Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 15 October 2003, Vol. 102, No. 8, pp. 3025-3027.
Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on June 26, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3325.


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-11-3325v1
102/8/3025    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunthararajah, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saunthararajah, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Immunotherapy
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

NEOPLASIA
Brief report

A simple method to predict response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Yogen Saunthararajah, Ryotaro Nakamura, Robert Wesley, Qiong J. Wang, and A. John Barrett

From the University of Illinois at Chicago; and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Immunosuppression with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or cyclosporine (CSA) can be used to treat the cytopenia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Previously, we identified HLA-DR15, younger age, and shorter duration of red cell transfusion dependence as pretreatment variables that correlate significantly with a response. Using these pretreatment variables we have devised a simple method to prospectively identify patients with low or high probabilities of response to immunosuppression. The ability of this system to predict response was confirmed in a separate cohort of 23 patients with MDS treated with immunosuppression.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic disorder characterized by bone marrow failure, marrow dysplasia, and a tendency to evolve to acute leukemia. MDS shares some of the features of acquired aplastic anemia (AA) and up to 30% of patients with MDS respond to immunosuppressive treatment with cyclosporine (CSA) or antithymocyte globulin (ATG) with sustained increases in red blood cell, granulocyte, and platelet production.1-5 The class II histocompatibility antigen DR15 (serologic split of HLA-DR2) is reported to be overrepresented in patients with AA.6-9 We noted a similar overrepresentation of HLA-DR15 in patients with MDS of the refractory anemia subtype.10 Furthermore, HLA-DR15, younger age, and a shorter duration of red cell transfusion dependence (RCTD) were pretreatment characteristics correlating significantly with a response to immunosuppression in multivariate analysis.10 In this study we have used these pretreatment variables to devise a simple method to predict the probability of response to immunosuppression in MDS. To validate the predicted probability of response (PPR), we assessed the correlation of the PPR with observed responses in a separate treatment cohort (the validation cohort). In multivariate analysis the PPR was the single best predictor of response.


    Study design
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics

The minimum criteria used to diagnose MDS were as published.10 Characteristics of patients in the cohort used to identify pretreatment variables correlating with response (training cohort, n = 82) have previously been published.10 The validation cohort consisted of 23 patients with MDS enrolled on the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Institutional Review Board–approved protocol 00-H-0169 for combination ATG and CSA to treat the cytopenia of MDS (17 with refractory anemia [RA], 2 with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts [RARS], 4 with refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB]). Twenty-one patients were receiving regular red cell transfusions for symptomatic anemia. Many of these patients were also thrombocytopenic (< 20 x 109/L) or neutropenic (< 0.5 x 109/L) or both (Table 1). Of the 2 patients not receiving regular red cell transfusions, one met the eligibility criteria because of transfusion-dependent thrombocytopenia, and the other had neutropenia with recurrent infections. On comparison of the training and validation cohorts, nonstatistically significant differences were noted in age, the proportion of patients with hypocellular marrows, and the proportion with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) by flow cytometry (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.. Comparison of pretreatment variables in training and validation patient cohorts

 

Treatment regimen

In the training cohort, 69 patients with MDS were treated with one course of ATG 40 mg/kg/d intravenously over 4 to 6 hours for 4 days and 13 patients were treated with CSA starting at 5 to 12 mg/kg/d, with dose adjustments to maintain therapeutic levels, and continued indefinitely if a response was noted by 6 months.10 The validation cohort received a combination of ATG and CSA at the same doses with ATG starting at day 0 and CSA at day 14.

Response criteria

For transfusion-dependent patients, response was defined as transfusion independence for red blood cells or platelets (ability to maintain a hemoglobin > 8 g/dL and a platelet count > 20 x 109/L without symptomatic indications for transfusions for a period of at least 6 weeks regardless of subsequent events). For nontransfusion-dependent patients, response was defined as the normalization of the absolute neutrophil count.

PPR

The following logistic regression equation with response as the dependent variable was derived from analysis of the training cohort: loge p/1–p = 8.3 – 0.156 (age in years) – 0.148 (duration of RCTD in months) + 2.14 (HLA-DRB1 15 status: 1 for present, 0 for absent), where p is the probability of a response. The c-index (concordance probability) to measure association of predicted probabilities and associated responses was 0.933 (values of `c' near 0.5 indicate that the model is no better than a coin-flip; values near 1.0 indicate superior performance of the model).

To generate a simplified prediction system integrating the 3 pretreatment variables of age, duration of RCTD, and HLA-DR15, we first converted the units for duration of RCTD to months. Then, to obtain approximately whole number values for the coefficients for age and duration of RCTD we multiplied both sides of the logistic regression equation by 6.67. By rounding to whole numbers the coefficients for age and RCTD in the logistic regression equation, the sum of the patient's age in years and duration of RCTD in months is readily calculated. This sum, depending on the patient's DR15 status, indicates the PPR (Table 2). In the training cohort, the mean ± SD PPR among actual responders was 0.7 ± 0.3 and among nonresponders 0.12 ± 0.18 (distributions were normal). Based on this observation, a PPR range of 0.41 to 1.0 (41%-100%) is designated "high PPR" and a PPR range of 0 to 0.4 (0%-40%)is designated "low PPR" (Table 2). In the training cohort, this choice of cutoffs for PPR categorization generated the largest c-index (0.85) in logistic regression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.. PPR to immunosuppression in MDS

 

Statistical analyses

The "freq"({chi}2 and Fisher tests), "ttest" (t test), "anova" (Kruskal-Wallis test), and "logistic" (logistic regression) procedures in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) version 8.1 were used to analyze for differences between pretreatment variables in cohorts and to assess the association between variables and response.


    Results and discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 
Response to immunosuppression in the validation cohort

Of the 23 patients in the validation cohort, 7 met criteria for response to the combination of ATG and CSA. All responding patients were red cell transfusion dependent before treatment and met response criteria for red cell transfusion independence. Of the 7 responders, 5 were pancytopenic and 2 bicytopenic before treatment; all responses were pancellular. In one responder, the duration of transfusion independence was 10 weeks; the remaining 6 patients had durable responses with the median transfusion-free survival not reached at the 2-year follow-up.

Comparison of PPR to observed response to immunosuppression in the validation cohort

Based on Table 2, 14 of the 23 patients had a low and 9 a high PPR. In univariate analysis, PPR (low, high), age, and PNH detected by flow cytometry were significantly associated (P < .05) with a response to immunosuppression (Table 3). In multivariate analyses using the 3 variables significantly associated in univariate analysis (PPR, age, and presence of PNH), only the PPR (which integrates age, duration of RCTD, and DR15 status) significantly correlated with response (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.. Association of pretreatment variables with response in validation cohort

 

The observed responses (ORs) were compared to the PPR (low, high). Responses to immunosuppression occurred in 6 of 9 patients with a high PPR and 1 of 14 patients with a low PPR (Table 4; Fisher exact test, P = .005).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.. Association between PPR and OR in the validation cohort*

 

HLA-DR15 may help identify that subset of MDS patients with immune-mediated marrow failure, a finding we have discussed previously.10 Reasons for the association of age and duration of RCTD with response to immunosuppression are not known. Speculatively, prolonged RCTD may indicate prolonged immune-mediated marrow damage and stem cell depletion. Similarly, older patients may have fewer hematopoietic stem cells.11 Stem cell depletion might limit recovery of normal stem cells after immunosuppression. Other pretreatment variables of predictive value (eg, identification of PNH clones) that could improve the scoring system may be identified through analysis of a larger training cohort.

In conclusion, the proposed scoring system, using HLA-DR15, age, and duration of RCTD, provides a useful method to identify those MDS patients most likely to respond to immunosuppression. These pretreatment variables are also relevant to the design and evaluation of immunosuppression trials for MDS.


    Footnotes
 
Submitted November 5, 2002; accepted June 19, 2003.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, June 26, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-11-3325.

Y.S. and R.N. contributed equally to this work.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Reprints: Yogen Saunthararajah, University of Illinois at Chicago, MBRB rm3150 (MC734), 900 S Ashland Ave, Chicago, IL 60607; e-mail: yogen{at}uic.edu.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Study design
 Results and discussion
 References
 

  1. Tichelli A, Gratwohl A, Wuersch A, Nissen C, Speck B. Antilymphocyte globulin for myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 1988;68: 139-140.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Molldrem JJ, Leifer E, Bahceci E, et al. Antithymocyte globulin for treatment of the bone marrow failure associated with myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137: 156-163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Biesma DH, van den Tweel JG, Verdonck LF. Immunosuppressive therapy for hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 1997;79: 1548-1551.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  4. Molldrem JJ, Caples M, Mavroudis D, Plante M, Young NS, Barrett AJ. Antithymocyte globulin for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 1997;99: 699-705.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Jonasova A, Neuwirtova R, Cermak J, et al. Cyclosporin A therapy in hypoplastic MDS patients and certain refractory anaemias without hypoplastic bone marrow. Br J Haematol. 1998;100: 304-309.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  6. Nimer SD, Ireland P, Meshkinpour A, Frane M. An increased HLA DR2 frequency is seen in aplastic anemia patients. Blood. 1994;84: 923-927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Nakao S, Takamatsu H, Chuhjo T, et al. Identification of a specific HLA class II haplotype strongly associated with susceptibility to cyclosporine-dependent aplastic anemia. Blood. 1994;84: 4257-4261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Ihan O, Beksac M, Arslan O, et al. HLA DR2: a predictive marker in response to cyclosporine therapy in aplastic anemia. Int J Hematol. 1997; 66: 291-295.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  9. Shao W, Tian D, Liu C, Sun X, Zhang X. Aplastic anemia is associated with HLA-DRB1*1501 in northern Han Chinese. Int J Hematol. 2000;71: 350-352.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  10. Saunthararajah Y, Nakamura R, Nam JM, et al. HLA-DR15 (DR2) is overrepresented in myelodysplastic syndrome and aplastic anemia and predicts a response to immunosuppression in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2002;100: 1570-1574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Champion KM, Gilbert J, Asimakopoulos F, Hinshelwood S, Green A. Clonal haemopoiesis in normal elderly women: implications for the myelo-proliferative disorders and myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1997;97: 920-926.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
R. M. Stone
How I treat patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Blood, June 18, 2009; 113(25): 6296 - 6303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
M. E.D. Chamuleau, T. M. Westers, L. van Dreunen, J. Groenland, A. Zevenbergen, C. M. Eeltink, G. J. Ossenkoppele, and A. A. van de Loosdrecht
Immune mediated autologous cytotoxicity against hematopoietic precursor cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome
Haematologica, April 1, 2009; 94(4): 496 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. M. Sloand, C. O. Wu, P. Greenberg, N. Young, and J. Barrett
Factors Affecting Response and Survival in Patients With Myelodysplasia Treated With Immunosuppressive Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2505 - 2511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. D. Nimer
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 4841 - 4851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Estey
Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Older Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1908 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
M. Melchert and A. F. List
Management of RBC-Transfusion Dependence
Hematology, January 1, 2007; 2007(1): 398 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Battiwalla, T. Hahn, M. Radovic, H. Roy, A. Wahab, E. Duman, R. Bajwa, S. Padmanabhan, J. Becker, A. J. Barrett, et al.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR15 is associated with reduced incidence of acute GVHD in HLA-matched allogeneic transplantation but does not impact chronic GVHD incidence
Blood, March 1, 2006; 107(5): 1970 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
D. P. Steensma and J. M. Bennett
The Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Diagnosis and Treatment
Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 104 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. M. Sloand, L. Mainwaring, M. Fuhrer, S. Ramkissoon, A. M. Risitano, K. Keyvanafar, J. Lu, A. Basu, A. J. Barrett, and N. S. Young
Preferential suppression of trisomy 8 compared with normal hematopoietic cell growth by autologous lymphocytes in patients with trisomy 8 myelodysplastic syndrome
Blood, August 1, 2005; 106(3): 841 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
D. P. Steensma and A. F. List
Genetic Testing in the Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Molecular Insights Into Hematologic Diversity
Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2005; 80(5): 681 - 698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2002-11-3325v1
102/8/3025    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saunthararajah, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saunthararajah, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neoplasia
Right arrow Immunotherapy
Right arrow Brief Reports
Right arrow Clinical Trials and Observations
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020