Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bearman, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bearman, S. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood
Blood, 1 September 2003, Vol. 102, No. 5, pp. 1561-1562

Don't GO to VOD

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is one of several regimen-related toxicities that results from high-dose cytotoxic therapy used to prepare patients for stem cell transplantation. Injury to sinusoidal endothelial cells is the initiating event in the pathogenesis of VOD and leads to sinusoidal obstruction, necrosis of hepatocytes in zone 3 of the liver acinus, and narrowing and fibrosis of central veins. Because of the primary role of sinusoidal obstruction in the clinical manifestations of VOD (hepatomegaly, jaundice, and fluid retention), it has been proposed that sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a more appropriate label for this syndrome (see DeLeve et al, Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22:27-42).

In this issue of Blood, Wadleigh and colleagues (page 1578) report that VOD/SOS is more common in patients who had previously received gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) than in patients who had not. Nine of 14 (64%) patients who had received GO prior to transplantation developed VOD/SOS, whereas only 4 of 48 (8%) patients who had not received prior GO developed VOD/SOS. Other groups have reported similar findings. What is different about Wadleigh et al's data is that VOD/SOS occurred only in patients who had received GO within 3.5 months of transplantation.

How should these data influence clinical practice? They suggest that patients should not receive transplants within 3.5 months of GO administration. The numbers are too small to say with confidence whether patients could safely receive transplants more than 3.5 months after GO. The most conservative approach would be to offer transplantation only to patients who have not received any GO. If GO must be given prior to transplantation, strong consideration should be given to using a reduced-intensity preparative regimen. Although no data are available regarding the use of GO prior to reduced-intensity allografts, it seems prudent to minimize the cytotoxicity in such patients. It is hoped that registry studies will indicate whether there is a safe interval beyond which transplantation can be performed in patients treated with GO and whether this is a concern at all in reduced-intensity allograft recipients.

What don't we know? We don't know whether GO can be safely administered for relapse after transplantation. One study reported that 11 of 23 patients who were treated with GO for relapse after transplantation developed VOD and 7 of these patients died of liver failure (see Rajvanshi et al, Blood. 2002;99:2310-2314). Registry studies will be important in this circumstance as well. We also don't know what the risk of VOD/SOS is in autologous transplant recipients who receive GO before transplantation. All reports of VOD/SOS and GO in the context of transplantation have been in allograft recipients. We must not forget that autograft recipients also develop VOD/SOS.

--- Scott I. Bearman
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Versluys, R. Bhattacharaya, C. Steward, J. Cornish, A. Oakhill, and N. Goulden
Prophylaxis with defibrotide prevents veno-occlusive disease in stem cell transplantation after gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure
Blood, March 1, 2004; 103(5): 1968 - 1968.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bearman, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bearman, S. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020