SEARCH:   Advanced

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brindle, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brindle, K. M. Related Collections Related Article in Blood Online Social Bookmarking                   What's this?  Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article  Blood, 1 August 2003, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 776 Magnetic cells show the way home Recent progress in stem cell biology has made cell-based therapies for the treatment of tissue damage a realistic prospect. The ability to track noninvasively the migration of these cells after implantation could aid the development of this therapeutic approach. In this issue Hinds and colleagues (page 867) describe a cell-labeling method that will allow cell tracking using an imaging modality, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is widely used in the clinic. The idea of labeling cells with MRI-detectable paramagnetic complexes is not new (Hawrylak et al, Exp Neurol. 1993;121: 181-192). Studies over the last 10 years have defined the requirements of such labels. They should be very sensitive to MRI detection, cell uptake should be rapid and uniform, there should be even distribution to daughter cells, and they should have no effect on cell viability, proliferation, or function. The agent described by Hinds et al fits the bill on all counts. An important attribute, which is shared by some other particles of this type, is that it permits detection of single cells (Dodd et al, Biophys J. 1999; 76:103-109). This is possible since, although MR image resolutions are rarely comparable with cell dimensions, the particles distort the magnetic field far beyond the cell. Thus water molecules moving within the vicinity of a cell are affected, and the effect of the label is amplified enormously. A distinguishing feature of the agent described by Hinds et al is that it is relatively large, and this should allow detection of single cells at the lower image resolutions that can be achieved in vivo. MRI detection of labeled cells is one of a growing number of noninvasive methods for investigating biologic processes in vivo (Weissleder and Mahmood, Radiology. 2001;219:316-333). These techniques are a valuable tool in the laboratory, but perhaps more importantly, they can also be used to help translate our understanding of these processes into new treatments in the clinic. Kevin M. Brindle University of Cambridge CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this? Related Article in Blood Online: Highly efficient endosomal labeling of progenitor and stem cells with large magnetic particles allows magnetic resonance imaging of single cells Kathleen A. Hinds, Jonathan M. Hill, Erik M. Shapiro, Mikko O. Laukkanen, Alfonso C. Silva, Christian A. Combs, Timothy R. Varney, Robert S. Balaban, Alan P. Koretsky, and Cynthia E. Dunbar Blood 2003 102: 867-872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brindle, K. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brindle, K. M. Related Collections Related Article in Blood Online Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

	Blood Online is supported in part by Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
	Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020