Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 November 2003, Vol. 102, No. 10, pp. 3464.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

A specific test for polycythemia vera?

Distinguishing between polycythemia vera (PV) and other polycythemic disorders can be very challenging. Although the diagnosis of PV may be straightforward if patients have the classic criteria as defined by the Polycythemia Vera Study Group, often patients present with an incomplete phenotype. Thus, a simple, readily available laboratory test to establish a diagnosis of PV would be highly desirable. In this issue, Klippel and colleagues (page 3569) report the utility of polycythemia rubra vera-1 (PRV-1) mRNA quantification in granulocytes for discrimination of PV from other polycythemias. The authors also report that PRV-1 may be overexpressed in the neutrophils of some patients with thrombocythemia and idiopathic myelofibrosis; it remains to be established if some patients presenting with a thrombocythemia phenotype may in fact be early PV, as reported by Shih et al,1 and if those with PRV-1-positive idiopathic myelofibrosis have the spent phase of PV. These investigators have previously reported increased PRV-1 mRNA in PV granulocytes but not in their progenitors. The function of PRV-1 in normal hematopoiesis is unclear, as the amount of this protein does not differ between normal and PV cells.

However, quantification of PRV-1 mRNA may be a useful and specific diagnostic marker of PV. In PV, the EEC assay (endogenous erythroid colonies grown in in vitro cultures without erythropoietin) is specific in experienced hands, but it is not easy to standardize; it is labor intensive and requires expensive reagents. Similarly, assays of the clonality of circulating myeloid cells can be performed only in females, and not every female is informative for the X-chromosome-inactivation-based clonality studies. Other newly described PV abnormalities, such as platelet c-Mpl expression, are difficult to perform and available only in specialized laboratories. In contrast, the PRV-1 test is conceptually simple, has minimal inter- and intra-assay variation, and any competent laboratory equipped with the increasingly widely available real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) instrument should be able to perform it. However, occasional patients with congenital polycythemia2 and familial thrombocytosis3 were reported to have elevated PRV-1 levels, raising questions about its specificity. Thus, the usefulness and specificity of the PRV-1 test for PV diagnosis remain to be proved in prospective studies. However, due to its simplicity, the PRV-1 assay is attractive and it eventually may become the preferred PV test for all practicing hematologists.

--- Jaroslav F. Prchal, and Josef T. Prchal
McGill University, Baylor College
of Medicine, and the Houston
VA Medical Center

References

  1. Shih LY, Lee CT. Identification of masked polycythemia vera from patients with idiopathic marked thrombocytosis by endogenous erythroid colony assay. Blood. 1994;83: 744-748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Liu EL, Jelinek JJ, Pastore YD, Guan YL, Prchal JT. Discrimination of polycythemias and thrombocytoses by novel, simple, accurate clonality assays and comparison with PRV-1 expression and EEC assay. Blood. 2003;101: 3294-3301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Kralovics R, Buser AS, Teo SS, et al. Comparison of molecular markers in a cohort of patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Blood. 2003;102: 1869-1871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Prchal, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020