Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
Blood, 1 November 2003, Vol. 102, No. 9, pp. 3081.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sezer, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sezer, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow


InsideBlood

Exciting times for myeloma research

The importance of the interaction of myeloma cells with bone marrow microenvironment has recently been recognized. Myeloma cells were found to interact with bone marrow stromal cells, osteoblasts, osteoclast precursors, and osteoclasts to trigger disease progression, and this knowledge is likely to be transferred into novel and, one hopes, more effective treatment strategies. Another important interaction of myeloma cells concerns bone marrow endothelial cells.Go


Folkman introduced the concept of angiogenesis in solid tumors 3 decades ago.1 Vacca et al were the first to show that bone marrow angiogenesis is increased in active compared with nonactive multiple myeloma.2 Recently, angiogenesis has been shown to be increased in a large variety of hematologic malignancies. Among them, myeloma was the first malignancy in which increased bone marrow angiogenesis was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for survival by Rajkumar et al3 and our group.4 This research field was also inspired by the work of Barlogie's group showing that thalidomide induces remissions in refractory myeloma patients, which was an important milestone in the treatment of multiple myeloma, even though this drug also has other properties besides its antiangiogenic action.5

In this issue of Blood, Vacca and colleagues (page 3340) provide new insights into the role of endothelial cells in multiple myeloma. The authors studied a variety of biologic features of endothelial cells extracted from bone marrow of patients with active multiple myeloma (MMECs) and compared these results with biologic features of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as a model of normal quiescent endothelial cells. Genetic, phenotypic, functional, and ultrastructural features of endothelial cells are described. Vacca et al show that MMECs exist in subsets, secrete growth and invasive factors for myeloma cells, and can be inhibited by thalidomide. These results expand our understanding of the biology of MMECs and of the possible paracrine and cell-to-cell interactions of endothelial and myeloma cells.

Where do we go from here? Myeloma cells secrete a variety of angiogenic cytokines and activate multiple pathways to induce angiogenesis. Furthermore, different subsets of MMECs were found in the present study by Vacca et al. These results are consistent with the suggestion that the inhibition of a single signaling pathway in this complex system may be overcome by the activation of alternative pathways, and an appropriate combination of inhibitors may be necessary to achieve the desired goals in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

--- Orhan Sezer
Universitätsklinikum Charité

References

  1. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285: 1182-1186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  2. Vacca A, Ribatti D, Roncali L, et al. Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1994;87: 503-508.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  3. Rajkumar SV, Leong T, Roche PC, et al. Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6: 3111-3116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Sezer O, Niemöller K, Eucker J, et al. Bone marrow microvessel density is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2000;79: 574-577.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

  5. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1999;341: 1565-1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sezer, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sezer, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020