Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 5, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1636.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-06-1636v1
101/2/466    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shuman, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shuman, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Blood, 15 January 2003, Vol. 101, No. 2, pp. 466-468

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
Brief report

Rituximab therapy for CNS lymphomas: targeting the leptomeningeal compartment

James L. Rubenstein, Dan Combs, Jay Rosenberg, Arthur Levy, Michael McDermott, Lloyd Damon, Robert Ignoffo, Kenneth Aldape, Arthur Shen, Dana Lee, Antonio Grillo-Lopez, and Marc A. Shuman

From the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Pathology, UCSF; San Francisco, CA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; and IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA.


    Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

Most lymphomas that involve the central nervous system are B-cell neoplasms that express the cell surface molecule CD20. After intravenous administration, rituximab can be reproducibly measured in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma; however, the CSF levels of rituximab are approximately 0.1% of serum levels associated with therapeutic activity in patients with systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Because lymphomatous meningitis is a frequent complication of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, we have conducted an analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of direct intrathecal administration of rituximab using cynomolgus monkeys. No significant acute or delayed toxicity, neurologic or otherwise, was detected. Pharmacokinetic analysis suggests that drug clearance from the CSF is biphasic, with a terminal half-life of 4.96 hours. A phase 1 study to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal rituximab in patients with recurrent lymphomatous meningitis will be implemented based on these findings. (Blood. 2003;101:466-468)

© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.

    Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is associated with an adverse outcome in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).1 Most NHLs that involve the CNS are B-cell neoplasms that express CD20.2 Dissemination within the leptomeninges represents a common pathway of progression in systemic NHL and primary CNS lymphoma and usually heralds neurologic deterioration and a fatal outcome.3

Rituximab monoclonal antibody therapy is an effective treatment for B-cell NHL.4-7 To date, preclinical and clinical practice involving rituximab has been limited to intravenous administration. This agent binds specifically to the antigen CD20, which is expressed on more than 90% of B-cell NHL and primary CNS lymphoma but is not expressed by normal neurons or glia in the brain.

A number of preclinical models have demonstrated that therapeutic antibodies administered into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are able to concentrate in and eradicate tumors within the craniospinal axis with minimal toxicity.8,9 The primate model of drug delivery into the CSF represents a valid experimental model for the prediction of CSF drug pharmacokinetics in humans.10-13 This is the first preclinical analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of rituximab administration within the craniospinal axis.


    Study design
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

All experimental procedures have been reviewed and approved by the Committee on Human Research and by the Committee on Animal Research, University of California, San Francisco.

Four female cynomolgus monkeys, aged 16 to 18 years, weighing 3 to 5 kg, were obtained from Biosurg (Winters, CA). A total of 7 experiments were performed with one monkey in each experiment. Data are reported from the 4 experiments that involved suboccipital administration of rituximab. Three experiments used an Ommaya reservoir (Integra NeuroCare, Plainsboro, NJ) in the right lateral ventricle. Although intra-Ommaya administration of rituximab resulted in high CSF concentrations, the size of the reservoir adversely affected normal CSF flow; therefore, these experiments did not provide data suitable for pharmacokinetic analysis. Two of the reported experiments used the same monkey, and the other 2 experiments used separate animals.

Animals were fasted overnight before anesthesia for rituximab intrathecal administration and CSF and serum collections. Animals were anesthetized with intramuscular midazolam plus ketamine and then intubated and maintained under anesthesia with isoflurane. Intravenous vancomycin and atropine were administered. Continuous intravenous fluid was provided during anesthesia. No intubation was required for cisternal puncture for CSF and serum collections on days subsequent to rituximab intrathecal administration.

Suboccipital administration of antibody was performed as described after an equivalent volume of CSF was removed.12 Rituximab (10 mg/mL) was administered as a single dose over 1 minute in a total volume of 0.2 to 0.5 mL, yielding 2 to 5 mg. CSF samples (less than 0.5 mL) were obtained by repeat suboccipital puncture and analyzed for chemistry, cell count, and rituximab concentration.

Pharmacokinetics

Rituximab concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of rituximab concentrations in the CSF was performed by fitting a biexponential equation representing a 2-compartment biologic model to the CSF concentrations. A nonlinear regression software was used for this purpose (WinNonlin-Pro version 3.0, Pharsight, Mountain View, CA).

Evaluation of toxicity

CSF cell count, differential, total protein, and glucose were measured at baseline, 48 hours, and at 1 week. Animals were closely monitored immediately following drug administration and daily for up to 8 months after treatment. Neuropathologic analysis was performed on each animal. Good laboratory practices were maintained.


    Results and discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

After intravenous administration in patients with CNS lymphoma, rituximab is reproducibly detected in the CSF at concentrations that are at most 0.1% that of matched serum14 (Table 1). It is probable that the blood-brain barrier limits the potential efficacy of intravenous rituximab in the prophylaxis or treatment of CNS lymphoma or lymphomatous meningitis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. CSF levels in patients with CNS lymphoma who were treated intravenously with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate or Ara-C

To improve the therapeutic index of rituximab in CNS lymphoma, it is critical that higher concentrations of this antibody be delivered into the intracranial compartment. For this reason there has been significant interest in intrathecal administration of rituximab in the treatment of patients with lymphomatous meningitis.

The observed CSF and serum profiles of rituximab concentrations after intrathecal injection (Figure 1; Table 2) are consistent with the existence of a space within the CSF-brain compartment that is separate from the central space following intrathecal administration. This is supported both by the fit of a 2-compartment model to the CSF concentration data and by the nonparallel profiles of rituximab in CSF and in serum, which indicate that there is a delayed transfer of rituximab from the CSF to the serum. This delay may indicate a distinct distribution space within the CSF prior to distribution to the systemic circulation. A rapid direct transfer from a single space within the CSF to serum would have resulted in parallel rituximab profiles in the 2 biologic fluids. It is possible that following intrathecal administration rituximab distributes within the extracellular space of brain parenchyma and then undergoes a transfer from the CSF through the arachnoid granulations or the Virchow-Robin spaces into the blood. A capacity-limited saturable transfer process from the CSF to the blood may also explain this observation.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pharmacokinetic and histopathologic analysis of intrathecal rituximab infusion. (A) CSF and serum profiles in cynomolgus monkeys injected with 3 to 5 mg rituximab via 1-minute intrathecal infusion. Observed CSF and serum concentrations were normalized to a 5-mg dose. Experiment numbers are shown in parentheses. Measured CSF concentrations of rituximab were maximal within 2 hours of intrathecal administration and ranged from 460 to 1550 µg/mL. CSF concentrations were approaching minimal detectable levels between 24 to 70 hours after administration in those animals with later collection time points. (B) Fit of 2-compartment intravenous infusion model to CSF concentrations from experiment no. 4 (1 monkey). Observed concentrations were normalized to a dose of 5 mg prior to fitting a 2-compartment model. (C) Fit of 2-compartment intravenous infusion model to CSF mean concentrations averaged across all experiments. Observed concentrations were normalized to a dose of 5 mg and then averaged across all experiments prior to fitting a 2-compartment model. (D) Gross and histologic analyses using hematoxylin and eosin and Luxol fast blue stains were performed between 1 and 8 months after either 1 or 2 intrathecal rituximab administrations. There was no evidence of neuronal loss, demyelination, ventriculitis, ependymitis, or vasculitis that was attributable to rituximab administration. (Di) No evidence of demyelination of white matter tracts (Luxol fast blue stain). (Dii) No evidence of neuronal loss in C1A cells of hippocampus (hematoxylin and eosin stain). Original magnifications × 200.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of rituximab CSF concentrations in cynomolgus monkeys

A 2-compartment model was fit to data from one full CSF profile (Figure 1B) and to the mean CSF profile across all 4 experiments (Figure 1C).

Based upon the mean CSF profile, half-lives for the initial distribution/elimination and terminal elimination phase were 0.414 hours and 4.96 hours, respectively. Predicted maximal CSF concentration (Cmax at time zero) was 2250 µg/mL. The CSF distribution volume for rituximab was estimated to be 6.82 mL at distribution equilibrium (Vss; Table 2). It was not possible to compute pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for serum concentrations, because rituximab levels were generally still plateaued at the end of the sampling period.

Intrathecal rituximab administration was well tolerated in cynomolgus monkeys. There was no clinical evidence of neurotoxicity after 7 intrathecal administrations in a total of 4 animals (3 animals received intrathecal rituximab twice) (Figure 1D).

The administration of rituximab into the CSF in patients with lymphomatous meningitis may provide an opportunity to deduce its mechanism of action. Blockade of CD20 may elicit B-cell lysis by several mechanisms, including induction of apoptosis and complement-mediated or antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. Under normal conditions and in the presence of intracranial tumors, CSF levels of complement proteins C3 and C4 are approximately 100- to 200-fold lower than serum levels.15 We were unable to detect complement activation or C3 antigen in the CSF of cynomolgus monkeys before and after the addition of rituximab.

The emergence of monoclonal antibody therapy in the treatment of leptomeningeal cancer may provide a potentially important addition to the limited armamentarium currently available for this devastating problem. Our pharmacokinetic data suggest that the intrathecal administration of a monoclonal antibody results in an initial high concentration before distribution into the CSF-brain compartment. There was no evidence for CNS toxicity in this study. This is the first analysis of the safety and pharmacokinetics of intrathecal administration of an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody targeted to treat cancer. These data may constitute a basis for the evaluation of other emerging antibodies that target tumors that commonly exhibit leptomeningeal involvement. We are currently using this information to initiate the first of these investigations: a phase 1 study of intrathecal rituximab in the treatment of recurrent lymphomatous meningitis.


    Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr Ronald Levy of Stanford University School of Medicine. We are also indebted to Laurie Brignolo, Peter Thorsen, Larry Carbone, Daniel Lau, Ron Bayreuther, Cheyne Stokes, Linda Brovarney, Michelle Aird, and Marsha Potolo for assistance with the animal studies.


    Footnotes

Submitted June 4, 2002; accepted August 15, 2002.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, September 5, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1636.

Supported by grants from the California Cancer Research Program, IDEC Pharmaceuticals/Genentech, and the UCSF Mt Zion Cancer Center.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: James L. Rubenstein, University of California, San Francisco, Division of Hematology/Oncology M1282, Box 1270, San Francisco, CA 94143; e-mail: jamesr{at}medicine.ucsf.edu.


    References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Study design
Results and discussion
References

1. van Besien K, Ha CS, Murphy S, et al. Risk factors, treatment, and outcome of central nervous system recurrence in adults with intermediate-grade and immunoblastic lymphoma. Blood. 1998;91:1178-1184[Abstract/Free Full Text].

2. Fine HA, Mayer RJ. Primary central nervous system lymphoma. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:1093-1104[Abstract/Free Full Text].

3. Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P, Glantz M. Recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma complicated by lymphomatous meningitis. Oncol Rep. 1998;5:521-525[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

4. Glantz MJ, LaFollette S, Jaeckle KA, et al. Randomized trial of a slow-release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3110-3116[Abstract/Free Full Text].

5. Maloney DG, Liles TM, Czerwinski DK, et al. Phase I clinical trial using escalating single-dose infusion of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8) in patients with recurrent B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 1994;84:2457-2466[Abstract/Free Full Text].

6. Maloney DG, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Bodkin DJ, et al. IDEC-C2B8: results of a phase I multiple-dose trial in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:3266-3274[Abstract].

7. McLaughlin P, Grillo-Lopez AJ, Link BK, et al. Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2825-2833[Abstract].

8. Reff M, Carner K, Chambers KS. Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood. 1994;83:435-445[Abstract/Free Full Text].

9. Bleyer WA, Poplack DG. Intraventricular versus intralumbar methotrexate for central-nervous-system leukemia: prolonged remission with the Ommaya reservoir. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1979;6:207-213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

10. Youle R. Immunotoxins for central nervous system malignancy. Semin Cancer Biol. 1996;7:65-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

11. Wood JH, Poplack DG, Bleyer WA, Ommaya AK. Primate model for long-term study of intraventricularly or intrathecally administered drugs and intracranial pressure. Science. 1977;195:499-501[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

12. Poplack DG, Bleyer WA, Wood JH, et al. A primate model for study of methotrexate pharmacokinetics in the central nervous system. Cancer Res. 1977;37:1982-1985[Abstract].

13. Kramer K, Cheung N-K, Humm J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and acute toxicology of intraventricular 131 I-monoclonal antibody targeting disialoganglioside in non-human primates. J Neurooncol. 1997;35:101-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

14. Rubenstein JL, Rosenberg J, Damon L. High-dose methotrexate plus rituximab (anti-CD20) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma [abstract]. Society for NeuroOncology Fourth Annual Meeting; November 17-21, 1999; Scottdale, AZ.

15. Trbojevic-Cepe M, Brinar V, Pauro M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid complement activation in neurological diseases. J Neurol Sci. 1998;154:173-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].

16. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7:308-313.

© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
D. Villa, J. M. Connors, T. N. Shenkier, R. D. Gascoyne, L. H. Sehn, and K. J. Savage
Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the impact of the addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., October 27, 2009; (2009) mdp432v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Angelov, N. D. Doolittle, D. F. Kraemer, T. Siegal, G. H. Barnett, D. M. Peereboom, G. Stevens, J. McGregor, K. Jahnke, C. A. Lacy, et al.
Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Intra-Arterial Methotrexate-Based Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: A Multi-Institutional Experience
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2009; 27(21): 3503 - 3509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. Sierra del Rio, A. Rousseau, C. Soussain, D. Ricard, and K. Hoang-Xuan
Primary CNS Lymphoma in Immunocompetent Patients
Oncologist, May 1, 2009; 14(5): 526 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
V. Boehme, N. Schmitz, S. Zeynalova, M. Loeffler, and M. Pfreundschuh
CNS events in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with modern chemotherapy (CHOP-14) with or without rituximab: an analysis of patients treated in the RICOVER-60 trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)
Blood, April 23, 2009; 113(17): 3896 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
S. Maza, P. Kiewe, D. L. Munz, A. Korfel, B. Hamm, K. Jahnke, and E. Thiel
First report on a prospective trial with yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) in primary CNS lymphoma
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2009; 11(4): 423 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J.-F. Mineo, A. Scheffer, C. Karkoutly, L. Nouvel, O. Kerdraon, J. Trauet, A. Bordron, J.-P. Dessaint, M. Labalette, C. Berthou, et al.
Using Human CD20-Transfected Murine Lymphomatous B Cells to Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravitreal and Intracerebral Rituximab Injections in Mice
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4738 - 4745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
H. Ishiura, M. Morikawa, M. Hamada, T. Watanabe, S. Kako, S. Chiba, T. Motokura, A. Hangaishi, J. Shibahara, M. Akahane, et al.
Lymphomatoid Granulomatosis Involving Central Nervous System Successfully Treated With Rituximab Alone
Arch Neurol, May 1, 2008; 65(5): 662 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
N. D. Doolittle, L. E. Abrey, T. N. Shenkier, S. Tali, J. E.C. Bromberg, E. A. Neuwelt, C. Soussain, K. Jahnke, P. Johnston, G. Illerhaus, et al.
Brain parenchyma involvement as isolated central nervous system relapse of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1085 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. D. Morrey, V. Siddharthan, A. L. Olsen, H. Wang, J. G. Julander, J. O. Hall, H. Li, J. L. Nordstrom, S. Koenig, S. Johnson, et al.
Defining Limits of Treatment with Humanized Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody for West Nile Virus Neurological Infection in a Hamster Model
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2007; 51(7): 2396 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Rubenstein, J. Fridlyand, L. Abrey, A. Shen, J. Karch, E. Wang, S. Issa, L. Damon, M. Prados, M. McDermott, et al.
Phase I Study of Intraventricular Administration of Rituximab in Patients With Recurrent CNS and Intraocular Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2007; 25(11): 1350 - 1356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kinoshita, N. McDannold, F. A. Jolesz, and K. Hynynen
Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption
PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11719 - 11723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
R C Chou, J W Henson, D Tian, E T Hedley-Whyte, and A M Reginato
Successful treatment of rheumatoid meningitis with cyclophosphamide but not infliximab.
Ann Rheum Dis, August 1, 2006; 65(8): 1114 - 1116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. F. Ferrucci, A. Vanazzi, G. Tesoriere, M. Ferrari, M. Bartolomei, P. Rocca, M. Cremonesi, G. Paganelli, and G. Martinelli
Cerebrospinal fluid diffusion of Zevalin(R) after high-activity treatment and stem cell support in a patient affected by diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with central nervous system involvement
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1710 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. T. Wong
Management of Central Nervous System Lymphomas Using Monoclonal Antibodies: Challenges and Opportunities
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 11(19): 7151s - 7157s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
E. T. Wong, L. E. Abrey, R. H. Enting, A. Demopoulos, and L. M. DeAngelis
Salvage therapy for primary CNS lymphoma with a combination of rituximab and temozolomide
Neurology, March 8, 2005; 64(5): 934 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Feugier, J. M. Virion, H. Tilly, C. Haioun, G. Marit, M. Macro, D. Bordessoule, C. Recher, M. Blanc, T. Molina, et al.
Incidence and risk factors for central nervous system occurrence in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: influence of rituximab
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 129 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-06-1636v1
101/2/466    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shuman, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rubenstein, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Shuman, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020