these investigations: a phase 1 study of intrathecal rituximab in the treatment of recurrent lymphomatous meningitis.
The authors thank Dr Ronald Levy of Stanford University School of Medicine. We are also indebted to Laurie Brignolo, Peter Thorsen, Larry Carbone, Daniel Lau, Ron Bayreuther, Cheyne Stokes, Linda Brovarney, Michelle Aird, and Marsha Potolo for assistance with the animal studies.
Submitted June 4, 2002; accepted August 15, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, September 5, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1636.
Supported by grants from the California Cancer Research Program, IDEC Pharmaceuticals/Genentech, and the UCSF Mt Zion Cancer Center.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: James L. Rubenstein, University of California, San Francisco, Division of Hematology/Oncology M1282, Box 1270, San Francisco, CA 94143; e-mail: jamesr{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.
1.
van Besien K, Ha CS, Murphy S, et al.
Risk factors, treatment, and outcome of central nervous system recurrence in adults with intermediate-grade and immunoblastic lymphoma.
Blood.
1998;91:1178-1184
2.
Fine HA, Mayer RJ.
Primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Ann Intern Med.
1993;119:1093-1104 3. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P, Glantz M. Recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma complicated by lymphomatous meningitis. Oncol Rep. 1998;5:521-525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Glantz MJ, LaFollette S, Jaeckle KA, et al.
Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis.
J Clin Oncol.
1999;17:3110-3116
5.
Maloney DG, Liles TM, Czerwinski DK, et al.
Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma.
Blood.
1994;84:2457-2466 6. Maloney DG, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Bodkin DJ, et al. IDEC-C2B8: results of a phase I multiple-dose trial in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:3266-3274[Abstract]. 7. McLaughlin P, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Link BK, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2825-2833[Abstract].
8.
Reff M, Carner K, Chambers KS.
Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20.
Blood.
1994;83:435-445 9. Bleyer WA, Poplack DG. Intraventricular versus intralumbar methotrexate for central-nervous-system leukemia: prolonged remission with the Ommaya reservoir. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1979;6:207-213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Youle R. Immunotoxins for central nervous system malignancy. Semin Cancer Biol. 1996;7:65-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 11. Wood JH, Poplack DG, Bleyer WA, Ommaya AK. Primate model for long-term study of intraventricularly or intrathecally administered drugs and intracranial pressure. Science. 1977;195:499-501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Poplack DG, Bleyer WA, Wood JH, et al. A primate model for study of methotrexate pharmacokinetics in the central nervous system. Cancer Res. 1977;37:1982-1985[Abstract]. 13. Kramer K, Cheung N-K, Humm J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and acute toxicology of intraventricular 131 I-monoclonal antibody targeting disialoganglioside in non-human primates. J Neurooncol. 1997;35:101-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Rubenstein JL, Rosenberg J, Damon L. High-dose methotrexate plus rituximab (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma [abstract]. Society for NeuroOncology Fourth Annual Meeting; November 17-21, 1999; Scottdale, AZ. 15. Trbojevic-Cepe M, Brinar V, Pauro M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid complement activation in neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci. 1998;154:173-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7:308-313.
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
D. Villa, J. M. Connors, T. N. Shenkier, R. D. Gascoyne, L. H. Sehn, and K. J. Savage Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the impact of the addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy Ann. Onc., October 27, 2009; (2009) mdp432v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Angelov, N. D. Doolittle, D. F. Kraemer, T. Siegal, G. H. Barnett, D. M. Peereboom, G. Stevens, J. McGregor, K. Jahnke, C. A. Lacy, et al. Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Intra-Arterial Methotrexate-Based Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Multi-Institutional Experience J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2009; 27(21): 3503 - 3509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sierra del Rio, A. Rousseau, C. Soussain, D. Ricard, and K. Hoang-Xuan Primary CNS Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients Oncologist, May 1, 2009; 14(5): 526 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Boehme, N. Schmitz, S. Zeynalova, M. Loeffler, and M. Pfreundschuh CNS events in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab: an analysis of patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL) Blood, April 23, 2009; 113(17): 3896 - 3902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maza, P. Kiewe, D. L. Munz, A. Korfel, B. Hamm, K. Jahnke, and E. Thiel First report on a prospective trial with yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) in primary CNS lymphoma Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2009; 11(4): 423 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Mineo, A. Scheffer, C. Karkoutly, L. Nouvel, O. Kerdraon, J. Trauet, A. Bordron, J.-P. Dessaint, M. Labalette, C. Berthou, et al. Using Human CD20-Transfected Murine Lymphomatous B Cells to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravitreal and Intracerebral Rituximab Injections in Mice Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4738 - 4745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ishiura, M. Morikawa, M. Hamada, T. Watanabe, S. Kako, S. Chiba, T. Motokura, A. Hangaishi, J. Shibahara, M. Akahane, et al. Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis Involving Central Nervous System Successfully Treated With Rituximab Alone Arch Neurol, May 1, 2008; 65(5): 662 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Doolittle, L. E. Abrey, T. N. Shenkier, S. Tali, J. E.C. Bromberg, E. A. Neuwelt, C. Soussain, K. Jahnke, P. Johnston, G. Illerhaus, et al. Brain parenchyma involvement as isolated central nervous system relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1085 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Morrey, V. Siddharthan, A. L. Olsen, H. Wang, J. G. Julander, J. O. Hall, H. Li, J. L. Nordstrom, S. Koenig, S. Johnson, et al. Defining Limits of Treatment with Humanized Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for West Nile Virus Neurological Infection in a Hamster Model Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2007; 51(7): 2396 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Rubenstein, J. Fridlyand, L. Abrey, A. Shen, J. Karch, E. Wang, S. Issa, L. Damon, M. Prados, M. McDermott, et al. Phase I Study of Intraventricular Administration of Rituximab in Patients With Recurrent CNS and Intraocular Lymphoma J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1350 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kinoshita, N. McDannold, F. A. Jolesz, and K. Hynynen Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11719 - 11723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R C Chou, J W Henson, D Tian, E T Hedley-Whyte, and A M Reginato Successful treatment of rheumatoid meningitis with cyclophosphamide but not infliximab. Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2006; 65(8): 1114 - 1116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Ferrucci, A. Vanazzi, G. Tesoriere, M. Ferrari, M. Bartolomei, P. Rocca, M. Cremonesi, G. Paganelli, and G. Martinelli Cerebrospinal fluid diffusion of Zevalin(R) after high-activity treatment and stem cell support in a patient affected by diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with central nervous system involvement Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1710 - 1711. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Wong Management of Central Nervous System Lymphomas Using Monoclonal Antibodies: Challenges and Opportunities Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7151s - 7157s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Wong, L. E. Abrey, R. H. Enting, A. Demopoulos, and L. M. DeAngelis Salvage therapy for primary CNS lymphoma with a combination of rituximab and temozolomide Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 934 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Feugier, J. M. Virion, H. Tilly, C. Haioun, G. Marit, M. Macro, D. Bordessoule, C. Recher, M. Blanc, T. Molina, et al. Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system occurrence in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: influence of rituximab Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 129 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||