Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

InsideBlood
Blood, 15 September 2003, Vol. 102, No. 6, pp. 1937-1938

Good-bye to GVHD

Bone marrow transplantation would be even more widely used if the complications of graftversus-host disease (GVHD) could be routinely and simply avoided. GVHD is induced by T cells in the bone marrow (BM) graft recognizing and reacting against the host. The disease tends to be much more severe when host and donor differ at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) but can also occur for MHC-identical transplants. The simple solution of removing all T cells from the graft prevents GVHD induction but then the graft, for reasons that are not totally clear, often fails. Residual T cells not only promote engraftment but also may provide some immune (particularly anti-tumor) protection. A solution to this problem might be a procedure that specifically removes only those T cells in the graft that can recognize and react against the host. Bachar-Lustig and colleagues (page 1943) describe such a protocol using "veto cells" for the successful transplantation of fully allogeneic BM containing large numbers of allogeneic T cells. They have worked with a mouse model but the design is such that the protocol should be readily transferable to the clinic. More important, they also show that when the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin is included in the protocol, it synergizes with rather than blocks the action of the veto cells.

Veto cells have been defined as cells that can delete T cells that recognize them.1 As reviewed by Bachar-Lustig and colleagues, a number of different cells appear to have this ability, among them being CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) lines. Let A, B, C, and D represent 4 MHC-different inbred mouse strains. When an A anti-B mixed-lymphocyte reaction (MLR) is set up, strain-A origin CTLs reactive against strain B are generated. If CD8+ CTLs syngeneic to the strain-B stimulator but not reactive against the A-strain responder (eg, from a B anti-D MLR) are included in the culture, they act as veto cells.2 A anti-B CTL precursors in the culture that recognize strain-B antigens on the added CTLs are now known to undergo apoptosis in a process involving both CD8 and Fas-L on the veto cell (Figure 1 in Bachar-Lustig et al). When the same B anti-D CTLs are added to an A anti-C MLR they do not affect the response because the A anti-C–activated CTL precursors cannot recognize them. Bachar-Lustig et al have effectively done the same series of experiments in vivo. Lethally irradiated strain-B mice received strain-A BM transplants containing large numbers of strain-A T cells. Rapid death ensued unless cells from a B anti-D CTL line were also included. Addition of rapamycin could make these cells more effective. In principle, the problem of GVHD has been solved!

--- Richard G. Miller
Ontario Cancer Insitute and University of Toronto

References

  1. Miller RG. How a specific anti-self deletion mechanism can affect the generation of the specificity repertoire. In: Sercarz E, Cunningham AJ, eds. Strategies of Immune Regulation. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1980: 507-512.

  2. Claesson MH, Miller RG. Functional heterogeneity in allo-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones, I: CTL clones express strong anti-self suppressive activity. J Exp Med. 1984;160: 1702-1716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020