Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. K.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood
Blood, 1 August 2003, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 778-779

Prognostic staging in myeloma: in search of biology

For 30 years, clinicians relied on the Durie-Salmon staging system (Durie and Salmon, Cancer. 1975;36:842-854) to define risk in multiple myeloma (MM). In recent years the {beta}2-microglobulin ({beta}2M) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have added to the prognostic arsenal (Bataille et al, Blood. 1992;80:733-737). Despite their longevity, both staging systems are limited by an inability to segregate risk accurately in all cases, a particular problem in such a heterogeneous disease. Indeed, until recently prognostic prediction has been something of an irrelevance since all patients with symptomatic disease received essentially the same therapy. Lately, however, the landscape has changed and identification of accurate prognostic biomarkers has assumed increasing importance since therapeutic options may now vary widely according to disease biology.

In this issue, Terpos and colleagues (page 1064) take a step in this direction by examining the roles of the receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand (RANKL) and RANK/osteoprotegerin (OPG), which play a dominant role in osteoclast activation and probably in the bone disease common to MM patients (Mundy, Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:584-593). The authors demonstrate that in 121 MM patients serum levels of sRANKL were elevated and correlated with bone disease. The sRANKL/OPG ratio was also increased and correlated with markers of bone resorption, osteolytic lesions, and markers of disease activity. More impressively perhaps, sRANKL/OPG ratio, CRP, and {beta}2M were the only independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis and, used together, defined a low-risk group having a 96% probability of survival at 5 years, as compared with 52% and 0% for the intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively: a remarkable discriminatory power. The results suggest that the RANKL/OPG system is not only associated with MM bone disease but also impacts the biology of plasma cell growth as reflected by its influence on survival.

Predicting prognosis and defining therapy using novel biomarkers (as described herein), chromosome translocation status and gene expression profiles point the way to the future of MM care, but all require further study. Until confirmed in large prospective studies, user-friendly and sensitive prognostic tools such as the recently devised MM International Staging System (ISS), which employs {beta}2M and albumin, deserve wide implementation, albeit with future refinement (Greipp et al, Hematol J. 2003;4:S42-S44).

--- A. K. Stewart
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article in Blood Online:

Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor {kappa}B ligand–osteoprotegerin ratio predicts survival in multiple myeloma: proposal for a novel prognostic index
Evangelos Terpos, Richard Szydlo, Jane F. Apperley, Evdoxia Hatjiharissi, Marianna Politou, John Meletis, Nora Viniou, Xenophon Yataganas, John M. Goldman, and Amin Rahemtulla
Blood 2003 102: 1064-1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. K.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in Blood Online
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
Sponsor: Genentech BioOncology and and Biogen Idec
Blood Online is supported in part by
Genentech BioOncology and Biogen Idec
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020