Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 November 2003, Vol. 102, No. 10, pp. 3693-3701.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on July 24, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1016.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2003-04-1016v1
102/10/3693    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brandes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Right arrow Cell Adhesion and Motility
Right arrow Chemokines, Cytokines, and Interleukins
Right arrow Gene Therapy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

IMMUNOBIOLOGY

Flexible migration program regulates {gamma}{delta} T-cell involvement in humoral immunity

Marlène Brandes, Katharina Willimann, Alois B. Lang, Ki-Hoan Nam, Chenggang Jin, Michael B. Brenner, Craig T. Morita, and Bernhard Moser

From the Theodor-Kocher Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland; Berna Biotech, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine and the Interdisciplinary Group in Immunology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City; and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
{gamma}{delta} T cells are inadequately defined both in terms of their migration potential and contribution to antimicrobial immunity. Here, we have examined the migration profile of human blood {gamma}{delta} T cells and related cell lines and correlated these findings with their distribution in secondary lymphoid tissues and their function in B-cell cocultures. We find that resting {gamma}{delta} T cells are characterized by an inflammatory migration program similar to cells of the innate immune system. However, T-cell receptor (TCR) triggering resulted in the rapid but transient induction of a lymph node (LN)-homing program, as evidenced by functional CCR7 expression and concomitant reduction in expression and function of CCR5 and, to a lesser degree, CCR2. Moreover, the LN-homing program was reflected by the presence of {gamma}{delta} T cells in gastrointestinal lymphoid tissues, notably in clusters within germinal centers of B-cell follicles. In line with these findings, V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR triggering resulted in prominent expression of essential B-cell costimulatory molecules, including CD40L, OX40, CD70, and ICOS. Furthermore, {gamma}{delta} T cells were shown to provide potent B-cell help during in vitro antibody production. Collectively, our findings agree with a role for {gamma}{delta} T cells in humoral immunity during the early phase of antimicrobial responses. (Blood. 2003; 102:3693-3701)


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The extraordinary conservation of the subset of T cells expressing V{gamma}V{delta}-T-cell receptors (TCRs) suggests a nonredundant but still poorly understood role in immune defense.1-5 The 2 major {gamma}{delta} T-cell subsets in human beings, defined by TCRs containing V{delta}1 or V{delta}2 chains, differ in their anatomic localization; V{delta}1+ T cells predominate within mucosal epithelia and skin whereas V{delta}2+ T cells are most numerous in peripheral blood. A function in antimicrobial immunity is supported by the dramatic expansion of human {gamma}{delta} T cells in response to a wide range of pathogens and by reduced {gamma}{delta} T-cell numbers and function during disease progression.4,5 Infectious disease models demonstrated a 2-stage involvement of {gamma}{delta} T cells, the first taking place during the innate phase of primary immune responses and the second being effective during wound repair after pathogen elimination.4,5 Recently, {gamma}{delta} T cells were postulated to contribute also to memory responses against mycobacteria.6

Lysates from a large variety of bacteria, parasites, and plants were shown to induce oligoclonal expansion of human V{delta}2+ T cells in vitro.3,4 However, {gamma}{delta} T cells differ fundamentally from {alpha}{beta} T cells in the types of antigens (Ags) they recognize. Human {gamma}{delta} T cells recognize small molecular weight nonpeptide Ags, stress- or tumor-induced self Ags, and the CD1 nonpolymorphic lipid Ag-presenting molecules.3,4,7 The principal pathogen-derived {gamma}{delta} T-cell Ags are isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and one of its metabolic precursors, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate (HMBPP).8-10 The simple mode of Ag recognition (apparent lack of requirement for Ag processing and major histocompatibility complex [MHC] restriction) and the chemical nature of these essential pathogen-specific metabolites suggest a pattern recognition type of Ag selectivity by human V{delta}2+ T cells.3,4,9 CD1-restricted Ag recognition mainly involves V{delta}1-TCRs and appears to participate in self-recognition of nonpolymorphic CD1 that may contribute to dendritic cell (DC) maturation11 (M.B.B. and D. Leslie, personal written communication, July 2002).

Responsiveness to microbial metabolic intermediates points to an immediate (as opposed to proliferation/differentiation-dependent) involvement of {gamma}{delta} T cells in antimicrobial processes. Therefore, the migration properties of {gamma}{delta} T cells may resemble those of monocytes and granulocytes that appear early at sites of infection. Chemokines are best known for controlling leukocyte localization during hematopoiesis, initiation of immune responses, and inflammation.12-14 Traffic patterns and the inflammatory function in leukocytes are largely defined by their chemokine receptor expression and migration profile. Chemokines are divided into 2 major subfamilies, the homeostatic and the inflammatory chemokines, and their distinctive roles are best exemplified in mature T cells.14-18 The homeostatic chemokines SLC/CCL21 13 and ELC/CCL19 are constitutively produced in T zones of secondary lymphoid tissues (such as lymph nodes [LNs], Peyerpatches [PPs], and spleen) and selectively attract CCR7-bearing leukocytes, including resting naive/memory T cells as well as Ag-loaded/mature DCs.19-23 Ag-driven T-cell priming and differentiation induces sequential changes in chemokine responsiveness.14,15,17,18 First, T-cell priming induces a follicular migration program by down-modulating responsiveness to the T-zone chemokines SLC and ELC and concomitant up-regulation of CXCR5, the selective receptor for the follicular chemokine BCA-1/CXCL13.24,25 CXCR5 is the signature chemokine receptor for follicular B helper T (TFH) cells.26-28 Second, further differentiation into effector T cells correlates with an inflammatory migration program for responsiveness to chemokines induced at inflammatory sites. Effector T cells in peripheral blood do not express CCR7 but instead express distinct combinations of receptors for inflammatory chemokines (including CXCR3, CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5).14,15 Naive and most memory T cells in peripheral blood do not respond to inflammatory chemokines and therefore are excluded from inflammatory processes in peripheral tissues. This migration profile clearly contrasts with the one seen in cells of the innate immunity, such as monocytes and granulocytes, which do not respond to T-zone or B-cell follicle chemokines but instead readily migrate in response to inflammatory chemokines.13-15

Here, we report the migration properties of peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells and related lines. Inducible LN-homing program, clustering in follicles of secondary lymphoid tissues, and potent B-cell helper activity provide strong evidence for an unexpected involvement of {gamma}{delta} T cells in the control of humoral immunity.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Reagents and antibodies

Synthetic chemokines (I-TAC, SDF-1, BCA-1, RANTES, MCP-1, EOTAXIN, MDC, MIP-1{beta}, LARC, and SLC) were prepared as described29 and kindly provided by I. Clark-Lewis, Vancouver, BC, Canada. MicroBeads coated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to CD4, CD14, or CD19 as well as with goat antimouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) and TCR{gamma}/{delta} isolation Kit were from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany. Mouse mAbs to CCR1 (53504.111), CCR2 (48607.211), CXCR5 (51505.111), and CCR7 (150503) and goat antibodies (Abs) to SLC (AF366) and BCA-1 (AF470) were from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; mouse mAbs to CCR3 (7B11), CCR5 (LS78-5C7), CCR7 (7H12), CXCR1 (LS33-7D9), CXCR2 (7-6C6.1), and CXCR3 (LS77-1C6.2) were from LeukoSite, Cambridge, MA; rat mAb anti-CCR7 (3D12) was from M. Lipp, Berlin, Germany; rabbit Ab anti-CXCR5 is described26; mouse mAbs to CCR4 (1G1), CCR5 (2D7), CCR6 (11A9), CXCR3 (1C6), CXCR4 (12G5), V{delta}2-TCR (B6.1), CD3 (UCHT1), CD4 (RPA-T4), CD8 (HIT8{alpha}), CD16 (3G8), CD19 (HIB19), CD20 (2H7), CD25 (M-A251), CD27 (M-T271), CD28 (CD28.2), CD29 (MAR4), CD45RA (HI100), CD45RO (UCHL-1), CD49d (9F10), CD56 (B159), CD62L (Dreg-56), CD69 (FN50), CDw70 (Ki-24), CD103 (Ber-Act8), and CD134 (ACT35) and rat mAbs to integrin {beta}7 (FIB504) and CLA (HECA-452) were from BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA; mouse mAbs to pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR (11F2), pan-V{alpha}V{beta}-TCR (WT31), and CD154 (89-76) were from Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA; mouse mAbs to pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR (5A6.E9) and V{delta}1-TCR (TS8.2) were from Endogen, Woburn, MA; goat Ab anti-pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR (A20) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; mouse mAb anti-pan-V{alpha}V{beta}-TCR (BMA 031) was from Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; mouse mAb anti-CD49d (44H6) was from Accurate Chemical and Scientific, Westbury, NY; mouse mAb to integrin {alpha}L (TS1-22) and {beta}2 (TS1-18) were from R. Pardi, Milano, Italy; mouse mAb anti-ICOS (F44) was from R. A. Kroczek, Berlin, Germany; mouse mAbs to V{delta}1-TCR (A13) and V{delta}2-TCR (BB3) were from M. B. Brenner, Boston, MA; and rabbit Ab anti-CD3 (A0452) and mouse mAb anti-CD21 (1F8) were from DAKO Diagnostics, Glastrup, Sweden. The following secondary Abs, conjugates, and control Ab were used: R-phycoerythrin (RPE)-conjugated goat antimouse IgG from DAKO; RPE-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO); biotin-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG from Amersham, Piscataway, NJ; biotin-conjugated donkey anti-rat IgG from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA; RPE as well as RPE-cyanine 5 (RPE-Cy5)-conjugated streptavidine (SA) from DAKO; rabbit control IgG from Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA; mouse control IgG1 (MOPC21) and goat control IgG (I-5256) from Sigma-Aldrich; and all other isotype-matching control Abs from BD PharMingen. Samples were analyzed on a FACScan from Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA.

Cell preparation and culture

Human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were isolated as described.26 Peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells and B cells were positively selected using the magnetic cell sorting system from Miltenyi Biotec. Tonsils from individuals undergoing tonsillectomy were mechanically dispersed, and lymphocytes were isolated by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque. Tonsillar {gamma}{delta} T cells were isolated by positive selection, and other lymphocyte subpopulations were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) as described.26 All cultures were performed in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate, 50 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 5 x 10-5 M 2-mercaptoethanol from GIBCO Invitrogen (Basel, Switzerland); 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan, UT) or from GIBCO Invitrogen; and 1000 IU/mL interleukin-2 (IL-2). Phytohemagglutinin-P (PHA-P) (1:4000 final dilution) from Difco (Detroit, MI) or, alternatively, isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) (50 µM) from Sigma-Aldrich presented by either Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B cells or autologous primary B cells were used to activate and expand {gamma}{delta} T cells. {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines were generated by periodic in vitro restimulation.

Functional assays

Chemotaxis and Ca2+ mobilization assays were performed as described.24,26 Membranes with pore sizes of 3 µm and 5 µm were used for resting and recently activated {gamma}{delta} T cells, respectively.

The ability of {gamma}{delta} T cells to provide B-cell help was studied essentially as described for TFH cells.26 After positive selection {gamma}{delta} T cells were cultured overnight in the presence of stimulating anti-pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR Ab; tonsillar B cells (CD4-CD45RO-CXCR5+) and {alpha}{beta} T cells (CD4+CXCR5+ and CD4+CXCR5-) were freshly prepared by FACS.26 Cocultures (96-well plates at 105 cells per well of each T and B cells) were preformed for 10 days in culture medium without addition of cytokines, and IgM, IgG, IgA, and IgE contents in the culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Immunohistochemistry

Biopsies from healthy donors and patients suffering from bacterial infections (yersiniosis, diverticulitis), Crohn disease, or tumor comprised samples of appendix, small intestine, colon, gastrointestinal draining LNs, and spleen. Tonsils were from patients undergoing tonsillectomy. Tissue samples were formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded. Freshly prepared 5 µm tissue sections were dewaxed and rehydrated. After pretreatment with 1 mg/mL proteinase from Streptomyces griseus (Sigma) in Tris (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane)-buffered saline (TBS) for 6 minutes at 37°C, blocking with human immunoglobulins (3 mg/mL; Sandoglobuline; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), swine or rabbit serum (10%; DAKO), and Tween 20 (0.01%), sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary Ab against pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR (A20, 5A6.E9), V{delta}1-TCR (A13), V{delta}2-TCR (BB3), CD3 (A0452), CD21 (1F8), SLC (AF366), BCA-1 (AF470), or isotype control Ab mouse IgG1 (MOPC21), goat IgG (I-5256), and rabbit IgG. Subsequent detection and visualization of bound Abs was performed by the ABC method as described26 or, alternatively, with a combination of secondary reagents using Texas red-, CyChrome- or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled conjugates for double-fluorescence microscopy. Mounted slides were analyzed with a Nikon Y-FL EPI-Fluorescence microscope (Melville, NY).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Rapid migration reprogramming during activation of in vitro-cultured {gamma}{delta} T cells

The migration potential of human {gamma}{delta} T cells was first determined in IPP-selective or PHA-responding {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines derived from PBLs. By contrast to freshly isolated blood {gamma}{delta} T cells, which contained 7% to 37% V{delta}1-TCR cells and 59% to 70% V{delta}2-TCR cells, IPP treatment selectively enriched for V{delta}2-TCR cells whereas the lines expanded by PHA stimulation still contained minor fractions (10% to 17%) of V{delta}1-TCR cells. Importantly, activation markers and chemokine receptor expression were similarly regulated in both types of cell lines (IPP- or PHA-responding) and, for sake of clarity, the data obtained with IPP-selective {gamma}{delta} T cells are shown. {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines uniformly expressed memory (CD45RO) and activation (CD69) markers but had low levels (less than 25% CD28, ICOS, CD70) or even lacked (CD40L, OX40) costimulatory molecules (not shown). Also, these {gamma}{delta} T cells expressed receptors for inflammatory chemokines that are typically found on effector/memory {alpha}{beta} T cells, most prominently CXCR3 (93% to 99%), CCR2 (15% to 58%), and CCR5 (59% to 98%) (Figure 1A).14 By contrast, homeostatic chemokine receptors CXCR4 (14% to 29%), CXCR5 (less than 5%), CCR4 (less than 5%), and CCR7 (less than 5%) that control lymphocyte traffic in primary and secondary lymphoid tissues were low or undetectable.14,16-18 In agreement with this pattern of chemokine receptor expression, {gamma}{delta} T cells showed vigorous migration and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization responses to inflammatory chemokines, notably I-TAC/CXCL11 (CXCR3) and RANTES/CCL5 (CCR1, CCR3, CCR5) but not lymphoid tissue chemokines, including SLC (CCR7) and MDC/CCL22 (CCR4) (Figure 1B-C). MIP-1{beta}/CCL4, MCP-1/CCL2, LARC/CCL20, SDF-1/CXCL12, and BCA-1 showed intermediate activity. Of note, migration but lack of Ca2+ mobilization responses was observed for BCA-1. Migration in response to BCA-1 was solely due to CXCR3 and could be blocked completely by anti-CXCR3 Abs (see the supplemental material on the Blood website; follow the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article). CXCR3 was recently shown to function as an alternative, low-affinity BCA-1 receptor in the absence of the primary receptor CXCR5.30 Together, resting (previously activated but postproliferating) {gamma}{delta} T cells are well equipped for rapid recruitment to inflammatory sites but not secondary lymphoid tissues. This situation was dramatically changed during {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation with IPP (or PHA; not shown). Receptors for secondary lymphoid tissue chemokines (CCR4, CCR7) were rapidly induced, reaching maximal levels at 1 to 2 days of culture, and these changes in chemokine receptor expression were fully matched by corresponding migration and Ca2+ mobilization responses (Figure 2A-B). Of note, maximal levels of these homeostatic chemokine receptors were reached well before the onset of cell proliferation (Supplemental Materials) and then declined to base levels during progression of cell culture. As in resting cells, CXCR5 was not detected during {gamma}{delta} T-cell stimulation. Conversely, responses to the inflammatory chemokines MCP-1, RANTES, and MIP-1{beta} (but not I-TAC) were reduced. Together, {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation resulted in an immediate acquisition of secondary lymphoid tissue-homing capabilities, which is the first indication that {gamma}{delta} T cells may have a role in adaptive immune responses.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.. nflammatory migration program in human peripheral blood-derived {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of chemokine receptors (open histograms) on resting (previously activated, nonproliferating), IPP-selective {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines derived from human peripheral blood. Filled histograms represent control staining with isotype-matched Abs, and numbers refer to the percent receptor-positive cells. (B) Chemotactic migration and (C) Ca2+ mobilization responses in resting IPP-selective {gamma}{delta} T cells. Migration data, expressed as the fraction (percent) of input cells that have migrated (± SD), correspond to maximal responses determined by titration of chemokine concentrations; BCA-1 was only active at the highest concentration (3 µM) tested. Maximal chemotaxis responses were obtained with 1 or 10 nM I-TAC, SDF-1, MCP-1, RANTES, MDC, and MIP-1{beta}; 100 nM eotaxin and LARC; 1 µM SLC; and 3 µM BCA-1. Ca2+ mobilization data correspond to 100 nM of chemokines. Functional data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.. Stimulation of cultured {gamma}{delta} T cells rapidly induces an LN-homing program. (A) Change in chemokine receptor expression during stimulation of peripheral blood-derived {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines with IPP. Positivity for CCR7 ({square}), CCR4 ({triangleup}), and CXCR4 ({circ}) was determined by flow cytometry as in Figure 1 and is expressed as the fraction (percent) of receptor-positive cells. (B) Chemotactic migration profile (±SD) of activated {gamma}{delta} T cells after 3 days of stimulation with IPP was examined as described in Figure 1. Asterisk points out that the migration response to LARC was examined with {gamma}{delta} T cells after 6 days instead of 3 days of stimulation, reflecting a delay in maximal CCR6 expression. One of 3 independent experiments is shown.

 

Peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T and {alpha}{beta} T cells are distinguished by opposite migration patterns

Next, we examined freshly isolated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T and {alpha}{beta} T cells. We found that the chemokine receptor profile in fresh {gamma}{delta} T cells closely resembled the one seen in resting {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines but differed fundamentally from that of fresh {alpha}{beta} T cells (Figure 3A). Receptors for inflammatory chemokines, notably CXCR3, CCR5, and to a lesser extent CCR2, were expressed at significantly higher levels in {gamma}{delta} T cells than in {alpha}{beta} T cells. In contrast, the LN-homing chemokine receptor CCR7 and follicular-homing chemokine receptor CXCR5 were expressed at lower levels or were absent in {gamma}{delta} T cells. CCR7 serves as a marker for LN-homing {alpha}{beta} T cells and is characteristic for peripheral blood naive and nonpolarized memory (termed central memory, or TCM) T cells 31,32; CCR7+ T cells with undefined migration properties do also exist in peripheral tissues and may reflect recently activated effector T cells.33-38 Accordingly, most peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T cells have the ability to continuously recirculate through secondary lymphoid tissues, whereas most peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells are excluded from these sites. Further, we found that CXCR5 was absent on freshly isolated {gamma}{delta} T cells, similar to cultured {gamma}{delta} T cells (Figure 1A) but in contrast to peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T (TFH) cells.26,27 Our CCR7 and CXCR5 expression data contrast with a recent report showing uniform but low-level expression of both LN-homing chemokine receptors in {gamma}{delta} T cells.39 The same antibody reagents as those used in this report39 plus 2 additional anti-CCR7 antibody reagents resulted in our hands in low but distinct (CCR7) or no (CXCR5) positivity (Figure 3B). Also, peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T cells used in control stainings showed the expected fractions of receptor-positive cells (Figure 3A). Finally, most blood {gamma}{delta} T cells expressed the necessary adhesion molecules ({alpha}4{beta}1, {alpha}4{beta}7, {alpha}L{beta}2, CD62L) for extravasation into peripheral mucosal tissues and associated lymphoid structures (Table 1).12 Thus, most peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells are characterized by an inflammatory migration program, which differs fundamentally from the LN-homing potential seen in most peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T cells.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.. {gamma}{delta} T cells and {alpha}{beta} T cells in peripheral blood differ fundamentally in their respective chemokine receptor expression profiles. (A) Dot plot diagrams show double staining data for CD45RO and chemokine receptors in freshly isolated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells (upper row) and {alpha}{beta} T cells (lower row). The data are representative of a study that included peripheral blood from a total of 19 donors. (B) {gamma}{delta} T cells and {alpha}{beta} T cells from the same donor blood differ substantially in their levels of cell surface CCR7 and CXCR5. Chemokine receptor staining data (open histograms) are plotted over control stainings with isotype-matched Abs (filled histograms). Bars define gates for receptor-positive cells, and numbers refer to the percent of receptor-positive cells. The Abs used in flow cytometric analysis are listed in parentheses and include 1 rat mAb (3D12) and 2 mouse mAbs (2H12 [PDB] , 150503) against CCR7 and 1 mouse mAb (51505.111) against CXCR5. The data are representative of a comparative analysis with peripheral blood T cells from 3 healthy individuals.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Expression of adhesion molecules in fresh and IPP-treated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells

 

Importantly, short-term stimulation altered the migration properties in several ways, and the corresponding changes in {gamma}{delta} T-cell chemokine receptor profiles are summarized in Table 2. As in cultured cells, stimulation of peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells with IPP (or PHA; not shown) rapidly induced CCR7 and instead dramatically down-modulated CCR5 and, to a lesser extent, CCR2 (Figure 4A). Further agreement with {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines is seen in unchanged high level of CXCR3 and lack of CXCR5 expression, whereas obvious differences relate to the prominent expression of CXCR4 on freshly isolated blood {gamma}{delta} T cells, which remained unchanged during stimulation with IPP, and the moderate induction of CCR4 expression. Of note, CXCR4 is well expressed on freshly isolated blood {gamma}{delta} T cells, whereas resting, cultured {gamma}{delta} T cells have low level of functional CXCR4 (Figure 1). Importantly, and in agreement with stimulated {gamma}{delta} T-cell lines, maximal expression of CCR7 was reached early (12 to 36 hours) during {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation and declined to base levels during subsequent cell culture, indicating that this chemokine receptor marks early activated as opposed to proliferating {gamma}{delta} T cells (Supplemental Materials). Of note, the reverse relationship in the regulation of inflammatory versus LN-homing chemokine receptors as a function of {gamma}{delta} T-cell stimulation (eg, CCR5 versus CCR7) is fully matched by changes in the migration responses to the corresponding chemokines (Figure 4B). Stimulation for 3 days did not affect the level and repertoire of adhesion molecules on {gamma}{delta} T cells (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. Chemokine receptor expression in fresh and IPP-treated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.. Rapid switch in the migration program during activation of freshly isolated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells. (A) Chemokine receptor expression is shown in freshly isolated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells (dashed lines) and activated {gamma}{delta} T cells after 36 hours of stimulation with IPP (bold lines). The control isotype Ab stainings (filled histograms) are shown for activated {gamma}{delta} T cells. Note the inverse regulation of CCR5 and CCR7 expression during {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation. (B) Chemotactic migration profile of activated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells after 36 hours of stimulation with IPP was examined as described in Figure 1. Maximal migration responses (±SD) were observed at 1 or 10 nM I-TAC, SDF-1, RANTES, and MDC; 1 µM SLC; and 3 µM BCA-1. One of 3 independent experiments is shown.

 

V{delta}1+ T cells represent a smaller proportion (7% to 37%) of {gamma}{delta} T cells in peripheral blood.1-5 They showed a similar migration profile as the majority fraction of {gamma}{delta} T cells, although the level of receptors for inflammatory chemokines showed a marked donor-to-donor variation (Supplemental Materials). Also, as seen in bulk {gamma}{delta} T cells, the LN-homing program was rapidly induced during stimulation of V{delta}1+ T cells. In summary, peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells acquire the ability to enter secondary lymphoid tissues during contact with Ag, thereby differing strikingly from most peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T cells, which enter these sites by default.

Localization of {gamma}{delta} T cells in epithelia-associated secondary lymphoid tissues

Ag-dependent induction of migration responses to the LN chemokines suggests that local activation of {gamma}{delta} T cells is reflected by their presence in involved secondary lymphoid tissues. This hypothesis was examined by immunohistochemical analysis of gastrointestinal LNs and intestinal mucosa-associated follicles of healthy or diseased donors as well as tonsils from tonsillectomy patients and of healthy spleen (Table 3). Indeed, {gamma}{delta} T cells were frequently detected in these tissues as demonstrated by immunohistochemical staining with pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR Ab of sections from a normal abdominal LN, and mucosa-associated lymphoid follicles, and a reactive LN from patients with Yersinia infection (Figure 5). Of note, single {gamma}{delta} T cells were broadly scattered in the T zone and marginal sinus area but, most conspicuously, were clustered in germinal centers as opposed to the mantle zone of B-cell follicles. {gamma}{delta} T cells in germinal centers of mucosal follicles were often oriented toward the epithelium. For comparison, control staining using Ab against the chemokines BCA-1 and SLC, which characterize follicular areas and T zone, respectively, revealed the expected patterns (Figure 5).19-21,25,26 A similar distribution profile was observed by using 2 different pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR-specific Abs as well as V{delta}1- and V{delta}2-TCR-specific Abs (Materials and methods), indicating that the 2 major {gamma}{delta} T-cell subsets do not differ significantly in their microanatomic localization within LNs (Supplemental Materials). {gamma}{delta} T cells clustering within the follicular dendritic cell (FDC) network of germinal centers and singular appearance among CD3+ cells in the T zone were also demonstrated by double-fluorescence microscopy (Figure 5D-E). {gamma}{delta} T cells were not detected in primary follicles (ie, follicles lacking germinal centers) but were present in some but not all reactive follicles of secondary lymphoid tissues (Table 3). Within healthy gut tissue, germinal centers of mucosa-associated lymphoid follicles were frequently positive for {gamma}{delta} T-cell clusters, and acute infections did not further increase their incidence, which may be related to the constant immune activities within this compartment against commensal bacteria and food Ag. However, reactive LNs of Yersinia-infected donors contained markedly more {gamma}{delta} T cells in their draining secondary follicles than LNs from healthy individuals. {gamma}{delta} T cells were always found in T zones of gastrointestinal LNs, and their distribution between T zone and germinal centers appears to be inversely related. LN tissue samples from 2 patients suffering from Morbus Crohn also contained follicular {gamma}{delta} T cells. Three of 5 tonsils were positive (ie, contained 1 or more {gamma}{delta} T cell-positive germinal center), and only 1 of 3 spleen specimens had secondary follicles, and some but not all of these secondary follicles contained {gamma}{delta} T-cell clusters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.. {gamma}{delta} T-cell distribution in gastrointestinal mucosa and draining lymph nodes, tonsil, and spleen

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.. {gamma}{delta} T cells cluster in B-cell follicles within secondary lymphoid tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue section from human biopsy specimen by means of bright field (A-C) and fluorescence microscopy (D-E). (A) Normal abdominal LN, (B) gut follicle from a patient with ileitis (Yersinia), and (C) draining LN from a patient with appendicitis (Yersinia). Red staining in panels A-C depicts positivity for {gamma}{delta} T cells using a goat Ab against pan-V{gamma}V{delta}-TCR or BCA-1 and SLC as indicated using mouse mAb, and IgG refers to negative control staining with isotype-matched unrelated Ab. (D-E) Assessment of {gamma}{delta} T-cell distribution in sections of an abdominal LN from a patient with yersiniosis. Double-fluorescence images show localization of {gamma}{delta} T cells in green, CD3+ T cells (D) and CD21+ FDCs (E) in red, and the corresponding superimposed images (overlays).

 

Collectively, {gamma}{delta} T cells are readily detected in secondary lymphoid tissues, notably in tight clusters within germinal centers of gastrointestinal LNs and mucosa-associated lymphoid follicles. Their relocation to secondary lymphoid tissues may be initiated at sites of microbial infections and suggests a role for {gamma}{delta} T cells in the initiation of antimicrobial LN activities.

{gamma}{delta} T cells provide help to follicular B cells

Clustering in germinal centers implies a role for {gamma}{delta} T cells in humoral immune responses. {gamma}{delta} T cells produce substantial amounts of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) and interferon-{gamma} (IFN-{gamma}) and, in some cases IL-4, which may affect B-cell responses.3-5 Here, we demonstrate that the costimulatory make-up on activated {gamma}{delta} T cells equips them well to provide cell-cell contact-dependent B-cell help. Freshly isolated peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells lack the T-cell activation marker CD69 and the costimulatory molecules CD40L (CD154), OX40 (CD134), ICOS, and CD70 (CD27 ligand) (all less than 5% positive) and showed weak expression of the lymphoblast marker CD25 (5% to 15%). Stimulation with IPP for 36 hours resulted in 69% to 86% CD69+ cells containing more than 50% blasts with uniform (100%) expression of CD25 (not shown) and substantial expression of CD40L (44% ± 16% [± SD]; n = 7), OX40 (80% ± 17% [± SD]; n = 3), ICOS (46% ± 21% [± SD]; n = 3), and CD70 (49% ± 15% [± SD]; n = 3) (Figure 6A). Of note, further culturing maintained or even increased the level of costimulatory molecules, reaching 54% ± 14% (± SD; n = 3) CD40L+ cells, 91% ± 1% (± SD; n = 2) OX40+ cells, 63% ± 17% (± SD; n = 4) ICOS+ cells, and 81% ± 15% (± SD; n = 4) CD70+ cells by 3 to 4 days of IPP stimulation. The delay in CD40L and ICOS up-regulation in {gamma}{delta} T cells is in obvious contrast to their rapid expression in {alpha}{beta} T cells,40-43 and long-term maintenance of all 4 costimulatory molecules strongly suggests a direct involvement of activated {gamma}{delta} T cells in follicular activities.44-55 This idea was further examined in {gamma}{delta} T-cell-B-cell coculture experiments. Coculture with {gamma}{delta} T cells resulted in substantial amounts of IgM, IgG, and IgA production (Figure 6B). Significant donor-to-donor variation in the level of Ab production was observed, which may have been due to variations in the state of preactivation among tonsillar B-cell preparations; however, the {gamma}{delta} T-cell helper effect was consistently seen and was at least as potent as the one obtained with the positive control TFH cells.26,27 Tonsillar TFH cells were recovered in a state of preactivation,26 and the {gamma}{delta} T cells were stimulated by {gamma}{delta}-TCR cross-linkage with an antibody before use in the B-cell coculture experiments. {gamma}{delta} T cell-mediated yield in Ab production was in the order of 0.51 ± 0.49 µg/mL for IgM, 1.61 ± 1.43 µg/mL for IgG, and 0.23 ± 0.24 µg/mL IgA, while IgE production was below detection (less than 0.01 µg/mL). Both, autologous (tonsillar) and heterologous (peripheral blood) {gamma}{delta} T cells were equally capable of providing B-cell help.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.. {gamma}{delta} T cells provide potent B-cell help. (A) Activation-dependent expression of costimulatory molecules in {gamma}{delta} T cells is delayed but sustained. Flow cytometric analysis of costimulatory molecules on peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells that were analyzed either immediately after isolation (top row) or after 36 hours (middle row) and 84 hours (lower row) of stimulation with IPP. Culturing of {gamma}{delta} T cells in the absence of TCR triggering (but in the presence of IL-2) did not result in marked expression of costimulatory molecules, as evidenced in cells at 84 hours of culture (dashed line). Control Ab stainings are shown in filled histograms. (B) {gamma}{delta} T cells induce Ab production during coculture with B cells. Tonsillar B cells were cultured alone (-)orin the presence of CXCR5-negative {alpha}{beta} T cells (TC), TFH cells (TFH), or peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells ({gamma}{delta} T) without addition of exogenous cytokines; after 10 days the Ab titers in the culture supernatants were determined by ELISA. One of 4 representative experiments is shown.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our study provides strong evidence of a direct role for {gamma}{delta} T cells in the control of humoral immunity. This conclusion is supported by a detailed migration analysis of peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells. Resting {gamma}{delta} T cells migrate very efficiently in response to the inflammatory chemokines I-TAC, MCP-1, and RANTES and uniformly express the corresponding receptors CXCR3, CCR2, and CCR5, whereas responsiveness to the LN chemokine SLC and expression of its receptor CCR7 are largely absent. CCR7 is the principal chemokine receptor for the steady-state circulation of peripheral blood T cells through secondary lymphoid tissues, as evidenced by mice lacking CCR7 or its specific ligands SLC and ELC.22,23 CCR7, together with CD62L, is used to define LN-homing T cells, including naive and TCM cells, which are characterized by their nonpolarized, noneffector phenotype.31,32 This paradigm applies to most peripheral blood {alpha}{beta} T cells, whose inflammatory involvement is secondary to their MHC-restricted recognition of Ag presented by T-zone DCs within secondary lymphoid tissues. By contrast, we show that most peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells lack CCR7 and, consequently, are not expected to recirculate through peripheral LNs and PPs by default. Instead, peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells are formidably equipped for instant relocation to inflammatory processes, which explains their early accumulation at sites of microbial infection.56,57 Low numbers of peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells express CCR7 and bear signs of preactivation, suggesting that they reflect ongoing immune activities (not shown).

Unexpectedly, activation by IPP (plus primary or EBV-transformed B cells) or PHA resulted in a rapid and transient switch in the {gamma}{delta} T-cell migration profile. Responsiveness to inflammatory chemokines and expression of corresponding receptors is largely replaced by the transient up-regulation of migration responses to the LN chemokines SLC and MDC, together with the expression of the corresponding receptors CCR7 and CCR4. Invariant and high-level expression of CXCR3 suggests a dual role for this chemokine receptor in regulating the relocation of peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells to sites of microbial infections as well as in recruiting activated {gamma}{delta} T cells to draining (reactive) LNs.14,15,58 In accordance with resting blood {alpha}{beta} T cells and tissue-derived mature DCs, we propose that activated {gamma}{delta} T cells find their way into reactive LNs via the expression of cell surface CCR7 and the responsiveness to the LN chemokines SLC and ELC.19-23 Their further relocation from the T zone into the B-cell compartments may be controlled by follicular chemokines, such as mantle zone BCA-1 targeting CXCR5 and, alternatively, CXCR3,26-28,30 and B cell-derived MDC acting on CCR4.59,60 We have no obvious explanation for the discrepancy in CCR7 and CXCR5 expression on peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells between our study and a recent report.39 However, another study dealing with V{delta}2+ T-cell numbers in immunocompromised and healthy individuals supports our finding about the low-level expression of CCR7 in peripheral blood {gamma}{delta} T cells61; unfortunately, changes in expression of CCR7 or modulation of migration properties during {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation were not examined. Collectively, we demonstrate that {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation resulted in the partial substitution of the inherent inflammatory homing capabilities for an immediate and transient LN-homing program. Possibly, the ability of {gamma}{delta} T cells to enter LNs is initiated during contact with microbial Ag at inflammatory sites.

What is the role of {gamma}{delta} T cells in secondary lymphoid tissues? {gamma}{delta} T cells may influence local immune processes through cell-to-cell contact or, alternatively, by providing cytokines. The former view is strongly supported by the remarkable level of costimulatory molecules present on activated but not resting {gamma}{delta} T cells, including CD40L, OX40, ICOS, and CD70, whose essential function in humoral immunity is well documented.44-55 By contrast to {alpha}{beta} T cells, costimulatory molecules are induced late during {gamma}{delta} T-cell activation and persist at high levels for more than 3 days, a finding that may be of crucial importance for the function of {gamma}{delta} T cells in controlling adaptive immune processes within germinal centers. Further, we show that {gamma}{delta} T cells are at least as effective as TFH cells in providing B-cell help,26,27 as evidenced by Ab production during coculture with B cells. Indeed, experiments in {alpha}{beta} T cell-deficient (TCR{alpha}-/-, TCR{beta}-/-) mice demonstrated a nonredundant role for {gamma}{delta} T cells in the generation of antimicrobial Abs62,63 and autoantibodies.62,64-66 Because {gamma}{delta} T cell-deficient mice do not show obvious defects in IgM and IgG Ab production, {gamma}{delta} T cells may have a modulatory as opposed to primary function in the control of humoral immunity. Ab production was also shown in in vitro cultures of human {gamma}{delta} T cells with B cells,67-70 but the outcome (level of Ab production) was moderate and the mechanisms underlying the observed B-cell help were not examined.

Contribution of {gamma}{delta} T cells to follicular activities may occur early during microbial infections, well before adaptive ({alpha}{beta} T cell-dependent) defenses come into play. Recently, we have observed that {gamma}{delta} T cells also induce DC maturation, further implicating their influence in early stages of antimicrobial immunity (M.B.B. and D. Leslie, personal written communication, July 2002). Follicular localization together with excellent provision of costimulation suggests that {gamma}{delta} T cells contribute to humoral immunity. We postulate that the innate response of {gamma}{delta} T cells, including their LN-homing and follicular activities, precedes the generation of an {alpha}{beta} T cell-driven immune response, which depends on a series of time-consuming steps, including Ag uptake and processing by tissue DCs, their relocation to draining LNs, and subsequent T-cell priming and effector cell development. In support, {gamma}{delta} T cells were found early at sites of infection, and their numbers decreased during disease progression.56,57

Thus, {gamma}{delta} T cells may influence the subsequent adaptive immune responses through interaction with peripheral DCs and B cells in reactive secondary lymphoid tissues. The rapid activation-dependent switch in homing characteristics provides new important insights into the role of {gamma}{delta} T cells in antimicrobial immune responses and clearly puts them apart from any other type of innate cells.


    Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to I. Clark-Lewis for providing chemokines, to LeukoSite for Abs to diverse chemokine receptors, and to R. Pardi, M. Lipp, and R. A. Kroczek for Abs to {alpha}L{beta}2, CCR7, and ICOS, respectively. We acknowledge the invaluable help by M. Caversaccio and L. Mazzucchelli for human tissue samples and K. Baltensperger for help in fluorescence microscopy.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted April 3, 2003; accepted July 9, 2003.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, July 24, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1016.

Supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (31-055996.98 [B.M.] and 32-57616.99 [M.B.]) and from the Bundesamt für Bildung und Wissenschaft (99.0471-5) (B.M.).

The online version of the article contains a data supplement.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Bernhard Moser, Theodor-Kocher Institute, University of Bern, PO Box 99, CH-3000 Bern 9, Switzerland; e-mail: bernhard.moser{at}tki.unibe.ch.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hein WR, Mackay CR. Prominence of {gamma}{delta} T cells in the ruminant immune system. Immunol Today. 1991;12: 30-34.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Haas W, Pereira P, Tonegawa S. {gamma}/{delta} cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11: 637-685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Morita CT, Mariuzza RA, Brenner MB. Antigen recognition by human {gamma}{delta} T cells: pattern recognition by the adaptive immune system. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2000;22: 191-217.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Hayday AC. {gamma}{delta} cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18: 975-1026.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Carding SR, Egan PJ. {gamma}{delta} T cells: functional plasticity and heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2: 336-345.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Shen Y, Zhou D, Qiu L, et al. Adaptive immune response of V{gamma}2V{delta}2+ T cells during mycobacterial infections. Science. 2002;295: 2255-2258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Moody DB, Besra GS, Wilson IA, et al. The molecular basis of CD1-mediated presentation of lipid antigens. Immunol Rev. 1999;172: 285-296.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  8. Tanaka Y, Morita CT, Tanaka Y, et al. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human {gamma}{delta} T cells. Nature. 1995;375: 155-158.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Morita CT, Beckman EM, Bukowski JF, et al. Direct presentation of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphate antigens to human {gamma}{delta} T cells. Immunity. 1995;3: 495-507.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Hintz M, Reichenberg A, Altincicek B, et al. Identification of (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate as a major activator for human {gamma}{delta} T cells in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 2001;509: 317-322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  11. Spada FM, Grant EP, Peters PJ, et al. Self-recognition of CD1 by {gamma}/{delta} T cells: implications for innate immunity. J Exp Med. 2000;191: 937-948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Butcher EC, Williams M, Youngman K, et al. Lymphocyte trafficking and regional immunity. Adv Immunol. 1999;72: 209-253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  13. Zlotnik A, Yoshie O. Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity. 2000;12: 121-127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  14. Moser B, Loetscher P. Lymphocyte traffic control by chemokines. Nat Immunol. 2001;2: 123-128.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  15. Luther SA, Cyster JG. Chemokines as regulators of T cell differentiation. Nat Immunol. 2001;2: 102-107.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  16. Müller G, Höpken UE, Stein H, et al. Systemic immunoregulatory and pathogenic functions of homeostatic chemokine receptors. J Leukoc Biol. 2002;72: 1-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Kim CH, Campbell DJ, Butcher EC. Nonpolarized memory T cells. Trends Immunol. 2001;22: 527-530.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  18. Moser B, Schaerli P, Loetscher P. CXCR5(+) T cells: follicular homing takes center stage in T-helper-cell responses. Trends Immunol. 2002;23: 250-254.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  19. Gunn MD, Tangemann K, Tam C, et al. A chemokine expressed in lymphoid high endothelial venules promotes the adhesion and chemotaxis of naive T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95: 258-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  20. Campbell JJ, Bowman EP, Murphy K, et al. 6-C-kine (SLC), a lymphocyte adhesion-triggering chemokine expressed by high endothelium, is an agonist for the MIP-3{beta} receptor CCR7. J Cell Biol. 1998;141: 1053-1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Willimann K, Legler DF, Loetscher M, et al. The chemokine SLC is expressed in T cell areas of lymph nodes and mucosal lymphoid tissues and attracts activated T cells via CCR7. Eur J Immunol. 1998;28: 2025-2034.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  22. Gunn MD, Kyuwa S, Tam C, et al. Mice lacking expression of secondary lymphoid organ chemokine have defects in lymphocyte homing and dendritic cell localization. J Exp Med. 1999;189: 451-460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  23. Förster R, Schubel A, Breitfeld D, et al. CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs. Cell. 1999;99: 23-33.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  24. Legler DF, Loetscher M, Roos RS, et al. B cell-attracting chemokine 1, a human CXC chemokine expressed in lymphoid tissues, selectively attracts B lymphocytes via BLR1/CXCR5. J Exp Med. 1998;187: 655-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  25. Gunn MD, Ngo VN, Ansel KM, et al. A B-cell-homing chemokine made in lymphoid follicles activates Burkitt's lymphoma receptor-1. Nature. 1998;391: 799-803.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  26. Schaerli P, Willimann K, Lang AB, et al. CXC chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell helper function. J Exp Med. 2000;192: 1553-1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Breitfeld D, Ohl L, Kremmer E, et al. Follicular B helper T cells express CXC chemokine receptor 5, localize to B cell follicles, and support immunoglobulin production. J Exp Med. 2000;192: 1545-1552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Schaerli P, Loetscher P, Moser B. Cutting edge: induction of follicular homing precedes effector Th cell development. J Immunol. 2001;167: 6082-6086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  29. Clark-Lewis I, Moser B, Walz A, et al. Chemical synthesis, purification, and characterization of two inflammatory proteins, neutrophil activating peptide 1 (interleukin-8) and neutrophil activating peptide 2. Biochemistry. 1991;30: 3128-3135.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  30. Jenh CH, Cox MA, Hipkin W, et al. Human B cell-attracting chemokine 1 (BCA-1; CXCL13) is an agonist for the human CXCR3 receptor. Cytokine. 2001;15: 113-121.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  31. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Förster R, et al. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401: 708-712.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  32. Weninger W, Crowley MA, Manjunath N, et al. Migratory properties of naive, effector, and memory CD8(+) T cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194: 953-966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Sallusto F, Kremmer E, Palermo B, et al. Switch in chemokine receptor expression upon TCR stimulation reveals novel homing potential for recently activated T cells. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29: 2037-2045.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  34. Campbell JJ, Murphy KE, Kunkel EJ, et al. CCR7 expression and memory T cell diversity in humans. J Immunol. 2001;166: 877-884.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  35. Kim CH, Rott L, Kunkel EJ, et al. Rules of chemokine receptor association with T cell polarization in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2001;108: 1331-1339.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  36. Debes GF, Hopken UE, Hamann A. In vivo differentiated cytokine-producing CD4(+) T cells express functional CCR7. J Immunol. 2002;168: 5441-5447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  37. Unsoeld H, Krautwald S, Voehringer D, et al. Cutting edge: CCR7(+) and CCR7(-) memory T cells do not differ in immediate effector cell function. J Immunol. 2002;169: 638-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Wills MR, Okecha G, Weekes MP, et al. Identification of naive or antigen-experienced human CD8(+) T cells by expression of costimulation and chemokine receptors: analysis of the human cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T cell response. J Immunol. 2002;168: 5455-5464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  39. Glatzel A, Wesch D, Schiemann F, et al. Patterns of chemokine receptor expression on peripheral blood gamma delta T lymphocytes: strong expression of CCR5 is a selective feature of V{delta}2/V{gamma}9 {gamma}{delta} T cells. J Immunol. 2002;168: 4920-4929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  40. Roy M, Waldschmidt T, Aruffo A, et al. The regulation of the expression of gp39, the CD40 ligand, on normal and cloned CD4+ T cells. J Immunol. 1993;151: 2497-2510.[Abstract]

  41. Lane P, Traunecker A, Hubele S, et al. Activated human T cells express a ligand for the human B cell-associated antigen CD40 which participates in T cell-dependent activation of B lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22: 2573-2578.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  42. Lederman S, Yellin MJ, Krichevsky A, et al. Identification of a novel surface protein on activated CD4+ T cells that induces contact-dependent B cell differentiation (help). J Exp Med. 1992;175: 1091-1101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  43. Hutloff A, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, et al. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature. 1999;397: 263-266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  44. Foy TM, Aruffo A, Bajorath J, et al. Immune regulation by CD40 and its ligand GP39. Annu Rev Immunol. 1996;14: 591-617.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  45. Liu YJ, Banchereau J. Regulation of B-cell commitment to plasma cells or to memory B cells. Semin Immunol. 1997;9: 235-240.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  46. Dong C, Juedes AE, Temann UA, et al. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature. 2001;409: 97-101.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  47. McAdam AJ, Greenwald RJ, Levin MA, et al. ICOS is critical for CD40-mediated antibody class switching. Nature. 2001;409: 102-105.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  48. Tafuri A, Shahinian A, Bladt F, et al. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature. 2001;409: 105-109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  49. Dong C, Temann UA, Flavell RA. Cutting edge: critical role of inducible costimulator in germinal center reactions. J Immunol. 2001;166: 3659-3662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  50. Liang L, Porter EM, Sha WC. Constitutive expression of the B7h ligand for inducible costimulator on naive B cells is extinguished after activation by distinct B cell receptor and interleukin 4 receptor-mediated pathways and can be rescued by CD40 signaling. J Exp Med. 2002;196: 97-108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Grimbacher B, Hutloff A, Schlesier M, et al. Homozygous loss of ICOS is associated with adult-onset common variable immunodeficiency. Nat Immunol. 2003;4: 261-268.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  52. Jacquot S. CD27/CD70 interactions regulate T dependent B cell differentiation. Immunol Res. 2000;21: 23-30.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  53. Walker LS, Gulbranson-Judge A, Flynn S, et al. Co-stimulation and selection for T-cell help for germinal centres: the role of CD28 and OX40. Immunol Today. 2000;21: 333-337.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  54. Agematsu K, Hokibara S, Nagumo H, et al. CD27: a memory B-cell marker. Immunol Today. 2000;21: 204-206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  55. Lens SM, Tesselaar K, van Oers MH, et al. Control of lymphocyte function through CD27-CD70 interactions. Semin Immunol. 1998;10: 491-499.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  56. Modlin RL, Pirmez C, Hofman FM, et al. Lymphocytes bearing antigen-specific {gamma}{delta} T-cell receptors accumulate in human infectious disease lesions. Nature. 1989;339: 544-548.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  57. Lima HC, Vasconcelos AW, David JR, Lerner EA. American cutaneous leishmaniasis: in situ characterization of the cellular immune response with time. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50: 743-747.

  58. Janatpour MJ, Hudak S, Sathe M, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-dependent segmental control of MIG expression by high endothelial venules in inflamed lymph nodes regulates monocyte recruitment. J Exp Med. 2001;194: 1375-1384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  59. Tang HL, Cyster JG. Chemokine up-regulation and activated T cell attraction by maturing dendritic cells. Science. 1999;284: 819-822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  60. Schaniel C, Pardali E, Sallusto F, et al. Activated murine B lymphocytes and dendritic cells produce a novel CC chemokine which acts selectively on activated T cells. J Exp Med. 1998;188: 451-463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Gioia C, Agrati C, Casetti R, et al. Lack of CD27-CD45RA-Vg9Vd2+ T cell effectors in immunocompromised hosts and during active pulmonary tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2002;168: 1484-1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  62. Pao W, Wen L, Smith AL, et al. {gamma}{delta} T cell help of B cells is induced by repeated parasitic infection, in the absence of other T cells. Curr Biol. 1996;6: 1317-1325.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  63. Maloy KJ, Odermatt B, Hengartner H, et al. Interferon gamma-producing {gamma}{delta} T cell-dependent antibody isotype switching in the absence of germinal center formation during virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95: 1160-1165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  64. Wen L, Roberts SJ, Viney JL, et al. Immunoglobulin synthesis and generalized autoimmunity in mice congenitally deficient in {alpha}{beta}(+) T cells. Nature. 1994;369: 654-658.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  65. Peng SL, Madaio MP, Hughes DP, et al. Murine lupus in the absence of {alpha}{beta} T cells. J Immunol. 1996;156: 4041-4049.[Abstract]

  66. Wen L, Pao W, Wong FS, et al. Germinal center formation, immunoglobulin class switching, and autoantibody production driven by non {alpha}/{beta} T cells. J Exp Med. 1996;183: 2271-2282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  67. Rajagopalan S, Zordan T, Tsokos GC, et al. Pathogenic anti-DNA autoantibody-inducing T helper cell lines from patients with active lupus nephritis: isolation of CD4-8- T helper cell lines that express the {gamma}{delta} T-cell antigen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87: 7020-7024.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  68. van Vlasselaer P, Gascan H, de Waal Malefyt R, de Vries JE. IL-2 and a contact-mediated signal provided by TCR {alpha}{beta} + or TCR {gamma}{delta} + CD4+ T cells induce polyclonal Ig production by committed human B cells. Enhancement by IL-5, specific inhibition of IgA synthesis by IL-4. J Immunol. 1992;148: 1674-1684.[Abstract]

  69. Munk ME, Fazioli RA, Calich VL, et al. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis-stimulated human {gamma}/{delta} T cells support antibody production by B cells. Infect Immun. 1995;63: 1608-1610.[Abstract]

  70. Horner AA, Jabara H, Ramesh N, et al. {gamma}/{delta} T lymphocytes express CD40 ligand and induce isotype switching in B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1995;181: 1239-1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Ali, L. Yan, N. Plagman, A. Reichenberg, M. Hintz, H. Jomaa, F. Villinger, and Z. W. Chen
{gamma}{delta} T Cell Immune Manipulation during Chronic Phase of Simian HIV Infection Confers Immunological Benefits
J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 5407 - 5417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Felices, C. C. Yin, Y. Kosaka, J. Kang, and L. J. Berg
Tec kinase Itk in {gamma}{delta}T cells is pivotal for controlling IgE production in vivo
PNAS, May 19, 2009; 106(20): 8308 - 8313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Brandes, K. Willimann, G. Bioley, N. Levy, M. Eberl, M. Luo, R. Tampe, F. Levy, P. Romero, and B. Moser
Cross-presenting human {gamma}{delta} T cells induce robust CD8+ {alpha}{beta} T cell responses
PNAS, February 17, 2009; 106(7): 2307 - 2312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Agrati, E. Cimini, A. Sacchi, V. Bordoni, C. Gioia, R. Casetti, F. Turchi, M. Tripodi, and F. Martini
Activated V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T Cells Trigger Granulocyte Functions via MCP-2 Release
J. Immunol., January 1, 2009; 182(1): 522 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Li, K. Luo, and C. D. Pauza
TNF-{alpha} Is a Positive Regulatory Factor for Human V{gamma}2V{delta}2 T Cells
J. Immunol., November 15, 2008; 181(10): 7131 - 7137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Ferrarini, F. Delfanti, M. Gianolini, C. Rizzi, M. Alfano, A. Lazzarin, and P. Biswas
NF-{kappa}B Modulates Sensitivity to Apoptosis, Proinflammatory and Migratory Potential in Short- versus Long-Term Cultured Human {gamma}{delta} Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 5857 - 5864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
V. Pitard, D. Roumanes, X. Lafarge, L. Couzi, I. Garrigue, M.-E. Lafon, P. Merville, J.-F. Moreau, and J. Dechanet-Merville
Long-term expansion of effector/memory V{delta}2- {gamma}{delta} T cells is a specific blood signature of CMV infection
Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 1317 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
I. Van Rhijn, V. P. M. G. Rutten, B. Charleston, M. Smits, W. van Eden, and A. P. Koets
Massive, sustained {gamma}{delta} T cell migration from the bovine skin in vivo
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2007; 81(4): 968 - 973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Vermijlen, P. Ellis, C. Langford, A. Klein, R. Engel, K. Willimann, H. Jomaa, A. C. Hayday, and M. Eberl
Distinct Cytokine-Driven Responses of Activated Blood {gamma}{delta} T Cells: Insights into Unconventional T Cell Pleiotropy
J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4304 - 4314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Caccamo, L. Battistini, M. Bonneville, F. Poccia, J. J. Fournie, S. Meraviglia, G. Borsellino, R. A. Kroczek, C. La Mendola, E. Scotet, et al.
CXCR5 Identifies a Subset of V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T Cells which Secrete IL-4 and IL-10 and Help B Cells for Antibody Production
J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5290 - 5295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
N. Caccamo, F. Dieli, D. Wesch, H. Jomaa, and M. Eberl
Sex-specific phenotypical and functional differences in peripheral human V{gamma}9/V{delta}2 T cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 79(4): 663 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Ebert, S. Meuter, and B. Moser
Homing and Function of Human Skin {gamma}{delta} T Cells and NK Cells: Relevance for Tumor Surveillance
J. Immunol., April 1, 2006; 176(7): 4331 - 4336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M.-C. Devilder, S. Maillet, I. Bouyge-Moreau, E. Donnadieu, M. Bonneville, and E. Scotet
Potentiation of Antigen-Stimulated V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T Cell Cytokine Production by Immature Dendritic Cells (DC) and Reciprocal Effect on DC Maturation
J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1386 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Brandes, K. Willimann, and B. Moser
Professional Antigen-Presentation Function by Human {gamma}{delta} T Cells
Science, July 8, 2005; 309(5732): 264 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2003-04-1016v1
102/10/3693    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brandes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moser, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunobiology
Right arrow Cell Adhesion and Motility
Right arrow Chemokines, Cytokines, and Interleukins
Right arrow Gene Therapy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020