| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on October 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0973.
IMMUNOBIOLOGY
From the Mater Medical Research Institute, South
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; the Mater Misericordiae Hospital,
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; the Princess Alexandra Hospital,
Queensland, Australia; and the Blood & Bone Marrow Transplant Service,
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.
Changes in blood dendritic cell (BDC) counts
(CD123hiBDC and CD11c+BDC) and expression of
CD62L, CCR7, and CD49d were analyzed in healthy donors, multiple
myeloma (MM), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, who received
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) containing peripheral
blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization protocols. Low-dose G-CSF in
healthy donors (8-10 µg/kg/d subcutaneously) and high-dose G-CSF in
patients (30 µg/kg/d) increased CD123hiBDC (2- to
22-fold, mean 3.7 × 106/L-17.7 × 106/L
and 1.9 × 106/L-12.0 × 106/L) in healthy
donors and MM but decreased CD11c+BDC (2- to 10-fold, mean
5.7 × 106/L-1.6 × 106/L) in NHL patients,
on the day of apheresis, compared with steady state. After apheresis,
CD123hiBDC counts remained high, whereas low
CD11c+BDC counts tended to recover in the following 2-5 days. Down-regulation of CD62L and up-regulation of CCR7 on
CD123hiBDC were found in most healthy donors and MM
patients. CD49d expression was unchanged. Thus, PBSC mobilization may
change BDC counts by altering molecules necessary for BDC homing from
blood into tissues.
(Blood. 2003;101:2314-2317) Dendritic cells (DCs) initiate and direct primary
immune responses and have attracted attention as cellular adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy. Two distinct subsets of blood dendritic cells
(BDCs) have been defined, the CD123hiCD11c BDC counts can be increased in healthy donors by several stimuli,
including surgical stress, exercise,10 and cytokines such as Flt3-ligand11,12 and granulocyte-colony stimulating
factor (G-CSF).13 G-CSF combined with chemotherapy is used
to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in patients undergoing
PBSC transplantation. It is possible that BDC counts may be increased during PBSC mobilization, which could provide an opportunity for BDC
harvesting for posttransplantation immunotherapy. Further data to
support or refute this hypothesis is crucial to plan the integration of
BDC harvesting with PBSC mobilization.14,15 An
understanding of BDC homing molecule expression patterns may also help
to further define mechanisms governing BDC trafficking and count
regulation. We report new data detailing sequential BDC counts, omitted
in previous studies,13 and changes in BDC homing molecules
induced by PBSC mobilization in healthy donors, multiple myeloma (MM),
and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients.
Blood samples
Flow cytometric analysis of BDCs
Effect of G-CSF or cyclophosphamide (CY)/G-CSF treatment on BDC counts We compared BDC counts in SS with those on DA and at various time points thereafter in healthy donors, MM, and NHL patients. It should be emphasized that our assessment of changes in BDC counts is the first report to examine individually paired samples, which allows interindividual variability to be assessed. We also, for the first time, examined the kinetics of BDC counts after PBSC collection to establish the timing of peak CD123hiBDC or CD11c+BDC counts.In healthy donors (7 of 8), low-dose G-CSF treatment increased
CD123hiBDC counts (2- to 22-fold, from a mean of
3.7 × 106/L in SS to a mean of
17.7 × 106/L on DA) and occasionally increased
CD11c+BDC counts on DA (Figure
1A). Maximal CD123hiBDC
counts coincided with peak CD34+ cell counts, predominantly
on DA (data not shown). Declining counts were noted 1 to 2 days
afterward. Maximal CD11c+BDC counts were found in SS or, in
some cases, 1 to 2 days after apheresis (Figure 1B).
In MM patients, considerable interindividual variability in CD123hiBDC counts on DA was observed, most likely due to differences in mobilization regimen (Table 1). Only MM patients, who received high doses of G-CSF treatment, increased CD123hiBDC on DA compared with SS (5 of 7, 2- to 22-fold, from a mean of 1.9 × 106/L in SS to a mean of 12.0 × 106/L on DA, Figure 1A, filled symbols). The increase in CD123hiBDC counts also coincided with peak CD34+ cell counts (data not shown), with a rapid decline 2 to 5 days after apheresis. CY/G-CSF treatment in MM patients had a variable influence on CD11c+BDC counts. Maximal CD11c+BDC counts varied, occurring either in SS, on DA, or 4 to 5 days after apheresis (Figure 1A-B). Despite receiving mobilization protocols of similar intensity, NHL patients produced lesser increases in BDC counts compared with MM patients. High CD123hiBDC counts were observed on DA in occasional NHL patients, with declining counts noted in the following 4 to 5 days (Figure 1B). In NHL patients, high doses of G-CSF treatment appeared to decrease CD11c+BDC counts to low levels on DA compared with SS (6 of 7, 2- to 10-fold, from a mean of 5.7 × 106/L in SS to a mean of 1.6 × 106/L on DA, Figure 1A, filled symbols). These counts tended to recover 4-5 days later (Figure 1B). Interestingly, another study, which defined BDC as CD80+/CD14+ cells, suggested that a G-CSF-containing PBSC mobilization protocol produced minimal increases in BDC counts compared with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor.16 The timing of CD123hiBDC harvesting appears to be optimal on the day of PBSC collection and for 2 to 5 days thereafter. It is striking that CD123hiBDCs were only increased in MM patients when high-dose G-CSF (30 µg/kg/d subcutaneously) was used. If CD11c+BDCs are considered the preferred cells for immunotherapy protocols, it may be prudent to harvest 4 to 5 days later, particularly in NHL patients. These data suggest that it seems possible to combine PBSC mobilization with BDC harvesting for posttransplantation immunotherapy, particularly if BDC counts are carefully monitored. Changes in the expression of CD62L, CCR7, and CD49d on BDC after G-CSF or CY/G-CSF treatment G-CSF may increase the blood count of several leukocyte populations, including CD34+ cells, by changing adhesion molecule expression17,18 or ligand interactions.19-23 Therefore, it is conceivable that G-CSF or CY/G-CSF treatment may contribute to changes in BDC counts by altering adhesion molecule and chemokine receptor expression. After G-CSF or CY/G-CSF treatment, considerable changes in expression of CD62L and CCR7 (but not CD49d) were noted on CD123hiBDCs, on DA compared with SS.Healthy donors, all of whom had low-dose G-CSF treatment (open symbols)
and the MM patients, who had high-dose G-CSF treatment (filled symbols)
increased CD123hiBDCs (Figure 1A). The small number of
study subjects precluded categoric conclusions, but changes in adhesion
molecule (CD62L) and chemokine receptor expression (CCR7) on
CD123hiBDCs appeared to be largely independent of G-CSF
dose. However, in most cases, the study subjects down-regulated CD62L
(2- to 28-fold) and up-regulated CCR7 (2- to 51-fold) (Figure
2).
In NHL patients, most of whom failed to increase CD123hiBDC counts after CY/G-CSF treatment, changes in CD62L expression on CD123hiBDCs were variable (Figure 2). However, down-regulation of higher SS levels of CCR7 expression was prominent. The apparent "mobilization" of CD123hiBDCs may be due to down-regulation of CD62L, with a subsequent inability of CD123hiBDCs to leave the blood and home to secondary lymphoid tissues.5,9 The association of "mobilized" CD123hiBDCs with CCR7 up-regulation in healthy donors and MM patients was unusual and not associated with BDC maturation.8 Of note, in MM and NHL patients, baseline levels of CCR7 expression were high, possibly as a result of disordered hematopoiesis due to prior marrow disease or cytotoxic therapy. The indirect contribution of G-CSF to the changes in CD62L and CCR7 on CD123hiBDC needs further investigation as in vitro exposure of BDCs to G-CSF did not induce the exact phenotype seen after in vivo G-CSF or CY/G-CSF treatment (data not shown). G-CSF and CY/G-CSF treatment minimally affected CD62L, CCR7, and CD49d on CD11c+BDCs. Occasional up-regulation of CD62L was seen on CD11c+BDCs on DA in NHL patients (data not shown). Of note, in all groups tested, in SS and on DA, BDCs showed an immature phenotype without expression of CD80, CD86, and CD83 (data not shown). These data may have implications for the therapeutic use of G-CSF and design of concurrent PBSC mobilization and BDC harvesting protocols.
Submitted March 28, 2002; accepted October 20, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, October 24, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0973.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Derek N. J. Hart, Mater Medical Research Institute, Aubigny Place, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane Qld 4101, Australia; e-mail: dhart{at}mmri.mater.org.au.
1. Robinson SP, Patterson S, English N, et al. Human peripheral blood contains two distinct lineages of dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:2769-2778[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Olweus J, BitMansour A, Warnke R, et al.
Dendritic cell ontogeny: a human dendritic cell lineage of myeloid origin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1997;94:12551-12556
3.
Robert C, Fuhlbrigge RC, Kieffer JD, et al.
Interaction of dendritic cells with skin endothelium: a new perspective on immunosurveillance.
J Exp Med.
1999;189:627-636
4.
Strunk D, Egger C, Leitner G, Hanau D, Stingl G.
A skin homing molecule defines the langerhans cell progenitor in human peripheral blood.
J Exp Med.
1997;185:1131-1136 5. Cella M, Jarrossay D, Facchetti F, et al. Plasmacytoid monocytes migrate to inflamed lymph nodes and produce large amounts of type I interferon. Nat Med. 1999;5:919-923[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Greaves DR, Wang W, Dairaghi DJ, et al.
CCR6, a CC chemokine receptor that interacts with macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha and is highly expressed in human dendritic cells.
J Exp Med.
1997;186:837-844 7. Sozzani S, Luini W, Borsatti A, et al. Receptor expression and responsiveness of human dendritic cells to a defined set of CC and CXC chemokines. J Immunol. 1997;159:1993-2000[Abstract].
8.
Sozzani S, Allavena P, D'Amico G, et al.
Differential regulation of chemokine receptors during dendritic cell maturation: a model for their trafficking properties.
J Immunol.
1998;161:1083-1086 9. Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Mantovani A. The role of chemokines in the regulation of dendritic cell trafficking. J Leukoc Biol. 1999;66:1-9[Abstract].
10.
Ho CS, Lopez JA, Vuckovic S, et al.
Surgical and physical stress increases circulating blood dendritic cell counts independently of monocyte counts.
Blood.
2001;98:140-145
11.
Maraskovsky E, Daro E, Roux E, et al.
In vivo generation of human dendritic cell subsets by Flt3 ligand.
Blood.
2000;96:878-884
12.
Pulendran B, Banchereau J, Burkeholder S, et al.
Flt3-ligand and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilize distinct human dendritic cell subsets in vivo.
J Immunol.
2000;165:566-572
13.
Arpinati M, Green CL, Heimfeld S, Heuser JE, Anasetti C.
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilizes T helper 2-inducing dendritic cells.
Blood.
2000;95:2484-2490
14.
Fearnley DB, Whyte LF, Carnoutsos SA, Cook AH, Hart DN.
Monitoring human blood dendritic cell numbers in normal individuals and in stem cell transplantation.
Blood.
1999;93:728-736 15. Nestle FO, Banchereau J, Hart D. Dendritic cells: on the move from bench to bedside. Nat Med. 2001;7:761-765[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 16. Gazitt Y, Shaughnessy P, Devore P. Mobilization of dendritic cells and NK cells in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with different growth factors. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2001;10:177-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 17. Bellucci R, De Propris MS, Buccisano F, et al. Modulation of VLA-4 and L-selectin expression on normal CD34+ cells during mobilization with G-CSF. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;23:1-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
18.
Prosper F, Stroncek D, McCarthy JB, Verfaillie CM.
Mobilization and homing of peripheral blood progenitors is related to reversible downregulation of alpha4 beta1 integrin expression and function.
J Clin Invest.
1998;101:2456-2467
19.
Lundell BI, McCarthy JB, Kovach NL, Verfaillie CM.
Activation-dependent alpha5beta1 integrin-mediated adhesion to fibronectin decreases proliferation of chronic myelogenous leukemia progenitors and K562 cells.
Blood.
1996;87:2450-2458 20. Bhatia R, Wayner EA, McGlave PB, Verfaillie CM. Interferon-alpha restores normal adhesion of chronic myelogenous leukemia hematopoietic progenitors to bone marrow stroma by correcting impaired beta 1 integrin receptor function. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:384-391[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 21. Bhatia R, McGlave PB, Verfaillie CM. Treatment of marrow stroma with interferon-alpha restores normal beta 1 integrin-dependent adhesion of chronic myelogenous leukemia hematopoietic progenitors: role of MIP-1 alpha. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:931-939[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 22. Papayannopoulou T, Nakamoto B. Peripheralization of hemopoietic progenitors in primates treated with anti-VLA4 integrin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:9374-9378[Abstract].
23.
Levesque JP, Takamatsu Y, Nilsson SK, Haylock DN, Simmons PJ.
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD106) is cleaved by neutrophil proteases in the bone marrow following hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Blood.
2001;98:1289-1297
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
E. S. Morris, K. P. A. MacDonald, and G. R. Hill Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF analogs: a rational approach to separate GVHD and GVL? Blood, May 1, 2006; 107(9): 3430 - 3435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rutella, F. Zavala, S. Danese, H. Kared, and G. Leone Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Novel Mediator of T Cell Tolerance J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7085 - 7091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Fagnoni, B. Oliviero, G. Giorgiani, P. De Stefano, A. Deho, C. Zibera, N. Gibelli, R. Maccario, G. Da Prada, M. Zecca, et al. Reconstitution dynamics of plasmacytoid and myeloid dendritic cell precursors after allogeneic myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Blood, July 1, 2004; 104(1): 281 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||