| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on October 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2051.
HEMATOPOIESIS
From the Departments of Hematology and Oncology,
Graduate School of Medicine, and Cell Therapy and Transplantation
Medicine, University of Tokyo Hospital, University of Tokyo,
Japan; the Riken Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe,
Japan; the Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University,
Japan; the Department of Immunology, Institute of Basic
Medical Science, University of Tsukuba, Japan; and the
Kirin Brewery Pharmaceutical Research Laboratory, Takasaki,
Japan.
Mouse long-term hematopoietic reconstituting cells exist in the
c-Kit+Sca-1+Lin Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are generated
during ontogeny and supply all mature hematopoietic lineages throughout
life with their self-renewal and multilineage differentiation
capacity.1 Efforts have been made to expand HSCs ex vivo
without loss of their original potency. Long-term reconstitution
capacity of mouse and human HSCs is maintained for up to 2 to 3 weeks
by coculture with certain stromal cells.2-4 For expansion
of HSCs without stromal cells, various combinations of cytokines that
are active for immature hematopoietic progenitors have been
surveyed.5-9 Of interest are approaches using Notch
signaling, since it has been shown to inhibit differentiation of
diverse types of cells in vertebrates.10-14 Notch signals
are mediated by interactions between Notch receptors and their
membrane-anchored ligands expressed in adjacent cells.15
In the hematopoietic compartment, Notch receptors and ligands are
expressed in hematopoietic progenitors and certain stromal cells,
respectively.16-19 It was recently reported that the Notch
ligand Jagged-1 maintained the severe combined immunodeficiency
(scid)-repopulating activity of human cord blood-derived CD34+CD38 In these previous investigations, however, it was not certain whether
HSC expansion was achieved without loss of the original biologic
phenotype, partly because unpurified cell populations were used as the
starting materials. Mouse HSCs are enriched in the
c-Kit+Sca-1+Lin Here, we used retrovirus-mediated transduction of 34 Mice
Antibodies and cytokines
Stem cell purification Bone marrow cells were obtained from 8- to 12-week-old mice and fetal liver cells from E14 embryo (B6-Ly5.1). Adult bone marrow- and fetal liver-derived KSL (B-KSL and L-KSL, respectively) and 34 KSL were sorted in accordance with a previously
described protocol.22 Briefly, lineage depletion from
low-density cells isolated on Histpaque (Sigma, St Louis, MO) was
performed with biotinylated rat IgG2b anti-lineage markers Gr-1, B220,
CD4, CD8, Mac1, and Ter119, and streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads
(Biomag Binding Streptavidin; Polysciences, Warrington, PA). These
cells were stained with ECD-streptavidin, PE-Sca-1, APC-c-Kit, and
FITC-antimurine CD34, and analyzed and sorted with a FACS Vantage
(Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The sorted cells were used for
virus infection and cultivation as described below.
Retrovirus production and infection A cDNA fragment for mouse HES-133 was subcloned into a retrovirus vector, pMY/IRES-EGFP (a gift from T. Kitamura, IMSUT, Tokyo, Japan). The resulting pMY/HES-1-IRES-EGFP and pMY/IRES-EGFP were transfected into MP34 cells34
(a gift from Wakunaga Pharmaceuticals, Hiroshima,
Japan; the resulting viruses were defined as HES-1IGv and GFPv,
respectively), which were single cell-sorted for enhanced green
fluorescence protein (GFP) with the FACS Vantage. Clones giving the
highest infection efficiency, namely 4.5 × 108/mL for
NIH/3T3 in both HES-1IGv and GFPv, were used for the rest of the experiments.
Either of the above-sorted KSL or 34 RT-PCR analysis Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) from 1.5 × 104 to 2.5 × 104 of GFP+-sorted cells after culture, and used for semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Primer pairs were as follows: glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5'-GCATTGTGGAAGGGCTCATG-3' and 5'-TTGCTGTTGAAGTCGCAGGAG-3'; HES-1, 5'-CGGCATTCCAAGCTAGAGAAGG-3' and 5'-GGTAGGTCATGGCGTTGATCTG-3'.Colony assay GFP+ KSL-derived cells were sorted at the end of the 48-hour infection period. Soon after this and after a further 3 days of culture in the presence of SCF, TPO, and FL, the cells were subjected to a colony assay using methylcellulose (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada).Noncompetitive and competitive long-term reconstitution assay For long-term reconstitution assay (LTRA) using the KSL-derived cells, Ly5.2 mice were exposed to 7.5 Gy (defined as "sublethal dose") irradiation before injection of 1000 KSL-derived GFP+-sorted cells (Ly5.1) into the tail vein. At each time point, chimerism of GFP+ (Ly5.1) and GFP
(Ly5.2) cells in the blood of recipients was analyzed. For competitive LTRA using the 34 KSL-derived cells, Ly5.2 mice were
exposed to 9.5 Gy ("lethal dose") irradiation and injected with
1000 pMY/HES-1-IRES-EGFP- or pMY/IRES-EGFP-transduced
34 KSL-derived GFP+-sorted cells (Ly5.1)
together with the same number of nontransduced 34 KSL-derived cells (Ly5.1) that were cultured for 2 days
in the same manner except for the absence of the virus. At each time point, chimerism of GFP+Ly5.1+ and
GFP Ly5.1+ cells in the blood of recipients
was analyzed. Decrease of Ly5.2+ (GFP ) cells
was simultaneously confirmed.
Identification of SP and CD34low/ For analysis of CD34low/
Retrovirus containing HES-1 preserves immature progenitors in bone marrow- and fetal liver-derived KSL We placed HES-1 cDNA in the retroviral vector pMY/IRES-EGFP, which drives expression of a cDNA of interest and of GFP as a marker from a single bicistronic mRNA (Figure 1A).35,36 The infection efficiencies of the resulting HES-1IGv and GFPv in B-KSL and L-KSL (Figure 1B) after 48-hour culture were 20% to 75% and 40% to 90%, respectively, in the presence of SCF, TPO, and FL (Figure 1C).
Next, the sorted GFP+ cells were subjected to the
colony-forming assay before and after an additional 3-day culture in
the presence of SCF, TPO, and FL. Results showed that the numbers of
mature progenitor-derived colonies such as granulocyte colonies and
erythroid colony-forming unit-derived colonies were similar between
the HES-1Igv-transduced and GFPv-transduced B-KSL-derived cells.
However, the number of high-proliferative-potential-mix (HPP-mix)-derived colonies was greater in the HES-1Igv-transduced than in the GFPv-transduced B-KSL-derived cells, particularly when the
assay was performed after an additional 3-day culture. The
HES-1Igv-transduced L-KSL-derived cells also formed a significantly higher number of HPP-mix-derived colonies than the GFPv-transduced L-KSL-derived cells (Figure 2A). We then
transplanted 1000 of the GFP+ B-KSL- and L-KSL-derived
cells sorted soon after the 48-hour infection period to sublethally
irradiated recipient mice. In both B-KSL- and L-KSL-derived cell
transplant recipients, donor cell chimerism was initially established
but rapidly decreased within 2 months after transplantation in the
control GFPv-transduced group, whereas high levels of chimerism were
maintained for up to 6 months after transplantation in the
HES-1Igv-transduced group in both myeloid and lymphoid lineages
(Figure 2B). Immunophenotyping of the bone marrow, spleen, and thymus
cells at 3 months after transplantation confirmed that donor chimerism
in these tissues was similar to that in the blood cells (data not
shown).
We next examined the ratios of KSL populations in the recipient bone
marrow. Recipient-derived (GFP
HES-1 maintains stem cell activity of 34 KSL cells, the most highly purified HSCs, which have
never been shown to be expanded or even maintained in vitro. Although
FL has often been used for retrovirus gene transfer directed to HSCs because infection efficiency is generally very low without it, it has
been reported that the use of FL is associated with the loss of
self-renewal capacity of KSL cells.37,38 Therefore, we
took advantage of omitting FL and used only SCF and TPO for HES-1IGv
and GFPv infection of 34 KSL cells (Figure
4A). Both viruses gave an infection
efficiency of no less than 20% (Figure 4B). For a competitive LTRA, we
also cultured 34 KSL for 48 hours in the same conditions
as those for the virus infection, except for the absence of virus. At
the end of the 48-hour culture period, most cells lost the
34 KSL phenotype in any virus-transduced and
virus-nontransduced group, as anticipated (data not shown). Even KSL
cells did not represent a major population in any groups.
Moreover, although the nontransduced 34 KSL-derived cells
kept the KSL phenotype at 16.7% to 24.9%, GFPv-transduced 34 KSL-derived cells kept the KSL phenotype at as low as
8.5% to 13.2%, probably reflecting the fact that only unquiescent and thus differentiation-prone cells are susceptible to retrovirus infection. In contrast, the ratio of KSL in the HES-1Igv-transduced 34 KSL-derived cells was 18.6% to 24.7%, which was as
high as that in the nontransduced 34 KSL-derived cells
(Figure 4C).
To better evaluate the effect of HES-1 on 34 The HES-1+ KSL population contains higher ratios of SP
and 34low/ cells in total
KSL were 14.6% and 32.0% in the recipient of the HES-1Igv-transduced
34 KSL-derived cell transplant (Figure
5A-B), and 10.7% and 27.3% in the
recipient of the GFPv-transduced 34 KSL-derived cell
transplant (data not shown), respectively. We then separated total KSL
into GFP (mostly virus-nontransduced donor
[competitor]-derived) and GFP+ (tester-derived)
fractions. Remarkably, ratios of SP and CD34low/ cells in
the GFP+ KSL population were 3.5- and 8-fold higher than
those in the GFP KSL population from the
HES-1Igv-transduced cell transplant recipient. In contrast, ratios of
SP and CD34low/ cells in the GFP+ KSL
population were much lower than those in the GFP KSL
population from the GFPv-transduced cell transplant recipient (Figure
5A-B). This indicated that HES-1IGv transduction preserved the KSL
cells characterized by the SP and CD34low/ profile,
suggesting that HES-1 stores the most immature HSCs without preventing
them from supplying mature blood cells.
To further investigate whether the greater ratios of SP and
CD34low/
In the present study, we demonstrate that retroviral transduction
of KSL and 34 Many investigators have introduced a gene of interest into bone marrow
and fetal liver cells by a retroviral gene transfer method and
transplanted the transduced cells to recipient
animals.39,40 These studies have described a number of
interesting phenotypes in the blood compartment of recipients, such as
those showing the development of leukemia and an increase or decrease
in hematopoiesis in a certain lineage, and aided understanding of the
roles of introduced genes in HSCs. However, with rare exceptions, the
use of highly purified HSCs for virus transduction is rare and it has
therefore been unclear which cells are transduced. Strictly, none of
the previous studies have directly proved the expansion or maintenance
of virus-transduced HSCs. A few reports22,41 have shown
multilineage hematolymphopoietic reconstitution in the recipient mice
with a sorted single HSC characterized by Lin HES-1 is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, which functions as a negative regulator for cell differentiation in various systems, such as neurogenesis,24,42,43 myogenesis,25,29 and hair cell formation,44 although it also induces cell differentiation in selected contexts, such as in glial cell differentiation.33 Down-regulation and up-regulation of HES-1, together with HES-5, in neuronal stem cells in developing mice indicate that this gene functions as a positive regulator of neuronal stem cell self-renewal.28 Our observation suggests that HES-1 has a similar effect on hematopoietic stem cells. In addition to its strong ex vivo maintenance capacity for
34 Recently, phenotypes of the recipients who received transplants of lineage-negative bone marrow cells introduced with HES-1 and HES-5, as well as active Notch-1, were reported.46 The phenotype of HES-1-transduced lineage-negative cell transplant recipients described in that report was similar to ours in that the recipients do not develop T-cell leukemia, in contrast to the fact that T-cell leukemia develops in active Notch-1-transduced lineage-negative cell transplant recipients.46,47 The finding in the previous report that the recipients had a greater number of clonogenic cells in bone marrow could be similar to our finding that immature clonogenic cells were maintained in vitro or that the recipients had a greater number of stem cells such as SP cells in bone marrow. However, there is a significant difference in the development of lymphoid cells in the recipients. In contrast to the results described in the previous report, we did not find any distortion in the lymphoid compartment of the HES-1-transduced HSC transplant recipients. This difference could be attributed to the difference in the experimental system. We used highly purified HSCs for retroviral gene transfer, implying that we transplanted much fewer numbers of HES-1-transduced committed progenitor cells. If less-purified bone marrow cells are used for retroviral transduction, it might be the case that the gene of interest is preferentially introduced into the committed progenitors such as T-cell progenitors, rather than into stem cells, and that in such cases the phenotype derived from progenitors rather than stem cells is prominent. Interestingly, HES-1 is a direct target of a transcriptional activator
complex comprising RBPJ and activated Notch in neurogenic, myogenic,
and lymphoid cells. Further, a growing body of evidence shows that
activation of Notch signaling results in prevention of differentiation.
We therefore expect that if ligands for Notch can efficiently
up-regulate HES-1 expression in 34 In the present study we show using several independent experimental designs that purified HSCs can be maintained ex vivo by HES-1 up-regulation. With technical improvement, the use of Notch ligands or other methods to up-regulate HES-1 carries strong promise for future clinical use.
We thank Y. Koyama of Becton Dickinson Hongo Laboratory for
assistance in SP analysis. We also thank T. Kitamura for the
pMY/IRES-EGFP retrovirus vector, T. Yoshimatsu for the
Submitted July 10, 2002; accepted October 4, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, October 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2051.
Supported in part by grants-in-aid from the Ministries of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology, and Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Hisamaru Hirai, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; e-mail: hhirai-tky{at}umin.ac.jp.
1. Till JE. Proliferation and differentiation of stem cells of the blood-forming system of the mouse. NASA CR-673. NASA Contract Rep NASA CR.; 1967:69-75. 2. Tsuji T, Itoh K, Nishimura-Morita Y, et al. CD34high+ CD38(low/-) cells generated in a xenogenic coculture system are capable of both long-term hematopoiesis and multiple differentiation. Leukemia. 1999;13:1409-1419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Nishikawa M, Tahara T, Hinohara A, Miyajima A, Nakahata T, Shimosaka A. Role of the microenvironment of the embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region in hematopoiesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;938:109-116[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 4. Nolta JA, Thiemann FT, Arakawa-Hoyt J, et al. The AFT024 stromal cell line supports long-term ex vivo maintenance of engrafting multipotent human hematopoietic progenitors. Leukemia. 2002;16:352-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
5.
Matsunaga T, Kato T, Miyazaki H, Ogawa M.
Thrombopoietin promotes the survival of murine hematopoietic long-term reconstituting cells: comparison with the effects of FLT3/FLK-2 ligand and interleukin-6.
Blood.
1998;92:452-461 6. Berger M, Fagioli F, Piacibello W, et al. Role of different medium and growth factors on placental blood stem cell expansion: an in vitro and in vivo study. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29:443-448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
7.
Shah AJ, Smogorzewska EM, Hannum C, Crooks GM.
Flt3 ligand induces proliferation of quiescent human bone marrow CD34+CD38- cells and maintains progenitor cells in vitro.
Blood.
1996;87:3563-3570
8.
Sui X, Tsuji K, Ebihara Y, et al.
Soluble interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor with IL-6 stimulates megakaryopoiesis from human CD34(+) cells through glycoprotein (gp)130 signaling.
Blood.
1999;93:2525-2532 9. Murray LJ, Young JC, Osborne LJ, Luens KM, Scollay R, Hill BL. Thrombopoietin, flt3, and kit ligands together suppress apoptosis of human mobilized CD34+ cells and recruit primitive CD34+ Thy-1+ cells into rapid division. Exp Hematol. 1999;27:1019-1028[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 10. Weinmaster G, Roberts VJ, Lemke G. A homolog of Drosophila Notch expressed during mammalian development. Development. 1991;113:199-205[Abstract]. 11. Ellisen LW, Bird J, West DC, et al. TAN-1, the human homolog of the Drosophila notch gene, is broken by chromosomal translocations in T lymphoblastic neoplasms. Cell. 1991;66:649-661[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 12. Del Amo FF, Smith DE, Swiatek PJ, et al. Expression pattern of Motch, a mouse homolog of Drosophila Notch, suggests an important role in early postimplantation mouse development. Development. 1992;115:737-744[Abstract]. 13. Weinmaster G, Roberts VJ, Lemke G. Notch2: a second mammalian Notch gene. Development. 1992;116:931-941[Abstract].
14.
Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ.
Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development.
Science.
1999;284:770-776 15. Shimizu K, Chiba S, Saito T, Kumano K, Hirai H. Physical interaction of Delta1, Jagged1, and Jagged2 with Notch1 and Notch3 receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;276:385-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
16.
Milner LA, Kopan R, Martin DI, Bernstein ID.
A human homologue of the Drosophila developmental gene, Notch, is expressed in CD34+ hematopoietic precursors.
Blood.
1994;83:2057-2062 17. Varnum-Finney B, Purton LE, Yu M, et al. The Notch ligand, Jagged-1, influences the development of primitive hematopoietic precursor cells. Blood. 1998;91:4084-4091. 18. Jones P, May G, Healy L, et al. Stromal expression of Jagged 1 promotes colony formation by fetal hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1998;92:1505-1511.
19.
Kaneta M, Osawa M, Sudo K, Nakauchi H, Farr AG, Takahama Y.
A role for pref-1 and HES-1 in thymocyte development.
J Immunol.
2000;164:256-264
20.
Karanu FN, Murdoch B, Gallacher L, et al.
The notch ligand jagged-1 represents a novel growth factor of human hematopoietic stem cells.
J Exp Med.
2000;192:1365-1372 21. Varnum-Finney B, Xu L, Brashem-Stein C, et al. Pluripotent, cytokine-dependent, hematopoietic stem cells are immortalized by constitutive Notch1 signaling. Nat Med. 2000;6:1278-1281[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Osawa M, Hanada K, Hamada H, Nakauchi H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science. 1996;273:242-245[Abstract].
23.
Sasai Y, Kageyama R, Tagawa Y, Shigemoto R, Nakanishi S.
Two mammalian helix-loop-helix factors structurally related to Drosophila hairy and enhancer of split.
Genes Dev.
1992;6:2620-2634
24.
Ishibashi M, Ang SL, Shiota K, Nakanishi S, Kageyama R, Guillemot F.
Targeted disruption of mammalian hairy and enhancer of split homolog-1 (HES-1) leads to up-regulation of neural helix-loop-helix factors, premature neurogenesis, and severe neural tube defects.
Genes Dev.
1995;9:3136-3148 25. Jarriault S, Brou C, Logeat F, Schroeter EH, Kopan R, Israel A. Signalling downstream of activated mammalian Notch. Nature. 1995;377:355-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Jarriault S, Le Bail O, Hirsinger E, et al.
Delta-1 activation of notch-1 signaling results in HES-1 transactivation.
Mol Cell Biol.
1998;18:7423-7431
27.
Tomita K, Hattori M, Nakamura E, Nakanishi S, Minato N, Kageyama R.
The bHLH gene Hes1 is essential for expansion of early T cell precursors.
Genes Dev.
1999;13:1203-1210
28.
Ohtsuka T, Sakamoto M, Guillemot F, Kageyama R.
Roles of the basic helix-loop-helix genes Hes1 and Hes5 in expansion of neural stem cells of the developing brain.
J Biol Chem.
2001;276:30467-30474 29. Shawber C, Nofziger D, Hsieh JJ, et al. Notch signaling inhibits muscle cell differentiation through a CBF1-independent pathway. Development. 1996;122:3765-3773[Abstract].
30.
Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC.
Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo.
J Exp Med.
1996;183:1797-1806 31. Goodell MA, Rosenzweig M, Kim H, et al. Dye efflux studies suggest that hematopoietic stem cells expressing low or undetectable levels of CD34 antigen exist in multiple species. Nat Med. 1997;3:1337-1345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 32. Zhou S, Schuetz JD, Bunting KD, et al. The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med. 2001;7:1028-1034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 33. Ishibashi M, Moriyoshi K, Sasai Y, Shiota K, Nakanishi S, Kageyama R. Persistent expression of helix-loop-helix factor HES-1 prevents mammalian neural differentiation in the central nervous system. Embo J. 1994;13:1799-1805[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 34. Yoshimatsu T, Tamura M, Kuriyama S, Ikenaka K. Improvement of retroviral packaging cell lines by introducing the polyomavirus early region. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9:161-172[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
35.
Onishi M, Nosaka T, Misawa K, et al.
Identification and characterization of a constitutively active STAT5 mutant that promotes cell proliferation.
Mol Cell Biol.
1998;18:3871-3879
36.
Kagami S, Nakajima H, Suto A, et al.
Stat5a regulates T helper cell differentiation by several distinct mechanisms.
Blood.
2001;97:2358-2365
37.
Ema H, Takano H, Sudo K, Nakauchi H.
In vitro self-renewal division of hematopoietic stem cells.
J Exp Med.
2000;192:1281-1288 38. Adolfsson J, Borge OJ, Bryder D, et al. Upregulation of Flt3 expression within the bone marrow Lin(-)Sca1(+)c-kit(+) stem cell compartment is accompanied by loss of self-renewal capacity. Immunity. 2001;15:659-669[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 39. Thorsteinsdottir U, Sauvageau G, Humphries RK. Enhanced in vivo regenerative potential of HOXB4-transduced hematopoietic stem cells with regulation of their pool size. Blood. 1999;94:2605-2612. 40. Izon DJ, Punt JA, Xu L, et al. Notch1 regulates maturation of CD4+ and CD8+ thymocytes by modulating TCR signal strength. Immunity. 2001;14:253-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
41.
Sato T, Laver JH, Ogawa M.
Reversible expression of CD34 by murine hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood.
1999;94:2548-2554 42. Kageyama R, Sasai Y, Akazawa C, et al. Regulation of mammalian neural development by helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1995;9:177-188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 43. Cau E, Gradwohl G, Casarosa S, Kageyama R, Guillemot F. Hes genes regulate sequential stages of neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Development. 2000;127:2323-2332[Abstract]. 44. Zheng JL, Shou J, Guillemot F, Kageyama R, Gao WQ. Hes1 is a negative regulator of inner ear hair cell differentiation. Development. 2000;127:4551-4560[Abstract].
45.
Bunting KD.
ABC transporters as phenotypic markers and functional regulators of stem cells.
Stem Cells.
2002;20:11-20 46. Kawamata S, Du C, Li K, Lavau C. Overexpression of the Notch target genes Hes in vivo induces lymphoid and myeloid alterations. Oncogene. 2002;21:3855-3863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
47.
Allman D, Karnell FG, Punt JA, et al.
Separation of Notch1 promoted lineage commitment and expansion/transformation in developing T cells.
J Exp Med.
2001;194:99-106
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
N. P. Rodrigues, A. S. Boyd, C. Fugazza, G. E. May, Y. Guo, A. J. Tipping, D. T. Scadden, P. Vyas, and T. Enver GATA-2 regulates granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cell function Blood, December 15, 2008; 112(13): 4862 - 4873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Tremblay, F. F. Huang, O. Habi, C. C. Huard, C. Godin, G. Levesque, and M. Carreau HES1 is a novel interactor of the Fanconi anemia core complex Blood, September 1, 2008; 112(5): 2062 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lahmar, C. Catelain, S. Poirault, M. Dorsch, J.-L. Villeval, W. Vainchenker, O. Albagli, and E. Lauret Distinct Effects of the Soluble Versus Membrane-Bound Forms of the Notch Ligand Delta-4 on Human CD34+CD38low Cell Expansion and Differentiation Stem Cells, March 1, 2008; 26(3): 621 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Blank, G. Karlsson, and S. Karlsson Signaling pathways governing stem-cell fate Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 492 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tanaka, T. Era, S.-i. Nishikawa, and S. Kawamata Forced expression of Nanog in hematopoietic stem cells results in a {gamma}{delta}T-cell disorder Blood, July 1, 2007; 110(1): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. O. Gudmundsson, L. Thorsteinsson, O. E. Sigurjonsson, J. R. Keller, K. Olafsson, T. Egeland, S. Gudmundsson, and T. Rafnar Gene Expression Analysis of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Identifies Dlg7 as a Potential Stem Cell Gene Stem Cells, June 1, 2007; 25(6): 1498 - 1506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tabe, L. Jin, Y. Tsutsumi-Ishii, Y. Xu, T. McQueen, W. Priebe, G. B. Mills, A. Ohsaka, I. Nagaoka, M. Andreeff, et al. Activation of Integrin-Linked Kinase Is a Critical Prosurvival Pathway Induced in Leukemic Cells by Bone Marrow-Derived Stromal Cells Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 684 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Fernandez-Majada, C. Aguilera, A. Villanueva, F. Vilardell, A. Robert-Moreno, A. Aytes, F. X. Real, G. Capella, M. W. Mayo, L. Espinosa, et al. Nuclear IKK activity leads to dysregulated Notch-dependent gene expression in colorectal cancer PNAS, January 2, 2007; 104(1): 276 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chadwick, M. C. Nostro, M. Baron, R. Mottram, G. Brady, and A.-M. Buckle Notch Signaling Induces Apoptosis in Primary Human CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Stem Cells, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, A. Crabbe, V. Van Duppen, and H. Vankelecom The Notch Signaling System Is Present in the Postnatal Pituitary: Marked Expression and Regulatory Activity in the Newly Discovered Side Population Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3293 - 3307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakagawa, M. Ichikawa, K. Kumano, S. Goyama, M. Kawazu, T. Asai, S. Ogawa, M. Kurokawa, and S. Chiba AML1/Runx1 rescues Notch1-null mutation-induced deficiency of para-aortic splanchnopleural hematopoiesis Blood, November 15, 2006; 108(10): 3329 - 3334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chiba Concise Review: Notch Signaling in Stem Cell Systems Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2437 - 2447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rizo, E. Vellenga, G. de Haan, and J. J. Schuringa Signaling pathways in self-renewing hematopoietic and leukemic stem cells: do all stem cells need a niche? Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R210 - R219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yu, J. K. Alder, J. H. Chun, A. D. Friedman, S. Heimfeld, L. Cheng, and C. I. Civin HES1 Inhibits Cycling of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells via DNA Binding Stem Cells, April 1, 2006; 24(4): 876 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hoebeke, M. De Smedt, I. Van de Walle, K. Reynvoet, G. De Smet, J. Plum, and G. Leclercq Overexpression of HES-1 is not sufficient to impose T-cell differentiation on human hematopoietic stem cells Blood, April 1, 2006; 107(7): 2879 - 2881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Delaney, B. Varnum-Finney, K. Aoyama, C. Brashem-Stein, and I. D. Bernstein Dose-dependent effects of the Notch ligand Delta1 on ex vivo differentiation and in vivo marrow repopulating ability of cord blood cells Blood, October 15, 2005; 106(8): 2693 - 2699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Burns, D. Traver, E. Mayhall, J. L. Shepard, and L. I. Zon Hematopoietic stem cell fate is established by the Notch-Runx pathway Genes & Dev., October 1, 2005; 19(19): 2331 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Murata, M. Hattori, N. Hirai, Y. Shinozuka, H. Hirata, R. Kageyama, T. Sakai, and N. Minato Hes1 Directly Controls Cell Proliferation through the Transcriptional Repression of p27Kip1 Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2005; 25(10): 4262 - 4271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ishiko, I. Matsumura, S. Ezoe, K. Gale, J. Ishiko, Y. Satoh, H. Tanaka, H. Shibayama, M. Mizuki, T. Era, et al. Notch Signals Inhibit the Development of Erythroid/Megakaryocytic Cells by Suppressing GATA-1 Activity through the Induction of HES1 J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4929 - 4939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iwata, N. Awaya, L. Graf, C. Kahl, and B. Torok-Storb Human marrow stromal cells activate monocytes to secrete osteopontin, which down-regulates Notch1 gene expression in CD34+ cells Blood, June 15, 2004; 103(12): 4496 - 4502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kunisato, S. Chiba, T. Saito, K. Kumano, E. Nakagami-Yamaguchi, T. Yamaguchi, and H. Hirai Stem cell leukemia protein directs hematopoietic stem cell fate Blood, May 1, 2004; 103(9): 3336 - 3341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||