| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on December 27, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2331.
HEMOSTASIS, THROMBOSIS, AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
From the Department of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis
Research, University of Vienna, Austria; Roche Diagnostics
GmbH, Vienna, Austria; Novartis Research Institute,
Vienna, Austria; Bio Molecular Therapeutics
(BMT) Research, Vienna, Austria; and Ludwig
Boltzmann Institute for Applied Cancer Research, Vienna,
Austria.
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is the main
fibrinolysis inhibitor, and high plasma levels are associated with an increased risk for vascular diseases. Inflammatory cytokines regulate PAI-1 through a hitherto unclear mechanism. Using reporter gene analysis, we could identify a region in the PAI-1 promoter that contributes to basal expression as well as to tumor necrosis factor Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is the
main inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activators (t-PAs) and
urokinase-type plasminogen activators (u-PAs) (reviewed in Binder et
al1 and Chapman2). It functions as a serine
protease inhibitor (SERPIN) by forming stable 1:1 stochiometric
complexes3 with its target proteases that are removed by
scavenger receptors.4 PAI-1 regulates intravascular
fibrinolysis and tissue proteolysis, and thereby controls thrombus
dissolution as well as invasion and migration of cells through the
extracellular matrix. PAI-1 is secreted by several tissues, including
the liver, adipose tissue, smooth muscle cells (SMCs), and endothelial
cells (ECs). ECs produce low amounts of PAI-1 under
normal resting conditions. PAI-1 is present only in low
concentrations (6-80 ng/mL) in normal human plasma. Elevated levels of
plasma PAI-1 found in several pathologic conditions are thought to
increase the risk for vascular complications such as
thrombosis5,6 or myocardial infarction.7
Indeed, PAI-1 mRNA levels are increased in atherosclerotic
vessels.8-10 Such local up-regulation of PAI-1 in vascular
tissues might be caused by several mechanisms, including
hypoxia,11 lipid mediators,12 and growth
factors,13,14 as well as inflammatory cytokines. Atherosclerosis is indeed regarded as a disease with a significant inflammatory component (reviewed in Libby et al15), and
PAI-1 expression is up-regulated by inflammatory mediators such as
tumor necrosis factor The PAI-1 promoter has been analyzed for the presence of transcription
factor consensus binding sites possibly responsible for its inducible
expression: best studied is the strong induction by TGF- Cell culture
Relative quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain
reaction (Q-PCR)
Nuclear run-on assay Nuclear run-on assays were performed as described.35 Nuclei were isolated from HUVECs that were either untreated or treated for 4 hours with 100 U/mL TNF .
The run-on reaction contained 1.5 × 107 isolated nuclei
and 250 µCi (9.25 MBq) [ 32P] UTP for
incorporation into the nascent pre-mRNA chains. PAI-1 and
glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) PCR
product (1 µg of each) was applied to Hybond-N (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) nylon membranes using a slot blot apparatus followed by
ultraviolet (UV) crosslinking. The labeled RNA was isolated from the nuclei using Trizol reagent, washed, and resuspended in DEPC H2O. Of each labeled RNA, 1.5 million cpm
was used for hybridization, and the membranes were exposed on
Phosphoimager plates (Amersham) for 3 days.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed as described.32 Confluent HUVECs were stimulated with 100 U/mL TNF for 2 hours. JURKAT were induced with phorbol
myristate acetate (PMA, 10 ng/mL) and ionomycin (0.5 µg/mL) for 2 hours, controls were induced with vehicle (1.1% dimethyl
sulfoxide [DMSO]). For the electrophoretic mobility shift
assay, 5 µg nuclear extracts of HUVECs were treated as indicated and
incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes, with
5 × 106 cpm/mL 32P (Amersham) of labeled
oligonucleotides representing the nucleotide (nt) 270 to
250 of the PAI-1 promoter, its single base mutations or the consensus
NGFI-B responsive element (NBRE). As a control, a competition assay was
performed by adding a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotide to the reaction prior to the addition of the labeled
probe. The rabbit anti Nur77 antibody E-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA) that recognizes the C-terminal parts of Nur77 and Nurr1
was used for supershifting. The samples were separated on a 5%
polyacrylamide gel. The gel was then dried and exposed to Phosphoimager
plates (Amersham).
One-hybrid screen Yeast one-hybrid screening was performed with the Matchmaker 1-Hybrid system (Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The "bait" was prepared by synthesizing 3 tandem copies of the nt 270 to 250 region that was
subcloned into pHISi (Clontech). The resultant plasmids were sequenced
for verification, transformed into the yeast strain YM4271, and
selected for integration in the his3 locus. Using a library
from activated lymphocytes (Clontech), 2 million transformants were
obtained. There were 5 clearly HIS-positive colonies, and 3 of
these contained inserts coding for Nur77; the other 2 were false positives.
Transfection of HUVECs Fragments of the human PAI-1 promoter (deletion series from nt 1520 to 80 ending at +20 and a 850 construct with deletion of the
bases from 250 to 270 NBRE]) were cloned into a luciferase expression vector, pUBT-luc.36 At 24 hours before
transfection, HUVECs were seeded in 6-well tissue-culture plates to
reach 80% to 90% confluence the next morning. Transient transfections
were performed by using the Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen) according to the protocol. Cells were incubated with transfection mixture containing 1.5 µg DNA (including a cytomegalovirus
[CMV]-beta-gal or CMV-renilla construct as internal control), 6 µL
Plus reagent and 4 µL Lipofectamine in a total volume of 1 mL medium
M-199 per well for 130 minutes. Induction with TNF (100 U/mL) was
performed the next day for 6 hours. Luciferase and beta-galactosidase
assays were performed with cellular lysates of transfected cells as
previously described.37 All experimental values were
determined from duplicate wells and were performed at least twice.
The constructs for overexpression of Nur77 contained the coding sequence for amino acids 1 to 580 for the full-length (wild-type [wt]) clone and 249 to 598 for the truncated (dominant negative) clone in the vector pCDNA3.1. The dominant-negative construct for immunocytochemistry contained the coding sequence for amino acids 248 to 598 in the vector pEGFP-C1 (Clontech), resulting in a fusion protein with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) on its N-terminus. As transfection control we used the empty pEGFP-C1. Immunohistochemistry For detection of PAI-1, mouse anti-PAI-1 (3PAI5; Technoclone GmbH, Vienna, Austria) diluted 1:50 was used, for Nur77 rabbit anti-Nur77 (M-210 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), diluted 1:100 was used. Secondary antibodies rabbit antimouse Alexa 488, goat antirabbit Alexa 488, and goat antimouse Alexa 568, all from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), were used diluted 1:2000 for immunocytochemistry and 1:300 for immunohistochemistry. Tissues were snap frozen and embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT; Miles Laboratories, Elkhart, IN). An anti-CD31 antibody (WM59 mouse monoclonal, TCS Cellworks, Botolph Claydon, Great Britain) was used to identify endothelial cells. Cryosections were fixed in acetone at 20°C and used for
standard immunodetection immediately.
TNF induces PAI-1 in endothelial cells, we
followed PAI-1 expression in HUVECs stimulated with TNF
using Q-PCR. PAI-1 mRNA levels increased after 1 hour and reached
10-fold higher levels after 4 hours (Figure
1A). We performed nuclear run-on assays
to ensure that this induced mRNA increase was due to de novo synthesis.
As shown in the inset to Figure 1A, treatment with TNF induced de
novo synthesis of PAI-1 mRNA, consistent with results reported
earlier.35 To analyze which part of the PAI-1 promoter
might be responsible for TNF -dependent induction, we constructed a
series of deletion mutants of the PAI-1 promoter (between
nucleotides [nt] 1520 and +20 relative to the transcription start) driving transcription of a luciferase reporter gene. When HUVECs
were transfected with these reporter gene constructs a 40-bp stretch
between nt 280 to 240 of the PAI-1 promoter could be identified as
critical for the small38 but consistent TNF -induced transcriptional activation in ECs (Figure 1B).
A nuclear protein complex binds from nt 280 to 240. The central region (nt
270 to 250) showed specific binding of a protein complex(es) when
incubated with nuclear extracts from HUVECs (Figure 1C). We therefore
used this 20-bp stretch (Figure 1D) of the PAI-1 promoter as bait in a
yeast one-hybrid screen using an activated lymphocyte cDNA fusion
library. We identified 3 positive clones, all containing the DNA
binding domain of the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77.
Nur77 binds to an NBRE in the PAI-1 promoter Upon analysis, we found that the PAI-1 promoter contains a putative NBRE (NGFI-B responsive element) from nt 261 to
254 also present in the oligonucleotides used for EMSA and in the bait sequence used for the yeast one-hybrid screen (Figure 1D). The
NBRE is a well-described binding site for Nur77 monomers, and binding
of Nur77 to this element has been shown to strongly activate
transcription of other genes.39,40
To establish that Nur77 binds to that site in the PAI-1 promoter, we
performed supershift assays after overexpressing a truncated Nur77 (amino acids 249-598, containing the DNA and
ligand-binding domains) in MCF-7 cells, which express low endogenous
amounts of Nur77. Lane 3 in Figure 2A
shows increased specific binding to the labeled PAI-1 oligonucleotide
(P) in transfected cells. This indicates that overexpression of Nur77
is sufficient to induce binding. Upon addition of an antibody
recognizing Nur77, the specific bands were retarded in the gel,
identifying the presence of Nur77 in the complex(es) bound to the
labeled oligonucleotide (Figure 2A, lane 5). The human T-cell leukemia
cell line JURKAT is known to express significant levels of Nur77 only
after stimulation,41 and indeed nuclear extracts of PMA-
and ionomycin-stimulated JURKAT cells exhibited specific
binding to the PAI-1 oligonucleotide (P, Figure 2A, lane 7),
which was also supershifted by the anti-Nur77 antibody (Figure 2A, lane
8). The differing positions of the antibody-supershifted bands in lane
5 compared with lane 8 can be explained by the fact that in MCF-7 cells
a shorter, truncated form of Nur77 was expressed, which still exhibited
full DNA binding activity,42 while JURKAT expressed a
wild-type Nur77. Binding of JURKAT nuclear extracts to the PAI-1
oligonucleotide was comparable with that of an oligonucleotide containing a canonical NBRE consensus site (5'-AAAAGGTCAAG-3' [Consensus NBRE, N], Figure 2A, lanes 11-14). Mutation of
the NBRE in the PAI-1 oligonucleotide from 5'-AGGTCA-3' (PAI-NBRE) to
5'-AGGACA-3' (PAI-T15A, T, Figure 1D), thereby destroying the most
conserved base of the consensus sequence, resulted in loss of binding
of the nuclear protein complexes to the oligonucleotide (Figure 2B,
lane 6). A part of the CTE (C-terminal extension) of Nur77, called the
A box, confers specificity for binding of Nur77 monomer to the NBRE.
This interaction is mediated by a stretch of 2 or more adenines located
5' from the NBRE.43,44 In order to analyze whether binding
of Nur77 to the NBRE in the PAI-1 promoter involves interaction with
the 5' adenines, we designed an oligonucleotide in which the original
site in the PAI-1 promoter was changed from 5'-GAAAGGTCA-3' (PAI-NBRE)
to 5'-GACAGGTCA-3' (PAI-A11C, A, Figure 1D). This mutation strongly
reduced binding of Nur77 to the oligonucleotide (Figure 2B, lane 8).
Taken together these data indicate that the PAI-1 promoter contains an
NBRE site that is a target for monomeric binding of Nur77 and that
Nur77 by itself is sufficient to induce specific binding.
TNF -stimulated cells
were used, indicating regulation of Nur77 by TNF (Figure 2B, lane
3); such increased binding activity resembles the results seen in
Figure 2A (lane 3) when Nur77 was overexpressed.
To assess whether in fact TNF
To test whether other inflammatory mediators also regulate Nur77 and
PAI-1 in a similar way, we performed experiments as shown in Figure 3A
using LPS (lipopolysaccharide) or IL-1 TNF (Figure 4A). Consistently, overexpression of Nur77
as well as TNF stimulation strongly induced a 4 ×NBRE luciferase
reporter gene construct (Figure 4B). Coexpression of a
dominant-negative mutant42 of Nur77 (dnNur77) reduced
basal reporter gene activity and completely abolished the up-regulation
of the reporter gene by TNF (Figure 4A). When a dnNur77 fused to
EGFP (dnNur77-EGFP) was transfected into HUVECs, followed by
stimulation with TNF for 4 hours, no PAI-1 expression was seen in
the transfected cells expressing the construct. Cells transfected with
EGFP alone or untransfected cells responded normally with PAI-1
expression to TNF stimulation (Figure 4C).
These data further indicate that the regulation of the PAI-1 promoter
as well as of PAI-1 protein by TNF Nur77 is present in atherosclerotic vessels and colocalizes with PAI-1 Having shown that TNF up-regulates Nur77 and in turn PAI-1
expression in ECs, we were interested to see whether Nur77 is also
up-regulated in atherosclerotic vessels in vivo. When normal or
atherosclerotic coronary arteries were stained for Nur77 and PAI-1, a
strong Nur77 signal was seen only in SMCs, macrophages, and
ECs (stained with antibodies against CD-31, Figure
5G) of the plaque area and of the
neointima and vessels of the adventitia. In these areas, PAI-1 staining
colocalized with Nur77 staining (Figure 5A-J). PAI-1 was additionally
seen in the extracellular matrix especially of the plaque (Figure
5D,F). Nur77 was also strongly up-regulated in the neointima (Figure
5L), while in the media only a scattered staining in SMCs was seen
(Figure 5M). This pattern of Nur77 staining is consistent with a model
in which inflammatory cells in the neointima release inflammatory
cytokines, which in turn induces Nur77 in SMC of the neointima and the
media.47 Our finding that inflammatory cytokines induce
Nur77 mRNA in cultured SMCs (not shown) supports this model.
Up-regulation of PAI-1 during inflammation has long since
been known to occur, and in fact, the deleterious outcome of sepsis was
for some time thought to be caused by the extremely high levels of
PAI-1 found under these conditions.48 However, the PAI-1 promoter is lacking consensus sequences for the inflammatory
transcription factor NF- We defined a consensus sequence in the proximal part of the
PAI-1 promoter for the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 that drives basal
transcription and is crucial for up-regulation of PAI-1 in ECs in
response to the inflammatory cytokine TNF Our data demonstrating that Nur77 expression is increased in
atherosclerotic vessels and colocalizes there with PAI-1 indicate the
importance of this mechanism also in vivo. Recent work by deVries et
al,53 who showed that Nur77 is found induced in a screen
for genes up-regulated by proatherogenic cytokines in smooth muscle
cells, supports our finding, as well as a report by Arkenbout et
al,54 demonstrating the involvement of the nuclear
receptor subfamily 4 in neointima formation in a mouse model. Nur77
(NAK-1, TR3) is a member of this nuclear receptor subfamily and the
human homolog55,56 of mouse Nur77 and rat NGFI-B. Nur77
was shown to be involved in T-cell receptor-induced
apoptosis42,57 and to be induced during B-cell
differentiation58 in response to growth
factors,59 mechanical stress,60 and dietary
fatty acids.61 We here show for the first time that the
transcription factor Nur77 is part of the TNF In conclusion, we have delineated the mechanism by which TNF
Submitted August 1, 2002; accepted December 10, 2002.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, December 27, 2002; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-07-2331.
Supported in part by grants from the Austrian Science Foundation within the program project grant F005 (projects no. 509 to B.R.B. and no. 512 to R.d.M.); by the Interdisciplinary Cooperation Project Program of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science, and Culture; and the competence center for Bio Molecular Therapeutics (BMT). Earlier work within this project was funded by grants from the Anton Dreher Foundation no. 234/93 and the Herzfeld-Foundation (P.H.).
F.G. and P.H. contributed equally to this work.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
Reprints: Bernd R. Binder, Department of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research, Schwarzspanierstr 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: bernd.binder{at}univie.ac.at.
1.
Binder BR, Christ G, Gruber F, et al.
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1: physiological and pathophysiological roles.
News Physiol Sci.
2002;17:56-61 2. Chapman HA. Plasminogen activators, integrins, and the coordinated regulation of cell adhesion and migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:714-724[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 3. Saksela O, Rifkin DB. Cell-associated plasminogen activation: regulation and physiological functions. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:93-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
4.
Stefansson S, Muhammad S, Cheng XF, Battey FD, Strickland DK, Lawrence DA.
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 contains a cryptic high affinity binding site for the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein.
J Biol Chem.
1998;273:6358-6366 5. Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC. PAI-1, obesity, insulin resistance and risk of cardiovascular events. Thromb Haemost. 1997;78:656-660[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]. 6. Genest J Jr, Cohn JS. Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors: targeting high-risk individuals. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:8A-20A[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
7.
Juhan-Vague I, Pyke SD, Alessi MC, Jespersen J, Haverkate F, Thompson SG.
Fibrinolytic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. ECAT Study Group: European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities.
Circulation.
1996;94:2057-2063
8.
Schneiderman J, Sawdey MS, Keeton MR, et al.
Increased type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor gene expression in atherosclerotic human arteries.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
1992;89:6998-7002 9. Salame MY, Samani NJ, Masood I, deBono DP. Expression of the plasminogen activator system in the human vascular wall. Atherosclerosis. 2000;152:19-28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
10.
Lupu F, Bergonzelli GE, Heim DA, et al.
Localization and production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in human healthy and atherosclerotic arteries.
Arterioscler Thromb.
1993;13:1090-1100
11.
Fink T, Kazlauskas A, Poellinger L, Ebbesen P, Zachar V.
Identification of a tightly regulated hypoxia-response element in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.
Blood.
2002;99:2077-2083
12.
Marx N, Bourcier T, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Plutzky J.
PPARgamma activation in human endothelial cells increases plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 expression: PPARgamma as a potential mediator in vascular disease.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
1999;19:546-551
13.
Wojta J, Nakamura T, Fabry A, et al.
Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 and tissue factor in HepG2 cells.
Blood.
1994;84:151-157
14.
Watanabe A, Kurabayashi M, Arai M, Sekiguchi K, Nagai R.
Combined effect of retinoic acid and basic FGF on PAI-1 gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells.
Cardiovasc Res.
2001;51:151-159
15.
Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A.
Inflammation and atherosclerosis.
Circulation.
2002;105:1135-1143
16.
van Hinsbergh VW, Kooistra T, van den Berg EA, Princen HM, Fiers W, Emeis JJ.
Tumor necrosis factor increases the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor in human endothelial cells in vitro and in rats in vivo.
Blood.
1988;72:1467-1473
17.
Emeis JJ, Kooistra T.
Interleukin 1 and lipopolysaccharide induce an inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator in vivo and in cultured endothelial cells.
J Exp Med.
1986;163:1260-1266
18.
Healy AM, Gelehrter TD.
Induction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in HepG2 human hepatoma cells by mediators of the acute phase response.
J Biol Chem.
1994;269:19095-19100
19.
Schleef RR, Loskutoff DJ, Podor TJ.
Immunoelectron microscopic localization of type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor on the surface of activated endothelial cells.
J Cell Biol.
1991;113:1413-1423
20.
de Boer JP, Abbink JJ, Brouwer MC, et al.
PAI-1 synthesis in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 is increased by cytokines 21. Paramo JA, Perez JL, Serrano M, Rocha E. Types 1 and 2 plasminogen activator inhibitor and tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with sepsis. Thromb Haemost. 1990;64:3-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
22.
Orbe J, Chorda C, Montes R, Paramo JA.
Changes in the fibrinolytic components of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells induced by endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1alpha.
Haematologica.
1999;84:306-311 23. Dennler S, Itoh S, Vivien D, ten Dijke P, Huet S, Gauthier JM. Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGF beta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene. EMBO J. 1998;17:3091-3100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
24.
Chen YQ, Su M, Walia RR, Hao Q, Covington JW, Vaughan DE.
Sp1 sites mediate activation of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter by glucose in vascular smooth muscle cells.
J Biol Chem.
1998;273:8225-8231 25. Motojima M, Ando T, Yoshioka T. Sp1-like activity mediates angiotensin-II-induced plasminogen-activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) gene expression in mesangial cells. Biochem J. 2000;349:435-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
26.
Arts J, Grimbergen J, Toet K, Kooistra T.
On the role of c-Jun in the induction of PAI-1 gene expression by phorbol ester, serum, and IL-1alpha in HepG2 cells.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.
1999;19:39-46 27. Knudsen H, Olesen T, Riccio A, Ungaro P, Christensen L, Andreasen PA. A common response element mediates differential effects of phorbol esters and forskolin on type-1 plasminogen activator inhibitor gene expression in human breast carcinoma cells. Eur J Biochem. 1994;220:63-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
28.
Mechtcheriakova D, Schabbauer G, Lucerna M, et al.
Specificity, diversity, and convergence in VEGF and TNF-alpha signaling events leading to tissue factor up-regulation via EGR-1 in endothelial cells.
FASEB J.
2001;15:230-242
29.
Cao XM, Guy GR, Sukhatme VP, Tan YH.
Regulation of the Egr-1 gene by tumor necrosis factor and interferons in primary human fibroblasts.
J Biol Chem.
1992;267:1345-1349
30.
Liu C, Yao J, de Belle I, Huang RP, Adamson E, Mercola D.
The transcription factor EGR-1 suppresses transformation of human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells by coordinated induction of transforming growth factor-beta1, fibronectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1.
J Biol Chem.
1999;274:4400-4411
31.
Christ G, Seiffert D, Hufnagl P, Gessl A, Wojta J, Binder BR.
Type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor synthesis of endothelial cells is downregulated by smooth muscle cells.
Blood.
1993;81:1277-1283
32.
Wrighton CJ, Hofer-Warbinek R, Moll T, Eytner R, Bach FH, de Martin R.
Inhibition of endothelial cell activation by adenovirus-mediated expression of I kappa B alpha, an inhibitor of the transcription factor NF-kappa B.
J Exp Med.
1996;183:1013-1022
33.
Wellmann S, Taube T, Paal K, et al.
Specific reverse transcription-PCR quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) splice variants by LightCycler technology.
Clin Chem.
2001;47:654-660 34. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E45[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].
35.
van Hinsbergh VW, Vermeer M, Koolwijk P, Grimbergen J, Kooistra T.
Genistein reduces tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 transcription but not urokinase expression in human endothelial cells.
Blood.
1994;84:2984-2991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||