| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on August 29, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0571.
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS
From the Department of Clinical Immunology, Center for
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (CAST), and Department of
Hematology, Karolinska Institute at Huddinge University Hospital,
Stockholm, Sweden; and Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska
University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
The kinetics of minimal residual disease (MRD) and chimerism
were studied in 15 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) and in 10 patients receiving conventional stem cell transplantation (CST). All
NST patients showed T-cell mixed chimerism (MC) while granulocyte and
B-cell MC occurred in 80% and 60% of the NST patients, respectively.
In CST patients, T-cell MC was detected in 5 patients, of whom 3 were
mixed only during the first month. MRD was detected in all NST
patients. During the first 3 months the median BCR-ABL/ABL ratio was
0.2% in NST patients compared with 0.01% in CST patients (P < .01). However, 12 months after transplantation, the
percentage of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR)-positive patients was 20% in NST patients and 50% in CST
patients. In conclusion, molecular remission can be induced in most
patients after NST, albeit with different kinetics from CST.
(Blood. 2003;101:469-472) Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
(SCT) is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic myeloid
leukemia (CML) who have a suitable donor.1 In older
patients and among those with comorbidity, however, there is a high
risk of regimen-related toxicity that makes conventional stem cell
transplantation (CST) unsuitable for these patients. In recent years,
nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) has been studied as a
safer approach for older patients.2-4 Such
transplantations are more dependent on a graft-versus-leukemia effect,
which is known to be powerful in CML patients.1,5
Molecular techniques for chimerism and minimal residual disease (MRD)
analysis after SCT are routinely used in many laboratories to follow
engraftment and predict a threatening relapse of leukemia. In the
conventional SCT setting, such analyses have been well evaluated in CML
patients.6-9
With the introduction of nonmyeloablative transplantations, the
significance of chimerism and MRD results to clinical outcome after
allogeneic SCT needs to be reevaluated.10,11
In the present study, we determined the incidence and kinetics of
chimerism and MRD in 15 CML patients receiving NST and compared them
with 10 patients receiving CST.
Patients
Conditioning
The CST group was conditioned with cyclophosphamide (Cy) 120 mg/kg with 10 to 12 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) (n = 5) or busulfan 16 mg/kg (n = 5).12 Details regarding supportive care have been described elsewhere.13 Samples Samples for chimerism and MRD analyses were 5 to 10 mL of peripheral blood.A median of 8 (range, 3-35) chimerism analyses and 10 (range, 3-30) MRD analyses was performed for each patient. Lineage-specific chimerism analysis Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs) was used to evaluate various degrees of donor and recipient chimerism in CD3+, CD19+, and CD45+ cells as previously described.14Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis for BCR-ABL Quantification was done by competitive PCR using plasmid constructs containing a modified BCR-ABL fusion gene.15 Dr N. C. P. Cross, Hammersmith Hospital, London, kindly provided pNC210/G (p210) and pNC190/G (p190) competitor plasmids.BCR-ABL and ABL transcript numbers were estimated by comparing the competitor and sample band intensity to find the equivalence point. Results were expressed as the ratio between BCR-ABL and ABL transcript numbers (BCR-ABL/ABL).
Sensitivity of BCR-ABL detection RNA from K562 cells was serially diluted in RNA from HL-60 cells in a total amount of 20 µg RNA. After cDNA synthesis and 40 cycles of PCR amplification, a sensitivity of 10 6 was obtained.
Patients In the NST group, 13 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 6-29 months). Two patients died of graft-versus- host disease (GVHD) and progressive disease 5 and 17 months after SCT, respectively (Table 1). One patient (N1) relapsed 7 months after SCT.In the CST group, 9 patients are alive with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 9-34 months). One patient died of GVHD 7 months after SCT. Two patients relapsed 9 and 16 months after SCT, respectively. Chimerism results NST.
T-cell mixed chimerism (MC) was detected in all 15 patients, and all
but 2 (N7 and N15) converted to donor chimerism (DC) at the end of this
study (Figure 1). The median time for
T-cell DC to occur was 87 days (range, 28-145 days) and was
significantly delayed (21 days [range, 14-60 days]) compared with the
CST group (P < .01). Granulocyte and B-cell MC were found
in 12 (80%) and 9 (60%) of the patients, respectively. Median times
to granulocyte and B-cell DC were 29 days (range, 14-128 days) and 30 days (range, 14-190 days), respectively.
CST. Five patients showed T-cell MC after SCT. Three patients had MC only the first month, whereas 2 patients (C9 and C10) had increasing levels of recipient cells in all cell fractions; both relapsed. In accordance with other NST studies, we found a high incidence of MC.10,14,16 The engraftment of T cells lagged behind granulocytes and B cells, which is in agreement with some but not other studies.10,17MRD results NST. All patients in this group had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts after SCT. The BCR-ABL/ABL ratio during the first 3 months was, with a median of 0.2%, significantly more compared with 0.01% in CST patients (P < .01) (Figure 1). This probably reflects the lower antitumor effect of nonmyeloablative conditioning. Eleven patients became MRD negative within 7 months (median, 3.5 months; range, 1-7 months). Three patients (N6, N12, N15) were BCR-ABL positive during the entire posttransplantation period. However, in 2 patients, the follow-up was less than 9 months. CST. After SCT, 7 of 10 patients showed at least 1 positive PCR assay for BCR-ABL. The percentage of MRD-positive patients was 50% at 1 year (Figure 1). Long persistent expression of BCR-ABL in the absence of clinical relapse has been observed in many studies.6,18-21 For these patients, it is important to monitor the change in transcript levels with quantitative analysis.15,22 Chimerism and MRD NST. A switch from T-cell MC to DC was usually seen before (n = 5) or at the time (n = 4) of MRD negativity. In the former group, the median interval between T-cell DC and MRD negativity was 40 days (range, 24-90 days). One patient (N3) had T-cell MC with no signs of the BCR-ABL transcript for 1 month. The short interval between T-cell DC and MRD negativity suggests that complete DC is not necessary for disease response.11 Twelve patients with MC in the granulocyte cell population were all PCR positive for BCR-ABL. Among those, a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of at least 0.1% was found in 10.CST. MC beyond 1 month after SCT was seen in only 2 patients (C9 and C10). Both had increasing BCR-ABL levels, and MC in B cells and granulocytes appeared only at BCR-ABL/ABL ratios of more than 1%. Three patients (C2, C5, and C8) with persistent BCR-ABL transcript (ratio less than 0.1%) more than 1 year after SCT had DC in all cell fractions. GVHD and MRD The incidence of acute GVHD was 73% and 90% in the NST and CST groups, respectively (Table 1). Interestingly, 4 NST patients without acute GVHD became MRD negative. This suggests that an allogeneic graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect may be seen even in the absence of GVHD, which is in accordance with a report in patients with acute leukemia.23In conclusion, despite high BCR-ABL levels during the early posttransplantation period and a high incidence of mixed chimerism, nonmyeloablative transplantation for CML patients may induce molecular remission in most patients. Close monitoring of chimerism and MRD is needed to guide the timely introduction of immune-therapeutic interventions.
We thank all staff at the departments for excellent and skillful patient care.
Submitted February 21, 2002; accepted August 19, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 29, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-02-0571.
Supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (0070-B99-13XAC), the Children's Cancer Foundation (1997/073), the Swedish Medical Research Council (K2000-06X-05971-20A), the Cancer Society in Stockholm, the Tobias Foundation, the FRF Foundation, and the Karolinska Institute.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Mehmet Uzunel, Department of Clinical Immunology F79, Huddinge University Hospital, SE-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden; e-mail: mehmet.uzunel{at}impi.ki.se.
1. Goldman JM, Gale RP, Horowitz, et al. Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase: increased risk for relapse associated with T-cell depletion. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:806-814[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, et al.
Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy.
Blood.
1997;89:4531-4536 3. Khouri IF, Keating M, Korbling M, et al. Transplant-lite: induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2817-2824[Abstract].
4.
Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al.
Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases.
Blood.
1998;91:756-763 5. Horowitz MM, Gale RP, Sondel PM, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990;75:555-562[Abstract]. 6. Cross NC, Hughes TP, Feng L, et al. Minimal residual disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia in first chronic phase: correlations with acute graft-versus-host disease and relapse. Br J Haematol. 1993;84:67-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 7. Roman J, Serrano J, Jimenez A, et al. Myeloid mixed chimerism is associated with relapse in bcr-abl positive patients after unmanipulated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia. Haematologica. 2000;85:173-180[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Serrano J, Roman J, Sanchez J, et al.
Molecular analysis of lineage-specific chimerism and minimal residual disease by RT-PCR of p210(BCR-ABL) and p190(BCR-ABL) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: increasing mixed myeloid chimerism and p190(BCR-ABL) detection precede cytogenetic relapse.
Blood.
2000;95:2659-2665
9.
Olavarria E, Kanfer E, Szydlo R, et al.
Early detection of BCR-ABL transcripts by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction predicts outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Blood.
2001;97:1560-1565
10.
Childs R, Clave E, Contentin N, et al.
Engraftment kinetics after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: full donor T-cell chimerism precedes alloimmune responses.
Blood.
1999;94:3234-3241 11. Mattsson J, Uzunel M, Brune M, et al. Mixed chimaerism is common at the time of acute graft-versus-host disease and disease response in patients receiving non-myeloablative conditioning and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:935-944[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
12.
Ringden O, Ruutu T, Remberger M, et al.
A randomized trial comparing busulfan with total body irradiation as conditioning in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients with leukemia: a report from the Nordic Bone Marrow Transplantation Group.
Blood.
1994;83:2723-2730 13. Remberger M, Svahn BM, Hentschke P, Lofgren C, Ringden O. Effect on cytokine release and graft-versus-host disease of different anti-T cell antibodies during conditioning for unrelated haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;24:823-830[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 14. Mattsson J, Uzunel M, Tammik L, Aschan J, Ringden O. Leukemia lineage-specific chimerism analysis is a sensitive predictor of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leukemia. 2001;15:1976-1985[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 15. Cross NC, Feng L, Chase A, Bungey J, Hughes TP, Goldman JM. Competitive polymerase chain reaction to estimate the number of BCR-ABL transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia patients after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1993;82:1929-1936[Abstract].
16.
McSweeney PA, Niederwieser D, Shizuru JA, et al.
Hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with hematologic malignancies: replacing high-dose cytotoxic therapy with graft-versus-tumor effects.
Blood.
2001;97:3390-3400 17. Niiya H, Kanda Y, Saito T, et al. Early full donor myeloid chimerism after reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation using a combination of fludarabine and busulfan. Haematologica. 2001;86:1071-1074[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Snyder DS, Rossi JJ, Wang JL, et al. Persistence of bcr-able gene expression following bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Transplantation. 1991;51:1033-1040[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Pignon JM, Henni T, Amselem S, et al. Frequent detection of minimal residual disease by use of the polymerase chain reaction in long-term survivors after bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 1990;4:83-86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Miyamura K, Tahara T, Tanimoto M, et al. Long persistent bcr-abl positive transcript detected by polymerase chain reaction after marrow transplant for chronic myelogenous leukemia without clinical relapse: a study of 64 patients. Blood. 1993;81:1089-1093[Abstract]. 21. Costello RT, Kirk J, Gabert J. Value of PCR analysis for long term survivors after allogeneic bone marrow transplant for chronic myelogenous leukemia: a comparative study. Leuk Lymphoma. 1996;20:239-243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
22.
Radich JP, Gooley T, Bryant E, et al.
The significance of bcr-abl molecular detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients "late," 18 months or more after transplantation.
Blood.
2001;98:1701-1707 23. Ringden O, Labopin M, Gorin NC, et al. Is there a graft-versus-leukaemia effect in the absence of graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation for acute leukaemia? Br J Haematol. 2000;111:1130-1137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
J. M. Goldman How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the imatinib era Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 2828 - 2837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Mauro and R. T. Maziarz Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: When Should It Be Used? Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2006; 81(3): 404 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Apperley Managing the Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Through and After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 226 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Crawley, R. Szydlo, M. Lalancette, A. Bacigalupo, A. Lange, M. Brune, G. Juliusson, A. Nagler, A. Gratwohl, J. Passweg, et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 2969 - 2976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tefferi, G. W. Dewald, M. L. Litzow, J. Cortes, M. J. Mauro, M. Talpaz, and H. M. Kantarjian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Current Application of Cytogenetics and Molecular Testing for Diagnosis and Treatment Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2005; 80(3): 390 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Goldman and J. V. Melo Chronic Myeloid Leukemia -- Advances in Biology and New Approaches to Treatment N. Engl. J. Med., October 9, 2003; 349(15): 1451 - 1464. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||