| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on October 31, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-1995.
PLENARY PAPER
From the Division of Hematopoiesis, Research Center for
Regenerative Medicine, Department of Hematology, and Institute of
Medical Sciences, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara,
Kanagawa, Japan.
To measure the ability of human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs),
the SCID-repopulating cell (SRC) assay has been widely used. Conventionally, human HSCs are transplanted into a nonobese
diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mouse via a tail
vein. However, those cells must go through various obstacles until they
reach the mouse marrow environment, which could explain the generally low homing efficiency in this system. Thus, the capability of HSCs may
not be studied accurately by this intravenous transplantation method. In our attempt to reveal actual SRC potential, ie, self-renewal and multilineage differentiation in recipient bone marrow, we introduced cells into mouse marrow directly (intrabone marrow [iBM])
to minimize the effect of factors that may interfere with the homing of
HSCs and compared the results obtained by intravenous and iBM methods.
When cord blood CD34+CD38 Measurement of human hematopoietic stem cell
(HSC) activity has been greatly facilitated by the development of
xenotransplantation assay. Especially, nonobese diabetic/severe
combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice have proven to be a reliable
recipient for detecting human hematopoietic-repopulating cells that
differentiate into multilineage mature cells and self-renew in
mice.1-3 Human hematopoietic-repopulating cells identified
in this assay, operationally defined as SCID-repopulating cells (SRCs),
have been shown to be enriched among an extremely rare
CD34+CD38 This assay, however, quite possibly underestimates human
hematopoietic-repopulating cell frequencies. When candidate human stem
cells are transferred by intravenous injection, cells travel into the
right atrium, ventricle, and lungs in which most of the cells are
trapped, then to the systemic circulation and lodge in organs according
to organ blood flow; therefore, only a small fraction of injected cells
can lodge in bone marrow (BM).5-8 The marrow
seeding efficiency of murine repopulating stem cells was reported
around 20%,9-11 and that of human stem cells in the sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mouse was even lower than in the syngeneic murine situation. van Hennik et al12
demonstrated that the seeding efficiencies of human CB
CD34+ cells in NOD/SCID mice were 4.4% by week 6 cobblestone area-forming cell (CFAC) assay and 2.3% by flow cytometry
analysis. Cashman and Eaves13 reported that the proportion
of total injected human CB competitive repopulating units (CRUs) in the
marrow of mice was 7%, as determined by limiting-dilution assays in
NOD/SCID mice.
To exclude stem cell homing interference (eg, stem cell trapping in
lung and/or liver, transendothelial migration step) and focus on the
phases of the stem cell and BM stromal cell interaction, we carried out
direct injection of human hematopoietic cells into mouse BM (intra-BM
[iBM] injection), as previously reported by Kushida et
al,14 and compared it with the SRC assay conducted by
intravenous injection. IBM injection is revealed to be sensitive and
adequate means to measure human HSC capability and enabled us to
investigate the interaction of HSCs and marrow environment in vivo directly.
Collection and purification of human CB CD34+
cells
NOD/SCID mice
Intrabone marrow or intravenous injection of human
hematopoietic cells
For in vivo blocking experiments, column-enriched whole CD34+ cells (> 95% purity, n = 10) were preincubated with 20 µg/mL antihuman-CXCR4 (12G5; BD Biosciences), antihuman-VLA-4 (HP2/1; Coulter/Immunotech), or antihuman-VLA-5 (SAM-1; Coulter/Immunotech) mAbs for 30 minutes on ice. After washing, 2 × 105 or 2 × 104 CD34+ cells were injected into mice intravenously or by iBM, respectively. All blocking antibodies used in this study were nontoxic to human CD34+ cells as determined by colony-forming assays and our stromal cell-dependent culture system as described previously (data not shown).17 For cell surface analysis, column-enriched CD34+ cells were again stained with APC-conjugated antihuman CD34 mAb and with FITC-conjugated antihuman-VLA-4, -VLA-5 mAbs, or PE-conjugated antihuman CXCR4 mAb. Cells labeled with mouse isotype control antibodies were used as negative control. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis was performed using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). Tracing of intrabone marrow-injected CD34+ cells Column-enriched CB CD34+ cells (> 95% purity, n = 16), washed once with PBS, were suspended in PKH diluent, and the PKH26 dye (Sigma) at 20 µM was added. Cells were incubated at room temperature for 3 minutes with gentle agitation. Fetal calf serum (FCS; 2 mL) was added to cell suspension to stop the reaction, and then cells were centrifuged and washed twice with alpha-minimal essential media containing 10% FCS. PKH26-stained cells, 106 cells per animal, were injected iBM or intravenously into irradiated NOD/SCID mice. Aliquots of cells were reserved for staining control. At 5 minutes and 20 hours after transplantation, BM samples were aspirated from the human cell noninjected side tibia through the knee joint, as previously described.18,19 Peripheral blood (PB) was aspirated from retroorbital sinus. After washing and hemolysis, samples were suspended in PBS containing propidium-iodide (PI) for flow cytometric analysis using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). Dead cells stained with PI were excluded from the analysis.Flow cytometric analysis Six to 9 weeks after transplantation, mice were killed, and BM, spleen, and PB were collected for analyzing the presence of human cells by flow cytometry. Human hematopoietic cells were distinguished from mouse cells by the expression of human CD45. BM cells were collected separately from tibia of human cell-injected side and noninjected side and suspended in PBS using a 27-gauge needle. Spleen was teased apart. PB was aspirated from retroorbital sinus. Samples were prepared as single cell suspensions in PBS containing 0.1% HSA and passed through a nylon filter to remove debris. Cells were stained with mAbs to human leukocyte differentiation antigens. FITC-conjugated antihuman CD34 (Coulter/Immunotech), CD14, CD19, CD33, CD56 (all BD Biosciences) mAbs, PE-conjugated antihuman CD38 (BD Biosciences), and APC-conjugated antihuman CD45 mAbs (Coulter/Immunotech) were used. Four-color flow cytometric analysis was conducted using FACSCalibur or FACSVantage (BD Biosciences). Quadrants were set to include at least 97% of the isotype-negative cells. Dead cells stained with PI were excluded from the analysis.Analysis of human cell engraftment in mice receiving transplants by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Genomic DNA was isolated from the BM of mice receiving transplants by standard extraction protocols. DNA samples (100 ng) were subjected to PCR to detect a 1171-bp fragment of human chromosome 17-specific -satellite using the primers: forward
5'-ACACTCTTTTTGCAGGATCTA-3' and reverse 5'-AGCAATGTGAAACTCTGGGA-3'
under the following conditions: 94°C for 2 minutes (1 cycle); 94°C
for 1 minute, 65°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 2 minutes (30 cycles);
and 72°C for 7 minutes (1 cycle). PCR was performed using the RNA PCR
kit (TAKARA SHUZO, Tokyo, Japan). PCR products were separated on 1.0%
agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The level of
human cell engraftment was determined by comparing the characteristic
1171-bp PCR product with that of human/mouse DNA mixture control
(detection limit of 0.001% human DNA).
Analysis of the integration site of lentivirally marked CD34+ cells Transduction of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) encoded gene to CD34+ cells by recombinant lentivirus infection was carried out as described previously.20 Briefly, CB CD34+ cells were prestimulated by incubating in StemPro-34 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing cytokines at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 hours. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (TPO; 50 ng/mL; kindly donated from Kirin Brewery, Tokyo, Japan), stem cell factor (SCF; 50 ng/mL; donated from Kirin Brewery), and Flk-2/Flt-3 ligand (FL; 50 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were used. Prestimulated CD34+ cells were cultured for 12 hours under the same conditions in the presence of highly concentrated lentiviral supernatant at an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 500. Lentiviral-infected CD34+ cells were transplanted into irradiated NOD/SCID mice by iBM injection. Genomic DNA was extracted from the injected side tibia, noninjected side tibia, and spleen of mice receiving transplants at 8 weeks after transplantation. DNA (10 µg) was digested with EcoRI, which recognizes a unique site in viral genome, and was electrophoresed on 0.7% agarose gel. After transferring to nylon membranes, DNA was hybridized with 32P-labeled random-primed EGFP probe.Secondary transplantation BM cells were obtained from tibiae and femurs of highly engrafted primary mice that received iBM transplants (23%-87% chimerism of human CD45+ cells, n = 10) at 6 weeks after transplantation, and cells were injected intravenously or by iBM into irradiated secondary NOD/SCID recipients. Six weeks after transplantation, presence of transplanted human cells in recipient tibiae was analyzed by flow cytometry, as was described for primary recipients.Statistical analysis Engraftment was determined positive when more than 0.01% human CD45+ cells in FACS or 0.01% human satellite PCR products in PCR were detected. For limiting dilution analysis, results of mice that received transplants scored positive by both methods were used. The data from several limiting dilution experiments were combined and used for analysis. The frequency of SRCs in the test BM sample was calculated by applying Poisson statistics to the proportion of negative recipients at different dilutions using L-Calc software (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Data are represented as mean ± SD. The 2-sided P value was determined, testing the null hypothesis that the 2 population medians are equal. P < .05 was considered significant.
Tracking intravenous or iBM transplanted human primitive hematopoietic cells We first examined the distribution of infused human primitive hematopoietic cells. PKH26-stained CB CD34+ cells (106 cells per mouse) were transplanted to irradiated NOD/SCID mice by direct injection into a BM cavity (iBM) or conventional tail vein infusion (intravenous). PB from retroorbital sinus and BM cells from noninjected side tibia were aspirated from each animal at 5 minutes and 20 hours after transplantation. The donor cells were detected by PKH26 fluorescence using FACS analysis (Figure 2A). As expected, PKH26+ donor cells appeared in the blood stream of intravenously injected animals at 5 minutes (0.6% ± 0.39%) and, albeit fewer, at 20 hours after transplantation (0.047% ± 0.025%). However, in the BM, intravenously injected donor cells could be detected only at 20 hours after transplantation (0.078% ± 0.016%) (Figure 2B). Because one tibia contains approximately 5% of the total BM cellularity of a mouse,21 a calculated seeding efficiency of intravenously injected PKH26+ donor cells at 20 hours after transplantation is 1.56% ± 0.32% and is consistent with a previous report by van Hennik et al12 However, in mice receiving iBM transplants, very few donor cells were present in the blood stream at both time points analyzed: 5 minutes (0.008% ± 0.008%), 20 hours (0.002% ± 0.004%). In addition, none, at 5 minutes, or very few, 0.006% ± 0.005% at 20 hours, of donor cells were detected in the noninjected side tibia (Figure 2B). The levels of iBM-transplanted PKH26+ cells in PB and left (noninjected side) BM were significantly lower than those of intravenously transplanted cells on either time points (P < .01). The results confirmed that there was little, if any, leakage of the injected cells when iBM strategy was used.
IBM injection of CB
Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells capable
of engrafting NOD/SCID mice, cells were transplanted by iBM or
intravenous injection for limiting dilution assay. In the
human-specific PCR-based method, mice were scored positive for
engraftment when more than 0.01% human DNA was detected in the murine
BM (detection limit of human DNA is 0.001%) (Figure 3C). In FACS analysis, more than 0.01%
of human CD45+ dots was considered positive. Statistical
analysis was performed using data from 84 recipients receiving
transplants of pooled CB from multiple donors (Figure 3; Table
1), and the frequency of human cells
capable of engraftment was calculated as described.4,22 As
determined by FACS and human DNA measurements, the frequency of CB
Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells capable
of engrafting NOD/SCID mice was 1 in 44 by iBM injection (95%
confidence intervals, 1 in 27 to 1 in 70). In contrast, the frequency
by intravenous injection (95% confidence intervals, 1 in 289 to 1 in
1510) was 1 in 660 Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells, which
is consistent with the previous report by Bhatia et al.4
By using the iBM transplantation method, more than 15-fold higher
frequency of human SRCs could be detected in NOD/SCID mice.
Higher levels of human hematopoietic cell engraftment by iBM injection The level of hematopoietic repopulation is a critical parameter in stem cell transplantation. Therefore, we compared the engraftment levels of mice that received transplants in both injection strategies using the same number of Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells.
Transplantation of CB
Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells into
NOD/SCID mice by iBM injection achieved higher levels of engraftment
than by intravenous injection in NOD/SCID mice (Figure 3; injected cell
number, 500 cells, P <.04; 100 cells, P < .03; 50 cells, P < .05). Furthermore,
the engraftment level of mice injected with 1000 cells by iBM was
significantly higher than those injected intravenously with 2000 or
5000 cells (2000 cells, P < .02; 5000 cells,
P < .05).
Multilineage differentiation and distribution of human hematopoietic cells in NOD/SCID mice that received transplants by iBM injection Multilineage differentiation of iBM-injected SRCs was observed in the injected side BM of NOD/SCID mice that received transplants, which included lymphoid CD45+CD19+ B cells, CD45+CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (Figure 4Aiii,v), and myeloid CD45+CD14+, CD45+CD33+ cells (Figure 4Aii,iv). In addition, presence of primitive Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells were
evident in the marrow of these mice (Figure 4Avi,vii). To examine the
distribution of reconstituted human hematopoietic cells in iBM or
intravenously injected NOD/SCID mice, BM cells were collected
separately from injected (right leg) and noninjected (left leg) side of
tibia. Lymphoid, myeloid, and stem/progenitor cell lineages are defined
as CD19+/CD45+ cells,
CD33+/CD45+ cells, and
CD34+/CD45+ cells, respectively. As shown in
Table 2, human hematopoietic cells with
the ability of lymphomyeloid differentiation were detected not only in
the injected side tibia but also in the noninjected side tibia, spleen,
and PB in all animals analyzed (Figure 4B; Tables
2-3). Multilineage differentiation was
also detected in mice with low chimerism of human cell (Table 2, mouse
iBM-injected mice 1, 8, 9). In the spleen, lymphoid cells were
85.64% ± 6.31% (iBM) and 90.65% ± 5.91% (intravenous), and
myeloid cells were 1.85% ± 1.13% (iBM) and 2.064% ± 1.59%
(intravenous). In the PB, lymphoid cells were 71.19% ± 6.23% (iBM)
and 74.84% ± 14.51% (intravenous), and myeloid cells were
4.16% ± 2.63% (iBM) and 8.21% ± 4.22% (intravenous) (data not
shown). Although 10 times more CD34+ cells were
transplanted by intravenous injection (2 × 105 cells),
the levels of engraftment were the same as the cases of iBM injection
(2 × 104 cells) (Table 2; iBM injected right tibia,
45.51% ± 26.96% versus intravenously injected BM,
27.98% ± 13.56% [mean percentage of sum of 2 legs],
P = .14). Human hematopoietic cells were also detected in
noninjected side tibia, spleen, and PB of
Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells
transferred to NOD/SCID mice (Table 3). As few as 5 Lin /lowCD34+CD38 cells
successfully engrafted in the noninjected side tibia (data not shown).
These results suggested that the engrafted human hematopoietic cells in
the injected side BM migrate to a noninjected BM by blood flow
circulation and differentiate into multilineage cells even when the
human hematopoietic cell chimerism showed low level.
Clonal analysis of engrafted human hematopoietic cells transplanted by iBM injection Relatively high frequencies of human hematopoietic cells found in noninjected BM might suggest that cells entering the blood stream because of the pressure applied in iBM procedure or release after engraftment in injected side tibia. Although we found little evidence of leakage (Figure 2), we proceeded in examining the clonalities of cells present in different hematopoietic organs. Retroviral gene marking provides the ideal tool for studies of clonal analysis because they randomly and permanently integrate into the genome of the host cell. Thus, each genomic integration site is a distinct clonal marker that can be used to trace the progeny of individual stem cells after transplantation.19,23-25 Therefore, we transduced the EGFP gene to CB CD34+ cells by lentiviral infection and transplanted them into NOD/SCID mice by iBM injection. Eight weeks after transplantation, BM and spleen were isolated and analyzed by flow cytometry. BM cells were isolated separately from tibiae of injected side and noninjected side. High frequencies of EGFP+ cells were demonstrated in the engrafted mice (61.16% ± 23.99%, n = 4) (Figure 5A). As shown in Figure 5B, common clones were evident among the injected side BM and other hematopoietic organs. The results suggest that HSCs, directly injected into BM, engraft in the marrow environment and migrate to other hematopoietic organs by mobilization through a systemic circulation.
Higher engraftment in secondary NOD/SCID mice that received transplants by iBM injection Self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells can be assessed by serial transplantation in SRC assay. A theory behind this assay is that stem cells which give rise to multilineage hematopoiesis in primary recipients are also capable of repeating this process in recipients of secondary transplants. The proportion of human cells in the secondary mice, however, is usually more than 10 times lower than in the primary mice. Consistent with previous studies, secondary mice that received intravenous transplants showed low levels of engraftment (Figure 6A). In contrast, engraftment levels in secondary recipients were significantly higher when they received transplants by iBM (Figure 6B; the reduction rate in chimerism from first to second recipients is 0.031 ± 0.018 in intravenous versus 0.546 ± 0.268 in iBM; P < .01). Thus, human cells recovered from BM of primary NOD/SCID mice that received iBM transplants possessed sufficient ability for consecutive multilineage engraftment in secondary recipients (Figure 6C), suggesting that human HSCs transplanted by iBM injection can self-renew in murine BM.
Engraftment of CD34+ cells by iBM injection is dependent on CXCR4, VLA-4, and VLA-5 Stem cell engraftment involves multistep processes, including activation of specific adhesion molecules. A number of studies have reported crucial roles of VLA-4, VLA-5, and other molecules in interaction of HSCs and microenvironment during homing and engraftment processes (reviewed in Prosper and Verfaillie26 and in Lapidot27). Up-regulation of these molecules through SDF-1-CXCR4 (stromal cell-derived factor 1 and CXC chemokine receptor 4) interaction is reported to increase homing and engraftment of primitive SRCs.27-29 Primitive human CB CD34+ cells express a chemokine receptor CXCR4 and major 1 integrin VLA-4
and VLA-5 (Figure 7A). The iBM
transplantation offers the opportunity to investigate the interaction
between stem cells and BM stromal cells in vivo by eliminating the
processes before entering marrow environment. To determine the in vivo
role of CXCR4, VLA-4, and VLA-5 during the engraftment process of human SRCs, enriched CB CD34+ cells were pretreated with
antibodies against the cell surface molecules mentioned and then
transplanted. When CB CD34+ cells were transplanted
intravenously, neutralizing antibodies to CXCR4, VLA-4, and VLA-5
completely blocked BM engraftment as described previously (Figure 7,
indicated as open circles, P < .01),27-29
whereas neutralizing antibodies to either VLA-4 or VLA-5 caused only
partial inhibition of engraftment in iBM transplants (Figure 7,
indicated as filled circles, P < .05). However, when CD34+ cells were pretreated with anti-CXCR4 or with both
anti-VLA-4 and anti-VLA-5 antibodies, human SRCs engraftment was
blocked completely (Figure 7, indicated as filled circles,
P < .01).
Primitive human hematopoietic cells can be assayed on the basis of
their ability to repopulate immune-deficient NOD/SCID mice and have
been termed SCID-repopulating cells (SRCs).1-3 By
using this human-to-mouse xenogeneic transplantation model, studies reported substantially low recoveries of SRCs.12,13 These
results imply that homing of primitive hematopoietic cells to the BM is nonselective and/or an inefficient process. A number of factors, such
as entrapment in liver and/or lung, molecular incompatibility between
human integrins and its ligands expressed on mouse, would interfere
with homing and engraftment of HSCs. Therefore, it has been speculated
that if one could eliminate such factors, SRC frequency should become
markedly higher than that reported previously.4,22,30 Here
we report that by introducing cells directly into the marrow environment with the use of the iBM method, the frequency of SRCs became more than 15-fold higher (1 in 44 Lin In addition, human hematopoietic cells with the ability of multilineage differentiation were detected in the noninjected side tibia, spleen, and PB (Figure 4; Tables 2-3). In our iBM strategy, there was little, if any, leakage of the injected cells into the peripheral circulation (Figure 2). In much the same way, recently Zhong et al,31 using the mouse-to-mouse intrafemur injection method, demonstrated that the donor murine cell in PB was undetectable at early points. At the late time points, transplanted donor cells in the noninjected femur were detected as the same level to the injected femur. In our experiments, however, engraftment in the noninjected BM tends to be low (Tables 2-3). The discrepancy may come from the lowering ability of human HSCs to home to the noninjected BM in xenoenvironment. Importantly, we confirmed the existence of common clones in the injected BM and other hematopoietic organs using a retroviral gene marking (Figure 5). We speculate that the human cells introduced directly into the murine marrow environment proliferate, migrate through a physiologic circulatory system, and engraft in other hematopoietic spaces. The level of chimerism may depend on the ability of proliferation and survival in each engrafted clone.19 Independent clones were also present in the injected side and the noninjected side of legs (Figure 5). There may be 2 possibilities: leakage of HSCs during iBM injection and behavioral differences in SRC clones engrafted in the injected BM. The results of our tracing experiments (Figure 2) strongly support the later possibility. Also, Wright et al6 demonstrated a dynamic circulation of HSCs. HSCs rapidly and constitutively migrate from BM to blood stream, and this circulation plays a physiologic role in the functional re-engraftment of another place of BM. Using this iBM method, we might shed light on the mechanisms of human HSCs homing (noninjected side BM) and engraftment (injected side BM). Self-renewal is a key characteristic of primitive stem cells and distinguishes them from short-lived progenitor cells. However, assessment of self-renewal in SRC assay requires transplantation into secondary recipients and has been difficult because of the lack of a sensitive and reliable method. Treatment of marrow cells derived from primary recipient mice with interleukin 6 (IL-6) and SCF up-regulated the surface expression of CXCR4 and resulted in higher engraftment levels than those of untreated cells when cells were transplanted in secondary recipients.28,29 Thus, the expression of CXCR4 appears essential for homing, and therefore engraftment, of human cells. In other words, reduced expression of CXCR4 and other homing-related molecules in primary-engrafted SRCs may be a reason for the diminished level of human cells in a secondary recipient. The iBM strategy we used in this study can disregard the effect of homing factors, and we successfully demonstrated high levels of engraftment and multilineage differentiation of HSCs in secondary recipient (Figure 6). Homing and lodgement of transplanted HSCs to recipient BM are critical steps in engraftment and initiation of marrow reconstitution. In the first phase "homing," transplanted cells must home to vascular sites and need to penetrate the basal lamina that is composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. In the second phase "lodgement," HSCs must stay in the appropriate niches of microenvironment where these cells survive, proliferate, and differentiate to reconstitute hematopoiesis, that is, "engraftment." Human HSC engraftment in NOD/SCID mice depends on the expression of the chemokine SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4.28,29,32 The SDF-1 activates the integrins lymphocyte function antigen 1 (LFA-1), VLA-4, and VLA-5 on human CD34+ cells. HSCs polarize and migrate through the ECM toward local gradients of SDF-1, which are produced by specialized stromal cells, and orient themselves through the different elements of the BM microenvironment and settle in the stem cell niches.27,29 Although previous studies showed the inhibition of engraftment in Ab blocking experiments,28,29,33,34 whether each molecule contributes to either the homing or lodgement step or both has not been clarified, because this system could not differentiate the homing and lodgement. Our iBM strategy is useful to evaluate lodgement as it bypasses the homing step. In line with the previous studies by Peled et al,28,29 intravenous injection of human CD34+ cells pretreated with anti-CXCR4, -VLA-4, and -VLA-5 mAbs resulted in complete inhibition of engraftment in NOD/SCID mice (Figure 7). However, the same researchers demonstrated that pretreatment with anti-integrin mAbs reduced homing, but not engraftment, of human cells into BM by approximately 30% to 50%.32 From these results, we hypothesize that VLA-4 and VLA-5, expressed on HSCs, are involved in part in both homing and lodgement processes. With the use of the iBM strategy, blocking of either VLA-4 or VLA-5 affected engraftment only partially, whereas neutralization of CXCR4 or VLA-4 and VLA-5 together completely inhibited human HSC engraftment (Figure 7). Therefore, engraftment requires interaction between integrins expressed on BM microenvironment and each VLA-4 and VLA-5 expressed on human HSCs. A number of in vitro studies suggested the importance of integrin-mediated signaling pathways for localization of HSC in BM microenvironment35-39 as well as survival and proliferation of human HSCs.40-43 To our knowledge, the results of our iBM strategy are the first to demonstrate directly the important in vivo roles of integrins and chemokine receptor for not only homing but also lodgement of HSCs in BM microenvironments. Further studies will determine the molecular mechanisms concerning the HSCs lodgement by our iBM strategy. We are in the process of examining the molecules participating only in HSC lodgement. Our study indicates that iBM transplantation is a method that can
accurately evaluate the innate ability of human HSCs. By using this
highly sensitive method, more primitive human hematopoietic stem cells,
including cells that have lower capability for homing, such as
Lin
We thank Dr Hiroshi Kawada for useful discussion, Hideyuki Matsuzawa and Tomomi Takanashi for technical assistance, Tomoko Uno for secretarial works, members of the animal facility of Tokai University, especially Mitsugu Hirano and Mayumi Nakagawa, for meticulous care of experimental animals, and members of Tokai Cord Blood Bank for their assistance.
Submitted July 8, 2002; accepted October 24, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, October 31, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-1995.
Supported by a grant-in-aid for a Research Grant of the Science Frontier Program from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Kiyoshi Ando, Department of Hematology, Tokai University School of Medicine Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan; e-mail: andok{at}keyaki.cc.u-tokai.ac.jp.
1. Larochelle A, Vormoor J, Hanenberg H, et al. Identification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating NOD/SCID mouse bone marrow: implications for gene therapy. Nat Med. 1996;2:1329-1337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
2.
Cashman JD, Lapidot T, Wang JC, et al.
Kinetic evidence of the regeneration of multilineage hematopoiesis from primitive cells in normal human bone marrow transplanted into immunodeficient mice.
Blood.
1997;89:4307-4316
3.
Hogan CJ, Shpall EJ, McNulty O, et al.
Engraftment and development of human CD34(+)-enriched cells from umbilical cord blood in NOD/LtSz-scid/scid mice.
Blood.
1997;90:85-96 4. Bhatia M, Wang JC, Kapp U, Bonnet D, Dick JE. Purification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating immune-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:53205325. 5. Cui J, Wahl RL, Shen T, et al. Bone marrow cell trafficking following intravenous administration. Br J Haematol. 1999;107:895-902[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
6.
Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP, Johnson FL, Weissman IL.
Physiological migration of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.
Science.
2001;294:1933-1936 7. Wagers AJ, Allsopp RC, Weissman IL. Changes in integrin expression are associated with altered homing properties of Lin(-/lo)Thy1.1(lo)Sca-1(+)c-kit(+) hematopoietic stem cells following mobilization by cyclophosphamide/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Exp Hematol. 2002;30:176-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
8.
Jetmore A, Plett PA, Tong X, et al.
Homing efficiency, cell cycle kinetics, and survival of quiescent and cycling human CD34(+) cells transplanted into conditioned NOD/SCID recipients.
Blood.
2002;99:1585-1593 9. Wolf NS, Kone A, Priestley GV, Bartelmez SH. In vivo and in vitro characterization of long-term repopulating primitive hematopoietic cells isolated by sequential Hoechst 33342-rhodamine 123 FACS selection. Exp Hematol. 1993;21:614-622[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Spangrude GJ, Brooks DM, Tumas DB.
Long-term repopulation of irradiated mice with limiting numbers of purified hematopoietic stem cells: in vivo expansion of stem cell phenotype but not function.
Blood.
1995;85:1006-1016
11.
van der Loo JC, Ploemacher RE.
Marrow- and spleen-seeding efficiencies of all murine hematopoietic stem cell subsets are decreased by preincubation with hematopoietic growth factors.
Blood.
1995;85:2598-2606
12.
van Hennik PB, de Koning AE, Ploemacher RE.
Seeding efficiency of primitive human hematopoietic cells in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune deficiency mice: implications for stem cell frequency assessment.
Blood.
1999;94:3055-3061
13.
Cashman JD, Eaves CJ.
High marrow seeding efficiency of human lymphomyeloid repopulating cells in irradiated NOD/SCID mice.
Blood.
2000;96:3979-3981
14.
Kushida T, Inaba M, Hisha H, et al.
Intra-bone marrow injection of allogeneic bone marrow cells: a powerful new strategy for treatment of intractable autoimmune diseases in MRL/lpr mice.
Blood.
2001;97:3292-3299
15.
Verstegen MM, van Hennik PB, Terpstra W, et al.
Transplantation of human umbilical cord blood cells in macrophage-depleted SCID mice: evidence for accessory cell involvement in expansion of immature CD34+CD38- cells.
Blood.
1998;91:1966-1976 16. Bonnet D, Bhatia M, Wang JC, Kapp U, Dick JE. Cytokine treatment or accessory cells are required to initiate engraftment of purified primitive human hematopoietic cells transplanted at limiting doses into NOD/SCID mice. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;23:203-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 17. Kawada H, Ando K, Tsuji T, et al. Rapid ex vivo expansion of human umbilical cord hematopoietic progenitors using a novel culture system. Exp Hematol. 1999;27:904-915[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 18. Verlinden SF, van Es HH, van Bekkum DW. Serial bone marrow sampling for long-term follow up of human hematopoiesis in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol. 1998;26:627-630[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 19. Guenechea G, Gan OI, Dorrell C, Dick JE. Distinct classes of human stem cells that differ in proliferative and self-renewal potential. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:75-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 20. Oki M, Ando K, Hagihara M, et al. Efficient lentiviral transduction of human cord blood CD34(+) cells followed by their expansion and differentiation into dendritic cells. Exp Hematol. 2001;29:1210-1217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
21.
Cashman JD, Eaves CJ.
Human growth factor-enhanced regeneration of transplantable human hematopoietic stem cells in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice.
Blood.
1999;93:481-487
22.
Wang JC, Doedens M, Dick JE.
Primitive human hematopoietic cells are enriched in cord blood compared with adult bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood as measured by the quantitative in vivo SCID-repopulating cell assay.
Blood.
1997;89:3919-3924 23. Dick JE, Magli MC, Huszar D, Phillips RA, Bernstein A. Introduction of a selectable gene into primitive stem cells capable of long-term reconstitution of the hemopoietic system of W/Wv mice. Cell. 1985;42:71-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 24. Keller G, Paige C, Gilboa E, Wagner EF. Expression of a foreign gene in myeloid and lymphoid cells derived from multipotent haematopoietic precursors. Nature. 1985;318:149-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 25. Lemischka IR, Raulet DH, Mulligan RC. Developmental potential and dynamic behavior of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 1986;45:917-927[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Prosper F, Verfaillie CM.
Regulation of hematopoiesis through adhesion receptors.
J Leukoc Biol.
2001;69:307-316 27. Lapidot T. Mechanism of human stem cell migration and repopulation of NOD/SCID and B2mnull NOD/SCID mice. The role of SDF-1/CXCR4 interactions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;938:83-95[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Peled A, Petit I, Kollet O, et al.
Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4.
Science.
1999;283:845-848
29.
Peled A, Kollet O, Ponomaryov T, et al.
The chemokine SDF-1 activates the integrins LFA-1, VLA-4, and VLA-5 on immature human CD34(+) cells: role in transendothelial/stromal migration and engraftment of NOD/SCID mice.
Blood.
2000;95:3289-3296 30. Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med. 1997;3:730-737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
31.
Zhong JF, Zhan Y, Anderson WF, Zhao Y.
Murine hematopoietic stem cell distribution and proliferation in ablated and nonablated bone marrow transplantation.
Blood.
2002;100:3521-3526 32. Kollet O, Spiegel A, Peled A, et al. Rapid and efficient homing of human CD34(+)CD38(-/low) CXCR4(+) stem and progenitor cells to the bone marrow and spleen of NOD/SCID and NOD/SCID/B2m(null) mice. Blood. 2001;97:32833291.
33.
Papayannopoulou T, Craddock C, Nakamoto B, Priestley GV, Wolf NS.
The VLA4/VCAM-1 adhesion pathway defines contrasting mechanisms of lodgement of transplanted murine hemopoietic progenitors between bone marrow and spleen.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1995;92:9647-9651
34.
Zanjani ED, Flake AW, Almeida-Porada G, Tran N, Papayannopoulou T.
Homing of human cells in the fetal sheep model: modulation by antibodies activating or inhibiting very late activation antigen-4-dependent function.
Blood.
1999;94:2515-2522
35.
Verfaillie CM, McCarthy JB, McGlave PB.
Differentiation of primitive human multipotent hematopoietic progenitors into single lineage clonogenic progenitors is accompanied by alterations in their interaction with fibronectin.
J Exp Med.
1991;174:693-703 36. Teixido J, Hemler ME, Greenberger JS, Anklesaria P. Role of beta 1 and beta 2 integrins in the adhesion of human CD34hi stem cells to bone marrow stroma. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:358-367[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
37.
Simmons PJ, Masinovsky B, Longenecker BM, Berenson R, Torok-Storb B, Gallatin WM.
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressed by bone marrow stromal cells mediates the binding of hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Blood.
1992;80:388-395
38.
Sanz-Rodriguez F, Hidalgo A, Teixido J.
Chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha modulates VLA-4 integrin-mediated multiple myeloma cell adhesion to CS-1/fibronectin and VCAM-1.
Blood.
2001;97:346-351 39. Hidalgo A, Sanz-Rodriguez F, Rodriguez-Fernandez JL, et al. Chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha modulates VLA-4 integrin-dependent adhesion to fibronectin and VCAM-1 on bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells. Exp Hematol. 2001;29:345-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
40.
Lataillade JJ, Clay D, Dupuy C, et al.
Chemokine SDF-1 enhances circulating CD34(+) cell proliferation in synergy with cytokines: possible role in progenitor survival.
Blood.
2000;95:756-768
41.
Cashman J, Clark-Lewis I, Eaves A, Eaves C.
Stromal-derived factor 1 inhibits the cycling of very primitive human hematopoietic cells in vitro and in NOD/SCID mice.
Blood.
2002;99:792-799
42.
Lataillade JJ, Clay D, Bourin P, et al.
Stromal cell-derived factor 1 regulates primitive hematopoiesis by suppressing apoptosis and by promoting G(0)/G(1) transition in CD34(+) cells: evidence for an autocrine/paracrine mechanism.
Blood.
2002;99:1117-1129
43.
Glimm H, Tang P, Clark-Lewis I, von Kalle C, Eaves C.
Ex vivo treatment of proliferating human cord blood stem cells with stroma-derived factor-1 enhances their ability to engraft NOD/SCID mice.
Blood.
2002;99:3454-3457 44. Bhatia M, Bonnet D, Murdoch B, Gan OI, Dick JE. A newly discovered class of human hematopoietic cells with SCID-repopulating activity. Nat Med. 1998;4:1038-1045[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
45.
Nakamura Y, Ando K, Chargui J, et al.
Ex vivo generation of CD34(+) cells from CD34(-) hematopoietic cells.
Blood.
1999;94:4053-4059 46. Osawa M, Hanada K, Hamada H, Nakauchi H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science. 1996;273:242-245[Abstract]. 47. Kushida T, Inaba M, Ikebukuro K, et al. Comparison of bone marrow cells harvested from various bones of cynomolgus monkeys at various ages by perfusion or aspiration methods: a preclinical study for human BMT. Stem Cells. 2002;20:155162.
© 2003 by The American Society of Hematology.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Z. Zeng, Y. Xi Shi, I. J. Samudio, R.-Y. Wang, X. Ling, O. Frolova, M. Levis, J. B. Rubin, R. R. Negrin, E. H. Estey, et al. Targeting the leukemia microenvironment by CXCR4 inhibition overcomes resistance to kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in AML Blood, June 11, 2009; 113(24): 6215 - 6224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Boehmler, A. Drost, L. Jaggy, G. Seitz, T. Wiesner, C. Denzlinger, L. Kanz, and R. Mohle The CysLT1 Ligand Leukotriene D4 Supports {alpha}4{beta}1- and {alpha}5{beta}1-Mediated Adhesion and Proliferation of CD34+ Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 6789 - 6798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Foguenne, I. Di Stefano, O. Giet, Y. Beguin, and A. Gothot Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic progenitor cells is associated with downregulation of {alpha}4 integrin- and CXCR4-mediated engraftment in NOD/SCID {beta}2-microglobulin-null mice Haematologica, February 1, 2009; 94(2): 185 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Dick Stem cell concepts renew cancer research Blood, December 15, 2008; 112(13): 4793 - 4807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Yahata, Y. Muguruma, S. Yumino, Y. Sheng, T. Uno, H. Matsuzawa, M. Ito, S. Kato, T. Hotta, and K. Ando Quiescent Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells in the Bone Marrow Niches Organize the Hierarchical Structure of Hematopoiesis Stem Cells, December 1, 2008; 26(12): 3228 - 3236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamamura, K. Ohishi, M. Masuya, E. Miyata, Y. Sugimoto, S. Nakamura, A. Fujieda, H. Araki, and N. Katayama Ex Vivo Culture of Human Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells Adversely Influences Their Distribution to Other Bone Marrow Compartments After Intra-Bone Marrow Transplantation Stem Cells, February 1, 2008; 26(2): 543 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kennedy, F. Barabe, A. G. Poeppl, J. C. Y. Wang, and J. E. Dick Comment on "Tumor Growth Need Not Be Driven by Rare Cancer Stem Cells" Science, December 14, 2007; 318(5857): 1722c - 1722c. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-L. Sellier-Leclerc, A. Duval, S. Riveron, M.-A. Macher, G. Deschenes, C. Loirat, M.-C. Verpont, M. Peuchmaur, P. Ronco, R. C. Monteiro, et al. A Humanized Mouse Model of Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome Suggests a Pathogenic Role for Immature Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 2732 - 2739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Inaba, Y. Adachi, H. Hisha, N. Hosaka, M. Maki, Y. Ueda, Y. Koike, T. Miyake, J. Fukui, Y. Cui, et al. Extensive Studies on Perfusion Method Plus Intra-Bone Marrow-Bone Marrow Transplantation Using Cynomolgus Monkeys Stem Cells, August 1, 2007; 25(8): 2098 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shi, J. Li, L. Liao, B. Chen, B. Li, L. Chen, H. Jia, and R. C. Zhao Regulation of CXCR4 expression in human mesenchymal stem cells by cytokine treatment: role in homing efficiency in NOD/SCID mice Haematologica, July 1, 2007; 92(7): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Li, H. Hisha, R. Yasumizu, T.-X. Fan, G.-X. Yang, Q. Li, Y.-Z. Cui, X.-L. Wang, C.-Y. Song, S. Okazaki, et al. Analyses of Very Early Hemopoietic Regeneration After Bone Marrow Transplantation: Comparison of Intravenous and Intrabone Marrow Routes Stem Cells, May 1, 2007; 25(5): 1186 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Chute, G. G. Muramoto, A. B. Salter, S. K. Meadows, D. W. Rickman, B. Chen, H. A. Himburg, and N. J. Chao Transplantation of vascular endothelial cells mediates the hematopoietic recovery and survival of lethally irradiated mice Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2365 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. McKenzie, K. Takenaka, O. I. Gan, M. Doedens, and J. E. Dick Low rhodamine 123 retention identifies long-term human hematopoietic stem cells within the Lin-CD34+CD38- population Blood, January 15, 2007; 109(2): 543 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fischer, M. Schmidt, S. Klingenberg, C. J. Eaves, C. von Kalle, and H. Glimm Short-term repopulating cells with myeloid potential in human mobilized peripheral blood do not have a side population (SP) phenotype Blood, September 15, 2006; 108(6): 2121 - 2123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Chute, G. G. Muramoto, J. Whitesides, M. Colvin, R. Safi, N. J. Chao, and D. P. McDonnell Inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase and retinoid signaling induces the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells PNAS, August 1, 2006; 103(31): 11707 - 11712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Tian, P. S. Woll, J. K. Morris, J. L. Linehan, and D. S. Kaufman Hematopoietic Engraftment of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Cells Is Regulated by Recipient Innate Immunity Stem Cells, May 1, 2006; 24(5): 1370 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ando, T. Yahata, T. Sato, H. Miyatake, H. Matsuzawa, M. Oki, H. Miyoshi, T. Tsuji, S. Kato, and T. Hotta Direct evidence for ex vivo expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells Blood, April 15, 2006; 107(8): 3371 - 3377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. V. Priestley, L. M. Scott, T. Ulyanova, and T. Papayannopoulou Lack of {alpha}4 integrin expression in stem cells restricts competitive function and self-renewal activity Blood, April 1, 2006; 107(7): 2959 - 2967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Hess, L. Wirthlin, T. P. Craft, P. E. Herrbrich, S. A. Hohm, R. Lahey, W. C. Eades, M. H. Creer, and J. A. Nolta Selection based on CD133 and high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity isolates long-term reconstituting human hematopoietic stem cells Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 2162 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Muguruma, T. Yahata, H. Miyatake, T. Sato, T. Uno, J. Itoh, S. Kato, M. Ito, T. Hotta, and K. Ando Reconstitution of the functional human hematopoietic microenvironment derived from human mesenchymal stem cells in the murine bone marrow compartment Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 1878 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Legrand, K. Weijer, and H. Spits Experimental Models to Study Development and Function of the Human Immune System In Vivo J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2053 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Pearce, D. Taussig, K. Zibara, L.-L. Smith, C. M. Ridler, C. Preudhomme, B. D. Young, A. Z. Rohatiner, T. A. Lister, and D. Bonnet AML engraftment in the NOD/SCID assay reflects the outcome of AML: implications for our understanding of the heterogeneity of AML Blood, February 1, 2006; 107(3): 1166 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Camargo, S. M. Chambers, E. Drew, K. M. McNagny, and M. A. Goodell Hematopoietic stem cells do not engraft with absolute efficiencies Blood, January 15, 2006; 107(2): 501 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Reynaud, E. Ravet, M. Titeux, F. Mazurier, L. Renia, A. Dubart-Kupperschmitt, P.-H. Romeo, and F. Pflumio SCL/TAL1 expression level regulates human hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and engraftment Blood, October 1, 2005; 106(7): 2318 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Adjali, R. R. Vicente, C. Ferrand, C. Jacquet, C. Mongellaz, P. Tiberghien, K. Chebli, V. S. Zimmermann, and N. Taylor Intrathymic administration of hematopoietic progenitor cells enhances T cell reconstitution in ZAP-70 severe combined immunodeficiency PNAS, September 20, 2005; 102(38): 13586 - 13591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lapidot, A. Dar, and O. Kollet How do stem cells find their way home? Blood, September 15, 2005; 106(6): 1901 - 1910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wang, P. Menendez, F. Shojaei, L. Li, F. Mazurier, J. E. Dick, C. Cerdan, K. Levac, and M. Bhatia Generation of hematopoietic repopulating cells from human embryonic stem cells independent of ectopic HOXB4 expression J. Exp. Med., May 16, 2005; 201(10): 1603 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kawada, J. Fujita, K. Kinjo, Y. Matsuzaki, M. Tsuma, H. Miyatake, Y. Muguruma, K. Tsuboi, Y. Itabashi, Y. Ikeda, et al. Nonhematopoietic mesenchymal stem cells can be mobilized and differentiate into cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction Blood, December 1, 2004; 104(12): 3581 - 3587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Christopherson II, G. Hangoc, C. R. Mantel, and H. E. Broxmeyer Modulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Homing and Engraftment by CD26 Science, August 13, 2004; 305(5686): 1000 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Chabner, G. B. Adams, J. Qiu, M. Moskowitz, E. S. Marsters, G. P. Topulos, and D. T. Scadden Direct vascular delivery of primitive hematopoietic cells to bone marrow improves localization but not engraftment Blood, June 15, 2004; 103(12): 4685 - 4686. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tavor, I. Petit, S. Porozov, A. Avigdor, A. Dar, L. Leider-Trejo, N. Shemtov, V. Deutsch, E. Naparstek, A. Nagler, et al. CXCR4 Regulates Migration and Development of Human Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Stem Cells in Transplanted NOD/SCID Mice Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 64(8): 2817 - 2824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kahn, T. Byk, L. Jansson-Sjostrand, I. Petit, S. Shivtiel, A. Nagler, I. Hardan, V. Deutsch, Z. Gazit, D. Gazit, et al. Overexpression of CXCR4 on human CD34+ progenitors increases their proliferation, migration, and NOD/SCID repopulation Blood, April 15, 2004; 103(8): 2942 - 2949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Mazurier, O. I. Gan, J. L. McKenzie, M. Doedens, and J. E. Dick Lentivector-mediated clonal tracking reveals intrinsic heterogeneity in the human hematopoietic stem cell compartment and culture-induced stem cell impairment Blood, January 15, 2004; 103(2): 545 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Scott, G. V. Priestley, and T. Papayannopoulou Deletion of {alpha}4 Integrins from Adult Hematopoietic Cells Reveals Roles in Homeostasis, Regeneration, and Homing Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2003; 23(24): 9349 - 9360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Weigel-Kelley, M. C. Yoder, and A. Srivastava {alpha}5{beta}1 integrin as a cellular coreceptor for human parvovirus B19: requirement of functional activation of {beta}1 integrin for viral entry Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 3927 - 3933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, T. Kimura, R. Asada, S. Harada, S. Yokota, Y. Kawamoto, Y. Fujimura, T. Tsuji, S. Ikehara, and Y. Sonoda SCID-repopulating cell activity of human cord blood-derived CD34- cells assured by intra-bone marrow injection Blood, April 15, 2003; 101(8): 2924 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||