| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on September 26, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2086.
RED CELLS
From the Developmental Biology Program, Hospital for
Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; the Department of
Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto,
ON, Canada; and the Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Human The development of small globin gene constructs
that express to high levels is a prerequisite for successful retrovirus
or lentivirus-mediated gene therapy of sickle-cell
anemia.1-3 Extensive analysis from many laboratories has
shown that a locus control region (LCR) located upstream of the human
To design smaller LCR cassettes that express globins to higher levels,
we have shown that the 850-bp 5'HS3 element alone can activate
There are several The function of the ATR may be to bind transcription factors that
cooperate with LCR elements. Jackson et al have reported several
transcription factor binding sites dispersed through the In vitro DNaseI footprint analysis
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
PCR-based site-specific mutagenesis The template for the mutant Oct-1 AT-rich region (mOct-1) and the mutant Gata-1 AT-rich region (mGata-1) constructs was the BGT50 construct.19 The template for the mutant Gata-1/mutant Oct-1 (mGata-1/mOct-1) construct was the mOct-1 construct, and the mutation was introduced at the Gata-1 factor-binding site. The primers used to introduce the mutation as described34 at the Oct-1 or Gata-1 sites are the same oligonucleotides used for EMSA: FT1D (S) and (AS) for the mGata-1 and mGata-1/mOct-1 constructs; and FT2B (S) and (AS) for the mOct-1 construct. The first set of polymerase chain reactions (PCR) was separately amplified; the sequence between a 5' primer named B50 (S) (5'-CTT TGC CCA GCT GAG TGA ACT GC-3') that lies in exon 2 and the antisense mutant oligonucleotide; and the sequence between the sense mutant oligonucleotide and a 3' primer named B50 (AS) (5'-GCC CTG AAA GAA AGA GAT TAG GG-3') that lies in intron-2. The first PCR reactions were performed using 50-ng template, 10 pmole each primer, deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mix (10 nmole each; Invitrogen), and 10 U Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). The 2 PCR products were gel purified. The second PCR reaction was performed by using 1 µg each of the products from the first PCR reaction, 500 pmole of B50 (S) and B50 (AS), dNTP mix, and 10 U of Pfx DNA polymerase. The product of this PCR reaction contained the entire AT-rich region (BamHI-DraI) with site-specific mutations at the targeted factor-binding site. The 521-bp mutant BamHI-DraI fragment was isolated and cloned into Litmus 38 as described above and sequence verified before subcloning into the BGT50 5'HS3 / -globin
construct.19
Generation of transgenic mice Transgene DNA was isolated as 3.9-kb ClaI-ClaI fragments and purified using Elutip-d columns (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassell, Germany), ethanol precipitated, and resuspended in injection buffer (10 mM Tris [tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane]-HCl pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA) and diluted to 0.1-0.5 ng/µL. Injected FVB mouse eggs were transferred into recipient CD1 females and fetuses dissected at day 15.5. Fetal heads were collected for identification of transgenic animals by slot blot hybridization to a -globin intron-2 probe, and
fetal liver split in 2 for subsequent DNA and RNA analysis from
frozen samples.
DNA analysis Southern transfer and hybridization were by standard procedures. Copy-number determination was performed using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager (Sunnyvale, CA). Single-copy animals showed a single random-sized end-fragment in BamHI and EcoRI digests hybridized with a -globin intron-2
probe. With multicopy animals, the intensity of the
end-fragment was defined as 1 copy and was used to calculate the copy
number of the multicopy junction-fragment in the same lane. The
intactness of the transgene in the DNA sample was verified by Southern
blot analysis using PstI digests hybridized to a -globin
intron-2 probe and an endogenous mTHY-1 probe. Nonintact transgenes were not included in the calculation of copy number. A
loading control of bred single copy transgenic mouse DNA included in
the PstI Southerns permitted mosaic analysis as
described.14 Mice that were highly mosaic were excluded
from study after demonstration that < 20% of the fetal liver
cells contained intact transgenes.
RNA analysis Fetal liver (embryonic day 15.5) RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen), 1 µg was hybridized to 32P( )dATP-labeled (Amersham Pharmacia) double-stranded
3' DNA probe (the EcoRI fragment containing exon 3) for
detection of human -globin.35 A
32P( )ATP-labeled (Amersham Pharmacia) double-stranded
5'DNA probe was used for mouse major-globin detection as
a loading control.23 RNA/DNA hybrids were subsequently
digested with 75 units of S1 nuclease (Roche) and run on a 6%
sequencing gel as described.23 Probe excess was demonstrated by including a sample that contains 3 µg of fetal liver
RNA. The protected 170 nucleotide (nt) Hu and 95 nt Mo bands were
quantified on a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and the percentage
expression levels calculated according to the formula (Hu /Mo ) × 100%. The percentage expression levels were
corrected for specific activities of the probe preparations by
normalization using T225 fetal liver RNA isolated from a heterozygous
BGT50 line, previously shown to express Hu at 40% per Mo
copy.19 Expression per transgene was calculated as (2 Mo genes/number of Hu transgenes) × (% expression)/(%
transgenic cells) × 100%.
Statistical analysis To determine if mean expression from a mutant transgene is statistically different from the mean expression level of the BGT50 construct, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed. Since at least 8 transgenic mice were generated for each transgene, a normal approximation can be made using the test statistic:
In vitro DNaseI footprint analysis of the AT-rich region To identify factor-binding sites in the -globin intron-2 ATR,
in vitro DNaseI footprint analysis was performed. The 521 BamHI-DraI fragment containing the 372-bp
ATR19,31,32 was cloned into the Litmus 38 vector.
Radiolabeled sense and antisense ATR fragments were incubated with
mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cell nuclear extract, briefly digested by
DNaseI, and separated adjacent to a sequence ladder. Two footprinted
regions were detected on the sense strand (Figure
1A); a 5' footprinted region (FT1)
downstream of 2 strong hypersensitive bases and a 3' footprinted region
(FT2). Strong footprints on the antisense strand also colocalized with
the same FT1 and FT2 sequences (Figure 1B). Location of the 2 strong footprints within -globin intron-2 is illustrated in
Figure 1C.
FT1 is an inverted noncanonical double Gata-1 site Double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were created covering the FT1 footprint. Sequence inspection of the FT1 region revealed an inverted noncanonical double Gata-1 site (5'-GATTGCATC-3'). EMSA with the FT1 probe detected a factor present in MEL cell nuclear extract but not Jurkat cell nuclear extract (Figure 2, lanes 2 and 3), consistent with the erythroid specificity of Gata-1. Preincubation of MEL extract with Gata-1 antibody, but not Oct-1 antibody, supershifted this complex (Figure 2, lanes 9 and 10), which also was competed with Gata-1 consensus sites, confirming its identity as Gata-1. To determine which of the inverted double Gata-1 sites are bound, mutations of GA to TT were introduced in either the 5', 3', or both noncanonical Gata-1 sites (FT1B, FT1C, and FT1D, respectively). The mutant oligonucleotides did not compete the FT1 complex, nor were they bound by factors in MEL nuclear extracts when used as EMSA probes (Figure 2, lanes 5-7 and 11-13). These data demonstrate that Gata-1 binding requires the entire inverted double site, and mutation of either or both noncanonical sites results in loss of Gata-1 binding.
To further investigate Gata-1 binding to this inverted double site,
EMSA using recombinant Gata-1 proteins36 was performed. Increasing amounts of FT1 probe for the inverted double site was bound
by the double finger recombinant protein consisting of both C-terminal
and N-terminal zinc fingers (Figure 3A,
lanes 1-3). In contrast, the mutant sites (FT1B, FT1C, and FT1D) were
unable to bind recombinant Gata-1 protein (Figure 3A, lanes 4-12).
These data confirm that the entire inverted double site is required to
bind Gata-1. A recombinant C-finger Gata-1 protein consisting of only
the C-terminal zinc finger bound to the inverted double site (Figure
3B, lanes 1-3). The C-finger protein also bound to probes that
contained only one noncanonical site (Figure 3B, lanes 4-9), but not to
the probe in which both noncanonical sites were mutated (Figure 3B,
lanes 10-12). These results show that the C-finger protein is capable
of binding to either noncanonical site. Furthermore, the C-finger
protein bound to the inverted double site comigrated with the complex
formed at single mutant Gata-1 sites, indicating that only one C-finger
protein molecule can bind to the inverted double site at a time. These
data are consistent with Gata-1 factor binding FT1 as a monomer that
simultaneously contacts both the noncanonical sites in the inverted
double site through its pair of zinc fingers.
FT2 is an Oct-1 site Double-stranded DNA oligonucleotides were created covering the FT2 footprint. Sequence inspection of the FT2 region revealed an Oct-1 consensus site. An FT2 EMSA probe detected a complex in both MEL and Jurkat nuclear extract (Figure 4, lanes 2 and 8) that was competed by excess unlabeled probe, but not by a mutant Oct-1 competitor containing an AT to GC substitution (FT2B) (Figure 4, lanes 3-4 and 9-10). The complex was also supershifted by Oct-1 antibody in both MEL and Jurkat extracts, but not with Sp3 antibody (Figure 4, lanes 5-7 and 11-14). These data show that FT2 is bound by the ubiquitous Oct-1 factor.
Creation of mutant AT-rich regions PCR-based site-specific mutagenesis was used to create 3 mutant ATRs: 1) the inverted double Gata-1 site mutated at both noncanonical sites (mGata-1 ATR); 2) the Oct-1 site mutated (mOct-1 ATR); and 3) both the inverted double Gata-1 site and the Oct-1 site mutated (mGata-1/mOct-1 ATR). To demonstrate that the mutant sites were not bound by any factors, DNaseI footprint analysis with MEL nuclear extract was performed. Footprint analysis of the mGata-1 ATR region detected a footprint at the Oct-1 site in the FT2 region but no footprint at the FT1 region as expected (data not shown). Conversely, analysis of the mOct-1 ATR region detected the Gata-1 footprint in FT1, but no footprint in FT2 region (data not shown). Finally, analysis of the mGata-1/mOct-1 ATR region did not detect any footprints on the sense or antisense strands (Figure 1A-B).Functional analysis in transgenic mice To test the functional importance of the Gata-1 and Oct-1 sites, the mGata-1/mOct-1 ATR was cloned into intron-2 of the BGT50 construct yielding BGT133 (Figure 5, bottom). BGT50 contains a 5'HS3 LCR element linked to the 815-bp -globin promoter,
-globin exon-1/intron-1/exon-2, -globin intron-2, -globin
exon-3, and the 260-bp -globin 3' enhancer (Figure 5, top). BGT50
transgenes in mice express human -globin (Hu ) mRNA at all
integration sites tested at 64% ± 11% (SE) per copy.19
Transgenic animals were created with the BGT133 construct, and fetuses
collected at day 15.5. Fetal head DNA was screened by slot blot
hybridization to identify transgenic animals. Southern blot analysis
was performed on fetal head and liver DNA of positive animals to
determine copy number, transgene intactness, and mosaicism in fetal
liver as described (data not shown). Highly mosaic animals
containing < 20% transgenic cells in the fetal liver were
excluded.
Mutation of inverted double Gata-1 and Oct-1 sites reduces transgene expression A total of 17 transgenic animals were identified with intact BGT133 transgenes, including 7 single-copy animals. Expression was determined by S1 nuclease protection assay with Hu and mouse major-globin (Mo ) probes (Figure
6). RNA from a single-copy BGT50 bred
line (T225)19 that expressed Hu at 40% per Mo copy
(the low end of the BGT50 expression range), and a nontransgenic (NT) animal served as controls. All single-copy and multicopy BGT133 animals
express Hu mRNA to a mean level of 37% ± 8% (SE). These data
demonstrate that the inverted double Gata-1 and Oct-1 sites in the ATR
are not essential for activating LCR-dependent transgene expression at
ectopic sites of integration. However, mutation of the inverted double
Gata-1 and Oct-1 sites reduced mean transgene expression levels from
64% to 37%.
Mutation of inverted double Gata-1 site does not affect transgene expression To identify which mutation was responsible for the reduction in transgene expression levels, transgenic animals were generated with the BGT132 (mGata-1 ATR) and BGT131 (mOct-1 ATR) constructs. Nine multicopy transgenic animals were identified with intact BGT132 transgenes. S1 protection assays demonstrate that all the animals express Hu to a
mean level of 61% ± 12% (Figure 7),
suggesting that mutation of the inverted double Gata-1 site does not
reduce transgene expression levels.
Mutation of the Oct-1 site reduces transgene expression Ten transgenic animals were identified with intact BGT131 (mOct-1 ATR) transgenes, including 3 single-copy animals. All single-copy and multicopy BGT131 animals express the Hu transgene to a mean level of
31% ± 8% when assayed by S1 protection assay (Figure 8). These data demonstrate that mutation
of the Oct-1 site alone reduces transgene expression to levels
equivalent to the BGT133 mice (mGata-1/mOct-1 ATR) described above.
Transgenic mice expressing BGT64 (in which the entire ATR is deleted)
also express to this same level (31% ± 2%),19
indicating that the absence of the Oct-1 site can fully account for
reduced expression levels by BGT64.
LCR activity by 5'HS3 at ectopic transgene integration sites
requires a functional interaction with elements in the Novel inverted double Gata-1 site EMSA on the FT1 region revealed binding of Gata-1 to an inverted repeat of noncanonical Gata-1 sites. Although previous analysis suggested that Gata-1 bound a single noncanonical site at this location,33 our experiments show that both noncanonical sites are required for Gata-1 complex formation and this unique binding profile is mediated by simultaneous interactions with both Gata-1 zinc fingers. The existence of canonical and noncanonical double sites with different apparent activities36 could suggest an unusual function for Gata-1 bound to the ATR.Oct-1 binds FT2 Analysis of the FT2 footprinted region by EMSA identified a complex competed by an Oct-1 site, supershifted by an Oct-1 antibody, and which failed to bind probes in which the Oct-1 consensus was mutated. These data are consistent with the presence of an Oct-1 site in -globin intron-2 as reported.33 Oct-1 is an
ubiquitous transcription factor with activator37 and
repressor38 functions in transcriptional regulation that
binds enhancers39 and promoters.38
Mutant Oct-1 site reduces 5'HS3 / -globin construct (BGT50) and
introduced into transgenic mice. If the LCR is dependent on the Gata-1
or Oct-1 sites in the ATR, then mutations removing one or both sites
could result in lack of expression at some integration sites and/or a
decrease in mean expression levels per transgene.
Analysis of BGT133 (mGata-1/mOct-1 ATR) fetal liver RNA demonstrated
expression in 7/7 single-copy and 12/12 multicopy
animals at a mean expression level of 37% ± 8% (SE) per transgene
copy (Table 1). BGT133 expression is
significantly different (P < .05) from BGT50 expression
of 64% ± 11% (Table 1), indicating that mutation of one or both
sites reduces transgene expression levels. To identify the binding site
responsible for reduced expression, transgenic animals were created
containing mutations at either the Gata-1 or the Oct-1 sites. BGT132
(mGata-1 ATR) transgenic animals expressed in 9/9 multicopy animals
with a mean expression of 61% ± 12%, indicating that mutation of the
inverted double Gata-1 site alone does not significantly reduce
(P > .50) transgene expression levels (Table 1). The lack
of an effect for the mutant Gata-1 site may reflect redundancy between
it and other Gata-1 sites present in the transgene including
5'HS3,40
Analysis of BGT131 (mOct-1 ATR) transgenic animals demonstrated
expression in 3/3 single-copy and 7/7 multicopy animals at a mean level
of 31% ± 8%. These data show that mutation of the Oct-1 site alone
significantly reduces (P < .05) mean expression levels
(Table 1). This reduction is similar to the decreased expression
(P < .01) observed when the ATR is deleted in
BGT6419 at a mean expression of 31% ± 2% (Table 1),
indicating that Oct-1 can fully account for this reduction. The strong
effect on expression levels of the Oct-1 mutation is surprising, but as
the other known Oct-1 site in the Mutant ATR constructs express detectable levels at ectopic sites We previously showed that 5'HS3 / -globin transgenes
containing the ATR (BGT50) express at all integration sites tested, whereas some integration sites are silent when the AT-rich region is
deleted (BGT64).19 The 3 ATR mutations of the BGT50
construct tested here express detectable levels at all integration
sites. These results show that sequences within the ATR other than the strong transcription factor binding sites ensure expression at all
5'HS3 / -globin transgene integration sites. The remarkable AT-richness of the sequence raises 2 models that are testable. First,
the ATR contains a MAR that may tether the / -globin transgene to
the nuclear matrix.25,26 This effect may contribute to LCR activity by extending open chromatin, similar to the chromatin modifications44,45 extending from MARs that surround the
immunoglobulin-µ enhancer.46 A report using higher
concentrations of nuclear extract in footprint experiments indicated
the presence of a weak SATB1 site downstream of the Oct-1 site at
FT2.33 SATB1 is expressed primarily in thymocytes where it
binds MARs and acts as a repressor, but the phenotype in SATB1 knockout
mice is limited to effects on T cells.47 Despite its
normal silencing function in T cells, weak SATB1 binding in erythroid
cells could contribute to intron-2 MAR activity. Second, periodic runs
of A or T can position nucleosomes48,49 that can be
anchored to their positions by adjacent transcription factor binding
sites.50 If Gata-1 and Oct-1 are bound to linker regions,
this could anchor a positioned nucleosome on the intervening 160 bp of
AT rich sequence (Figure 1C) without creating a detectable HS. An array
of phased nucleosomes across intron-2 might result, and these could
increase Gata-1 accessibility to sites at the intron-2 enhancer,
facilitating HS formation at this location and the spread of open
chromatin. Sequences that position nucleosomes within -globin loci
have been reported.51 The Oct-1 site may be more important
than the Gata-1 site for elevating expression levels directed by the
intron-2 enhancer in this scenario, but the AT sequences alone could be
sufficient to establish weaker unanchored nucleosome positioning and
permit detectable expression at all transgene integration sites.
Use of the ATR in gene therapy The intron-2 ATR is deleterious for high titer production of globin retrovirus vectors, but the Oct-1 site in the ATR is important for high-level expression in transgenic mice. Hence, deletion of the ATR in globin retrovirus vectors improves virus titer31,32 but compromises mean expression levels.19 Our analysis of RNA extracted from transient transgenic mice precludes single-cell analysis to study possible variegation effects. However, mean expression levels of 64% from 5'HS3-regulated / -globin hybrid transgenes suggests that most cells are expressing therapeutically effective levels of globin RNA that are higher than the 31% levels obtained from ATR deleted cassettes. These findings suggest that components of the ATR, including the Oct-1 site, should be retained to
create the ideal LCR -globin cassette for gene therapy capable of
expressing high mean levels at all ectopic integration sites. Future
experiments designed to test LCR dependence on MAR activity or
nucleosome positioning in the ATR may define minimal sequences that can
perform this function and be transmitted through gene therapy vectors
at high titer.
SATB1 has recently been shown to regulate nucleosome positioning.52
Thanks to J. Rubin, D. Pannell, and L. Wei for technical advice and support, and to J. Omichinski for the peptides used in this study.
Submitted July 11, 2002; accepted September 17, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, September 26, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2086.
Supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (J.E.) and a Hospital for Sick Children Research Training Centre Graduate Studentship (R.R.B.).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: James Ellis, Elm Building, Room 8154, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8; e-mail: jellis{at}sickkids.ca.
1.
Persons DA, Nienhuis AW.
Gene therapy for the hemoglobin disorders: past, present, and future.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
2000;97:5022-5024 2. Sadelain M. Globin gene transfer for the treatment of severe hemoglobinopathies: a paradigm for stem cell-based gene therapy. J Gene Med. 2002;4:113-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Ellis J, Pannell D. The beta-globin locus control region versus gene therapy vectors: a struggle for expression. Clin Genet. 2001;59:17-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Grosveld F, van Assendelft GB, Greaves DR, Kollias G. Position-independent, high-level expression of the human beta-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell. 1987;51:975-985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Peterson KR, Clegg CH, Huxley C, et al.
Transgenic mice containing a 248-kb yeast artificial chromosome carrying the human beta-globin locus display proper developmental control of human globin genes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1993;90:7593-7597
6.
Gaensler KM, Kitamura M, Kan YW.
Germ-line transmission and developmental regulation of a 150-kb yeast artificial chromosome containing the human beta-globin locus in transgenic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1993;90:11381-11385
7.
Ryan TM, Behringer RR, Martin NC, Townes TM, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL.
A single erythroid-specific DNase I super-hypersensitive site activates high levels of human beta-globin gene expression in transgenic mice.
Genes Dev.
1989;3:314-323
8.
Bungert J, Dave U, Lim KC, et al.
Synergistic regulation of human beta-globin gene switching by locus control region elements HS3 and HS4.
Genes Dev.
1995;9:3083-3096
9.
Tuan D, Solomon W, Li Q, London IM.
The "beta-like-globin" gene domain in human erythroid cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1985;82:6384-6388
10.
Forrester WC, Thompson C, Elder JT, Groudine M.
A developmentally stable chromatin structure in the human beta-globin gene cluster.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1986;83:1359-1363
11.
Bulger M, van Doorninck JH, Saitoh N, et al.
Conservation of sequence and structure flanking the mouse and human beta-globin loci: the beta-globin genes are embedded within an array of odorant receptor genes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1999;96:5129-5134 12. Talbot D, Collis P, Antoniou M, Vidal M, Grosveld F, Greaves DR. A dominant control region from the human beta-globin locus conferring integration site-independent gene expression. Nature. 1989;338:352-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 13. Ellis J, Tan-Un KC, Harper A, et al. A dominant chromatin-opening activity in 5' hypersensitive site 3 of the human beta-globin locus control region. Embo J. 1996;15:562-568[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
14.
Ellis J, Pasceri P, Tan-Un KC, et al.
Evaluation of beta-globin gene therapy constructs in single copy transgenic mice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
1997;25:1296-1302 15. May C, Rivella S, Callegari J, et al. Therapeutic haemoglobin synthesis in beta-thalassaemic mice expressing lentivirus-encoded human beta-globin. Nature. 2000;406:82-86[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
May C, Rivella S, Chadburn A, Sadelain M.
Successful treatment of murine beta-thalassemia intermedia by transfer of the human beta-globin gene.
Blood.
2002;99:1902-1908
17.
Pawliuk R, Westerman KA, Fabry ME, et al.
Correction of sickle cell disease in transgenic mouse models by gene therapy.
Science.
2001;294:2368-2371 18. Ellis J, Talbot D, Dillon N, Grosveld F. Synthetic human beta-globin 5'HS2 constructs function as locus control regions only in multicopy transgene concatamers. Embo J. 1993;12:127-134[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
19.
Rubin JE, Pasceri P, Wu X, Leboulch P, Ellis J.
Locus control region activity by 5'HS3 requires a functional interaction with beta-globin gene regulatory elements: expression of novel beta/gamma-globin hybrid transgenes.
Blood.
2000;95:3242-3249 20. Navas PA, Josephson B, Furukawa T, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Li Q. The position of integration affects expression of the A gamma-globin-encoding gene linked to HS3 in transgenic mice. Gene. 1995;160:165-171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Li Q, Stamatoyannopoulos JA.
Position independence and proper developmental control of gamma-globin gene expression require both a 5' locus control region and a downstream sequence element.
Mol Cell Biol.
1994;14:6087-6096
22.
Persons DA, Allay ER, Sabatino DE, Kelly P, Bodine DM, Nienhuis AW.
Functional requirements for phenotypic correction of murine beta-thalassemia: implications for human gene therapy.
Blood.
2001;97:3275-3282 23. Antoniou M, deBoer E, Habets G, Grosveld F. The human beta-globin gene contains multiple regulatory regions: identification of one promoter and two downstream enhancers. Embo J. 1988;7:377-384[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. deBoer E, Antoniou M, Mignotte V, Wall L, Grosveld F. The human beta-globin promoter; nuclear protein factors and erythroid specific induction of transcription. Embo J. 1988;7:4203-4212[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 25. Jarman AP, Higgs DR. Nuclear scaffold attachment sites in the human globin gene complexes. Embo J. 1988;7:3337-3344[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 26. Walter WR, Singh GB, Krawetz SA. MARs mission update. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242:419-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
27.
Wall L, deBoer E, Grosveld F.
The human beta-globin gene 3' enhancer contains multiple binding sites for an erythroid-specific protein.
Genes Dev.
1988;2:1089-1100
28.
Trudel M, Costantini F.
A 3' enhancer contributes to the stage-specific expression of the human beta-globin gene.
Genes Dev.
1987;1:954-961
29.
Behringer RR, Hammer RE, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD, Townes TM.
Two 3' sequences direct adult erythroid-specific expression of human beta-globin genes in transgenic mice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1987;84:7056-7060
30.
Moreau-Gaudry F, Xia P, Jiang G, et al.
High-level erythroid-specific gene expression in primary human and murine hematopoietic cells with self-inactivating lentiviral vectors.
Blood.
2001;98:2664-2672 31. Leboulch P, Huang GM, Humphries RK, et al. Mutagenesis of retroviral vectors transducing human beta-globin gene and beta-globin locus control region derivatives results in stable transmission of an active transcriptional structure. Embo J. 1994;13:3065-3076[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
32.
Sadelain M, Wang CH, Antoniou M, Grosveld F, Mulligan RC.
Generation of a high-titer retroviral vector capable of expressing high levels of the human beta-globin gene.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1995;92:6728-6732
33.
Jackson CE, O'Neill D, Bank A.
Nuclear factor binding sites in human beta globin IVS2.
J Biol Chem.
1995;270:28448-28456
34.
Higuchi R, Krummel B, Saiki RK.
A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions.
Nucleic Acids Res.
1988;16:7351-7367 35. Kollias G, Wrighton N, Hurst J, Grosveld F. Regulated expression of human A gamma-, beta-, and hybrid gamma beta-globin genes in transgenic mice: manipulation of the developmental expression patterns. Cell. 1986;46:89-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 36. Trainor CD, Omichinski JG, Vandergon TL, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM, Felsenfeld G. A palindromic regulatory site within vertebrate GATA-1 promoters requires both zinc fingers of the GATA-1 DNA-binding domain for high-affinity interaction. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:2238-2247[Abstract]. 37. Clark ME, Mellon PL. The POU homeodomain transcription factor Oct-1 is essential for activity of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron-specific enhancer. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:6169-6177[Abstract].
38.
Schwachtgen JL, Remacle JE, Janel N, et al.
Oct-1 is involved in the transcriptional repression of the von Willebrand factor gene promoter.
Blood.
1998;92:1247-1258
39.
Jenuwein T, Grosschedl R.
Complex pattern of immunoglobulin mu gene expression in normal and transgenic mice: nonoverlapping regulatory sequences govern distinct tissue specificities.
Genes Dev.
1991;5:932-943 40. Philipsen S, Pruzina S, Grosveld F. The minimal requirements for activity in transgenic mice of hypersensitive site 3 of the beta globin locus control region. Embo J. 1993;12:1077-1085[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
41.
Trainor CD, Ghirlando R, Simpson MA.
GATA zinc finger interactions modulate DNA binding and transactivation.
J Biol Chem.
2000;275:28157-28166 42. Boyes J, Omichinski J, Clark D, Pikaart M, Felsenfeld G. Perturbation of nucleosome structure by the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1. J Mol Biol. 1998;279:529-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
43.
Ryan TM, Sun CW, Ren J, Townes TM.
Human gamma-globin gene promoter element regulates human beta-globin gene developmental specificity.
Nucleic Acids Res.
2000;28:2736-2740
44.
Forrester WC, Fernandez LA, Grosschedl R.
Nuclear matrix attachment regions antagonize methylation-dependent repression of long-range enhancer-promoter interactions.
Genes Dev.
1999;13:3003-3014
45.
Fernandez LA, Winkler M, Grosschedl R.
Matrix attachment region-dependent function of the immunoglobulin mu enhancer involves histone acetylation at a distance without changes in enhancer occupancy.
Mol Cell Biol.
2001;21:196-208 46. Jenuwein T, Forrester WC, Fernandez-Herrero LA, Laible G, Dull M, Grosschedl R. Extension of chromatin accessibility by nuclear matrix attachment regions. Nature. 1997;385:269-272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
47.
Alvarez JD, Yasui DH, Niida H, Joh T, Loh DY, Kohwi-Shigematsu T.
The MAR-binding protein SATB1 orchestrates temporal and spatial expression of multiple genes during T-cell development.
Genes Dev.
2000;14:521-535
48.
Shrader TE, Crothers DM.
Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1989;86:7418-7422 49. Widlund HR, Cao H, Simonsson S, et al. Identification and characterization of genomic nucleosome-positioning sequences. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:807-817[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
50.
Pazin MJ, Bhargava P, Geiduschek EP, Kadonaga JT.
Nucleosome mobility and the maintenance of nucleosome positioning.
Science.
1997;276:809-812 51. Yenidunya A, Davey C, Clark D, Felsenfeld G, Allan J. Nucleosome positioning on chicken and human globin gene promoters in vitro: novel mapping techniques. J Mol Biol. 1994;237:401-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 52. Yasui D, Miyano M, Cai S, Varga-Weisz P, Kohwi-Shigematsu T. SATB1 targets chromatin remodelling to regulate genes over long distances. Nature. 2002;419:641-645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
A. Buzina, M. I. Aladjem, J. L. Kolman, G. M. Wahl, and J. Ellis Initiation of DNA replication at the human {beta}-globin 3' enhancer Nucleic Acids Res., August 5, 2005; 33(14): 4412 - 4424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. H. Wang, T. Schmidt, J. Chen, P. A. Sharp, and D. Tantin Embryonic Lethality, Decreased Erythropoiesis, and Defective Octamer-Dependent Promoter Activation in Oct-1-Deficient Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2004; 24(3): 1022 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||